A.B.O.
As a veteran political observer, I have been encouraging myself to comment on the current primary battle among the Republican presidential hopefuls. With a red face, I confess that I am singularly uniinspired. This is a lackluster group of wannabe's to say the least.
My personal favorite, Herman Cain, sadly is gone. I liked him mainly because he was a black conservative, which gave liberal black apologists like Eugene Kane fits. I did like his political philosophy, though. Predictably, Democrats managed to dig up irrelevant dirt on him, primarily I think because they feared him, and picked him off.
I sort-of liked Michelle Bachman, but she impressed me as a lightweight and not what I would think of as being presidential material. (No, that's not sexist!) Anyway, I couldn't stomach another Michelle in the White House. (Joke!)
Newt is a seasoned politician and a pretty knowledgeable guy, based on his television commentaries, but I think he's got more baggage that Southwest Airlines, which would make for a field day for the opposition. Also, I don't like his immigration stance. I don't believe amnesty in any of its permutations is the answer, at least not without first achieving firm control of the border.That also goes for the linguistically-challenged Rick Perry.
Next we have the Democrats' favorite RINO candidate, Mitt Romneycare. I'm not a fan of Mormonism but that's not the real issue, just as Catholicism was not an issue for JFK. I don't see him taking marching orders from the Grand High Poobah in Salt Lake City. I do think he will and has say/said anything to get elected. Not that that's unusual in politics today, but I think Mitt wants it so bad he will compromise any of his core principles to reach his goal. I simply don't trust that. Maybe I'm still spoiled by Reagan who stuck to his principles no matter what.
I have little to say about Ron Paul. I consider Libertarians as being basically unrealistic. Having the goal of significantly reducing the size of government is a little like the Man of LaMancha going after windmills. (Actually, that's not a bad idea today, but that's another subject.) I think he's a bit of a flake and--this really hurts me to say--too old for eight years in the White House.
Now to the current conservative darling, Rick Santorum. I'll be honest; I simply don't know him or have a clear impression. I like what I read but don't put much credence in it. He's a possibility, but for now the jury's out. He's got Romney worried, which is a good thing.
So, where are we in this 7-ring circus? Okay, I'll say what many are thinking: A.B.O.---Anybody But Obama. I fear that four more years of Mr. Obama in power, without the constraint of re-election, is a clear and present danger to this nation. I don't think he likes the United States, at least not as a world superpower. I characterized him during the campaign as an empty suit, and I stand by that. He is influenced by a small circle of advisors whom I do not trust. This will not sit well with many of you, but I fear for the survival of my country as I know and love it with four more years of President Obama.
So, I will vote for the Republican, whoever he turns out to be. I may again have to enter the polling place with a clothespin on my nose. I know that's a bit irresponsible, but I don't see any other choice.
P.S. Maybe Hillary will find a way to bump him out. Hmmmm, interesting thought. That would make for a really interesting race.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






145 Comments
Carl Hicks - Jan 10, 2012 6:14 PM
reformed trucker - Jan 10, 2012 7:37 PM
At least Newt's baggage would fly for free...
reformed trucker - Jan 10, 2012 7:42 PM
Ouch. I would have preferred "idealistic". :)
reformed trucker - Jan 10, 2012 7:46 PM
Good luck on a theocracy around here.
Carl Hicks - Jan 10, 2012 8:43 PM
WFB resident - Jan 10, 2012 9:41 PM
comments . Sorry RT ! lol...
sirlaughsalittle - Jan 11, 2012 7:09 AM
Oh please, there's no way that Reagan would pass today's Tebagger ideological
purity test. And if he were a Wisconsinite he'd be standing on a corner
somewhere soliciting signatures:
"Collective bargaining in the years since has played a major role in America’s
economic miracle. Unions represent some of the freest institutions in this land.
There are few finer examples of participatory democracy to be found anywhere.
Too often, discussion about the labor movement concentrates on disputes,
corruption, and strikes. But while these things are headlines, there are thousands
of good agreements reached and put into practice every year without a hitch."
Lincoln would be embarrassed at what has become of the party of Lincoln.
MGarber - Jan 11, 2012 8:19 AM
http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/romney.png
MGarber - Jan 11, 2012 10:13 AM
Dont you mean "Reagan would be ...."
I said it before: Reagan would clearly be considered a RINO today.
sharpaxe - Jan 11, 2012 10:55 AM
As far as the empty suit, it's no big surprise there's no comments defending him. I know it's a fresh topic, but don't look for any soon, at least logical ones that is.
ExToDResident - Jan 11, 2012 12:40 PM
because Romney is the front runner at this time. According to the poll if the
election were held when the poll was taken Obama would beat Romney 50% to
48%.
I guess we need the republican ghost candidate to run, if Obama is to be removed
from office.
Carl Hicks - Jan 11, 2012 12:59 PM
one getting one. Bain received a $10M bailout from the FDIC in 1991.
And only feels others should pay taxes as he hides his money in the Grand
Cayman islands.
Carl Hicks - Jan 11, 2012 2:27 PM
He is the only one that actually wants smaller government.
His stance on ending our imperialistic foreign policies is the only sustainable long
term plan for this country.
His message of a return to sound money and wanting the federal reserve audited
would do a lot to turn this economy around.
And last but not least he is the only politician in Washington that understands
terrorism. It is western interference in the middle east, not the fallacy that
because they hate freedom. If they hate freedom then explain the uprising
against oppressive government. If we stopped supporting oil company friendly
oppressive dictatorships, terrorism would die.
MGarber - Jan 11, 2012 2:45 PM
The 2 are not mutually exclusive.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/23/us-usa-campaign-paul-plots-idUSTRE7BM03320111223
Make sure you get a gander of the referenced http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/11/12/Solicitation2.pdf newsletter. In all fairness, theres no proof that he was the actual author.
He also was (up til very recently) a frequent guest of Alex Jones whose Flake index is inarguably unparalleled.
WFB resident - Jan 11, 2012 2:52 PM
Carl Hicks - Jan 11, 2012 3:31 PM
extreme, but Paul has had a big struggle getting airtime from left or right wing
media, so I'll give him a pass on getting desperate for exposure.
I personally believe the owners of mainstream media like FOX, MSNBC and CNN
do not want people to hear his views since it conflicts with what they want us to
hear.
MGarber - Jan 11, 2012 3:50 PM
Ill be the 1st to agree that the mainstream media's 1st and formost fault is that it shys away from anything that is both unconventional and non-commercial. That combination, in their minds, equals a drop in ratings and advertiser support. Which Im loath to actually believe. But seeing how, for example, Lowes pulled their ads from a "controversial" show make me realize how many spineless entities there are these days.
Jacob Pickard - Jan 11, 2012 5:25 PM
I'll vote for Obama.
The republican field is terrible this year, you got racists like Newt, Santorum & Ron Paul, and the only decent candidate who is conservative but has a moderate streak in 2nd to last place.
As long as the circus maxmus of the Republican Primary lasts the better it is for democrats and non conservative extremists in 2012.
WFB resident - Jan 11, 2012 6:13 PM
Carl Hicks - Jan 11, 2012 6:43 PM
interesting. Republicans would never have accepted his idea that the downturn
was the fault of Wall St,instead of blaming a piece of legislation from that 70s
(which had been rewritten so many times I doubt any of the original language
was still even there.