A 9/11 Perspective
There is much to be said about the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, most of which has already been said and repeated. The events leading up to that outrage and subsequent events are widely misunderstood, in my opinion. I intend to deal with that issue in a future post. For now, I wish to address the blizzard of Muslim apologetics from President Obama and virtually all the media.
It is asserted over and over that it's not the religion of Islam that's responsible for terrorist acts but rather a small fringe group of misguided fanatics. The Fort Hood assassin was "a self-radicalized, home-grown terrorist;" the Times Square bomber was a demented extremist and, most of all, the 19 hijackers that flew planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon were wild-eyed suicidal al Qaeda dupes. I wish that all were true, but it's not.
The motivation behind Islamic terrorism is in fact Islam. The Fort Hood assassin, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, was a trained psychiatrist, certainly not an ignorant fool. The 19 hijackers included several educated professional men. The Times Square bomber, Faisal Shahzad, was an account analyst although he does seem a bit unbalanced.
It is a mistake to assume that those who commit violent acts in the name of Islam and their supporters are all fringe Muslims following erroneous Islamic teachings. Islam, as widely preached and practiced today, is not a "religion of peace." Alone of all the major religions, it advocates aggressive and, "if necessary," violent worldwide expansion. Historically, there have been two major violent jihads. The first began shortly after Mohammad's death in 632 AD and reached into France before being stopped, and the second, promulgated by the Turks, also reached Europe before suffering a series of defeats by the Crusaders and others. This one led to what was called the Ottoman Empire.
Islam divides the world into two zones: Dar al-Islam (zone of submission) and Dar al-Harb (zone of war). All of the world is covered by one or the other of these two zones. We are located in Dar al-Harb. The United States, in fact, is the center of Dar al-Harb. We are the "Great Satan;" Israel is relegated to "Little Satan" status because it is not a significant obstacle to the expansion of Islam.
Most major religions encourage expansion--Judaism alone seems content to practice their faith in peaceful contentment. Christians call this evangelism. It is practiced by persuasion, ancient history notwithstanding. Islam also encourages conversion by persuasion, and in fact the Quran states that those who chose not to convert should be left alone in peace. However, if unbelief constitutes an obstacle to Islamic expansion, violence and death are justified. Guess who is the major obstacle to Islamic expansion in the world today?
The U.S. is an "infidel" economic and military superpower with major worldwide influence. We are the most significant anti-Islamic influence in the world today. We are morally corrupt, irreverent and arrogant. We treat women as equals. We will not tolerate Shari'a law or theocracy in any form. Islam alone among religions requires government inclusion--a theocracy. It's not just a religion, it's a form of government. Thus, we are the "Great Satan," the prime enemy of Islam and its primary target for destruction.
Certainly not all Muslims subscribe to this madness. In fact many are peaceful, mind-your-own-business citizens, mostly in the West. But make no mistake, many worldwide do subscribe to violent jihad. (The Quran does call for "jihad" as a military struggle on behalf of Islam. But the Quran also refers to jihad as an internal, individual, spiritual struggle toward self-improvement, moral cleansing and intellectual effort.) Recall the pictures of Muslims around the world celebrating the World Trade Center outrage.
Many Muslims, especially in this prosperous country (or at least it was), don't countenance terrorism or violent expansion, subscribing to the second definition of jihad above. They just want to practice their religion in peace. Despite this, we are the prime target of violent jihad. Israel is just a boil; we are the septic disease that must be "cured". That cure is either wholesale conversion to fundamental Islam or our destruction.
Uncomfortable as this may be to many, we ignore the threat to our peril. All the politically-correct speeches and warm-fuzzy newspaper articles will not change reality.
Certainly, all people, regardless of religious persuasion, should be considered individuals without stereotyping or pre-judgement. But the underlying aggressive and violent jihadic elements of Islam, very seldom disavowed by Islamic leaders, warrant great caution and vigilance.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






50 Comments
jman99 - Sep 11, 2010 9:43 PM
Thanks
I think the good of that day is what should be remembered. The selflessness, the courage, the strength of a nation to rebound and say,yes we still stand and the fire still burns for those who need to find their way. That was the very best there was.
What came after was a perversion of those holy acts.
reformed trucker - Sep 12, 2010 12:20 AM
On an off note, I disagree with that dude in Florida who wants to burn Qu'rans because:
a) smart people don't burn books.
b)he's "charismatic".
c) the apostle Paul didn't rip on the false gods of the Greeks when he was doing "apologetics".
d) smart people don't burn books, they study them (to do apologetics) [I know, repeat].
People who spew "Islam is a religion of peace" need to know thier arsch from a hole in the ground.
The Florida dude's actions were incendairy. We've always had village idiots; once upon a time we didn't give them press coverage.
reformed trucker - Sep 12, 2010 9:12 PM
"The 'dude in Florida' is acting under his Christian faith."
That's why I mentioned he was Charismatic; he was going to burn the books because "God told him to".
Please.
Ever notice that almost all of the sexual/financial scandals involving televangelist hucksters are all Charismatic? No, really, God "told them" they needed to have that 10 million $ private jet. ;)
"In fact, he's one of our Christian leaders".
I heard he has a congregation of about 50 people. Kind of like that nutrod Fred Phelps. I wonder if his whole congregation is all family members also.
"Or don't you believe in our system?"
Yes, I do... and I also believe the freedoms we enjoy are another reason they hate us.
My concern isn't only with Muslim violence against Americans, but Muslim violence against Christians worldwide. Like the wholesale slaughter of Christians by Muslims in Africa, just because they're Christians. Of course you don't hear much about stuff like this, because we wouldn't want to "offend" all those "peace-loving Muslims". Of course if the tables were turned, it would be ballyhooed from the highest rooftops. Google "The Voice of the Martyrs" for some chilling stories.
Ah yes, man's inhumanity to his fellow man...
sirlaughsalittle - Sep 13, 2010 11:30 AM
Man who needs to know his arsch from a hole in the ground: "The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_ZoroJdVnA&feature=related
LOL
aneuhauser - Sep 13, 2010 5:27 PM
However, the Christian and Judaic religions do not advocate violence in the name of expansion. Christian values are largely based on the New Testament, the OT regarded as generally historical, which emphasizes love and persuasion. Judaic values are similarly benign. Only Islam, as practiced by the majority of Muslims and heavily influenced by the draconian Hadith, advocates forceful and, if necessary, violent expansion. (Ask bin Laden if he believes in Dar al-Harb.) I won't even touch on the treatment of women under Shari'a. This creates an environment conducive to horrendous acts of terrorism like the WTC outrage. (I'm sorry, jman99, I see nothing "good" about the violent death of 6000 innocent victims.)
Until Islamic leaders condemn in no uncertain terms Muslim acts of terrorism and violent jihad, which to my knowledge they have not done except for some mealy-mouthed statements opposing generic violence, I will hold Islam responsible for the acts committed in its name.
reformed trucker - Sep 13, 2010 7:43 PM
Agreed. Once again, man's inhumanity to his fellow man. Why, there's people who have done much worse, claiming no religion at all.
reformed trucker - Sep 13, 2010 8:12 PM
reformed trucker - Sep 13, 2010 8:27 PM
My bad.
sirlaughsalittle - Sep 14, 2010 11:27 AM
I think what you mean to say is mythological. Unless you want us to believe that a revengeful, baby killing, psychopathic god of the old testament decided at some point in his career to reinvent himself into being a liberal, compassionate, tolerant, turn-the-other-cheek, all loving god. That's quite a personality change. Talk about "extreme makeover". Wow.
And they call it the "good book". Go figure.
This whole my-religion-is-better-than-your-religion zero-sum game is just plain silly.
Here's a 9/11 perspective:
They killed 2,977 innocent American men and women.
We killed 100,000 (conservative figure) innocent Iraqi men, women, and children ... and babies.
And for those who believe we would have invaded Iraq absent the fear inducing effect that 9/11 had on the American psyche, doesn't know their arse from a hole in the ground.
aneuhauser - Sep 15, 2010 1:11 AM
aneuhauser - Sep 15, 2010 1:31 AM
yert49 - Sep 16, 2010 9:17 PM
If one was not to construct two double negative sentences, and no one read it, do we not hold them responsible for making any sense?
reformed trucker - Sep 16, 2010 10:16 PM
If a man speaks in the middle of the woods, and a woman isn't there to hear him, is he still wrong?