A 9/11 Retrospective
I'm sure lots of folks have or will comment on this the tenth anniversary of what happened on September 11, 2001. This is perhaps a different look.
I was getting off the elevator at Moreland Medical for a routine cardiologist appointment when a lady getting on asked if I had heard what happened to the World Trade Center in New York. I said no, I hadn't and she told me that an airplane had flown into one of the towers. I said something about how terrible and went on to my appointment. Not until I was driving home with the radio on did I realize what had happened. I was in disbelief, followed by intense anger.
Today, there is a tendency to view 9/11 as a great tragedy. This is the wrong word. It was an outrage of Biblical proportions. Yes, there were literally thousands of individual tragedies, but the event was a pure, unprecedented outrage. The target was civilians; not one active member of the military was targeted in the World Trade Center by our enemy. The Pentagon was also attacked, killing a few military among many civilian employees.This enemy, militant Wahhabist Islam in the personage of Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda, in total violation of the Geneva Conventions, simply decided to attack and kill American civilians for reasons of pure hate and nothing else. Sadly, this heinous act was justified by him in the name of religion.
This enemy wears no uniforms or other identification and represents no nation. He represents a religion--actually a distortion thereof. He operates completely outside the Geneva Conventions that address military combat. In the past, wars began with one nation's military attacking another's. Civilians were not the target and the Conventions were adopted to insure this. For the first time in history, to my recollection, a combative entity preferentially targets civilians. In the past civilian deaths in war were considered "collateral', regrettable victims of attacks on military-industrial targets. Not here. They (we) were the primary target.
This is new ground in war, and war this is, make no mistake. Militant Wahhabist Islam considers us obstructive infidels and thus legitimate targets for elimination. In a grotesque distortion, we in the West are impediments to Islamic expansion (Jihad) and thus are legitimately subject to death. (Note that I am not indicting all of Islam, only the extremist militant Wahhabi version.) Thus, this confrontation is with an enemy who is not subject to any of the protections of the Geneva Conventions subscribed to by nearly all of the civilized world. (There are two Protocols added in an attempt to cover "insurgents", but most nations, including the U.S. have not signed them.)
As a result of the outrage of 9/11, we embarked on a war with Afghanistan and its Taliban government that unwisely sheltered al Qaeda's headquarters. This attack was certainly justified, but al Qaeda is long gone and in disarray, and we're still fighting the indigent tribal Taliban under some misguided idea of nation building. This makes no sense. What makes even less sense is the expansion of our military actions into Iraq, where we still are, and now Libya which is completely senseless. There was some justification, largely mistaken as it turned out, for deposing Saddam Hussein. Libya is completely irrational. At least we finally got bin Laden, after he became isolated and essentially innocuous.
We are wearing out our military, especially our absolutely crucial air power, to depose a dictator who foreswore terrorism many years ago and posed absolutely no threat to us. The whole business has spiralled out of control, all initiated in response to 9/11. I maintain this militaristic nonsense dishonors the memory of that outrage.
Anger at our sworn enemy, a radical sect of Islam demanding fundamentalist Islamic theocracy and implementation of draconian Shari'a law, a system totally anathema to our concepts of freedom and democracy, is certainly justified. No moral code requires one to allow another to destroy him. However, we must be careful not to swing too wide an arc with our sword. There are over a billion Muslims in the world. Many are misguided into disliking us, even vehemently, for reasons that I think even they do not clearly understand. Perhaps it is a ridiculously long-lived resentment of the Crusades of the 13th Century, or perhaps simply a fear of a competing religion. However, this is not hate and is not a justification for reactionary fear and hate. Hate is a serious word regrettably all too thoughtlessly employed.
So, if some Muslims do not condemn the 9/11 outrage to our satisfaction, this is not justification for anger or--that word again--hate. We certainly should be vigilant and impersonally suspicious of young Mid-eastern men entering our country, and observant of suspicious activity. Fairly-applied profiling is simply prudent given the nature of terrorism. But, over it all we should be tolerant and above all, fair. Muslims too have a right to be here, so long as they are peaceful as the overwhelming majority are. So, amidst the outrage, let us remember the priniciples of Christian morality.
In that vein, I would like to close by quoting a familiar prayer, at the risk of offending some of you fine reader/commenters. Believe it or not, I subscribe to it completely while still being outraged and angry at what happened ten years ago on September 11, 2001, a day that will--and should--live in infamy.
Let us not, however, let that evil poison our outlook on our life and time. Recall the words of Desiderata: "With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world."
Lord, make me an instrument of your peace:
where there is hatred, let me sow love;
where there is injury, pardon;
where there is doubt, faith;
where there is despair, hope;
where there is darkness, light;
and where there is sadness, joy.
O devine Master, grant that I may not so much seek
to be consoled, as to console;
to be understood as to understand;
to be loved, as to love;
for it is in giving that we receive,
it is in pardoning that we are pardoned.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






53 Comments
bamaphd - Sep 12, 2011 5:47 AM
Perhaps you have forgotten the plane crashing into the Pentagon?
Carl Hicks - Sep 12, 2011 1:23 PM
I think many Americans are the misguided when it comes to why America is hated in the middle east. Consider the actions of the "west" over the past couple of hundred years. Most middle eastern countries were colonies of the European powers up until the end of WW1. The US since WW2 has propped up some very brutal dictators whom our government deemed to be "friendly to our interests". Iran being the prime example.We backed the Shah knowing he was no mister nice guy to his own people but since he was our puppet we backed him. Even as the Egyptians rallied against one of "our friends"we pondered shutting down a popular revolution of the people due to our worry that Egypt might "fall into the wrong hands".
It has been our own intervention in the form of propping up brutal regimes that has bred hate for this country by the masses in the middle east and that hate has morphed into a radical religion bent on revenge.
I disagree that current actions in Libya are somehow a part of the "war on terror". And besides the intial (& final) get bin Laden special ops (not the nation building it became) has been the most justifiable military operation of this millenium by our military. Had the overthrow of Saddam been carried out in a simular fashion I would have supported it but because Iraq was not helping the citizens of a foriegn country overthrow their own brutal dictator it was the wrong path for this country to take.
I am willing to bet we created even more enemies in Iraq and Afghanstan with our actions and have created allies in Libya.
WFB resident - Sep 12, 2011 1:56 PM
aneuhauser - Sep 12, 2011 2:39 PM
Carl: And there's that word again. Many nations have made mistakes in the past. None of that justifies the kind of terrorist outrage we saw on 9/11. The preferential killling of civilians is never justified, regardless of the "hate". Islam prides itself on its ancient civilization. The Wahhabist element has degenerated into wanton explosions of uncivilized depravity. Also, I think you are sadly mistaken if you think our throwing our military might around the Middle East is creating any "friends" for us. I would not turn my back on any of those "friends".
jhayett - Sep 12, 2011 5:56 PM
bamaphd - Sep 12, 2011 7:18 PM
http://www.discoveringislam.org/muslims_before_islam.htm
sirlaughsalittle - Sep 12, 2011 9:47 PM
Sponsored by Lake Country's finest fundamentalist Christians
Carl Hicks - Sep 12, 2011 11:13 PM
aneuhauser - Sep 13, 2011 1:27 AM
I hope I'm wrong, but I think Iran will succeed in becoming the leader of a new Arab League against Israel. Witness what is happening in Egypt after their populist uprising. The Egypt-Israel peace treaty is trash. With Egypt and the other Arab nations in concert and with a nuclear Iran in the lead, Israel won't have a chance. And we are the dupes helping it happen. On the other hand, I think Israel is well aware of what is happening and will not let it succeed. I don't know how they will stop it, but I have faith.
Note: Even though Iran is not Arab and is not particularly liked by the Arabs, they have a saying: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Colonel Striker - Sep 14, 2011 12:58 PM
Perhaps this statement would be correct if not for the 100's of years of western colonalism and the overthrowing of Elected Governments (Iran), to the propping up of American friendly dictators during the cold war, the first Iraq War, troops in Saudi Arabia and to the bitter end with the CIA being part of the birth of Al- Quadia in afghanastan were the Soviet Union's empire went to die.
And lastly, the Invasion of Iraq and our continued occupation of Afghanastan.
- I also strongly suspect that Iran is behind many of these so-called populist uprisings. Al
Or a reaction against our autocrats whom supressed their own people for the past decades. Mumbarek, Yemmen, Bahrain, non America friendly dictatorships did as well such as Syria and Libya. Iran has it's own problems as well with dissatisifed youth, high un-employment, and populations over 50% young people.
Christian Western Europe has been interfering in the middle east since 1000 A.D. The USA has been for the last century.
They want us out of their hair, they want the power of self-determination without western powers in the way to create whatever society they deem.
9/11 and the terrorism of Al-Quadia is partly a reaction to our nation interfering in middle east and asian political affairs.
jhayett - Sep 14, 2011 3:49 PM
In 610 when Islam was born, Muslims went on a rampage of hate, murder, rape, and slavery (and the slaves were not white BTW!). This went on for over 400 years against not just Jews and Christians, but some Muslims as well.
Best to study-up before you opine on this subject.
bamaphd - Sep 14, 2011 4:51 PM
Slavery in what would become the United States of America began in 1619 ( almost 1000 years after the rise of Islam) an continued until 1862. It was practised mostly by Christians. Subjugation of the sones of slaves went on well into the 1960's
At the same time ( and into the late 1800's ), Christians raped and pillaged, murdered and starved the indigenous native populations of North America since 1492, and in the United States of America since 1776 specifically.
You would think that enlightened Christians would not do such things having seen the Muslim example. And yet the truth is right there.
Best not point the finger too far Hayett because the other three point back at you.
bamaphd - Sep 14, 2011 4:58 PM
http://www.slaveryinamerica.org/history/overview.htm
Colonel Striker - Sep 14, 2011 5:53 PM
As much as I hate to sound elite but I have done a lot of reading and study in college on the Crusades and both Islam & Christianity.
There have been those in power throught the ages that have used their religion that have used violence under the name of god to justify murder, rape, and counquering others. Christian, Muslims, Budhists, Confusionism, Hindu, and Jew.
Do you know that after the fall of Rome and during the european dark ages that it was the muslims in the middle east that kept the western idea's of the romans and greeks alive, the teaching and writings of plato, socrates, and other's that kept the and treasured while math and poetry and thrived?
It was the crusades that brought the west and east together and the anceint knowledge of the first western civilations was brought back to europe to lift them out of the dark ages and back to some reason and logic, not just under the sway of the inquisition that killed non-beleivers and turned them by torture, or launched programs against jews in europe.
Sorry Jim, but through the eyes of history Christianity is like every other religion, a human construct held as an excuse used to conquer, rape, and pillage.
Carl Hicks - Sep 14, 2011 11:25 PM
The world was a very savage place 1400 years ago ...slavery .murder and rape were common place at that point in history. You prove nothing by trying to demonize any region or religion by its peoples actions from over a 1000 years ago. You can easily compare what happened in 610 as with what was happening anywhere on the planet at that point in time.
WFB resident - Sep 15, 2011 4:41 PM
christian values and morals to the most part are not inclined to be as you wrote
above . Welcome to the 21st century America . Can you say that about Sharia law in
the 21st century ?
Colonel Striker - Sep 15, 2011 6:35 PM
The Guy who murdered George Tiller was an Evangelical.
Jim Jones started as a baptist.
David Koresh thought he was Jesus.
And Rick Perry is proud the 234 people have been executed in his state.
Some Tea Partiers would rather see a man die than spend tax dollars to save him.
Slavery, Murder and Rape are not a religious based. If we are mostly a chrisitan country how do you account for all the murder and rape in our society?
bamaphd - Sep 15, 2011 9:04 PM
christian values and morals to the most part are not inclined to be as you wrote
above . Welcome to the 21st century America . Can you say that about Sharia law in the 21st century ? "
Well given that it has taken Christians 21 centuries to get this far, and they are 600 years further along the religious time line, that would put Islam about at the beginning of the Renascence in their Religious time line. So about equal then, with fundamentalist religious law ruling the believers and secularism and democracy not yet developed.
WFB resident - Sep 15, 2011 9:18 PM
that word . You just got done telling all of us that they were the keepers of the
values . Then some how it is OK that they are centuries behind us in treating people
as a whole . From that picking crazies that caused harm to others and stating that it
is a larger societal problem is shaky on your part . How can you say that we are
behind them in treating others then switch it and say that we are ahead ? Do not
worry we know, if you guys are ept !! lol.......
bamaphd - Sep 15, 2011 9:44 PM
behind them in treating others then switch it and say that we are ahead ? "
I never said that.