Walker initiated John Doe investigation
Wisconsin finally has a governor- Scott Walker - whom we can be proud of. For the first time in many years, the state budget has been balanced - honestly. No shell games. No robbing from one fund to pay for another. No accounting gimmicks, making it appear that the budget was "balanced" only to learn later that it wasn't and the state was deep in the red. (Thanks Governor Doyle!) In addition, our second amendment rights have actually been upheld - allowing citizens to carry guns if they chose to. We also have the long overdue safeguard against voter fraud in place - yes, Voter ID has become a reality which so many of us wished for. And the "car-speed" rail train, destined to soak taxpayers for years to come, was derailed - exactly as Walker promised. Taxes did not increase, and in many cases taxes went down. Thousands did not lose their jobs in an effort to "balance the budget." Private companies are finally finding an accepting, positive business climate in Wisconsin, rather than thinking of fleeing the state due to excess rules, regulations, taxes, and fees. Governor Walker clearly has brought back Wisconsin from the brink of disaster and the malaise of the Doyle years.
Walker has been a refreshing, energizing change for our state. A true leader in every way. Walker has done exactly what he promised. No double-speak, lies, or misleading the people. We got who we voted for. Walker has stood firm in the face of reprehensible behaviors on the part of unionista's and the anti-Walker crowds, many whom are crying that their taxpayer-funded entitlements are being curtailed. To get our house in fiscal order, the taxpayers of Wisconsin cannot keep paying for the premium health care, retirements, and pensions of government employees. To do so is simply not sustainable. Common sense and reality are finally prevailing.
The fact is, the majority of Wisconsin voters elected Walker. Yet our votes at this time sure don't seem to matter, as the anti-Walker crowd wants to "disenfranchise" the many who elected our governor. Guess that "disenfranchising" is OK when one doesn't like it that a Republican/conservative was elected and is enacting legislation that a minority don't approve of. What blatant hypocrisy - but the left is famous for it.
So now the latest ploy in the anti-Walker campaign comes to fruition.
The long, drawn-out, John Doe investigation has finally reached somewhat of a conclusion. The media, who kept tantalizing the public with allusions that Walker and Walker co-horts were going down with what seemed to be a never-ending "John Doe" investigation, finally reported the story. Turns out that "Walker appointees" - Timothy Russell and Kevin Kavanaugh - were charged with embezzling more than $80,000.00. The money was supposed to go to military veterans and their families. Only one key point in this story has been glossed over or ignored by the media: the fact (yes, FACT) that County Executive Scott Walker AND his chief of staff - Tom Nardelli - were the two men who brought this criminal activity to the attention of the Milwaukee District Attorney - John Chisholm - in the first place.
This bears repeating: County Executive Scott Walker and his Chief of Staff Tom Nardelli helped set the whole "John Doe" investigation in motion!
Yet, the media sure seems reluctant to mention this very important fact. Why? Aren't journalists supposed to report the who, what, why, where, when, and how for a story? Why are they dragging their feet - or ignoring - the fact that Walker and Nardelli helped launch the John Doe investigation to begin with? Does the media think this is somehow not newsworthy? Imagine for one moment if there was a role reversal. Let's say that Jim Doyle had been the Milwaukee County Executive who started an investigation into bookkeeping concerns regarding Operation Freedom. Doyle goes on to become governor. After many months go by, the Milwaukee District Attorney discovers the embezzlement of funds meant to go to military families. Now, does anyone honestly think the news media would not have printed large headines regarding how Doyle played a key role in initiating the investigation in the first place? They would have tripped all over themselves to gush about what a hero Doyle was for bringing these two corrupt individuals to justice. The whole case would have been presented as a big politic boost for Doyle. Can the same be said for the way the media is treating Scott Walker?
What is also puzzling is the fact that when employees are caught embezzling funds (like Russell and Kavanaugh appear to have been doing), the employer is usually blameless and left out of the picture. In many cases, the employer (in this case, Walker) is usually portrayed sympathetically as a victim (and rightly so) - having been taken advantage of by the criminal activities of their employees who they hired and trusted. So why the over-use of the "Walker" name when reporting on this story to begin with? It's as though the media, by dropping Walker's name in with Russell and Kavanaugh at every opportunity, hopes people think "guilt by association," when this could not be further from the truth.
Bias in the media? An anti-Walker slant? Most definitely. Pay attention. Realize what the media is trying to do. Scott Walker - as County Executive - questioned where funds were going after his chief of staff, Tom Nardelli, brought concerns about bookkeeping issues regarding Operation Freedom, to Walker's attention. Walker and Nardelli then asked the District Attorney to look into the situation. Shouldn't Walker be given some credit for doing so? Guess not, as the media has an anti-Walker template that they have to abide by. Sigh.
At least WE can get the word out. Governor Walker is one of the best governors this state has ever had. Walker is a man of real character, honesty, beliefs, and faith. Walker is truly looking out for the people of Wisconsin. This recent "John Doe" investigation is yet another example of Walker doing the right thing. We must not allow him to be recalled by the misguided few who are only looking out for themselves, at the expense of all the taxpayers.
Walker deserves accolades for helping to initiate the "John Doe" investigation that eventually ended with the arrests of Tim Russell and Kevin Kavanaugh. He must not be thrown under the bus with these two men as though he conspired with them to rob military veterans of funding. That is not true, it never was, and the media should cease and desist in their obvious desire to smear Walker.
Spin can only go so far. In this case, spin is all the media has.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- 1984 (36)
- Our government has forgotten its place (42)
- Just a few observations... (95)
- Obama waves the white flag on the War on Terror (323)
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (267)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (261)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (236)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (297)
- Boston Massacre (257)
- What's missing? (243)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






112 Comments
WFB resident - Jan 07, 2012 10:46 AM
him dumb so they attack blindly . He then lowers the hammer on the other side
and the Dumocrats just look blank as he shows he is a great Boy Scout !! So they
harped on him for an entire 2 seasons on how corrupt he is and when it started
he just said that he will cooperate with athorities ,and that was it . Then in the
end he lets them know that he started the whoe thing to be a Great Boy Scout !! I
love Walker and what he has done for Wisconsin . Now do you think the media
will ever be unbiased and share the whole story with the wing nut Dumocrats ?
Time will tell .
Carl Hicks - Jan 07, 2012 11:37 AM
Hmmm
Carl Hicks - Jan 07, 2012 4:31 PM
funds. This non government entity was doing an excellent job at putting the
money to use as it was intended.
So much for less government interference in the privacy sector.
I just wonder what the reason for taking this money from the VFW was.
My personal bet is they thought they could make a few quick bucks investing it
but played a bad bet and lost it and Walker turned them in to cover his own
behind.
(Hey the whole blog post is mostly opinion and conjecture, so theirs mine )
WFB resident - Jan 07, 2012 5:09 PM
$60,000 !! Gosh you guys are slow !!
Carl Hicks - Jan 07, 2012 5:19 PM
believe you heard.
Where did I say he stole it?
How you can read the words try to make a few quite bucks from investing it into "
criminally steal " is a stretch.
Makes me wonder what you consider to be non criminal theft though.
WFB resident - Jan 07, 2012 8:36 PM
believe that for I am closer to being a Republican than a Dumocrat . The man is
indited for pilfering money and you anbd your friends are trying to blame it on
Walker . That is why I placed the word stealing there appropriatly ! I understand in
your circles that it is OK as long as you get aeway with it but everyone I deal with
would not do it and if they did I would be the first one to turn them in ! Just Like
Scott Walker !!
Carl Hicks - Jan 07, 2012 9:23 PM
Carl Hicks - Jan 07, 2012 9:26 PM
without a name.
Ooop
Carl Hicks - Jan 07, 2012 9:46 PM
I don't deal with that type either but I'm not a politician. But I believe politicians
from both parties " temporarily reappropriate " funds for personal gains
To a politician it's only unethical if you can't beat the rap. These two are most
likely Walkers' Scooter Libby.
It would be nice if I am way off base and Walker is acting responsibly. The guy has
been in politics for too long for me to give him the benefit of the doubt though.
BruceSpringsteen - Jan 07, 2012 11:08 PM
beginning of the end for him.
RECALL WALKER.
PS - anymore taxpayer funded trips to DC or Florida this upcoming week for our
Governor?
jhayett - Jan 08, 2012 12:49 AM
WFB resident - Jan 08, 2012 8:18 AM
BruceSpringsteen - Jan 08, 2012 8:33 AM
Governor? (to speak at a conservative think-tank gig which has nothing to do with
WI).
Your hypocrisy is one of many factors that contributes to your downfall, which
begins in 9 days.
CAN'T WAIT
WFB resident - Jan 08, 2012 8:42 AM
ahemmer - Jan 08, 2012 9:55 AM
The newspaper on Friday ran with headlines: "Walker appointees charged in John Doe investigation" (1/6/12). It isn't until paragraph four that they quote Walker as saying "his office had been responsible for raising initial concerns about bookkeeping at Operation Freedom." In Saturday's (1/7/12) paper, on the editorial page, the Urinal writes that, while Walker did the right thing in starting the John Doe, he should be given blame, too, for being buddies with the two men indicted. That little backhanded slap sure doesn't seem to give much credit to Walker.
And George, the news on television when this story broke did NOT mention the fact that Walker played a major role in starting the John Doe. People were talking about this fact on the radio the next day. Fox 6 News is pretty liberal - especially leftie anti-Walker reporter Mike Lowe - and they did not mention it. I know, I was watching.
BruceSpringsteen: I've asked you before, where in the world do you get the idea that 65% of Wisconsinites cannot stand Scott Walker? I'd love for you to cite a source. I've requested this before, but you haven't been able to provide any more info. Why?
As for Walker traveling to Washington D.C./Florida: Were you upset when Diamond Jim Doyle made a few trips to Spain to buy useless choo-choos' with the taxpayer dime? Or when he and his entourage made a trip to Cancun, Mexico (when Doyle was on his way out of office by the way) for a "climate change" conference?
Carl Hicks - Jan 08, 2012 10:59 AM
travel that it is ok for the current bum to do the same thing.
Carl Hicks - Jan 08, 2012 11:16 AM
Had it been so he would have let the VFW do what it had been doing very well on
it's own.
ahemmer - Jan 08, 2012 11:42 AM
Walker went to Washington D.C. this past April (2011) to testify at on budget reforms before the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform.
He was in Orlando Florida to attend a Republican Governor's Convention this past November (2011).
Over the Christmas holidays, he was in Washington D.C. to attend a Christmas party. This was part of his personal calendar, not his official calendar. And elected officials have two calendars: an official calendar and a personal calendar. They are not required to make their "personal" calendar public knowledge.
He was also recently in Washington D.C. to discuss strategy regarding recall efforts with the GOP and activitists - which is expected and he has every right to do (read: http://governorsjournal.com/2012/01/walker-to-d-c/). This occurred during the first week of January 2012.
A small blurb from the article states:
"The primary purpose behind Walker’s trip to Washington, D.C. is fundraising. The invitation documents point out that under state law, any Wisconsin public official targeted for a recall can “raise unlimited personal or PAC contributions while petitions are being circulated and throughout any legal challenges initiated by the elected official as to the validity of the signatures.”
I'd say that comparing the fun-n-sun travels of Diamond Jim Doyle to the work travels of Scott Walker is not the same.
Carl Hicks - Jan 08, 2012 1:03 PM
want it but it is still official business.
Personally I feel political fund raising trips should not be paid for by taxpayers!
This privilege is abused by too many politicians. Why should tax dollars be spent
to help politicians keep their jobs!
I also feel a sitting politician should relinquish their seat if campaigning for
a.higher office (must be nice to not have to show up to work as you try for a
promotion.
WFB resident - Jan 08, 2012 1:16 PM
politicians not people to you ?