Discussion Guidelines
For those wishing to comment on blog posts to the livinglakecountry.com website, here are the "Discussion Guidelines" as set forth by the livinglakecountry.com administrators:
Discussion Guidelines
We welcome your participation in our blogs and other discussion areas within the Journal Interactive network. We hope the words our bloggers write will elicit your comments, whether you agree or disagree with them, just find them entertaining, or have additional information or analysis to pass on.
To keep the conversation enjoyable and interesting for all of our readers, however, we ask that you abide by some simple, common sense rules.
Here's the short version:
- Don't use profanities or obscenities.
- Don't post personal attacks and insults; threats; ethnic, racial, religious or sexual slurs; or otherwise engage in hateful conversation.
- Don't stray from the topic of the blog or submit pointless comments.
- DON'T SHOUT BY USING ALL UPPERCASE LETTERS.
- Don't use this space for press releases or commercial purposes.
- Don't submit knowingly false or libelous comments.
- Don't pretend to be somebody else, or maintain more than one screen name, or use a screen name that might be considered objectionable or insulting.
- Don't knowingly give out any personal information about other individuals, including participants of these blogs.
- Don't post copyrighted or trademarked content.
Also, take what you find among the comments with a grain of salt. Some people in online communities derive satisfaction from trying to upset others. Ignore them. We'll monitor reader comments as best we can, but we do not necessarily read every word submitted by users of these blogs. If you see comments that don't abide by our discussion guidelines, please let us know by clicking the "report abuse" link on the blog or e-mailing our online staff.
By participating in our blogs, you agree to abide by the terms of this agreement. We also reserve the right to change this agreement at any time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a side note, three people who have commented to the various blog sites in the past have been banned. They have lost their commenting privileges due to repeated "Guideline violations." They include: jmark, sirlaughsalittle, and bamaphd. These three have been banned by the livinglakecountry.com administrators.
As of January 24th, 2011, we bloggers have been given the ability to delete comments that violate the Discussion Guidelines as well as delete any comments coming in from the three people mentioned earlier. However, the livinglakecountry.com administrators have informed us that these three occassionally try to "sneak in" using different IP addresses. However, if comments show a certain pattern or border on the ridiculous (anyone remember the short-lived comments from "Cosette?"), it isn't too difficult to figure out when we are being scammed. The administrators can then be alerted and check out the IP addresses and the people behind them.
However, if people are that desperate to make a comment, here's a solution: ultra-leftie blogger Dustin Klein allows the wayward liberals who found it too difficult to abide by the rules, to use his blog to post comments to their hearts content. So, in the future, sirlaughsalittle, jmark, and bamaphd should take advantage of Klein's hospitality. These three will not find a home at my blog anymore. And even though it may take some time for me to check in and see if they have posted, their comments will be removed - as per the direction of the editors of livinglakecountry.com.
I would also suggest to others making comments, do not respond to anything sirlaughsalittle, jmark, or bamaphd may say on my blog site. Their remarks will disappear - whether it be quickly or within a day or two, and there is really no need to carry on a conversation with them.
Most importantly, I also will never delete a comment "I do not like." I have never done so in the past, when we bloggers had this ability a few years ago. And I will not do so in the future.
This now brings everyone up-to-date on what the "Discussion Guidelines" are, and hopefully we can get back to a more civil discourse in the future. We are moving in the right direction!
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- 1984 (52)
- Our government has forgotten its place (42)
- Just a few observations... (95)
- Obama waves the white flag on the War on Terror (323)
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (267)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (261)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (236)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (297)
- Boston Massacre (257)
- What's missing? (243)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






29 Comments
jhayett - Jan 30, 2011 2:25 PM
jhayett - Jan 30, 2011 2:29 PM
This can be found below under "terms of use."
No Thread Hijacking. Thread hijacking – we don’t like it. Thread hijacking – or taking a Discussion Forum thread unreasonably off topic by discussing something entirely unrelated to the discussion at hand, or submitting an unreasonable number of off-topic posts to a thread that does not contribute to the value of a discussion - is disrespectful to other discussion forum members and discourages members from participating in discussions. So please don’t hijack threads.
We encourage you to tell us if you believe a member is hijacking a thread. We will attempt to remind users perceived as engaging in thread hijacking to start a new thread for their discussion or, in our sole discretion, may temporarily suspend or permanently block access by such user to one or more of our forums.
ahemmer - Jan 30, 2011 2:51 PM
jhayett - Jan 30, 2011 3:08 PM
referee33 - Jan 30, 2011 3:46 PM
ahemmer - Jan 30, 2011 4:33 PM
I will not simply delete a comment - or two - or three - that are waaaay off topic unless after repeated warnings that individual simply cannot focus back on the topic of the blog. Suffice it to say, we all stray from the topic of the blogs occassionally. It happens as other things come up. I expect that. And if the tangents we go off on sort of apply to the blog topic, so be it. I am not sitting at my keyboard waiting in anticipation of deleting anything that comes my way. I feel it is best to use restraint and, as I have stated many times, I have never - nor will I ever - delete a comment simply because "I do not like it." So - comment away.
I hope to have to never use my "delete" capabilities unless a banned commentor appears. In that case, I will delete sirlaughsalittle, bamaphd, or jmark since they have been banned by the administrators and they have lost their privileges to comment. Hope this answers your question.
referee33 - Jan 30, 2011 5:00 PM
;-) - but I generally try to keep it clean. Refereeing for the WIAA, which has a zero tolerance policy for profanity, only re-enforced the "soap to the mouth" policy of my Mom.
jhayett - Jan 30, 2011 6:22 PM
Onlyoneme - Jan 30, 2011 6:37 PM
After all with the vulgar personal attack Victor Ponelis made on Hemmer, I am surprised that his blog wasn’t removed from LLC’s archives.
jhayett - Jan 30, 2011 7:32 PM
irked - Jan 31, 2011 1:25 PM
Onlyoneme - Jan 31, 2011 2:35 PM
I could care less if Victor's blog is still on the LLC site. Or that he insulted or attackedeither Hemmer of you, it is none my business.
jhayett - Jan 31, 2011 5:01 PM
Either one works.
yert49 - Jan 31, 2011 7:14 PM
yert49 - Jan 31, 2011 8:21 PM
"Tonight's the night"
irked - Jan 31, 2011 10:10 PM
lol .... Oblivious you sounded sane for a minute there !! lol.. Seriously you were
making me laugh and I was double checking your comment name . I have to agree
with that comment though . I believe that it would take a lot of the hate out of the
web . Not to mention a lot of crime .