"And there is your dagger!!!!"
Metaphor: (met a - for) n. a figure of speech in which a term is transferred from the object it ordinarily designates to one it can designate only by implicit comparison or analogy, as in the phrase evening of life (definition taken from "The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language").
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The past few days in the aftermath of the Arizona shootings, many on the left - including the "unbiased" media - immediately jumped to the unfounded conclusion that political rhetoric - coming from the right, of course - was somehow responsible for the killings and woundings of many people in that state. As time went by, this was proven to be untrue. Jared Loughner, the lone gunman, who shot and killed six people, while wounding fourteen others, was mentally unstable. He and he alone was the "guilty party." Mr. Loughner was found to be "unpolitical," meaning he did not follow politics, didn't listen to "talk radio," nor did he watch television shows that discussed the political happenings in the country. He wasn't interested. Instead, Jared Loughner had many personal issues and was very irrational. And rational people cannot explain the irrational, no matter how hard they try.
Political rhetoric was eventually given a pass as being the scapegoat for the actions of Mr. Loughner. And rightly so. What IS very interesting is a topic that Charlie Sykes, a conservative talk radio host for WTMJ, discussed on Friday, January 14th. Here is the link to his specific podcast:
http://www.620wtmj.com/podcasts/charlie_sykes_podcast/113618229.html?video=pop&t=a
What Mr. Sykes talked about, with the blessings of sportscaster Wayne Larrivee, was Mr. Larrivee's use of the phrase "and there is your dagger!" whenever the Green Bay Packers football team was assured of a victory. (On to Chicago! - it is a great time to be a Packer fan! And for those of you who may not know, Mr. Larrivee is one of the "voices of the Green Bay Packers" who covers their football games live on the radio.) During the podcast, listen to Mr. Larrivee actually say "and there is your dagger, right through the heart of Jake Cutler and the Chicago Bears!" from an earlier game in the season. Oh my goodness! Violent? Yes. Graphic? Yes! But does anyone really believe that a Packer football player is stabbing a Bear player? That Jake Cutler is being knifed in the heart? No. People realize this is a harmless metaphor. But given what happened in Arizona, and how the liberal media was so quick to jump to conclusions and point the finger at the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, and conservatives, for somehow stirring up the violence with "political rhetoric,' wouldn't it be expected that if someone goes out and stabs someone after listening to Mr. Larrivee, Mr. Larrivee's rhetoric is now somehow to blame???
No.
Silly to even think so. Metaphors are used all the time. Most people probably read the sports section of newspapers. One team "kills" another. One team "annihilates" another. One team "slaughters" another. However, most people who have an ounce of common sense realize that a team is not really "killing, annihilating," or "slaughtering" another team. No, one team won and another team lost. That's all. Harmless. Such headlines or references don't mean that the winning teams picked up machine guns and mowed down members of the opposing teams, or ran out onto the playing field and knifed all the members of the losing team.
So, does Mr. Larrivee need to tone down his violent rhetoric in order to assure that people do not go out and kill one another? Should he use the words "and there is your time out!" as Charlie Sykes joked about, in an effort to keep the perpetually-offended politically-correct crowd happy? No. Just imagine if come Sunday, the Packers win - they beat the Chicago Bears - and Mr. Larrivee shouts out "and there is your time out!" Wouldn't that sound simply ridiculous? Of course it would. The audience wants to hear "AND THERE IS YOUR DAGGER!" - and on to the Super Bowl!
Let's get real. The majority of people in the United States are not idiots, as many of the liberal elitists like to believe. We know right from wrong. We know what is a metaphor and what isn't. For example, we know what the word "target" means, ala Sarah Palin or the Democratic "target" map from 2004. We know that neither Palin, nor the Democrats meant that it was "open season" to hunt and kill members of the opposite party. Common sense tells us that. We know that political discourse is good for the country. And we know that the Obama Administration and liberals don't like to hear complaints about how many feel that the country is being led towards socialism. They don't want to hear it - they want people to follow along without question. Well, we won't. We will keep up the political discourse and complaints. After all, free speech is for everyone - not just the left. And metaphors are just that - metaphors. Most people DO know the difference.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (130)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






91 Comments
bamaphd - Jan 17, 2011 3:53 PM
True
"And metaphors are just that - metaphors."
True
"Most people DO know the difference."
Possibly and for those who fall into the group that is not best described by "most people" you have a problem. You just don't know what will set them off.
That's why free speech must also be responsible speech. Danger for incitement lurks everywhere. Metaphor viewed outside it's intended context can be a dangerous thing. The Jews were Hitler's metaphor for all that was wrong in Germany. The metaphor turned into a justification. The justification spawned 6 million dead.
The metaphor "master race" (herrenvolk, I think it was) for Germans lead to another 20,000,000 dead Russian plus 4 to 6million dead Poles, plus all the European Theatre allied losses.
It was the same for Japan.
When the "other" is reduced to a "less than I" status, the "other is dehumanized and therefore less burden on the soul when disposed of.
Normal people can see this is wrong. Abnormal people see nothing wrong with it. And that is where the problems begin.
It is up to those of us who are "normal" to know when we should hold back and not say a phrase that we know will incite. We are the ones wanting to use the words so we are the ones who need to check our meaning and the possible interpretations before those words pass our lips or make it on to the screen of the computer.
We are no longer in the age of just printed media. We are in the age of visual conclusion. If ever the medium was the message it is now.
It is up to us to make sure the message is true, real, and realistically represents the issue or fact at hand.
Otherwise we are all just our own little Hitlers.
sirlaughsalittle - Jan 17, 2011 4:48 PM
has been taken hostage (metaphorically speaking) by Marxists now wants us to
believe that she's qualified to lecture about rationality? If I remember correctly
this is the same person who believes government thugs will soon be cracking
down on PTO bake sales. There's no explaining this person's irrationality.
ahemmer - Jan 17, 2011 6:37 PM
And the new nutritional standards that the government is imposing on the schools does indeed reach into areas of what foods are allowed for sale at various school functions. Who would have ever thought that such a thing woud happen? I find that to be a classic example of the government overreach.
Nothing you state in your comment speaks to my "irrationality" as you call it. How so? I fail to understand how you have twisted things to such a degree. You only make yourself look foolish.
Now, care to comment on the topic of the post? How the use of the very violent phrase "there is your dagger!" may set people off to kill one another at sporting events? Or the real key point in my post - that such rhetoric is tongue-in-cheek. People - well, at least those who have common sense - know this. We see this kind of speech in every day life and it doesn't "force" people to go beserk and kill or wound people. Just as political rhetoric doesn't either. Try to stay on topic, libs. I know it is hard.
yert49 - Jan 17, 2011 7:01 PM
ahemmer - Jan 17, 2011 8:07 PM
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/
This is a shocker - the exampes abound. Yet, all we have been hearing is the "hate-filled rhetoric" from the right that somehow inspired Jared Loughner to kill and wound people. Although this was proven false, apologies from the liberal media and other leftie figures have been noticeably absent. Funny how that works...
Check it out. The examples are stunning. Then get back to me on how "hate-filled" the rhetoric coming from the right is. And yet, you know what? Did anyone claim that any of this garbage Michelle Malkin points out - coming from those oh-so-compassionate, open-minded lefties - was responsible for any violence anywhere? No. Why is that? Maybe cuz those on the right are better at identifying metaphors? Maybe those on the right have something many libs lack - common sense?
Just as the phrase "there is your dagger!" Harmless. Like the term "diehard" fan even used on the website home page to this blog. Metaphors abound everywhere and are a part of our lives. Yet, irrational people abound too. Now, not all are violent. But we do not know what sets some people off and makes them tick. And we probably never will. Maybe Arizona may be a "teachable moment (the liberals love that term) and maybe the liberal media and other lefties may think twice before blaming those who don't think like they do, and stop rushing to unfounded conclusions the next time something horrible happens in our society.
sirlaughsalittle - Jan 17, 2011 8:42 PM
been there for 76 years and suddenly it has become a "Marxist quote". Was it
considered a "Marxist quote" when it was used by a very Republican senator in
his opening remarks to a congressional subcommittee? No. Why? Because
"Marxist quotes" didn't become "Marxist quotes" until hysterical, Obama-hating
dimwits came onto the scene.
Btw, you're the one who went off topic in your last blog and then begged others
to follow: "No comment on your thoughts as to the U.S. government deleting the
... blah, blah, blah, blah, ... with a quote by a Marxist in the upper-right hand."
Thanks for providing yet another shining example of your hypocrisy. Hemmer and
hypocrisy go together like hand and glove. I'm going to refer to it as hemocrisy
from now on.
bamaphd - Jan 17, 2011 8:53 PM
Are you trying to shame the left or fire up the right?
sirlaughsalittle - Jan 17, 2011 9:29 PM
link."
There she goes, straying from topic again. Another shining example of hemocrisy.
irked - Jan 17, 2011 10:17 PM
so ? It was always a Marxist quote ! It just recently came in to main stream !! Think
PDLS's ....
ahemmer - Jan 18, 2011 6:57 AM
Nor do we believe that such "hate-filled rhetoric" inspires people to go out and kill or wound others, as the left was so eager to believe regarding Jared Loughner - blaming the right in it's zealous reporting and talk immediately after the Arizona shootings.
And the Marxist quote shown on the U.S. Department of Justice website is from C. Wilfred Jenks, "who in the 1930's was a leading proponent of the "international law" movement, which had as its goal to impose a global common law and which backed ‘global workers' rights.' " (American Thinker - 8/31/10)
Here's the link for more on how the U.S. Department of Justice has altered it's website from using the American flag, and the red, white, and blue, and gone to black and gold, with a marxist quote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/08/department_of_justice_ditches.html
Sirlaughsalittle: In the case of Nidal Malik Hassan, the facts were out there very early on. He was a Muslim - with ties to radical Imams - via communications. Yet, days went by with every attempt made to "not jump to conclusions" in Hassan's case - cuz we wouldn't want to "offend" any Muslim terrorists, now would we? Wouldn't want to group Hassan in with them - even though that was the case. In Loughner's situation, the liberal media and left were rushing all over themselves to "pre-judge" who was really responsible for Loughner's shooting spree. Couldn't be Loughner, could it? He had to be motivated by: right wing hate-filled rhetoric!!! When it became apparent that Loughner had little interest in politics and was just a mentally unstable man- well, the media had to cringe with disappointment and report that..Loughner was mentally unstable! He was the "lone gunman."
Compridious - Jan 18, 2011 8:39 AM
Compridious - Jan 18, 2011 10:20 AM
bamaphd - Jan 18, 2011 1:04 PM
Points 4 and 5 especially;
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/01/18/jared-lee-loughner/
sirlaughsalittle - Jan 18, 2011 1:15 PM
The organization's objectives as summed up by the current Director General:
"The primary goal of the ILO today is to promote opportunities for women and
men to obtain decent and productive work, in conditions of freedom, equity,
security and human dignity."
Damn Marxists.
http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/mission-and-objectives/lang--
en/index.htm
irked - Jan 18, 2011 1:51 PM
sirlaughsalittle - Jan 18, 2011 2:59 PM
To draw a comparison between the ILO and the KKK is really quite stupid. You'd be
a perfect fit with Amy's election campaign. You could help garner the complete ----
ing idiot voters.
Onlyoneme - Jan 18, 2011 4:02 PM
Wait a minute...there are "others" to the right of Hemmer???I'm sorry, its just hard to imagine that anyone could be to the right of Hemmer. Nevertheless, I suppose the possibility does exist for there to be others to the right of Hemmer, just hard to believe.
ahemmer - Jan 18, 2011 5:44 PM
(from http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/08/justice-department-marxist-website)
" Jenks helped make the ILO a tool of the communist movement. Most telling: Jenks, as director of the ILO is credited with putting in place the first Soviet senior member of the UN organization, and also with creating an environment that allowed the ILO to give "observer status" to the Palestinian Liberation Organization, and to issue anti-Israeli statements, which precipitated efforts by the U.S. Congress to withdraw U.S. membership from the ILO."
In the same article is also the following, regarding the deletion of the American flag and red white and blue colors from the Dept. of Justice website:
""We were told that the media team and the senior leadership that signed off on the design thought that the patriotic shtick from the Ashcroft days was a bit much for an agency that isn't supposed to be political. It was a real effort not to laugh at that."
"Patriotic shtick" from the Untied States Department of Justice? The sooner Obama and his socialist cronies vacate Washington D.C., the better.