A subtle blend of politics, sports, and music blended together and seen through the eyes of a young adult.
Walker-Gate: Wisconsin's Most Recent and Developing Scandal
I haven’t written anything for a while because I’ve been quite busy personally and I’ve been waiting for this whole John Doe thing to be blown completely wide open. While I’m still as busy as ever, the whole John Doe thing is now starting to become a monster that I believe will eventually someday be known as Walker-gate.
Anyone who is still defending Walker at this point is downright unintelligent. I’ve tried to think of ways to say that nicer, but I just can’t. The man is clearly involved in the illegal things that have been going on since the time he was elected to County Executive, and almost no one can honestly believe otherwise. So far, 4 of his aides/people he put into positions of power have been indicted on various counts of corruption, fraud, and money laundering. Two of them sicken me the most, as I have a friend who is in the Air Force and I don’t tolerate anything that has to do with ripping veterans off. Great people Walker chooses to trust running county/state programs, huh?
The simple fact that Walker’s former assistant chief of staff is involved with this whole scandal makes the story to seem pretty much over- Walker knew about the vast majority of the things that were going on. It would be ludicrous to think that he wouldn’t have known about all these things, as shown by how close to him some of these indicted people were/are.
All that the prosecutors need now is evidence to charge good ol’ Scotty with some charges of corruption, voter fraud, bribery, or other various illegal crimes and throw him out of office. Recall? Think more like resignation.
What kind of evidence could they use to do this? Supposedly, according to one of his former aides, there was a massive network set up on the side that Walker’s aides ran to talk about all the illegal things they were doing, i.e. campaigning on county time, taking kickbacks, soliciting support, etc. A major part of this network was numerous amounts of e-mails sent back and forth between people within it. Supposedly, some of these e-mails claim that Walker knew what was going on and was giving instructions accordingly. However, the funny thing is that these e-mails have magically disappeared. According to former aides, orders were given to disable the network and delete and erase all traces of it once Walker started his campaign for governor, or right after he was elected governor. If one of these aides testifies about these e-mails or can somehow produce them, that’s game over.
Scott Walker should stop with his gimmicks as well. He’s trying to play Mr. Innocent and emphasize the fact that he is cooperating with the law. Really sir? Why’d you just hire two defense lawyers then? An innocent man who shouldn’t have to prove anything (as he’s claimed he is) has no use for defense lawyers. Something is fishy here….
Going along with that, a phenomenal article was published in the Journal Sentinel yesterday explaining some quotes Scott Walker made back in 2006. During that year, a former aide of Governor Jim Doyle was charged with corruption and found guilty. When it was made public, Walker made a HUGE stink about it, saying Doyle should be held accountable because it was his aide that was charged. Walker went on to say that anyone even remotely close to the Governor is his responsibility, and he used this line to attack Doyle before losing the eventual GOP nomination. Hmmm, wait a second. Scott Walker said that if a politician’s aides are found guilty of breaking the law, they should be held accountable? WHAT?!
Yea, good job being a hypocrite Scotty. 6 years ago, Walker stated that politicians should be responsible for their aides’ behavior and resign if they break the law. Walker, however, has done the exact opposite of that. Instead of accepting responsibility and resigning, Walker is denying and staying right where he is. Seems like a bit of a flip-flopping, law-breaking, long-nosed Nixonian if there ever was one!
Either way, Walker will, eventually, be charged in this John Doe thing if they can find the electronic evidence. When it happens, the whole house of cards that Walker has built over the last year will come tumbling down. I just hope there’s a good politician, a uniter, who will be able to swoop in and heal the divides that Walker has created.
Kathleen Falk isn’t it. Tammy Baldwin isn’t it. Tommy Thompson or Russ Feingold, I’m looking at you at people just like you. They aren't perfect, but man, they brought people together if people would just listen to them.
P.S. Glad to see Tom Brady suck the big one last night. I don't care for Eli too much but I still hate Brady and his Cheating Coach more than anything.

We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- A Change in Topic (101)
- I'm Back! Post-Florida Update (34)
- I Said What?! (Don't Worry, My Old Views Are Still Here Too) (48)
- A Short Little Conversation with a Walker Lover (107)
- Walker-Gate: Wisconsin's Most Recent and Developing Scandal (165)
- Here's To a Happy Beginning To The Holiday Season! (25)
- The Shame of Joe Paterno (57)
- Long Time, No See (120)
- A Short Story: "There's A Bad Moon on the Rise" (33)
- Release the Photos. We Deserve to See Them. (76)
- More A Day in Ion Square posts





161 Comments
WFB resident - Feb 10, 2012 11:58 PM
I do not care . When a person is in discussions with these individuals you talk about
everything to gain their confidence . Since Politics is one of my enjoyments . Asking
about their opinions was and is fascinating to me . Try it some time . You probably
will not for you hide from the truth .
ExToDResident - Feb 11, 2012 12:26 PM
ask them what their income was before they were incarcerated? Or did you ask
them about their education? Or if they held a political office?
Not that any of these questions represent any form of a statistical study, or even
means anything at all. But you would have found that the greater majority of them
come from the lower runs of society. In fact I would be surprised if any of them
were from the upper tiers of society.
A reading suggestion; The Rich get Richer and the Poor Get Prison.
ExToDResident - Feb 11, 2012 3:52 PM
that felons cannot vote.
So explain again how who the people in prison (who you supposedly "helped")
voted for proves that the "righties" are far less likely to commit crimes.
WFB resident - Feb 11, 2012 7:11 PM
not say smart people , or educated people , or politicians ! I said ask most and most
will tell you they are and did vote Dumocrat !! That is all !! I was wondering after
they have served their time are they able to vote again ? Minty you must be a
Dumocrat . lol...
ExToDResident - Feb 11, 2012 7:22 PM
ExToDResident - Feb 11, 2012 7:25 PM
incarcerated means and proves nothing at all.
WFB resident - Feb 12, 2012 12:36 AM
people what they do . lol... You are a gift . "ExToDResident - Feb 11, 2012 7:25 PM
FYI (just in case you haven't figured it out yet) asking people that are/were
incarcerated means and proves nothing at all." .......You are so smart . So Minty who
do you ask if you want to find out about somebody ? lol... New name for you (Minty
gift) !! lol...
ExToDResident - Feb 12, 2012 9:27 AM
You are so stupid. I have a hunch that the "college course" you took was the GED
program. Considering your remedial writing skills you didn't pass it.
"You are a gift ."
You are right, it is time to stop feeding the troll.
Tom Bal - Feb 12, 2012 10:35 AM
The investigation is just that to find if any proof of wrong doing exists.
Another is secrecy these investigations all have secrecy orders handed down with them. John does are in place to compel people to talk knowing full well that what they say is done in strict confidence from public option.
Someone has been leaking information to the media once again with absolutely no proof of guilt and you have fallen right into their hands.
Peoples life’s are at stake along with reputations names have been named but charges haven’t been filed toward them but you decided to find them guilty by association. How do these people get their reputations back if indeed they are never charged with anything?
My question would be who’s doing the leaking and why isn’t it being stopped, Where’s the FBI now?
Why the anonymity and most importantly why now during a recall is this so called scandal coming to light?
As for myself I would like to start hearing more cold hard facts and less he said she said anonynamust rhetoric sooner than later. I really don’t want to see this dragged into the recall intentionally just to leave doubt about an innocent person. Either charge him or clear him and soon. Don’t you people ever get tired of playing dirty?
WFB resident - Feb 12, 2012 1:18 PM
lol... Where are the headlines for those Dumocrat scandals ? Why are those OK to
bury ?
ExToDResident - Feb 12, 2012 3:55 PM
any guilty by association talk should be stifled.
But when the target of the guilt by association talk is about a "liberal" democrat
then everyone is supposed to join the choir.
reformed trucker - Feb 12, 2012 5:14 PM
sharpaxe
Don't forget stealing $1.3 BILLION from the transportation fund. It's bad enough I get
raped in fuel taxes, but apparently it's O.K. to steal food out of my children's mouths
to fund unsustainable benefits for teachers. It's a.o.k. to steal from blue collar
workers to fund the educational elite.
reformed trucker - Feb 12, 2012 5:31 PM
xtdr
I hate to interrupt your and irked's pizzing match, but are you implying low
income people are unethical out of necessity?
"Or did you ask them about their education?"
O.K., now I REALLY hope you're not implying anyone without a college education
is stupid. More times than not, that diploma is only fit for use as T.P.
"A reading suggestion; "The Rich get Richer and the Poor Get Prison".
Author? Thanks for heaping on my reading list. ;)
FYI, I'm really enjoying "The Monster from Jekyll Island". Great recommendation.
reformed trucker - Feb 12, 2012 5:45 PM
Please stop quoting Libertarians when it suits your need... or switch over to "the
dark side".
On second thought, don't.
reformed trucker - Feb 12, 2012 5:53 PM
Since I don't know how to cut-and-paste, whenever I interact with a comment, I'll
write down the quote so I don't misquote. On the back of the piece of paper that
I wrote down the last few quotes, I found this:
"RT... then why do you defend Obama and some of the very vile and hate-filled
liberals/libertarians? I know you are old friends with one." - the Jimmers
I have never been an Obama fan, but I must have made the mistake of agreeing
with Carl on something.
Priceless.
Carl Hicks - Feb 12, 2012 7:28 PM
da jimmer just never recovered from that UFO abduction!
You know it is just because you have never blamed Obama for things like WW2 or
traffic jams.Should we tell him we haven't really spoke since the 80's?Nah let him
have his fantasies, we all need those (which by the way after my power ball ticket
wins on Wednesday what kind of truck you want, I'm buying, all you got to do is
bring me some traffic bond for my driveway ).
Creature is a good read, he does go a little conspiracy theorist,but the historical
parts of the book are fascinating.
Carl Hicks - Feb 12, 2012 7:42 PM
an A & an O & a B he confuses the two. I haven't really defended him so much as
called people out on the honesty of claims made against him.
Just because I don't like someone it isn't an excuse to make up stories about
them! LOL with My voting record he should wish I have or will vote for him since I
haven't picked a winner in 30 years of voting for presidents.
Carl Hicks - Feb 12, 2012 8:01 PM
Secrets of the Temple
How the federal reserve runs the country
William Greider
Fyi Google how copy and paste LOL I was going to write it a lot out but not
knowing if you use a desktop, laptop or phone, etcetera I figured I wouldn't help
any giving the wrong directions
ExToDResident - Feb 12, 2012 8:06 PM
I wasn’t trying to imply that low income people are unethical out of necessity. However, (what I was actually implying was) the poor (or low income) people usually cannot afford the “best” lawyers like the more “well to do” or upper income brackets. Because of not being able to afford a “better” lawyer they are generally (but not always, depending on other mitigating factors)
“"Or did you ask them about their education?"…O.K., now I REALLY hope you're not implying anyone without a college education is stupid. More times than not, that diploma is only fit for use as T.P.”
And no I am not implying that anyone without a college education is stupid either. However, in most companies opportunities are withheld from those without a Bachelor degree. This creates a ceiling which limits the average person from advancement. (However this isn’t true in all cases a person who is exceptional at a task or job can rise above this ceiling, Steve Jobs is a prime example.) (Somehow I get the feeling I am digging a deeper hole for myself.)
“"A reading suggestion; "The Rich get Richer and the Poor Get Prison".
Author? …Jeffrey Reiman .( I have a copy in my 1,400 book library, however I just moved and it is still packed away so I didn’t have the book readily available to check the author when I made the suggestion.)
ExToDResident - Feb 12, 2012 8:21 PM
Sorry, but I was actually attempting to further irked’s (or as I affectionately refer to him as Wanting For Brains) education, not yours.
“The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison” is a critique of the criminal “justice” system. Basically the author states that the primary purpose of the criminal “justice” system was created to insure that anyone who has been incarcerated becomes a repeat offender. The secondary purpose is to take the attention away from the “white collar” criminal. (I have a number of books which I started but never finished, for various reasons, this is one of them, so far I Just read the intro.)
“FYI, I'm really enjoying "The Monster from Jekyll Island". Great recommendation.”
I have wanted to ask you how you were doing on “The Monster from Jekyll Island”.
BTW, I just started Carroll Quigley’s tome “Tragedy and Hope” (only 1,248 pages to go) also a good read, from what I have read so far.
Here is a link to the book on my favorite used/new book site.
http://www.alibris.com/booksearch?title=rich+get+richer+and+the+poor+get+prison&mtype=B