The Border Problem
There has been intense media focus on the controversial Arizona illegal immigrant law, much of which conveniently omits the adjective "illegal". The strategy of the protestors is obviously to lump Arizona's attempt to deal with its illegal immigrant problems with generic (legal) immigration. I am not going to discuss the Arizona situation any further except to observe that there does not seem to be any intent other than to deal with a very difficult, dangerous and costly problem with illegal immigrants entering Arizona from Mexico.
Lost in the sturm und drang is the wider issue of very real danger from a ridiculously leaky border with Mexico. The very violent drug war under way in Mexico has already cost the lives of Americans in border cities like Laredo (Nuevo Laredo), El Paso (Juarez) and Nogales (Nogales). The problem is that the Mexican government, while ostensibly fighting the drug cartels, is in fact simply supporting one cartel against another.
There is a major drug war under way between the Juarez and Sinaloa drug cartels. The Mexican government is alledgedly militarily supporting the Sinaloa cartel and its leader Joaquin Guzman Loera ("El Chapo") against the Juarez folks. Most of the fighting is focused on the Juarez organization which is becoming desperate because they are losing. In fact, the lucrative drug flow through our porous border from Juarez into Texas/New Mexico is now largely controlled by the Sinaloa cartel.
O.K., you say, at least the Mexican government is reducing the influence of a major drug cartel. Problem is there is really big money at stake and the Juarez folks aren't going down quietly. Since they can't beat the Sinaloa-government alliance, in desperation they are trying to draw the U.S. into the conflict through intimidation. In March of this year, three U.S. Consulate employees (two American) in Juarez were murdered. A member of the Los Aztecas street gang--a Juarez ally--has been arrested.
The well-fortified U.S. Consulate in Juarez was closed for a few days at the end of July in response to a threat from an enforcement arm of the Juarez cartel to blow it up with a VBIED (vehicle-borne improvised explosive device) unless the U.S. forced out the head of a Mexican government intelligence agency they said was working with Sinaloa. The enforcement arm--La Linea--successfully killed two Mexican federal police in July with a small IED, demonstrating the ability to carry out their threat. Obviously, the U.S. considered the threat credible, although it was not carried out.
In case you think this is just a Mexican problem, recall that Juarez is 7 miles from central El Paso, TX. Also, Los Aztecas has a U.S. branch, Barrio Azteca. Grenade and IED attacks have been made against U.S. Consulates in Monterrey and Nuevo Laredo. The Juarez cartel is desperate and, with the huge amount of money at stake, could do something very drastic and foolish to attempt to get the U.S. involved, which to date it has refused to do.
The virtually unfettered drug traffic and the easy transit from Mexico into the U.S. pose a major threat to not only border cities but major drug distribution points withing the continental U.S. The complicity of the corrupt Mexican government in facilitating a major drug war is a continuing danger. The longer we close our eyes to this threat, the greater the possibility of it spilling into our backyard.
Sadly, the once great nation of Mexico is today a drug-infested corrupt battleground of powerful criminal organizations that dwarf the Mafia at its peak, fighting over billions in drug traffic to the U.S. through a joke of a border. The Mexican government is inept and riddled with corruption purchased with cartel money, with its military co-opted by drug money. Its economy is in shambles, dependent for survival on wages sent home by illegal aliens working illegally in the U.S.
This is the national boundary the present and previous administrations refuse to enforce for self-serving political reasons, creating an increasingly dangerous situation for border states that threatens to spread like a cancer throughout our nation. We have our own little war on terror here at home, the very existence of which which our esteemed leaders consciously refuse to acknowledge. Instead, our government goes after a hapless border state for taking matters into its own hands out of desperation and frustration.
Extinction, thy name is complacency.
(NOTE: This post incorporates information from a STRATFOR (stratfor.com) newsletter.)
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






11 Comments
Proud Progressive - Aug 15, 2010 1:51 AM
understand how Arazona's lay address any of it.
Carl Hicks - Aug 15, 2010 10:26 AM
One of my favorite comedians , Bill Hicks ,( no relation) had this to say about the drug war..."cigarettes and alcohol kill more people every year then lsd , cocaine and herion combined" and "it's not a war on drugs it's war on personal freedoms,keep that in mind at all times".
I'm not advocating drug use here simply pointing out the futilty of the "drug war".
reformed trucker - Aug 15, 2010 10:05 PM
I agree about the futility of the effort, and the war on personal freedoms.
aneuhauser - Aug 16, 2010 12:38 AM
Carl, Reformed: I believe the Dutch tried legalization and it was, or maybe still is, a disaster with druggies OD-ing and dying like flies all over Amsterdam. The problem is that stuff will kill you. I maintain that the DEA does not want to "win" the war because that would put them out of business. Remember, the first rule of the bureaucracy is to preserve the bureaucracy. (The second is to expand it.)
Carl Hicks - Aug 16, 2010 10:12 AM
The number of hard drug addicts has stabilized in the past few years and their average age has risen to 38 years, which is generally seen as a positive trend. Notably, the number of drug-related deaths in the country remains amongst the lowest in Europe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_policy_of_the_Netherlands
Onlyoneme - Aug 16, 2010 11:48 AM
That is the current rhetoric being spread at this time, however, under the current administration deportations have gone up.
""Still there are many people who will be surprised to learn that deportations are higher under a liberal administration than a conservative one...What's changed has been the mix of deportations. The Bush Administration did more work-site raids with many of the illegal immigrants rounded up in those raids being deported...The Obama Administration has focused more on deporting illegal immigrants with criminal histories, especially violent ones. The Bush administration also went after criminals illegally in the U.S. but under Obama that has been ratcheted up...Both administrations got tough in their own ways because of the political realities.""
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/07/26/128772646/deportations-higher-under-obama-than-bush
There are many more sites which will collaborate this.
reformed trucker - Aug 16, 2010 9:58 PM
People dropping dead from weed? I've heard of "killer weed" before, but not like that. ;)
I don't think all drugs should be legal, just weed. But that is a topic for another thread.
aneuhauser - Aug 17, 2010 12:39 AM
" ... drug abuse has increased in the Netherlands. From 1984 to 1996, marijuana use among 18-25 year olds in Holland increased twofold. Since legalization of marijuana, heroin addiction levels in Holland have tripled and perhaps even quadrupled by some estimates.
"Switzerland has some of the most liberal drug policies in Europe. In late 1980s, Zurich experimented with what became known as Needle Park, where addicts could openly purchase drugs and inject heroin without police intervention. Zurich became the hub for drug addicts across Europe, until the experiment was ended, and “Needle Park” was shut down.
"Not all of Europe has been swept up in the trend to liberalize drug laws. Sweden, Finland, and Greece have the strictest policies against drugs in Europe. Sweden’s zero-tolerance policy is widely supported within the country and among the various political parties. Drug use is relatively low in the Scandinavian countries."
aneuhauser - Aug 17, 2010 12:52 AM
Only: I was primarily addressing border control, not deportations. SB 1070 may have a deterrent effect but is no substitute for strict border enforcement.
The number of illegals in the country has increased greatly, so I would expect selective deportations would also. Both administrations deported mainly those they considered helpful--or least harmful--politically.
Carl Hicks - Aug 22, 2010 12:40 PM
aneuhauser - Aug 22, 2010 5:05 PM
Unfortunately, the bleeding hearts in our society today would probably insist we spend trillions to "save" the poor souls from their folly.