... By Any Other Name
(Full disclosure: I am the proud father of two adopted daughters.)
There was a time when a pregnant woman would say that she was carrying a baby, from the moment she learned that conception had taken place. She didn't say, "I'm carrying a zygote."--or "blastocyst", or "embryo". She didn't even refer to that little life within her as a "fetus". It was a baby, a human, living baby. Whether or not the pregnancy was planned, or even wanted, it was a baby.
However, when abortion was legalized early in 1973, the language changed. Refuge from reality was taken in Latin, insulating us from recognizing the truth: that pregnancy from the beginning is the miracle of creating a new human life. We could not recognize that in the atmosphere of legalized abortion, lest we acknowledge that abortion is the taking of an innocent human life, otherwise categorized by society as murder.
Early in 2011, this mechanism was amply illustrated by actress Nicole Kidman and her husband Kieth Urban, who happily announced the surrogate birth of their baby girl, Faith Margaret, expressing gratitude to their "gestational carrier." One marvels at their linguistic creativity. Personally, I would have preferred "surrogate mother." I wonder how many of you mothers out there would appreciate being referred to as "gestational carriers."
Some medical authorities some years ago, advocating the legalization of killing newly-born handicapped children, described them as "radically defective neonates." That's about the pinnacle of dehumanization, on a par with describing brain-damaged individuals as being in a "persistent vegetative state." I guess relating a severely injured or handicapped person to vegetation or "radically defective" shields us from the reality of dealing with a human life.
Personally, I'm much more comfortable referring to babies, mothers, parents and grandparents rather than the more politically-correct modern terminology of fetus, neonate, gestational carrier and vegetable. By dehumanizing the language, we enable magical thinking whereby we can choose a convenient rationalization rather than face the hard reality of the vicissitudes and necessities of life and the attendant responsibilities.
In 2008, there were 1.21 million abortions, down a bit from the peak of 1.6 million in 1990. Since Roe v. Wade there have been about 50 million abortions. In 2008 36% of abortions were to white women and just over 50% to black and Hispanic women. Nearly 60% were to college-educated women, which calls into question the commonly-cited element of poverty as a driving factor.
Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop stated during a speech some years ago, "It is a small leap in logic to go from taking life in the womb to taking life outside of the womb." Abortion-rights advocate Naomi Wolf has written, "... the pro-life slogan, 'Abortion stops a beating heart,' is incontrovertibly true." Fellow supporter Camille Paglia wrote "I have always admitted that abortion is murder, the extermination of the powerless by the powerful."
Recent figures from Planned Parenthood reveal a booming business. Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) performed 332,278 surgical and chemical abortions in 2009. At the same time, there was a 25% decline--7,021 recipients--in prenatal services and adoption referrals, of which only 977 mothers received the latter, a 59% drop from 2008. At an average of $400 a pop, that's a net income from abortions of about $133 million. Not bad for a public service organization that receives taxpayer subsidy.
Finally, we have the replacing of the term "abortion" with the neutered term "pro-choice". "Choice" is a nice-sounding term; in this freedom-loving nation we are all in favor of "choice". But in a civilized society, our choices are of necessity limited. We cannot "choose" to burn down the house of a neighbor who annoys us. We cannot "choose" to drive 90 mph in a school zone because we're late to work. Also, we cannot "choose" to take another human life. Except in the latter case, there is an exception and I don't mean self-defense. Under Roe v. Wade, a human life can be taken for a variety of reasons other than to save the life of the mother, i.e. self defense. I won't bother to enumerate them as they are ludicrously varied, vague and rationalized. You've undoubtedly heard them all.
I close with a posthumous tribute to Dr. Bernard Nathanson, former abortionist and founder of NARAL ( National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League), who estimated he had performed 75,000 abortions in his medical career. In 1979, he quit his practice and strongly and actively opposed abortion for the rest of his life. He was the producer of the lauded and reviled--depending on your orientation--film Silent Scream, which depicted ultrasound images of a pre-born baby trying to escape an abortionist's instrument. Dr. Nathanson died February 21st at the age of 84, a testimony to the miracle of redemption.

We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






158 Comments
reformed trucker - Apr 20, 2011 8:40 PM
Tom Bal - Apr 21, 2011 8:24 AM
Just the last paragraph alone brought a tear to my eyes.
I guess I’m tired or something.
The picture tells it all.
Fighting Jims Lies - Apr 22, 2011 7:00 AM
FYI - Nobody is pro-abortion. But I'm sure you don't understand that: See the above paragraph.
aneuhauser - Apr 22, 2011 1:09 PM
Fighting Jims Lies - Apr 22, 2011 4:29 PM
I only bring up the taxes because it indicates your level of understanding. Since you aren't capable of understanding the simplest concepts, how do you expect to understand anything at all?
aneuhauser - Apr 23, 2011 12:23 AM
sirlaughsalittle - Apr 23, 2011 9:12 AM
bamaphd - Apr 23, 2011 11:31 AM
Be a good Christian.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/42725827#42725827
Fighting Jims Lies - Apr 23, 2011 12:14 PM
First of all, they claim to stand on some sort of moral high ground by claiming that they are protecting babies’ lives. But when you look deeper, you see that they are only concerned with eliminating women’s rights. They aren’t concerned with eliminating abortion at all. If they were concerned with eliminating abortion, then the root-cause of abortion wouldn’t matter to them. But it does. All they care about is eliminating women’s rights. If they were truly concerned about eliminating abortion, then they would fight to criminalize all causes of abortion, including spontaneous abortion. Spontaneous abortion has many causes that are recognized by medical professionals. Most of the causes of spontaneous abortion are tied to profit-making, including many environmental causes. Some of the causes include MSG, Nutrasweet, food additives, pesticides, automobile emissions, and certain plastics. Never do you hear these insincere wack-os’s trying to criminalize any of these profit-making products. They only attack women’s rights. That’s how you know they’ve watched too many WWE-style programs on FOX.
Tom Bal - Apr 23, 2011 3:54 PM
They most likely are in a bad moods because those of us who truly believe that Jesus died for us are about to celebrate his Rising also for us.
Have a very nice Easter.
Al
God Bless you and yours.
sirlaughsalittle - Apr 23, 2011 5:00 PM
resurrection. Being Jewish will suffice.
BTW, it is now common knowledge that Jim Hayett and Tom Bal are
simultaneously wearing the same pair of underwear. I imagine he/they look like
this:
http://www.synergizedsolutions.com/simpsons/pictures_homer_43.shtml
ahemmer - Apr 23, 2011 5:53 PM
Despicable. What has our society become?
And Obama - in all his self-rightousness of supporting ANY kind of abortion out there - even late-term - harps about taking away health care benefits from the elderly and scares people into believing that is what Republicans desire under Paul Ryans budget plan (not true, but Obama knows how to distort). Coming from a President who supports any and all methods of murdering an infant.
On that sad note, I'll change the topic and wish a Happy Easter to all. Hopefully the banned commentors on Al's post may see fit to write a comment which is not off the topic or slanderous or disgusting, but I know that is difficult for them. Perhaps they may even acknowledge that Easter is an important day for Christians around the globe.
Excellent - and sad - post Al!
Fighting Jims Lies - Apr 23, 2011 9:26 PM
Isaiah 64:6 But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags.
Yes indeed, those like hemmer pretend to do God’s work, but their hypocrisy is noted.
Matthew 6:2 Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
Mattew 7:4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
Fighting Jims Lies - Apr 23, 2011 10:08 PM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002458/
We should take note that those who speak of the sinners are unconcerned with the majority of (what they call) "the murdering of babies". They are not oblivious to these deaths yet they display no concern at all. They only concern themselves with judging others.
aneuhauser - Apr 24, 2011 1:07 AM
Tom: Thank you. I like to let them babble their nonsense as it clearly chracterizes them. Nothing indicts liberalism more than their venomous and angry unrelevent comments. (I have also noted that these far-left foul-mouthed liberals hide behind pseudonyms while conservatives are more likely than not to use their real names. I wonder why?) Easter joy and blessings to you and your family.
Amy: As usual, you cut right to the chase. Thanks for the comment, and a Happy Easter to you and yours.
The rest of you: Go with God.
Fighting Jims Lies - Apr 24, 2011 8:26 AM
And let's not forget that the VAST majority of abortions are spontaneous, many caused by environmental factors.
Fighting Jims Lies - Apr 24, 2011 8:27 AM
Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.
bamaphd - Apr 24, 2011 10:06 AM
Here are a bunch of women who have taken the road you recommend, and you won't even help them with their lives?
What sort of Christian are you?
Deeds are what matter, not words.
Do the deeds, you will be known by them, the words are empty without them.
sirlaughsalittle - Apr 24, 2011 11:01 AM
which is not off the topic or slanderous or disgusting"
The next comment is not only slanderous, disgusting and downright idiotic, it also
has absolutely nothing to do with the blog topic.
"And Obama - ... Coming from a President who supports any and all methods of
murdering an infant."
Did I mention that it no doubt qualifies as "venomous", "angry" and "unrelevent"
as well?
It doesn't matter what the topic is, you can always count on Hemmer to inject a
bit of her good, old fashioned, Christian, hate-filled rhetoric.
By the way, I'm not the only one who uses a pseudonym from time to time. I'm
almost 100% certain that one of the blog hosts here continues to pass
themselves off as Tom Bal. I'm guessing it's Jim Hayett, but, I could be wrong.
So, the question is, which one of the blog hosts is it? Judging by the hatred that
Tom holds in his heart for liberals, I think we can rule out Dustin, Andy, and
Tami. That leaves us with Jim, Amy, and Al.
Will the pretentious one please reveal thyself.
Have a great Bunny Day!
John Markham
bamaphd - Apr 24, 2011 1:25 PM
"We cannot "choose" to burn down the house of a neighbor who annoys us. We cannot "choose" to drive 90 mph in a school zone because we're late to work. Also, we cannot "choose" to take another human life. "
This is totally wrong. You can chose to do any or all of those things. That's why jails are full, from people making those choices.