Are you Thing 1 or Thing 2?
The State Department is altering U.S. passport applications to be "gender neutral." That means that the terms "mother" and "father" will no longer be found on such forms to describe one's parentage. Instead, in an effort to recognize "different types of families," and bend over backwards to be politically-correct, we no longer recognize people as "moms" or "dads." No, now they are called: "Parent One" or "Parent Two." This change has been considered a huge victory by gay rights groups.
Absurd.
In 2008, the estimated number of same-sex couples in the United States was 850,000. Out of this figure, only 6% were said to consist of two people raising children. Simply because a very, very small minority of society may be raising children in two daddy or two mommy households, the 70% of children in the United States being raised by a mom and dad are now being dismissed. In order to appease those on the left and the gay rights movement, the Federal Government has seen fit to snub the majority of people who prefer to use the terms "mother" or "father." The president of the Family Research Council, Tony Perkins, called this action by the State Department an example of the "topsy-turvy world of left-wing political correctness" and a move that is "designed to advance the causes of same-sex marriage." I agree.
And before all the usual suspects out there go berserk calling me and others with the same views "homophobes" or other endearing terms, think again. I find this move by the State Department to be troubling. Parents of children are no longer being referred to as a "mother" or "father" in this situation. That alone sounds terribly wrong. I have a problem with this. I do not look upon these views as being somehow "anti-gay" but rather "pro-family."
In an earlier post I expressed my opinion that ending the "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the military wasn't really done to address that practice. I really don't think most people cared one way or another about the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell." However, this repeal was done with one goal in mind by those with a certain political agenda - to lead the country towards making gay marriage legal. Shortly after the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell," the State Department announced it's new policy on passport forms. Small steps leading to the big step. The ultimate goal - legalizing gay marriage - is something that the majority of Americans oppose - for a wide variety of reasons, including religious beliefs, moral standards, support of the traditional family, etc. However, the majority of Americans (myself included) have no problem allowing civil unions of members of the same sex.
Political correctness run amok. Upon first hearing about the State Department's actions - all I could think of was Dr. Seuss's "The Cat in the Hat" in which two characters are referred to as "Thing 1" and "Thing 2." Dr. Seuss's books are well-known and loved by children and adults for the clever wording and pictures. They are fun and enjoyable. However, never did I imagine that the United States would now see fit to refer to "mothers" and "fathers" as "Parent 1" or "Parent 2." Our country is moving into some scary territory - whether we like it or not - when such blatant attempts at demeaning the traditional family are acceptable and promoted - by the United States government.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Obama waves the white flag on the War on Terror (14)
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (273)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






145 Comments
Compridious - Jan 13, 2011 11:45 AM
irked - Jan 13, 2011 1:18 PM
do you teach them to say thing 1 and 2 to you ? For me you new name is just thing !!
Do not act as if it is wrong for you can now tell your significant other that they can
refer to you as thing . Well what are the answers ? All the adopting parents I know
have kids that call them mom and dad !! Do you know any being called thing ? thing !
Compridious - Jan 13, 2011 2:16 PM
Would you make your child call their step-parents mom and dad, too? Would you force a child to call their adoptive parents mom and dad? I think it is up to the family what names they use, not you, not Amy, not the government.
Cosette - Jan 13, 2011 2:32 PM
Why are you so hateful to others?
I have two young children and my husband passed away last year. The children's grandmother is joint legal guardian with myself. This was done so if anything should happen to me, she would have custody of the children.
What is wrong with having a form that includes me? The wording just needs to be Guardian 1 and Guardian 2.
Are we not all Guardians to our children?
Do I love my children less than you do? Do other's love their children even less? Are we not all Americans when we travel outside this great country?
Perhaps just for people like you the government could print up a special "homophobic" form so you could ask for that when you want a passport.
Compridious - Jan 13, 2011 3:07 PM
Here is the "traditional family" in America: - "50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce." - Jennifer Baker of the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology in Springfield, Missouri."
Makes for alot of step-parents or should I say "moms" and "dads"?
ahemmer - Jan 13, 2011 3:52 PM
A true nuclear family - where a mother, father, and children live under the same roof accounts for 25% of all families in the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_family
From Wikipedia: "Current information from United States Census Bureau shows that 70% of children in the US live in traditional two-parent families, with 60% living with their biological parents, and that "the figures suggest that the tumultuous shifts in family structure since the late 1960s have leveled off since 1990."
No matter how you want to look at it, the reality - and common sense - says that most children come from a ....mother and ....a father....ta da!!! Given that this is the majority of the family structure in the United States, no matter how much a very, very small segment of society may not like it, this is the truth. So, why in the world are we adjusting forms to discount the usage of "mother" and "father" to appease a very small minority? Couldn't the forms just be changed to include a section for those who have unconventional family situations, rather than crossing out "mom" and "dad" in favor of "parent 1" and "parent 2?"
And how will people decide which parent is allowed to be #1? #2? Could see some fights break out over that one..... :)
sirlaughsalittle - Jan 13, 2011 4:08 PM
If I had a nickel for every time that question was asked of Hemmer I'd be very
wealthy.
I think we can blame it on her parents.
Compridious - Jan 13, 2011 4:23 PM
On your income tax return are you the "spouse" or is your husband the "spouse"? Why?
irked - Jan 13, 2011 4:35 PM
laughalittle . why are you PDLS's so hateful that you can not leave families alone ? I
do not understand why you hate moms and dads , you guys and girls are pathetic .
Onlyoneme - Jan 13, 2011 4:42 PM
Since the topic of this blog is generally about what you see as government overreach, the question follows your blog topic.
I do not believe that republicans are for smaller government, I believe that fiscal conservatism is just another Republican fallacy. The republicans showed how fiscally responsible they are when they held all three branches of government under G. Walker Bush.
If Republicans are for smaller government, then answer this question; What has the Republican Party done to reduce the size of government?
I am not talking about what they "plan" to do. I mean what have the Republicans already done to reduce the size of government??
What, if any, programs did the republicans pass that actually reduced the size of government?
Tom Bal - Jan 13, 2011 4:51 PM
Mom name/ Mom name-- Dad Name/ Dad Name and for a Normal family Mother and Father.
Why is this so hard for you guys. She's explaing her option and why she doesn't agree and I agree with her 1000% You don't but why is it you have to attack every stinking time. Now your calling her Gay --Cosette.
I'm sure this most likely doesn't bother Amy but let me tell you something If your what Librals are all about I don't want anything to do with any of you.
Discuss it give your options cause when you start with your personal attacks you look simple minded and nuts. It becomes a contest for you guys to see who can come up with the best line In your own Heads that is.
Tom Bal - Jan 13, 2011 5:14 PM
You Hypocrite, two faced Liber
ahemmer - Jan 13, 2011 5:15 PM
I am simply stating that the government is clearly overstepping its bounds - catering to the will of a very select few and ignoring the many who are proud to be called a "mother" or "father." Kids do not just pop out of thin air. And the majority of American families do consist of two parents of the opposite sex. Whether or not they live in the same household doesn't matter. The point is, to delete calling people what they are to satisfy the clamorings of a very few is wrong. Words mean something - just as the Obama Administration sought to minimize the "war on terror" by calling it the softer, gentler term of "overseas contingency operation." Ridiculous. Political correctness seems to work one way in this country, and one way alone. Whatever liberals say is "correct" is what the rest of us need to abide by. Change the language, minimize reality - manipulate to get your desired results. Liberals are very good at that, and this recent change to passport form language is an excellent example.
Cosette - Jan 13, 2011 5:20 PM
irked - Jan 13, 2011 6:16 PM
ahemmer - Jan 13, 2011 6:25 PM
Now, if you can comment on the actual post and stop with the personal attacks directed at me in several comments, you would be on the "right" path towards actually having an on-topic discussion. Funny how so many liberals just find that to be very difficult.
Cosette - Jan 13, 2011 6:35 PM
If woman is raped, who goes in father place?
You thing because you have whole family you better than me? You have whole family because you lucky. Tomorrow could be different. You could be like me.
ahemmer - Jan 13, 2011 7:11 PM
And I have never stated, nor do I think that my family is better than anyone elses. Please point out in my post or comments anywhere where I say such a thing.
I will wait for your examples.
And thanks, Cosette, for this little gem - it's such a classic example of a question a liberal would pose or even think up:
"If woman is raped, who goes in father place?"
I would have to say that if one has no mother or no father to list in the section that applies to such on a U.S. passport application, leave it blank! Is that so difficult???
Cosette - Jan 13, 2011 7:27 PM
You hate children because you hate people who are not same kind parents as you. Like Russians. Same a Russians ok, not same as Russians is bad. Make feel like nobody. You same, you make people feel like nobody because different then you.
How you thing that woman feel when she see that on application? You don't know, Don't care. Care only that they be like you.
ahemmer - Jan 13, 2011 8:19 PM
Again, I must ask that you give me some examples that speak to your claims that somehow - because of my blog topic and comments - I hate children. Or that I hate parents who are not like me?!? Please - just an example of any statement I make that backs this claim of yours up.
And I really have to wonder, why all of sudden, the types of forms we use and wording really NEED to be changed. Did a bunch of gay activists suddenly rush the State Department, complaining of the wording on a passport form? I am sure that there are other forms out there that require one list a husband, or wife - a credit card application perhaps? And what usually happens if one doesn't have a husband or wife, or mother or father in this instance, you leave it blank, write "none" and move on. Is that really so hard and challenging?
This speaks to the mindset of liberals. When conservatives don't like a radio talk show or television show, they change the channels. Liberals act offended and want to silence the talk or television show they don't like. If conservatives don't want to eat fattening foods, they don't. If liberals don't like fattening foods, they want to ban them. If a conservative doesn't want to own a gun, they don't buy one. Liberals want to ban guns for all. I could go on and on because the examples out there are just so numerous - but the "perpetually offended" crowd would be better served just letting people live their own lives. Which is a basic theme I try to hammer home. Less government is better than bigger government any day.