I have a dream...
A wonderful conservative acquaintance of mine (thanks, Paula) recently e-mailed me the following article. After reading it, I was very impressed. I contacted the author, Tim Nerenz, who gave me his permission to reprint his entire column. Thanks very much, Tim!
Remember these from school? “Ask not what your country can do for you; demand it.” “The only thing to fear is buying our own stuff.” “Give me liberty or give me free stuff.” “One if by land, two if by sea; get off that horse and buy my stuff for me.”
And who can forget, “I have a dream…where you have to give me stuff.”
What in the world has happened to us? How did we go from Patrick Henry and Dr. Martin Luther King to some 30 year-old still-a-student from Georgetown going on national TV to demand more government because she can’t figure out how to keep from getting knocked up on her own dime?
President Obama – our President Obama - called to congratulate her for that and tell her she represents all women. Really? All women? How about it, ladies – are all of you spending your days getting drilled by losers who can’t afford their own condoms and then bragging about it under oath on CSPAN? Has your liberation from men left you that completely helpless?
I don’t think she represents very many women at all; most that I know are proud of their independence and character. Sometimes politicians say things so incredibly stupid we wonder how they managed to ever get elected...and then other times they sleep.
But you know what? This whole free contraception thing is the straw that broke the camel’s back. I am tired of pushing the rock up the hill – I’m throwing in with the gimmee-gimmee crowd. Kennedy didn’t know squat, Henry was a flake, Jefferson had it all wrong, and Dr. King must have been some selfish, racist, libertarian with that stupid dream that every individual should be judged by the content of their character. Screw that.
I have a better dream. I have a dream that you buy your stuff for you and then you buy my stuff for me. That’s equality, right there. Whatever I want and just because I want it. Food, housing, day care, abortions, contraception, train rides, a job, pension, health care, a Volt, college, flat-out cash. The way it works is you give me the stuff I need so I can use my own money to buy the stuff I want – Spring Break in Cancun, iTunes, tattoos. You even have to buy my Ambien so I can dream my dream.
I have another dream where you taxpaying welders have to pay for my college as long as I want to keep going, and then I will whine and bitch about my student loans for years until you write them off. And then I will whine and bitch some more because you won’t hire me with my useless degree and pathetic attitude. If that doesn’t work, I’ll sue you. Or boycott, or occupy, or break your glass or light your stuff on fire.
I don’t need a reason. You owe me, because I breathe. I have a dream…
In my new dream you have to hire me and then you can’t fire me, and I get sick days and vacation days and holidays and union conferences off, and call-in days, and I can watch porn on school computers and if you fire me for that I get reinstated with back pay. I have a dream…where I can retire early, draw a pension and then get paid again to go back to work at the same job.
How about this one: “We hold this truth to be self-evident - I get my way.”
If my guy doesn’t win an election we get to recall the guy who did, and you have to pay for it. I decide my pay and benefits and you pay. I get to tell you what to do and you do it. In my dream I can stop you from mining on your own land, from owning your own guns, selling your own milk, and growing your own food. We’re all in this together – I say and you do.
I have a dream that I decide how much profit you can make and how much of your own money you get to keep. I have a dream where you have to join my union and dues get taken out your check before the IRS even gets their bite of the apple. I have a dream where you don’t have squat to say about it. Shut up, bitch – this is what democracy looks like. That’s how I sound in my dream - street.
I have a dream where it is a disability to be me, so now I get to park up front and get even more free stuff than if I was a just a regular broke-dick. I want that ID card where you have to give me medical marijuana and King Crimson CD’s. I have a dream… [Alarm goes off and I wake all sweaty and heart-pounding]
Wow, that was some nightmare; too bad we are living in it. Do you know the difference between shame and Beetlejuice? If you say Beetlejuice three times, he shows up. The Wisconsin lefty protestors have proven you can chant “shame shame shame” until the cows come home or flee to Illinois and it won’t instill any in you.
This Georgetown woman did her own shameful three-way; turns out she is not 23, is not a real student, and is a serial testifier – a 30 year-old “activist” fabricated for the cameras by the marketing department over at Democrat Victimhood, Inc. Wham, bam, thanks for the sound bite, ma’am. The party of women creates a new national Lewinsky to humiliate, and the shameless left cheers her on. Cheeky.
The worst thing about his whole incident is that we now know what kind of dipstick gets into law school these days; we can look forward to decades of her suing us because her watch stopped, or the Fox station airs Seinfeld re-runs when she likes to tan, or brunettes earn more than blondes, or guys don’t need tampons, or they play hockey in the South. Who knows what craving for attention will trigger another seizure?
At age 40 she will be up on the Hill testifying about why we need to buy her a tummy tuck and liposuction, and at age 50, it will be breast augmentation and collagen implants. At 60 we will start medicating her libido back into action and 70 she will be hounding us to buy the hubby’s dinger pills and call dermabrasion health care and make us pay for it. By then she will have some money and have turned Republican. It won’t matter; they both want free stuff.
At a panel on nationalizing health care in 2009, I warned the greatest danger of a government-run system was the politicization of illness, disease, and treatment. Equating avoidance of a voluntary condition (pregnancy) with prevention of a disease in order to mandate contraceptive coverage without compensation is just the tip of the iceberg of what we can expect each election year when the pols are trolling for votes in the highly-contested moron community.
When your health care costs go up and your employer drops your coverage, you can’t say that you weren’t warned. While this young lady was reading her lines over at Nancy Pelosi’s Theatre of the Absurd, the real news was being made by HHS Secretary Sebelius, who gloated that the insurance industry was in a “death spiral” and promising us straight-faced that mandating coverage without compensation had nothing to do with it.
No doubt the frisky coeds over at Georgetown Law School believed every word of it.
“Moment Of Clarity” is a weekly commentary by Libertarian writer and speaker Tim Nerenz, Ph.D. Visit Tim’s website www.timnerenz.com to find your moment and order Tim’s new book, “BRING IT!”
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (255)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






117 Comments
Mucho - Mar 08, 2012 7:51 AM
I think I will enroll at BYU and petition Congress to have the University buy me beer. After all, it is as much of a right for me to indulge with alcohol and have the University I attend buy it for me as it is for Sandy Fluke to engage in premarital sex at Georgetown and have them pay for her birth control pills.
- Both are privileges - not constitutional rights
- Both are immoral per University policy but legal according to the Feds
- Both have documented health benefits
- Vast majority of Americans indulge in both, despite their religious affiliations and teachings against it
More importantly, I want to do it and it is socially acceptable and actually, even regarded as "cool" so in today's world - IT IS MY RIGHT! and Uncle Sam should pay for it.
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 11:15 AM
One flaw in your plan - You can APPLY to BYU, but then you would have to be ACCEPTED!
We all know that ain't gonna happen. "
lol.
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 11:37 AM
The biggest Gimme's with their hands out are parents. Because they have kids they want a break on their taxes and have th kids as dependents.
No way. You work just as hard as a single person. It is not the single person's fault you have kids and a wife to feed, you did that by CHOICE.
Pay your taxes, just like the single person.
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 11:44 AM
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 11:47 AM
http://www.youngwomenshealth.org/summarychart.html
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 11:53 AM
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html
Carl Hicks - Mar 08, 2012 12:02 PM
She wants her insurance plan to include contraceptives ,she did not ask the
government to provide contraceptives .
Mucho - Mar 08, 2012 12:27 PM
We have some common ground. Close the Schools and give me 55% of my property taxes back. Repeal ObamaCare - you "____"ed and got diabetes, heart disease, AIDS, emphysema, cancer - You pay for it.
Give me my Social Security and Medicare back - Getting old is a choice, not my problem.
What a hypocrite you are.
PS. Your women's helath charts about contraception left out Abstinence. 100% effective.
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 12:35 PM
I don't think so. You chose to have sex don't you? According to Hemmer once you chose, what happens after is your responsibility and the rest of us should not pay so that you can go on having sex without assuming your responsibility.
So if you have kids as a result of having sex, guess who's responsibility they are? Yours. You made the choice. What that does to your income is your problem not mine, if we take the argument further.
You can't have it both ways.
If society is not going to pay not to have kids , then why does society have to pay if you do have kids, especially for those who are single and don't want kids.
There's your whiners. and your budgetary blood suckers.
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 12:36 PM
I have no interest in the sex lives of nuns and priests.
MGarber - Mar 08, 2012 1:07 PM
government to provide contraceptives."
I was going to point that out, and then realized from the last Blog topic that Amy and her minions dont/wont hear anything that doesnt fit their notions.
Like she told us: "I believe otherwise."
Unless theres some really wacky bs being spewed, I will try to keep out of here completely. There is no point doing otherwise.
Mucho - Mar 08, 2012 1:49 PM
How is it not hypocritical of you to make other people only pay for one consequence of having sex (children) and not VD, AIDS, abortion, abortion pills, option of contraception?
Life is full of choices. Some students at Georgetown want to fornicate - they should leave everyone else out of it, including my insurance company and the Churches.
The idea that contraception and killing the unborn is cheaper for the taxpayer is a concept that goes back to the likes of Dr. Paul Popenoe and Margaret Sanger. Be careful of the company you keep.
ahemmer - Mar 08, 2012 2:18 PM
Now, if you can get yourselves out of the gutter and make some comments that actually apply to the post topic, that would be great.
And I find it so revealing that when the lefties have no factual retorts or logical comments to make - they resort to personal attacks. Bravo - for living up to the low expectations of liberalism.
By the way - heard Rush Limbaugh has some new companies signed up to advertise during his show hours - and some who left in the media-created frenzy over "reproductive rights activist" Susan Fluke, now want to return. And Rush is still on the air - imagine that! A lefties worst nightmare...
Wonder if Obama called up Sarah Palin after Bill Maher called her the "c" word to see how she was doing...
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 2:54 PM
ahemmer - Mar 08, 2012 2:58 PM
The Susan Fluke controversy was just ginned up to deflect attention to what is really at stake here. Fluke was little more than a willing pawn (or plant) - busy with her "reproductive rights activism." (If there ever was a liberally created title, that's gotta be right up there with the best of 'em.) The take-over of health care by the government is what we need to be aware of.
Remember how none of this garbage was supposedly in the original Obamacare bill? Remember how we heard that taxpayers wouldn't be funding abortions?
I'd have to say all bets are off. If Obamacare is allowed to come into being, only then will we learn the true extent of the devastation and plans the socialists have for the country.
This isn't about sex, contraception, condoms, etc. This is all about the government inserting itself where it doesn't belong - ever-changing the social landscape to make people more dependent upon the government.
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 3:08 PM
Fund you own births. Should not be up to all the insurers to fund that should it?
And lets say the co-ed decides to get pregnant and deliver. Why should that be funded? She chose, just like in the other instance.
ahemmer - Mar 08, 2012 3:23 PM
Check out: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/planned-parenthood-s-annual-report-got-4874m-tax-money-did-329445-abortions
Here's a small clip:
"According to its latest annual report, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) received $487.4 million in tax dollars over a twelve-month period and performed 329,455 abortions."
Just the facts, Del Norte. Just the facts.
Mucho - Mar 08, 2012 3:36 PM
However, when someone selectively applies a tenet they preach to suit their ideals it is surely more than just a conundrum or paradox.
Beyond the mere semantics of this topic is the question of whether or not it is appropriate for the government to mandate that one party take action to subsidize what is clearly an optional activity for another party.
Morality and religion aside, why should a company that offers a product for sale be compelled by law to provide "protection" from or products for a non essential, elective activity of its customers?
What is the difference between mandated, free:
- contracpetives for sex
- sunscreen for the beach
- helmet for biking
- parachute for skydiving
- soap for shaking hands
- ketchup for hamburgers
- glass of wine/beer per day
- money for gambling
...
All are practical products with clear, proven benefits for the associated optional activities. Providing for Want vs. Need is not an appropriate function of government.
(In the absence of a logical counter to what I presented, I fully expect: "Well if you don't even know the difference between Ketchup and contraceptives......)
Mucho - Mar 08, 2012 3:51 PM
They probably won't sell many policies to fertile women without that coverage but its up to them.
That's the point.
jman99 - Mar 08, 2012 3:53 PM
- contracpetives for sex
- sunscreen for the beach
- helmet for biking
- parachute for skydiving
- soap for shaking hands
- ketchup for hamburgers
- glass of wine/beer per day
- money for gambling
..."
Seat belts and air bags for cars. Safety zones for schools ....