F/A 18D Virginia Crash
As some of you know, I have an abiding interest in aviation, especially military, based on my background as a jet fighter pilot. I am particularly interested in reports of aircraft accidents, partly as the result of my experience as an Air Force Squadron Flying Safety Officer on active duty. It has been my frustrating experience that media reports and even NTSB investigations of aircraft accidents suffer from error and inaccuracy. Such is the case concerning media reports and some military comments of the recent crash of a Navy F/A-18D jet fighter shortly after takeoff from NAS Oceana in Virginia Beach, VA.
The McDonnel-Douglas (now Boeing) F/A-18C/D Hornet (The F/A stands for Fighter-Attack, the "C" model is single-seat, the "D" dual.) (See Photo) is the predecessor, dating from 1989, of the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet ("E"-single, "F"-dual), an enhanced version that has become the Navy's premier and just about only carrier-based fighter aircraft. It is the aircraft flown by the Blue Angels, the Navy's aerial demonstration team.

F/A-18D Hornet
The "D" is powered by two F404-GE-402 turbofan engines of approximately 18,000 pounds thrust each. It is capable of speeds of 1.8 Mach (1.8 x speed of sound) and weighs between 23,000 pounds empty and 51,000 pounds maximum takeoff weight. The aircraft that crashed probably had a full fuel load having just taken off and weighed about 37,000 pounds. The full fuel load is approximately 20,000 pounds. I don't know the exact fuel load of the aircraft that crashed but it probably was around this value. That's about 1900 gallons of highly volatile jet fuel.
The aircraft was only minutes from takeoff when it apparently experienced catastrophic engine failure. This is very unusual in a twin-engine aircraft and may have been the result of foreign object ingestion. The pilots stayed with the aircraft and jettisoned almost the entire fuel load (this capability is a normal feature of many aircraft, military and civilian and is specifically for the purpose of minimizing fire danger in the event of a crash or dangerous landing) before ejecting just before impact. Both were injured due in part to the action of the rocket-propelled ejection seats operative during low-altitude ejections. Dumping 2000 gallons of jet fuel takes time, since the dump is not normally pump-fed. A photograph of the crash site suggests they also steered their crippled craft to a relatively open area before ejecting.
The aircraft crashed in a populated area, an apartment project, which could have resulted in major loss of life in the event of a fire which would have been intense if fueled by nearly 2000 gallons of jet fuel. (Remember the World Trade Center attack?) However, there was little fire, no loss of life and only a few relatevely minor injuries. This has been labeled a "miracle". I maintain this was an heroic action on the part of these two pilots and believe that the "miracle" was the direct result of the crew's heroism. They stayed with their doomed aircraft until the fuel was all or nearly all gone, ejecting at very low altitude.
All high performance military airceraft are equipped with "zero altitude" ejection systems consisting of a seat propelled typically by two rockets and vectored automatically to the vertical in the event of an unusual-attitude ejection. These seats are little rocket-propelled guided missiles based on the venerable British Martin-Baker ejection seat and have saved many pilots' lives. Having said this, very low altitude ejections are always dangerous. The seat is not perfect and has been known to malfunction. Also, had they been a few seconds later, they would likely have been killed in the impact with the ground.
The media and Navy commentators who should know better have generally failed to give due credit to these two fine Navy pilots. There has even been in the media a thinly-veiled suggestion that the presence of a "a student pilot" may have been a factor in the accident. This was most likely a transition training flight where a fully-qualified pilot was being familiarized with a new aircraft by an instructor pilot. This "student" no-doubt had hundreds of hours of flight time and was a fully-qualified military aviator.
These pilots were fully responsible for the fact that there was no loss of life and only a few relatively minor injuries resulting from the crash of a large, powerful military jet aircraft in a populated area. This was due solely to the lack of significant fire, a direct result of these pilots' heroic action to stay with the aircraft to jettison the fuel. They deserve medals.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






10 Comments
Carl Hicks - Apr 09, 2012 2:09 AM
replacement for the A-7 at the time of I was finishing my enlistment in the Navy
in 1984.
I agree with you that it makes no difference if the pilot involved in this cease was
a seasoned pilot or was at the controls of a F-18 in flight for the first time, the
extensive training a Naval aviator receives makes them the best there is.
(No offense meant towards Air Force pilots like you but I bet you never had to
land on a moving deck at sea)
FOD is my guess also as to the cause of this crash if both engines experienced
catostrophic failure simultaneously.
aneuhauser - Apr 09, 2012 2:13 PM
sirlaughsalittle - Apr 09, 2012 8:07 PM
of a "a student pilot" may have been a factor in the accident."
What do you mean "thinly veiled suggestion"? It seems to me they were simply
reporting the facts as articulated by Captain Mark Weisgerber, Deputy
Commander for the Strike Fighter Wing Atlantic:
"Weisgerber added the pilot in the front seat was a student, while the back seat
was occupied by an experienced instructor."
http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/local_news/va_beach/military-plane-crashes-
in-virginia-beach
"These pilots were fully responsible for the fact that there was no loss of life"
I would say it was dumb luck that the apartment building was unoccupied at the
time of the crash.
Carl Hicks - Apr 10, 2012 1:14 AM
Al I believe Naval aviators are hotdoggers due to the way they take off and land.
Tossed into the air and then a controlled crash land.The sudden starts and stops
must have an effect on them. I used to love watching night flight ops with darken
ship in effect. I think you have to be a little crazy to do what they do.
Any talk about if the pilot involved was a newbe or seasoned pilot is
irrelevant,you don't learn how to fly in a F-18 this pilot was well trained.
Carl Hicks - Apr 10, 2012 1:28 AM
busy place and F-18's are in the sky above that area everyday.
Victor Ponelis - Apr 10, 2012 9:41 AM
crash...those few seconds must have been harrowing.
patriot4progress - Apr 10, 2012 2:54 PM
WFB resident - Apr 10, 2012 8:10 PM
treated with kid gloves . In other words grow up . Back to the plane news ! Pun
intended . lol...
aneuhauser - Apr 12, 2012 12:21 AM
You are welcome to make any other comments, even wandering off into the woods if you so choose. Just keep it civil and avoid personal references and insults.
WFB resident - Apr 13, 2012 10:11 PM
put this up so you could see how the media and the PDLS Libs are not being
professional !!