The smear campaign begins...
GOP presidential candidate, Herman Cain, has become the first to fall victim to the media campaign to smear and destroy GOP front runners for the presidency in 2012.
Out of nowhere, allegations of sexual improprieties against Cain have surfaced - made by three anonymous sources. Why did the media immediately jump on such allegations as valid - without question - and continue to lend credibility to very vague and unsubstantiated claims by three sources unwilling to come forward? The day-to-day attention devoted to this is incredible.
Compare the Cain stories to how the media turned up their noses at the serious claims of rape and sexual gropings regarding Bill Clinton. During Clinton's terms as a Governor of Arkansas, and later at the President of the United States, several women - using their own names - stepped forward to bring to light the sexual misconduct of Bill Clinton. Initially they were ignored. After days and weeks passed, their stories were shrugged off - discounted. Eventually, these brave women were targeted by the press as bimbos and trailer trash. Never mind as to whether or not their claims had substance - and in many cases they did. There was a pattern of sexual misconduct that Clinton apparently adhered to for years. However, what happened?
In regards to the several women who came forward with different sordid stories on Bill Clinton's sexcapades, ABC anchor Charles Gibson stated on the air "why does anyone care what this woman (Paula Jones) has to say?" Newsweek editor Evan Thomas called Jones "some sleazy woman with big hair." Then there was Gennifer Flowers - whom Clinton denied having an affair with at first, but later admitted to in his book "My Life." The press ripped her to shreds, never caring what her side of the story was. Kathleen Willey and Juanita Brodderick also were targets - subject to ridicule and harassment on behalf of a media intent on protecting Clinton. Monica Lewinski and Linda Tripp were others who suffered the wrath of the media and left. The press did all they could to defend Bill Clinton. The press did all they could to demonize and discredit all of Bill Clinton's accusers - and there were a lot of them!
Remember John Edwards? Seems that many news outlets knew of Mr. Edwards affair while on the campaign trail in 2008, yet refused to report it. They wanted Edwards around to cancel out Hillary Clinton's chances for the Democratic presidential nomination, since they wanted Barack Obama to become the Democratic nominee. They sat on the story long enough in order for that to happen.
Why the double standard? What Herman Cain is supposedly accused of - by three unknown people with vague descriptions of what Cain supposedly did years ago - pales in comparison to Slick Willie's recreational and criminal sex life and John Edwards affair (while his wife was suffering from cancer).
So here we go. Out of the blue, sudden allegations are thrown at Herman Cain by unknown sources. After all, Herman Cain is everything the left despises. A black conservative (the epitome of what the left really hates). A self-made man who rose up out of poverty, went to college, was hired by several large corporations (Coca-Cola and Pillsbury- ah, those evil large corporations that liberals also bristle at), who eventually ended up as the CEO of Godfather Pizza. Cain became the CEO and President of Godfathers Pizza when the company was nearly bankrupt. Cain took charge and made the company a success. He went on to become the head of the National Restaurant Association. So, a black conservative who didn't rely on entitlements, worked hard, achieved success, believes in smaller government, lower taxes, and is running for president as a Republican. Evil on all levels! He's got to go!
Liberals and Obama are scared of Cain. Just like they are of Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin. Any strong conservative is a threat - to the liberal/socialist status quo and Obama. ( I like to compare Herman Cain to our own Senator Ron Johnson - a successful businessman who knows what it takes to get the job done and actually run a business. Who isn't afraid of the government and is willing to take on the wasteful spending and idiocy coming out of Washington D.C. head on.) Herman Cain is what this country needs. If the press succeeds in taking him out with their National Enquirer methods of reporting, it would be a shame. At least Mr. Cain isn't budging an inch - he's calling them out as he should and saying the allegations against him are not true. They have been concocted by the left and the liberal media in an effort to take him out of the running. The Democratic M.O. we have come to expect is in full swing. Cain should continue to speak out against what the media is trying to do and not back down.
And if for some sad reason the media is successful in it's anti-Cain campaign, think they'll stop? No - their next target will be Rick Perry. After all, this situation is like the 2008 elections, when the media wanted John McCain to be the Republican nominee for president. They knew he was the weaker candidate. They touted him and wrote glowing endorsements on what a great guy McCain was - during the primaries. As soon as McCain became the Republican candidate for president, the press turned on him. They printed every damaging thing they could and then some. McCain must have been shell shocked.
The exact same thing will happen to the darling of the left right now - Mitt Romney. The left wants Romney as the front runner, since they know if he wins the nomination, they can tear him from limb to limb with his "Romney-care" and flip-flops of the past. Romney is another RINO and conservatives won't be too happy with him as a candidate. Obama stands the best chance of being re-elected (I shudder at the thought - are there that many foolish people out there who would vote for this anti-American socialist AGAIN???) should Romney be the nominee.
With this in mind, Herman Cain needs to fight back and stand up to the media and their smear campaign. If Cain goes down, Perry is next. If Perry bites the dust, Romney will be the Republican nominee for President. The Democrats will once again succeed in choosing the Republican candidate for the Republicans - with the help of the lamestream media, of course. We must not let this happen.
Cain IS able!
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (52)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






45 Comments
WFB resident - Nov 04, 2011 9:33 PM
Carl Hicks - Nov 05, 2011 6:23 AM
Liberals don't fear them because they are "strong conservatives" we fear them because loonies like them recieve votes from people who have to be even loonier to vote for goofballs like them.We should be afraid....very afraid...
Conservatives who bemoaned how Obama didn't haven't enough foriegn affairs experience are now supporting Mr "becky becky stan stan" now there is priceless irony.
sharpaxe - Nov 05, 2011 7:09 AM
I disagree. There is nothing scarier to the Obama administration than a strong conservative BLACK man possibly getting the nod. Think about it.
We're sick and tired of you
numbskulls continually playing the victim card. - SPalin
Actually, you've got a point. How long has the right been dealing with slanted media? Seems like forever. Get over it. It's not going away anytime soon. It would be great to see a candidate face it head-on, ignore it, and focus on the task at hand. We can't afford distractions. This also goes for supporters, bloggers, me, and the like. It's tiresome. Although un-electable, Newt Gingrich seems to come the closest. The others who could handle it, aren't even in the race. The coulda, woulda, shoulda crap needs to stop.
I look at the candidates, and lately it resembles a circus. It needs to be whittled down...soon.
MGarber - Nov 05, 2011 7:26 AM
"Romney is another RINO "
Translation - He doesnt hear voices.
"Conservatives who bemoaned how Obama didn't haven't enough foriegn affairs experience are now supporting Mr "becky becky stan stan" now there is priceless irony. "
Priceless point CH. Didja hear the NPR interview where Cain didnt realize China was already a nuclear power?
jhayett - Nov 05, 2011 8:33 AM
"With Herman Cain, in three days you've got 50 network news stories," Bozell noted, contrasting the coverage with when Paula Jones "held a press conference and laid out" how Clinton "had exposed himself and told her to perform oral sex on him." Despite that press conference, Jones "got 16 seconds on one network and that was it," the Media Research Center founder noted.
Likewise, Kathleen Willey's allegation of Clinton groping her got just three network stories when the news broke. Broaddrick's serious allegation of rape also got just three network stories, Bozell reminded Hannity viewers.
Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2011/11/04/media-mash-cain#ixzz1cpyKvFb0
ahemmer - Nov 05, 2011 9:38 AM
WFB resident - Nov 05, 2011 9:46 AM
means something about hearing voices is ironic . For when we say Rino and tell you
what it means . You as a PDLS read far more into it and literally hear voices telling
you it means something else . I took the time to inform you so that you may end
your vicious cycle . Lets see if it works ? lol...
Tom Bal - Nov 05, 2011 10:18 AM
Is exactly what the left fears the most Black, Conservative Tea Partier.
I mean in their eyes how can a black man be a conservative and if he is he’s going to take votes from us we need to ruin him.
They did the same thing to Clarence Thomas but failed.
Ya see with Cain in there running a campaign and leading in the republican polls they can’t use that race card as freely as they would like.
Once he’s ruined and gone they can go back to the old stand by and call the Tea Party and republicans racist.
Right now that cards on hold and can’t be used.
Ya just can’t let the republicans be the first to have a woman president nor can you allow them to have a minority as there candidate it would ruin everything the left has ever said about us.
jhayett - Nov 05, 2011 11:59 AM
Why is it so hard to follow or debate the blog topics? PJ Medai blog as your source? But what makes me laugh even more is your source only underscores Amy's blog facts! Thanks again for the help!
ahemmer - Nov 05, 2011 12:44 PM
SPalin/sirs/bama/jmark's comments will no longer be allowed on my blog. He simply found it too difficult to abide by the Discussion Guidelines. (But don't fear, if anyone misses this individual, I am willling to bet a new moniker will suddenly pop up and the comments will sound exactly like SPalin!!! :) )
ahemmer - Nov 05, 2011 1:21 PM
Tom Bal - Nov 05, 2011 2:58 PM
Could you imagine how big of room you would have needed if the MSM had all of Clintons extramarital girls come forward.
Little did anyone know that when Bill asked for a Debriefing he meant it, literally.
They did the same thing with Palins E-Mails and now this, they just never give up.
ahemmer - Nov 05, 2011 4:25 PM
The height of hypocrisy and biased journalism: the media didn't lift a finger to really consider the claims of the many women who came forward with what are very valid charges against Bill Clinton. Instead they worked to discredit the women. And don't get me started on how the media has refused to really look into Barack Obama's past. Isn't it funny how the media hasn't reported on such things as: Obama's grades from college, Obama's friends (did he have any besides those the media have chosen to ignore like Bill Ayers and other socialists/Marxists/etc.), and even any past girlfriends? Just bizarre. So little is really known about Barry O. And what glaring objectionable past escapades HAVE been brought to light (like Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Tony Resko's sweet deals for the Obama's on real estate) have immediately been dismissed by a media unwilling to dig any deeper or present all the facts. Yet, Herman Cain - simply a frontrunner for the GOP nomination for President - is being scrutinized, criticized, and condemned by a rabid press intent on destroying him. And if they succeed in bringing Cain down, Rick Perry WILL be next.
sharpaxe - Nov 05, 2011 6:46 PM
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f39_1180686387
reformed trucker - Nov 05, 2011 10:58 PM
Naw, I think it's more "I was for it before I was against it".
reformed trucker - Nov 05, 2011 11:19 PM
That's what I'm waiting to see, but his "smart guy" image would be popped. I think he is a moronic ideologue; I would love to debate him, and I would have a hatchetman at the ready to take out his teleprompter. :)
reformed trucker - Nov 05, 2011 11:31 PM
If Cain did get the nod, you could call anyone who voted for Obama "racist" because he's half white. ;)
ahemmer - Nov 06, 2011 9:03 AM
And why don't we know what Barack Obama's grades were in college? or who paid for him to attend college in the first place? No clue, yet Obama is sooo smart. Although, without his beloved teleprompter, he stumbles and bumbles and cannot put together a coherent sentence on his own...
As for the allegations against Cain, all it takes is for the press to throw out the mere hint of any inappropriate behavior. They are not able to back up the charges - and the so-called "victims" are unwilling to come forward, provide any details, and have their names used. So the press insists this is a story - with no facts - and runs with it - almost daily. (And the only version of "sexual harrassement" that has come out is that Cain once told one of his accusers that he thought she was as short as his wife - oh my goodness!!! The woman must have been mentally devastated!)
Think the same would happen if Cain was a Democrat? I didn't think so. We'd hear all about how what a politician does in their private life is none of our business. How these women were "bimbos" or "trailer trash" or "have big hair." The accusers would have been discounted and Cain would have been helped by the media - not trashed as they are doing now - if Cain were a Dem. The double-standard and hypocrisy of the media is alive and well.
Carl Hicks - Nov 06, 2011 10:41 AM
Well they can't break the gag order they agreed on with Cain in the legal settlement.
You know the settlement he forgot about.
Tom Bal - Nov 06, 2011 11:25 AM
Funny how when a state Justice accused another of chocking her everyone said: I’ll comment when I see the facts come forward.
Here we have she said he said again but your not waiting this time.
Never mind that they have no one coming forward to verify these accusations whether it’s true or not the damage has been done.
No wonder the MSM controls you people.
All republicans are guilty until proven innocent it’s the liberal way and even if this turns out to be false you already got what you wanted to stain his image.
Once he’s gone you can use your race card again.