The Class Struggle
First, a personal note. Sorry I've been away from the blog for awhile. Everything is O.K. but April is a bad month, what with taxes and an idiotic court-required guardianship asset accounting in excruciating detail, required annually to prove I'm not robbing my wife blind. That's all done now, so I'm back. Don't all cheer at once.
Both of my parents immigrated from Germany in the late 1920's, They were escaping the horrendous depression that had gripped their homeland since the end of World War I. The unwise draconian provisions of the Versailles Treaty were designed to insure that Germany would never rise again. What they succeeded in doing was to destroy the German economy along with the lack of young labor due to war casualties. The mandated governmental system--the Weimar Republic--was ineffectual and disorganized, unable to right the ship. The net result, of course, was to create huge resentment which helped fuel the rise of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist (NAZI) Party. Guess that didn't work too well, did it?
Anyway, my parents, especially my father, came here for the promised opportunity afforded by a classless economic and social system that permitted upward mobility based on talent and hard work. There was no "middle class" or "upper class." There were poor of course--there always have been and will be--but even they had opportunity to climb the economic ladder and many did. Even they were not labeled a "class".
Sadly, what my parents and many others ran into was our own 1929 depression that shattered many an American Dream. They struggled, and despite the hard times, my father found work and a very modest income that kept a roof over our heads and food on the table. I never really felt poor, just not as well-off as some other folks. Father worked at anything he could find, even a short stint in the WPA which he never considered welfare because he worked for the meager wages. (He helped build a "road to nowhere" in a county park.)
He even took a job as a janitor in an apartment building in a black area of Cleveland (East 86th Street) because it came with a tiny basement apartment. I still can picture the single small rectangular window high on the wall of my bedroom. I attended an all-black elementary school (Bolton School; it still exists) and perhaps the best friend I ever had in my youth was a black kid by the name of Clifford Eucker. I remember his mother made him wear knickers to school, which he hated. Father always had crummy jobs, partly a result of the depression and partly due to some bad decisions. But he still loved this country and the opportunities it presented.
The Founders deliberately created a system that avoided the semi-feudalism prevalent in Europe, remnants of which exist even today in many countries both there and even more so in Asia. Yes, there was slavery here which was decried by some but sadly countenanced by others at the time. Nothing is perfect. The unfettered Adam Smith economic system was considered a model. While there were excesses, the result was an unprecedented economic expansion into the world's greatest economic engine, largely responsible for building the society that we enjoy today. Even our so-called "poor" today are often considerably better off than the poor of other parts of the world.
The great motivator of economic expansion is free enterprise and the promise of hard-earned reward. Poor could become comfortable and the comfortable could become rich. Yes, there's an element of greed in the system, but enlightened greed is not all bad. The great advantage of a classless social system and a free enterprise, Capitalist economy is the powerful motivation and opportunity to better oneself.
But times they are a-changin". Today we hear constant reference to the "rich" and the "middle class." There was no middle class whien I was growing up. At least I never heard the term. There was no "wealthy class," just folks who had done better than most of us. There was an attempt after World War II to "soak the rich" to help reduce the deficit from the war. Confiscatory tax rates of up to 91% were levied. Unfortunately, the unintended consequence was business and professional folks, who it turned out were the folks who kept the country running--stopped working part of the year and the government got less in taxes than before. (Sounds a little like Ayn Rand, doesn't it?)
I challenge anyone to precisely define the "middle class" we constantly hear about. Is it a single female legal assistant in New York making $85,000 a year, or the farm family in Kansas with an income of $60,000? How about the owner of a small plumbing shop making $110,000? Shoot, I made that much the last few years I worked. Was I rich? I didn't think so. Then there's the novelist who finally writes a good one and makes $275,000 in one year. Is he rich, considering that he made zilch in previous years?
The fact is, this business of class designations is a relatively recent political construct designed to create envy. The political system in this country--Republican as well as Democrat--has manufactured a class envy paradigm strictly to get votes and gain power. Democrats claim Republicans love the upper class and disdain the middle class and the poor. Republicans claim Democrats pander to the working classes and the poor to get votes. The elderly get stuck somewhere in the middle of all this. Sadly, the current administration seems particularly inclined to toss around class labels. This is grossly irresponsible and detrimental to the welfare of the nation.
The result is conflict and anger all around us, which is dangerous in the extreme. The great advantage of this country is its melting pot paradigm, with all citizens living and working together to better themselves. E Pluribus Unum really meant something years ago. What does it mean today except something printed on money?
Someone once said "divide and conquer." Karl Marx advocated class struggle in the Communist Manifesto. We're headed in a bad direction, folks. If this manufactured class warfare continues, we will indeed be "divided and conquered."
All for votes.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






28 Comments
jman99 - May 07, 2012 5:31 PM
I think you missed one important point:
Inclusion vs.Exclusion
As soon as you have things like gated communities with their own "special police forces" that can exclude an ordinary American from just walking around, you have created a class system that makes some people feel like they are more part of the great idea while keeping those with less, away from them.
We must mingle and interact. Fleeing city cores to the exclusiveness of suburbs has done more to divide the country than anything else.
The rich stay with the rich and party. The rest, not so much.
WFB resident - May 07, 2012 7:09 PM
tracks"? I still hear that term once in a while . But it was never a " I am rich" ! It
was more of "I have manners" !! As for "Gated communities" and such . jman we
are all still living like that ! For an example : Jman where do you live ? Why ? ...... If
jman ever answers those questions truthfully . He would realize that he lives in his
own "gated community" as even he would see it . In wfb those of us that live east of
Marlboro define the wrong side of the tracks as west of Marlboro ! Those that live
both of Henry clay say those that live south of it are on the wrong side. Those North
of Silverspring say those to the south are on the wrong side . Those on Circle dr. say
that those not on it are ! Then there are those that are east of Lake . In other words
we all have a self imposed way of making our selves feel good !! Look at5 PDLS's ....
They assume to be smart for they think a certain way ! Or they think of themselves
as caring (more than non PDLS's ) For it is their own gated community that they
impose on others who they deem "not worthy" !!!! jman above imposed his belief
that Al was wrong and pointed out that some exclude while others include !! Yet
while doing so he excluded Al !!! lol.... The difference with non PDLS's is that we do
not pretend to be superior or to help PDLS's understand " We do not care what side
of the tracks you come from ,but we acknowledge the tracks !!!!!!!! lol....
jman99 - May 07, 2012 7:23 PM
jman ever answers those questions truthfully ."
I live close to where my wife works, for reasons of proximity. I live on an urban street. no gates, just city cops when they patrol, once in a while. I'm not far from my downtown. One bus and I'm in the core.
"!!!! jman above imposed his belief
that Al was wrong and pointed out that some exclude while others include !!"
I imposed nothing. I only stated the obvious.
jman99 - May 07, 2012 7:23 PM
jman ever answers those questions truthfully ."
I live close to where my wife works, for reasons of proximity. I live on an urban street. no gates, just city cops when they patrol, once in a while. I'm not far from my downtown. One bus and I'm in the core.
"!!!! jman above imposed his belief
that Al was wrong and pointed out that some exclude while others include !!"
I imposed nothing. I only stated the obvious.
Jacob Pickard - May 07, 2012 8:58 PM
The first set the husband inherted the wealth. The couple was in a different world they did not have to worry about the typical things like water bills, car repairs, medical, etc... they had enough money that this sort of anxeity that most of us face was not an issue.
The second rich couple the man built up his fortune from the ground up after he served in ww2. Instead of the condensation I felt with the first set of rich people I think he still had an idea of what it was like to be poor and trying to work your way up the ladder. They were 100% conservative and republican and a monetary class 1000% above me. Even with the background they had, they saw the world differently than I. While I was struggling, and those that worked for them in their factory as well, they were so far removed from the 99% of what the majority of us deal with that they did not understand.
There is one thing to be admired about boot straps and ambitition, but when those who never had to do that, or when those who did and now ignore the phlight of those who are now trying want to supress it, then it is wrong.
When will people figure out that hordered gold is no replacement for good cheer and freindship?
WFB resident - May 07, 2012 9:19 PM
funny to me . Also for them to employ others and enjoy life one must spend !! I live
no better now than I did when I made only $30,000 a year ! At $500,000 I still did
not live any better ! Yet I did go on more trips and had more to spend ,but I still
worried about having enough . I at my present monetary income still worry about
having enough ! To pay close to 50% in taxes , to improving my surroundings . Yet I
do understand that jp and those lie him would assume that my life is all roses ! It is
not . That is just the green eyed monster telling you so !!
Carl Hicks - May 08, 2012 12:32 AM
he was but with the way he obsessed about money it was clear he was the
poorest of all who worked there.
aneuhauser - May 08, 2012 12:37 AM
Carl Hicks - May 08, 2012 1:05 AM
"I can see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes
me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been
enthroned,an era of corruption in high places will follow ,and the money - power
of the country will endeavor to prolong it's reign by working upon the prejudices
of the people until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is
destroyed."
bamaphd - May 08, 2012 7:01 AM
Exactly! Money can buy anything, especially, it can buy those who want it.
That's what's happened with this whole Koch thing. they are in a position ( placed their by those who want more ) where they can pull the strings of many politicians to do their bidding in order to buy a version of America they hold in their minds.
I would rather that people like this actually ran for office so that their views and influence were out in the open.
You make big campaign contribution and you expect access, access that the guy walking on the street will never have, even if he has contributed to the same candidate.
That's our class struggle: those with influence who are included vs those without influence who are excluded from the making of the democratic process. What Al asks as to what is the "middle class" , it is those who are dragged along and into politics that are designed by those who are "included and have influence" : those who have the money to pay to have their agenda placed on the table: the " influence class " which breeds the "upper class".
This all started around 1900 to 1920, when the influence of money and those who controlled it became more powerful than the influence of those who worked at manual labor for a living. There was a division formed when the trade unions started to organize for better condition of work.
They were labeled Communists/Socialist/Bolsheviks and were removed from having a credible voice in politics by law and by force in most instances. The division lines were drawn. Those with money and influence began to insulate Washington from the rest of the people.
bamaphd - May 08, 2012 7:03 AM
Carl:
Exactly! Money can buy anything, especially, it can buy those who want it.
That's what's happened with this whole Koch thing. they are in a position ( placed their by those who want more ) where they can pull the strings of many politicians to do their bidding in order to buy a version of America they hold in their minds.
I would rather that people like this actually ran for office so that their views and influence were out in the open.
You make big campaign contribution and you expect access, access that the guy walking on the street will never have, even if he has contributed to the same candidate.
That's our class struggle: those with influence who are included vs those without influence who are excluded from the making of the democratic process. What Al asks as to what is the "middle class" , it is those who are dragged along and into politics that are designed by those who are "included and have influence" : those who have the money to pay to have their agenda placed on the table: the " influence class " which breeds the "upper class".
bamaphd - May 08, 2012 7:03 AM
This all started around 1900 to 1920, when the influence of money and those who controlled it became more powerful than the influence of those who worked at manual labor for a living. There was a division formed when the trade unions started to organize for better condition of work.
They were labeled Communists/Socialist/Bolsheviks and were removed from having a credible voice in politics by law and by force in most instances. The division lines were drawn. Those with money and influence began to insulate Washington from the rest of the people.
bamaphd - May 08, 2012 7:04 AM
Mucho - May 08, 2012 11:37 AM
The comments so far highlight the concern that you so eloquently state:
"The fact is, this business of class designations is a relatively recent political construct designed to create envy."
The envy is pervasive and the recent addition of the "Super Rich" into the fictitious Class tier structure you reference, makes the divisiveness of our current leadership in Washington even more obvious.
Promoting opportunity, encouraging industriousness, accepting self-accountability and responsibility is a tough road for a politician to hoe. The appeal of a leader that provides subsidies, entitlements, "stimulus" in their stead was too tempting for today's instant gratification culture despite history clearly demonstrating that the bottom does not get raised by lowering the top.
Those that claim victim status by virture of the station of their birth are all too eager to make victims of others that also had no choice in the matter. Feels good in the short term so little chance for change in 2012.
WFB resident - May 08, 2012 2:00 PM
any other single individual . Not only that but the Kochs stand for some great issues
that help the American people more than the unions have ever done in the past 50
years !!
jman99 - May 08, 2012 3:05 PM
Same holds true for the instant gratification of "tax cuts".
And,
A rising tide floats all ships.
aneuhauser - May 08, 2012 3:53 PM
Mucho: Thanks. Your comments are to the point. Until we eliminate vote-buying as a political construct, the corruption of the political process will continue. However, I'm not quite so pessimistic about 2012. I think the electorate, at least a major part of it, is becoming aware of the dirty little game being played across the Potomac and doesn't like it one bit.
WFB resident - May 08, 2012 4:25 PM
I totally agree !!! Like all Conservatives would ! It is not the tax cuts that are good .
It is what you do to be able to cut taxes !!!! Act ten deals with that ,now we need a
Walker act 11,12,13,and so on . The minor gratification of cuts are second to stop
spending . By the way spending is the biggest fast gratification !!
jman99 - May 08, 2012 5:37 PM
No actually it is only a straw man for gratification. Self improvement is the biggest gratification and you get the greatest reward.
WFB resident - May 08, 2012 9:01 PM
of that !! But notice the improvements under act 10 ! They are awesome .