Mayor of Occupy Milwaukee
What do most of the Occupy (insert name of city here) protesters have in common?
- they have a lot of free time to camp out, sing songs, yell, defecate and urinate in public, consume alcoholic beverages, share their drug stashes, indulge in sexual escapades, and cause general mayhem - leaving filthy cesspools in their wake for others to clean up (at taxpayer expense). After all is said and done, we don't know what their goals really are - or if they even have any.
- they don't seem to like work
- they don't like successful private businesses or people who are employed by successful private businesses
- they seem to abhor the fact that successful businesses make (here comes that dreadful word) profits! By using utter contempt when saying the word "profits," the Occupy crowd seems to think that all business owners are greedy and evil.
- they appear to to believe that everyone owes them a living - that they deserve "their fair share" without having to lift a finger
With this all in mind, Mayor Tom Barrett would be an ideal candidate to lead the Occupy Milwaukee crowd - if such a group decides to camp out and trash any of the public parks in his own city.
Why would Barrett be a shoo-in for leading the losers of the nation? Simply because there are many similarities between the Occupy protesters and the Mayor of the city of Milwaukee.
1) Just like the Occupy crowds, Barrett has contributed very little to Milwaukee during his terms as Mayor. Tom Barrett has been the Mayor of Milwaukee since 2004. Yet, does Barrett have any major accomplishments of which to speak since he has been mayor? Can anyone think of anything? Has the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District stopped dumping poop directly into Lake Michigan every time there is a thunderstorm? Has Mayor Barrett overseen vast improvements in education in the Milwaukee Public School System - after yet another round of school violence and pathetic graduation rates? Has Mayor Barrett done anything to address every-increasing property taxes in Milwaukee County ? What has Mayor Barrett done to help revitalize the ghost town known as the Grand Avenue Mall? Has Mayor Barrett, with all the tax money and social programs out there, solved the poverty of the inner city? NO. So, in essence, Barrett isn't really working - he's doing nothing. Same as the Occupy crowds.
2) Real jobs - those offering honest-to-goodness employment- are leaving Milwaukee. And what does Barrett have to say? Not a whole lot besides a "goodbye." Recently Frontier Airlines announced they were cutting 450 jobs from Mitchell International Airport. Barrett had a "heads-up" on this - since 2009. What is very interesting is that Denver, Colorado stands to gain a few thousand jobs from this very same airline for agreeing to nix four very pricey taxes that the airlines had been saddled with.
3) Kohl's Corporation just said "no" to building a new headquarters and parking structure in downtown Milwaukee. Seems that Kohls would have faced much higher property taxes if they relocated to the Park East area than if they chose a site in the suburbs. However, this isn't really what is key to the story. How come Mayor Barrett isn't doing ANYTHING to attract out-of-state businesses to the downtown area? Why bother with local Wisconsin companies? All that serves is to take away the tax base from one area of the state and move it to another.
What is really interesting is all of this is that Mayor Barrett did offer some cash ($100 million in public financing assistance) to Kohls to relocate downtown. SAY WHAT? A liberal politician offering money to a big corporation! Why, first off - where did this money come from? Do Barrett and County Executive Chris Abele have a "stash" somewhere like Obama does? And if so, why aren't the lefties outraged that Barrett would do such a thing!?! Before anyone points out that this really isn't part of the Occupy Crowd's creed - yes it is. What Barrett did is an example of the total hypocrisy of the left. They cry and moan about "big business" and all the "greed" and "corruption" of anyone who is successful in business, but then they offer MONEY for a big company to move to their neck of the woods? C'mon Tom! You let all your liberal followers down.
Barrett did say after Kohl's representatives nixed moving to Milwaukee: "I couldn't be prouder of the effort we made." (Think that weak little sentiment would have won accolades from Vince "winning isn't everything, it's the only thing" Lombardi?). What is so typical of liberalism is the idea that mediocrity deserves celebration. The very notion of having "winners" or "losers" is bad because it might hurt someone's oh-so-delicate self-esteem. Let's pat ourselves on the back for failure - but it was great that we really tried! Gold medals all around!
So now Milwaukee continues to be a city in decline, but never fear - soon there will be a $65 million dollar waste-of-taxpayer-money trolley that travels around in a circle, thanks Mayor Barrett!
4) And now for the kicker - Mayor Tom "do nothing" Barrett actually has the gall to complain about Governor Scott Walker using some of the $140 million dollars the state of Wisconsin will receive in a federal foreclosure funds settlement to help the state budget. Walker has said that he will use $26 million to apply to the budget to help taxpayers and the needy. So Barrett is now feigning outrage. Why? Seems Barrett wants a hand-out - just like the Occupy protesters. He wants the money for Milwaukee. Yet, as Governor Walker pointed out, the foreclosure issue hit many - affecting unemployment levels and hurting all taxpayers in the state. And the majority of the foreclosure dollars WILL go to those affected by the situation. Whether it was due to loans being made to people who could ill-afford them in the first place or those who had no business purchasing homes they had no means of paying for. (This all goes back to the Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac fiasco and horrible lending practices the federal government forced upon the banks with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.) Funny how none of the liberals can point fingers at the true cause of the debacle, but instead get upset at Governor Walker. Similar to President Barack Hussein Obama pointing his finger and blaming Bush for all his own messes - three-plus years into his disastrous presidency.
5) When Barrett and the city of Milwaukee face any major problem, the root cause is never addressed. Rather, the problems are blamed on "society" in general. Case in point, the recent rash of "co-sleeping" deaths. With the usual sleight-of-hand from elected officials in Milwaukee - including Barrett, drunk and/or drugged out adults who smother their infants to death while passed out are never taken to task. Nope. Cannot fault those who should know better and act responsibly - like PARENTS! Instead, let's pass out free cribs and hang up a few disturbing posters about the dangers of "co-sleeping!" Never mind that drunk/drugged out adults probably will ignore the message, and the problem will persist until such irresponsible losers are tossed in the slammer.
In summary, when attempting to find ANY, just ANY of Mayor Tom Barrett's accomplishments, the following popped up: he's a member of Mayors Against Illegal Guns Coalition. He recently announced a goal to reduce infant mortality in Milwaukee by 10% (free cribs!). He has a vision to bring cleaner air and a healthier environment to Milwaukee. He really wants to go green - the latest fad du jour. He wishes to bring family-supporting jobs to his city. He tried REALLY hard to bring Kohls to Milwaukee. He ran for governor and lost, not once - but twice. And let's not forget the idiotic streetcar project to the tune of $65 million...
(Now, don't jump to the conclusion that I dislike the Mayor personally. I don't. Mayor Barrett appears to be a nice guy and - to his credit - he did rush to the aide of a citizen outside of State Fair Park in August of 2009 who was being attacked. While Mayor Barrett was attempting to dial 911 on his cell phone, he was severly beaten. However, as a Mayor, leader, and politician, Barrett is sub-par. Barrett is a "do-nothing" elected official, content to criticize Governor Scott Walker whenever he can, yet has no laurels himself of which to speak.)
Given all the similarities between Mayor Barrett and the Occupy crowd, Barrett sure would be an ideal candidate - not as Wisconsin's next governor - but as a leader of the Occupy Milwaukee movement.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (128)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






75 Comments
ExToDResident - Feb 18, 2012 11:01 AM
ahemmer - Feb 18, 2012 11:37 AM
When people keep saying that this country needs to "come together" - it sure does - we need to unite to fight against liberalism!
Have a great day!
Fadjah - Feb 18, 2012 11:54 AM
ahemmer - Feb 18, 2012 12:08 PM
From: http://www.thehispanicconservative.com/Scott-Walker/scott-walkers-longstanding-history-with-labor.html
"During Walker’s tenure, he reduced the size of the county workforce by 20%, decreased the county debt by 10%, and did it all without raising the property tax levy from the previous year. According to Moody’s, Walker’s “strong management and prudent budgetary controls” strengthened the county bond rating for future investing. Nobody would argue that Milwaukee County’s fiscal health is without ailment or disease, but there is no doubt that Walker left the county in a healthier state from which he had first found it."
And what do you mean by "move back to the city and help fix the problems?" I have never lived in the city of Milwaukee and have absolutely no desire to. Let the liberals in charge solve the problems!!! Yeah, the amazing duo of Barrett and Abele ought to work wonders...throw in the County Board and WOW! - hope and change is on the way! (That's a joke...)
ExToDResident - Feb 18, 2012 12:11 PM
kill food
make fire
cook food
yert49 - Feb 18, 2012 1:23 PM
Jump off cliff
Make us smile
The whole Kohl's episode shine's the light on what a weak and ineffective leader Barret is. But he's always been weak. He was a weak congressman. There is not a bold bone in his body. I can't believe that is not a young professional with a vision for this city that wants to make his/her mark, who could run for this job. We're starving for visionary leadership!
ExToDResident - Feb 18, 2012 1:25 PM
I don't see it that way. I believe that liberalism is the counter balance to
conservatism, light against the dark, night and day. Some conservative ideals are
rooted in classical liberalism (such as personal freedoms) and some liberal ideals
are conservative in origin.
I must admit I do not understand how conservatives (or liberals for that matter)
can believe that they will defeat liberalism (or liberals defeat conservatism).
ExToDResident - Feb 18, 2012 1:38 PM
What would a world without liberalism look like?
What would a world without conservatism look like?
Do anyone really believe you could eradicate or even marginalize the other?
ExToDResident - Feb 18, 2012 1:42 PM
A true victory for either side will mean the end of this country as we know it.
yert49 - Feb 18, 2012 2:03 PM
Carl Hicks - Feb 18, 2012 2:44 PM
country,deep down hates it.It is like saying to your woman I love you but I wish
you were different.Thet are too blinded by their own beliefs to accept that a
society has to have differing beliefs in order to grow and survive.
Imagine what an ugly backwards country this would be if everyone thought a like.
Carl Hicks - Feb 18, 2012 2:55 PM
problem without an increase in taxes. Seperating sanitary and storm sewers is
going to be very expensive.
MGarber - Feb 18, 2012 2:57 PM
Bullseye!! They yearn for that days that they know little about and/or never existed.
Carl Hicks - Feb 18, 2012 3:08 PM
Bush because he has been president for 3 years,followed by blaming Carter for a
program from 3 decades ago! We had republican presidents for 20 of those 30
years,if tube program ( which has been rewritten several times ) was so bad
authors don't any of them share the blame?
geno53151 - Feb 18, 2012 3:09 PM
Liberalism and Socialistism has not worked. We have many who lack an education even though it is given to them free. They have little desire to help themselves. Government is there to give them a handout and take care of them from cradle to grave.
Unless that changes, things will get worse.
yert49 - Feb 18, 2012 3:41 PM
every grow government politician we've elected on a local and national level in the
past 40 years. And yet he goes after the very group that has broken away from
groupthink and defending the status quo. It's disingenuous to say the.least and a
dunheap at best!
yert49 - Feb 18, 2012 3:42 PM
every grow government politician we've elected on a local and national level in the
past 40 years. And yet he goes after the very group that has broken away from
groupthink and defending the status quo. It's disingenuous to say the.least and a
dunheap at best!
referee33 - Feb 18, 2012 4:04 PM
ExToDResident - Feb 18, 2012 4:47 PM
Well, that would explain the republicans signing Grover Norquist’s pledge to not raise taxes, as well as their Pledge to America in 2010, preceded by the Contract With America in 1994, and of course their “purity” test for a political candidate.
ahemmer - Feb 18, 2012 4:47 PM
And how soon lefties forget that one of Mayor Barrett's original campaign promises (a real biggie) upon becoming Mayor was to end the dumping of raw sewage into Lake Michigan by the MMSD. Has that happened? NO. Have any of the usual lefties complained about Barrett not upholding his campaign promises? NO. Yet, Walker becomes an instant target for "broken campaign promises" when he starts contribuiting to a portion of his own pension a few months after taking office. I'd give him a pass on that one, since he may have been a bit preoccupied with clowns taking over the Capitol for months and causing general chaos in Madison, disrupting the legislative process as much as they could.