
I have a background in science and writing. I consider myself liberal, progressive, environmentally aware on many issues, but also believe that conservatism has a place and is valid.
The Walker Gang in: I Control your Uterus & Pro-Discrimination is good for Business
I the great El Pickardo, have been letting these two issues simmer for awhile to see what was going to happen, to see if they would go away.
They have not.
These issues are exposing how extreme the majority of WI conservative republicans have evolved into (or maybe I should have said created as?).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/14/wisconsin-abortion-sex-education-bills-pass_n_1345873.html
The Anti-Abortion/Sex Education Big Government legislation:
1) The bill bans insurance companies in the Affordable care act exchanges to cover abortion.
2) Tells doctors what they can say to their patients regarding Abortion and infringes on the doctor-patient relationship.
3) Bans hormonal contraception without a Doctors consent and can not prescribe it via a webcam.
4) Schools have to emphasize Abstinence but do not have to discuss contraception. (The Repub’s say schools get more choice? Right? How can you do that with this mandate???)
5) If a doctor does not follow this law makes it a Class I felony and a 10,000 fine.
So much for small government conservative Republicans!
They have screamed, “Keep yours hand off my healthcare President Obama, We WI Republicans reject your public mandate for everyone to buy health insurance (Car insurance is okay though), and then go and pass this legislation?
Scott Walker signs it which inserts government into the Doctor-Patient relationship and finally into a women’s uterus, while making it illegal to perform certain parts of a legal procedure and simultaneously says it gives School Districts more leeway in their sex education classes but then forces them to emphasize abstinence! Huh! How can a school district have more choice but then be mandated at the same time? Tell me conservatives how can you use this logic. Sybil, is that you Sybil?
I keep on getting told that “Big Government” is not a conservative principle.
Big Government is a conservative value when it comes to social and religious princples. They will use government in any way to push their agenda.
Employer Discrimination – A Wisconsin Republican Value:
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/midwest/2012/04/09/242583.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/06/scott-walker-wisconsin-equal-pay-law_n_1407329.html
1) “The legislation eliminates compensatory and punitive damages for acts of employment discrimination or unfair honesty, according to the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). The bill repeals 2009’s Act 20, which for the first time imposed punitive and compensatory damages under Wisconsin’s employment discrimination law.”
2) “Under current state law, employees who prevail in discrimination lawsuits can collect between $50,000 and $300,000 in compensatory and punitive damages. The Republican bill blocks anyone from collecting such damages in employment discrimination suits.”
3) HP, “The 2009 Equal Pay Enforcement Act was meant to deter employers from discriminating against certain groups by giving workers more avenues via which to press charges. Among other provisions, it allows individuals to plead their cases in the less costly, more accessible state circuit court system, rather than just in federal court.”
4) PF “The law does not ensure pay equity, but rather gives discriminated workers the right to sue in state court for compensatory and punitive damages. So, if the GOP-backed bill is signed into law, that right to sue would be lost.”
5) Fact: This bill makes it more difficult for discriminated people (black, women, and homosexuals) to sue for punitive damages. State courts are easier than federal courts to do this. Scott Walker and WI Conservative Republicans have made it easier to discriminate based on race, sex, gender, and soon political ideology.
Oh! It makes me feel so warm to hear Glenn Grothman’s words of wisdom who lead the repeal of the equal pay act, you know the upstanding west bend state senator that said single parenthood is a cause of child abuse, “You could argue that money is more important for men,” he said. “I think a guy in their first job, maybe because they expect to be a breadwinner someday, may be a little more money-conscious. To attribute everything to a so-called bias in the workplace is just not true.”
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-04-11/news/31326804_1_wage-gap-wage-bill-discrimination
Obviously, father knows best and this is the reason why women on average make .77 cents to the 1.00 dollar a man makes and the obvious reason that lovable slob Grothman uses, why Women should not be able to sue in state court for damages.
Yet, this is bigger than a war against women.
I’ve secretly changed the adjective “Women” Wisconsinite (might be your wife, girlfriend, daughter, aunt, or mother) with “African” Wisconsinite (Black) and found out that it’s not just about making it harder for women to fight discrimination, but that this bill is about making it more difficult by barring Wisconsinites to sue and punish businesses and corporations for denying fair pay to anyone.
I never thought that weakening anti-discrimination laws was a Republican value or is it a new conservative principle?
Take Away: Big government pushed by Conservative Republicans is okay for social and religious intrusion into education and the uterus, while big government that protects people from pay discrimination based on race, sex, or sexual orientation by business & Corporations is bad.
Hey! I think I just saw a double standard.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- To discharge or otherwise discriminate against any individual because of any of the following (228)
- Vote for Romney, if you don't I will be forced to take your benefits so I can keep the majority of the profits! (60)
- "Yes. Right. I think we believe that insofar as there are inappropriate things, people who vote inappropriately are more likely to vote Democrat." Glenn Grothman (122)
- Writers Block - Open Forum (82)
- Being self-sufficient is not a partisan ideology (103)
- Congrats Walkerites! Victory, Forward, I think? (81)
- To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women. Conan the Barbarian (51)
- Dunkirk Walker Style: Divide & Conquer (58)
- The Walker Gang in: I Control your Uterus & Pro-Discrimination is good for Business (81)
- Death Threats so soon! (87)
- More Alien Relay 2.0 posts





81 Comments
Mucho - May 08, 2012 9:24 AM
You funny. You draw an illogical, invalid conclusion from one data point. Then even while historical data shows absolutely no correlation to lawsuits and WI's redundant legislation and you stick to your guns like Ted Nugent.
http://www.bls.gov/ro5/wewi.htm
So to "prove" your point, you call Governor Walker a racist (he signed more victims' rights legislation in one year than Doyle did in 8), Grothman a slob (hold your pic up against his), and me a Walker crony that defacates from my mouth.
Well you got me. I give you stats and graphs to prove you dead wrong. You go to your old standby and call people names. I accept your intellectual concession but prefer not to respond in kind. No need for you to respond either - I don't want you to have to stay in for recess if you call me a "poopy face" as your rebuttal after you consult your Thesaurus.
Mucho - May 08, 2012 9:59 AM
Truth hurts. Obama's touchdown dance while he has presided over the bloodiest 3 years in Afghanistan. 2012 year to date: Marines caught on film urinating on dead Taliban fighters, Soldiers burn a pile of Qur’ans, Army sargeant murders 17 cilvilians, mostly children, US troop death toll tops 1000, Afghan civilian death toll nears 15,000.
Does Obama pull the troops out? Finish it off with a final surge? nope, nope - he announces a gradual, deadly withdrawl and then "Spikes the Football" and uses the bloody mess and the Navy Seal attack of a dying diabetic has been terrorist as a campaign commercial.
A commercial highlighting Obama as the failure he is will only be telling the truth, which Obama is clearly running from. Unfortunately for American families and workers, a commercial with facts about Obama's past 4 year record = Negative Campaigning.
WFB resident - May 08, 2012 10:02 PM
terrorists and he went in to Iraq . He took over the country , and when this mission
was accomplished he went on TV and correctly stated that the mission was
accomplished !! The o using the intel. from the Bush and what Bush set up finally
found the o ! He then tells everyone how he got the o . Good for the o , but he did
not do much ! Deffinetly far less than Bush !!
reformed trucker - May 08, 2012 10:54 PM
whatever they want..." - Mucho
And a participation ribbon and a hug, because they deserve it. They're special.
Mucho - May 08, 2012 11:13 PM
Using your JP logic, I debunked below- it is obvious that since the enactment of the WI
Voter ID law that the loss of the Dead and out of state votes has hurt the Democrats.
How else can you explain that Walker got more votes running uncontested than ALL the
Dems COMBINED!?
jman99 - May 09, 2012 2:43 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/05/09/what-want-obama-to-say-about-gay-marriage/
Mucho - May 09, 2012 7:01 PM
"Love is blind, so is justice. Any man and any woman can find each other in the dark and get married if they want to. I would not want to exclude either the man or the woman from the privilege of this union and take issue with anyone that would discriminate in such a fashion simply based on sex."
WFB resident - May 09, 2012 11:04 PM
Joke times and PMSNBC !! Atleast you see that now !!
Mucho - May 10, 2012 11:30 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OhnQEP2Hl4
ExToDResident - May 11, 2012 9:04 AM
“Minty: You have gone from a liberal nerd to a royal Jack Wagon really. I know exactly what Jim means when he says he once was a liberal I was to and do I think that by arguing on this blog anyone of you is going to convert to conservatism Hell no.
I don’t believe for one minute Jim does either.” TB
Better inform Jim of what he is supposed to be thinking.
“You want me to move on since no one made a comment in 5 days...so you progressives...can let Obama push his socialism on America. But make sure guys like me don't let the public know so those who have no clue can vote Obama back in.” Hayett
“Blogs call Fighting Liberal Lies no ones going to convert you that you’ll have to do by yourself same as Jim and I did Don’t care if you do Don’t care if you don’t but I will let you in on a little secret.
I have a strong feeling Jim and for that matter Amy just sit back and laugh and laugh cause they both know they touched your liberal nerve. I personally think its hilarious knowing they have gotten under that thin snake skin of yours.
That’s what makes this blog so good Knowing he got Ya”
You have it all wrong Tom, Jim and for that matter Amy did not get under my skin. I laugh at them all the time (I just don’t sprinkle my posts with lol like WFB does), it is just so funny too me to see people like them and you pontificate your ideology. I think it is absolutely hilarious that you have taken up a fight against the liberal ideology.
So what is this “little secret” you were going to “let me in on”? The secret must be that you think Jim and Amy are laughing at the liberals in these blogs and or me in particular – what should I care what Jim and or Amy are doing. Besides this isn’t “a little secret” it is more like a “what to know what I think”, or an “in my honest opinion”.
ExToDResident - May 11, 2012 9:08 AM
Ok, now you lost me. Where did you get this idea that I insult anyone who isn’t on my side of the isle? Show me where I have done what you accuse me of.
“Just so your buddy’s(sic) can slap you on the butt now and again.
I think your seeking attention and have found your little niche
You’re a pathetic lonely person and a coward.”
Well you are entitled to your opinion, err, I am sorry, I mean you are entitled to your option. However, I do not relate my posting to these blogs to anyone. I consider this a waste of time (just so happens I have some time I don’t mind squandering).
Could you do us all a favor and take a composition or an English course since your writing is as hard to read as WFB’s.
Why is it so many conservatives like you are grammatically challenged?
Mucho - May 11, 2012 10:10 AM
"Just posted the following in Jim's blog doubt they will show up."
"You have it all wrong Tom, Jim and for that matter Amy did not get under my skin."
"– what should I care what Jim and or Amy are doing."
All posted by " ExToDr" as he critiqued others on grammar - Priceless.
ExToDResident - May 11, 2012 1:37 PM
WFB resident - May 11, 2012 1:45 PM
see , Could it be that how you write something is not what you are writing ? Could it
be that ex is not able to think for himself ? Could it be that most people in the world
actually work ? Could it be that ex is not able to think of conclusions, with out it being
written ? Then he would still question how it was written instead of understanding
what it is talking about ! In conclusion . PDLS's like ex are not able to think about
what the text is about only how well it was written !! That is probably why PDLS's
are PDLS's !! They are not able to think about issues only how well it was written !!
Yep ! All of the above is the correct answer. Now watch ex will either ignore what is
written (for he is not able to comprehend text) or he will comment on how badly it
was written . lol... For the issue is above him .
ExToDResident - May 11, 2012 5:03 PM
see , Could it be that how you write something is not what you are writing ?”
Huh? ...how you write something is not what you are writing? That certainly is the case in Tom’s instance.
“ Could it be that ex is not able to think for himself ?”
Nope that isn’t it...I think you are grasping for straws.
“Could it be that most people in the world actually work ?”
How profound; but what would this have to do with Tom’s inability to write a proper sentence, or my critiquing of his or your atrocious grammar. Though you have improved over what you were writing when you first started to post to these blogs.
“Could it be that ex is not able to think of conclusions, with out it being written ?”
Nope that isn’t it either; I have no problems drawing conclusions. Just like I long ago concluded that you are a jerk.
and I didn't have to write it down to come to that conclusion.
“Then he would still question how it was written instead of understanding what it is talking about !”
How a sentence is written determines its readability. The more effort it takes to read a sentence the greater the chance there is of misunderstanding the message. But I understand that a conservative doesn’t really want to be understood, they only seek absolution from any of the problems they created or helped create.
ExToDResident - May 11, 2012 5:07 PM
Like I said, how well something is written goes a long way toward helping the reader understand what is being said.
“That is probably why PDLS's are PDLS's !! They are not able to think about issues only how well it was written !!”
Your love of conjecture is hilarious.
“Yep ! All of the above is the correct answer.”
Nope, all of the supposition above is not the correct answer! Funny how your mind works leaping from conclusion to conclusion with little in the way of facts or any link between the conclusions.
“Now watch ex will either ignore what is written (for he is not able to comprehend text) or he will comment on how badly it was written . lol... For the issue is above him .”
Why do you always have to insert yourself in to every conversation WFB? Do you feel that your opinions are that noteworthy?
Mucho - May 11, 2012 5:32 PM
What does your grammar diversion have to do about Tom Barrett's record of increasing violent crime, unemployment, taxes, African American drop-out rates, and taxes in Milwaukee?
Politifact says Barrett is not walking backward. All his numbers above are way up!
ExToDResident - May 11, 2012 5:33 PM
Anyways tell me how readable this is for you This is what Tom’s writing resembles except with less I did not say no misspelling or use of phonetically equivalent words like appoint for a point a curd for occurred or option instead of opinion What I really question of myself is why I keep coming back to these blogs and wasting my time here It will accomplish nothing and I do have much better things to do so I suppose it is a perverse obsession like watching a building burn or slowing to look at an accident on the freeway The abuse personal attacks and vitriol that permeates these blogs makes them unsavory to me There is no way I would ever want to host a blog here The only blog in here that has any virtue to it is Al’s all the rest are a waste of time Who ever came up with the old saying that a few bad apples spoils the barrel must have visited these blogs I must admit that I admonished myself for critiquing others writing because of the backlash it obviously creates However when I was trying to read what Tom was saying I was having a difficult time understand his convoluted rant The lack of punctuation and run on sentences made what he wrote extremely hard to read I really don’t care what you think of me your opinion like those of the majority of the conservative here means nothing to me I think I like writing this way it is a lot easier than having to determine where to place a comma or semicolon or try to use the correct grammar or to have to think about proper sentence structure I will have to use this style when I reply to Tom and WFB since they are more apt to understand this writing style than a sentence which comes closer to following the rules of grammar and punctuation Of course it is difficult to totally give up trying to use and actually abandon the use of proper sentence structure
reformed trucker - May 11, 2012 7:16 PM
It's like a bad drug addiction.
Or so I'm told...
Jacob Pickard - May 12, 2012 2:11 AM