The Masque Cometh Away
Futurist Alvin Toffler once said, "We are advancing the sophistication of deception faster than the technology of verification. The consequence of this is the end of truth." We have been subjected to a blizzard of deception concerning this Wisconsin recall mudpit for months now. Columnists, spokespersons, seminar letter writers and assorted pundits have been listing a litany of vile transgressions by Governor Scott Walker and his Republican supporters to justify spending $10 million in an eruption of so-called democracy to save us from this evil dictator in the State Capitol.
He has been accused of depriving school children of an education, disenfranchising 80,000 of our elderly, depriving the disadvantaged of health care and the working class of their livlihood. He is accused of taxing the poor to benefit the rich, who are his only friends, as well as despoiling our environment.. He is also accused of lying by omission by not explaining in detail how he planned to eliminate a $3.59 billion largely structural deficit. (Yes, I know, there's still a piece of structural deficit left if you employ GAAP, which no-one has done in Madison since the Civil War. O.K., he materially cut the structural deficit.) Of course, no-one asked.
Finally, this past week the "masque" came off. As I have maintained right along, this whole six months of recall mania was and is about a single issue: union money and power. As Marquette University Professor Walter Farrell used to say, "Follow the money." The largest Wisconsin teachers' union, WEAC, corralled the potential Democrat Governor candidates and demanded that they--as Governor--agree to veto any state budget that does not contain a restoration of collective bargaining rights. Only one candidate agreed: flaming Madison liberal Kathleen Falk. (Surprise!) WEAC immediately endorsed her candidacy. There was no mention of any other issue.
Unions, especially public service unions, have become big business. WEAC even runs a health insurance business that they crammed down the throats of school district administrations in their so-called collective bargaining sessions. Union leaders command substantial salaries, well into six figures. They employ hundreds of administrative personnel. This is all funded solely by union dues. Anything that threatens the union dues golden goose must of needs strike fear into their hearts and that's exactly what Walker's and the Republicans' ACT 10 legislation does by breaking the stranglehold WEAC and other teachers' unions had on school districts.
Loss of collective bargaining rights for benefits--something most other unions do not have!--pulls most of their teeth and greatly reduces their influence. This, coupled with the elimination of dues checkoff (automatic union dues payroll deduction), threatens to materially reduce membership as teachers and others who disagree with union politics bail out, something that already is taking place. They've also lost their health insurance monopoly, resulting in major layoffs and requiring competitive bidding which forces them to reduce premiums to compete with private insurers.
Thus, this whole taxpayer-funded recall movement is about one single issue: union dues. The rest is all smoke and mirrors. Democracy my ----! Tell me, Wisconsinites, do you want to spend millions of your money just to maintain union fatcats?
Sorry, folks, but it's too late to stop this travesty. All we can do is ensure that their plan fails. Get out there and vote! Don't let the union special interests carry the day.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






65 Comments
reformed trucker - Feb 12, 2012 8:54 PM
deduction)..." - Al
I still maintain if Walker would have kept this in place, we wouldn't have heard nary
a peep from the unions. They throw their members under the bus all the time; they
care about the money and power.
WFB resident - Feb 12, 2012 8:56 PM
Jacob Pickard - Feb 12, 2012 9:20 PM
The jerrymandering redistricting plan were republicans representatives signed a silence agreement with a law firm trumping open government to their own constiuents?
There's more to this recall than union's Al and it is a democratic right in this state written into the State constitution by Republicans in the late 1920's.
You are on the wrong side of princple's Al, when did you sell out to put ideology over ethics???
Jacob Pickard - Feb 12, 2012 9:30 PM
The travesty is that conservatives (not all but most) on the right hate anything left of your view so much you will let yourself be conned by the first smooth talking pretty boy, and when it comes time to take your own to task, suddenly your princples disappear and end up defending the conn.
Seriously you are soon to have your Rob Blagovich moment, how many on the right will go down with the ship defending a con man called Scott Walker.
WFB resident - Feb 13, 2012 7:11 AM
So the concentration of legislative power into the governor's office is not an issue?
Of course it is Jason ! That is why we need Governors to have some also ! The o
has been over powering all . From new czars with no accountability to hihering tax
cheats ! I am glad to see that you care enough to take some of the power away
from the little man child .Then we get to another slow thinking comment , Jacob
Pickard - Feb 12, 2012 9:30 PM» Report abuse 0 0 Click thumb to rate
As well as John Doe and Walker's either flaming incompetance of keeping his
people from breaking campaign law on MY taxpayer dime and money laundering
or willfull ignorance to his Koch brother benefactors who do not have your or my
intrests in mind.I ask you what proof do you have other than a fake call to Walker
,and Walker being nice toi the individual (like we all are when on the phone) do
you have that they have control over Walker ? Your comment is unfounded and
childish at the least . As for the so-called incompetence , Walker has a higher up
His name is the o . SO since you want to play who should be at fault . lol... How
about just blaming the criminal not the person who did not do it ? Or do you feel
that we should start jailing all who are friends with criminals ? Watch out for you
befriended the o and he is with Bill Aires . Comrade Jakob
sharpaxe - Feb 13, 2012 9:25 AM
Al - Excellent blog, once again. I agree, it's all about union dues, nothing more, nothing less. It's very simple. Do I deserve having a choice to belong to a union? Of course. Is collective bargaining a right? No. Do I deserve to have a voice at the CB table? Yes. Did making public sector employees help pay more bankrupt them? No. Not even close. (shared sacrifice, right?) Did our taxes go up? No. Etc...Etc...Etc...
Now, you might get an argument stating the unions already conceded paying more for their bennies, but not CB. That defense has been blown apart so many times, I would be surprised (not really) if that weak attempt will be made again.
yert49 - Feb 13, 2012 5:35 PM
Even Bill Clinton can get that!
jhayett - Feb 13, 2012 6:35 PM
"Teachers Union Leader Says NEA About Power, Not Kids"
http://www.thehotjoints.com/2011/02/25/video-flashback-teachers-union-leader-says-nea-about-power-not-kids/
Did you remember last years ads against Walker where kids are sitting on the floor because Walker's cuts took away their desk and chairs and "A TV ad by the liberal Greater Wisconsin Committee uses interview clips to hammer Walker for backing business tax breaks while reducing state support for local schools." Both found to be completely false. the kids pictured where in gym class.
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2011/dec/23/greater-wisconsin-committee/greater-wisconsin-committee-says-cuts-school-aid-l/
sirlaughsalittle - Feb 14, 2012 7:03 AM
Sorry, but I don't feel an ounce of sympathy for Scotty boy. Because everything
that's occurring to him is a result of the actions that were taken by him. The truth
is if he had campaigned on eliminating collective bargaining he wouldn't have
been elected. And we wouldn't be having this discussion regarding a recall had
he conceded to not taking away collective bargaining rights when the offer was
made a year ago. So, if you have any complaints about the 10 mil, blame it on
your beloved Scotty.
Yes, the masque is off. And what's been revealed is a secretive, deceptive
conman. This clown is up to his neck in corruption, and the only thing you boys
can do is shower him with adoration? ... I guess it's true, love is blind. But don't
expect any of that man-love to be reciprocated, rumor has it Scotty boy is pretty
tight with one john doe. Hey, maybe you guys could get together and cuddle with
one another.
sirlaughsalittle - Feb 14, 2012 7:18 AM
most exalted tax and spend, freedom loving Republican union president of all time,
suck on this:
"where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost."
God Ron
jhayett - Feb 14, 2012 8:02 AM
Regardless of your opinion, Walker still would have won. All that Walker passed in the collective bargaining is for Gov employee’s to “pay their fair share” with their pension and healthcare benefits that we all have to pay. That’s it sirliesalot. But that phrase and idea seems to be “fair” only when Obama wants to use it but not Walker. Hmmm!
jhayett - Feb 14, 2012 8:16 AM
"On using Gov. Scott Walker’s collective-bargaining limits to help balance the city of Milwaukee budget"
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2011/oct/27/tom-barrett/using-gov-scott-walkers-collective-bargaining-limi/
WFB resident - Feb 14, 2012 8:54 AM
to kick many more % of money to our collective dollars to be fair . GGGGGOOOOOO
Walker !! (I Love you Man ) lol...
sirlaughsalittle - Feb 14, 2012 9:55 AM
constitution, and therefore not "inherently from our creator".
Yeah, right. I suppose the right to bear arms is from our creator? What an idiot.
This is your brain on religion, folks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObW-Hr9Uho4&feature=player_embedded
WFB resident - Feb 14, 2012 4:24 PM
he is, your analogy is what was flawed ! But we have come to expect that from you .
Jacob Pickard - Feb 14, 2012 4:56 PM
You will have your mafleasence. Unless of course you approve of the lesser of 2 of Walker's evils being overwhelming incompatence.
sirlaughsalittle - Feb 14, 2012 5:55 PM
Does there need to be? After all, collective bargaining is the defining issue. It is
unquestionably the impetus for the recall movement.
I know it's been repeated endlessly on AM talk radio that the reason is union
power and money. And I know that if something is repeated often enough the
slow-thinkers will mindlessly latch on to it. But the truth of the matter is, the
majority of the million plus who signed the recall petitions are not union
members. They're just ordinary citizens like me who recognizes injustice when
he sees it. Yes, injustice, there's nothing fair about taking away the bargaining
rights of one group while allowing for another's to remain. And we all know it
was a lie that it was necessary in order to balance the budget. He as much
admitted so during a congressional hearing. It's all about union busting. It's
nothing less than a despicable power grab.
WFB resident - Feb 14, 2012 7:13 PM
year and the unions gave up nothing . They even received raises in most cases ! Yet
they repeated to you over and over how Walker did not need to so-called "break the
unions" That repeated lie you actually did take . lol...
reformed trucker - Feb 14, 2012 7:47 PM
Where to start...
"taking away collective bargaining RIGHTS" - sir
Like Hitler said, repeat a lie loud enough and long enough, and people will start
believing it (like you).
So, they're not a privilege that was abused, but rather a "right"?
Federal workers and state workers in many states don't have this "right".
We need to recall Obama. You lead the charge (as not to be a hypocrite).
reformed trucker - Feb 14, 2012 7:58 PM
Like the Johnny Thomas corruption?
wispolitics.com/1006/120202_Johnny_Thomas_complaint.pdf
Isn't he under Able and Barrett? They should both step down.
And all those e-mails being sent out by MPS teachers about political activity from
government computers? Barrett REALLY needs to step down; that's his baby! We
need a John Doe investigation/witch hunt!!!
Just so you don't look like a flaming hypocrite, I'm sure you'll approve.