The Face of Evil
This is a difficult post for me to write. The Aurora, Colorado, mass killing of 12 innocent souls and the wounding of 58 others, some seriously, is a monstrous tragedy with victims well beyond the casualties. Dozens of family members and friends are also deeply affected. Please believe me when I assure you I am not trying to capitalize on this tragedy, but I think there is a critical issue here that the media and others are missing. The significance of this and other similar mass killings committed without clear motive or justification is not being addressed, which masks their significance.
As is virtually always the case, the pundits and analysts come out of the woodwork to search for an explanation, precursor, motive or justification for someone deciding to kill a large number of innocent people, usually complete strangers. They look into the perpetrator's childhood, his activities, his associates, searching, searching for some vehicle of understanding. This derives from the pervasive notion that bad things can be prevented from happening if only we find the key to the behavior and fix it. Sometimes it's there in a distorted childhood or traumatic event, but usually it eludes identification.
Jeffery Dahmer had a stupefyingly normal upbringing in a normal family. He stated he didn't know why he did what he did, he just wanted to. The present mass killer, James Holmes, complete with red hair, appeared to be a relatively harmless Batman freak to friends, family and associates. One person, a shooting range proprietor, judged him from a bizarre voicemail greeting and strange conversation to be too unstable to shoot at his range, but did not consider him dangerous. Fellow neuroscience researchers thought him strange or did not notice him at all. The government gave him a sustaining stipend plus a $26,000 grant for his research, part of which he apparently spent to purchase the weapons he used in his rampage.
So. what motivated this hapless misfit and other mass killers? Are they just nuts? Certainly they are not mainstream mentally normal, but is that enough to explain such catastrophic behavior? I think it offers a partial explanation, in that we have shut down mental institutions and made it extremely difficult to commit someone against his will. However, there are lots of mentally deranged individuals walking the streets who don't slaughter a dozen or more fellow citizens.
So, what do we have here? How do we explain these seemingly inexplicable tragic events? We have a tendency in this country to avoid acknowledging evil. We explain the most heinous occurences, sometimes with extremely tortured reasoning. Atrocities committed by Islamic extremists are justified--not by everyone but by some--as the consequence of our bad deeds as a nation. Even 9/11 was so justified. Today, the cowardly street bombings by rebels in Syria are excused as a justified reaction to persecution by the Assad regime. It appears that only Adolf Hitler is acknowledged as an unredeemable bad guy by most folks. Yet, seemingly inexplicable outrages continue to occur with disturbing regularity.
Gun restrictions or an outright ban will not stop the acts of the man without a soul. An assault weapons ban is meaningless. The AR-15 "assault rifle" Holmes carried, along with a shotgun and handgun, was semi-automatic like most handguns, rifles and shotguns. "Semi-automatic" means the weapon fires each time the trigger is pulled. "Military style" is a meaningless appellation that relates more to appearance than function. The military AR-15 has full automatic capability, but is not available to the general public. The designation "assault weapon" is vague and undefined, which is why the NRA opposes their ban. A weapons ban will not stop mass killings. It will just serve to mask the problem.
The cold, hard truth is that evil exists in this world. There are individuals whose, in the Biblical sense, souls are dead. There is no voice of conscience to stay their proclivities for evil. There is no guilt or remorse. The image of red-haired James Holmes in a courtroom, nodding off during the proceedings, disconcerts family members and the public at large. Everyone is afraid to say it: this is an evil man. Jeffery Dahmer was an evil man. John Wayne Gacy was an evil man. So were David Berkowitz, Ted Bundy, Ed Gein, Charles Manson and more.
Without a soul, there is no limit on conduct. I do not subscribe to the inherent evil of man as some do. I interpret the concept of original sin differently. But there are those depraved individuals for whom there is no explanation other than they are purely evil. Evil has existed in the world since the beginning of history. It even has been responsible for despicable acts in the name of religion. This is not the fault of the religion, but rather of the soulless monster who cloaks his evil actions in it.
Aurora, Colorado, has no rational explanation, other than the act of an evil man. We search in vain for a rational causation. Holmes perhaps is technically insane, but that is not the answer. The only answer, and it is imperfect, is to confront evil where we find it and not to be afraid to deal with it, instead of like the shooting range operator who shrugged off his suspicions. Honest recognition of the existence of evil at least may allow us to identify and confront the enemy before the commission of a horrendous act of mass destruction.
There is no limit to the evil acts of the soulless.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






115 Comments
ahemmer - Jul 27, 2012 6:34 PM
Witness for yourself the protests against "Death Row" vs. the promotion by the same libs for abortion. Makes any sense? Only in liberal land.
bamaphd - Jul 27, 2012 7:01 PM
"What I find appalling is that many (liberals for the most part) find more compassion for the victims of crimes then the actual criminals."
Should it not be that way?
You are one twisted monkey Hemmer.
bamaphd - Jul 27, 2012 7:39 PM
In the past we may have called these folks "possessed by demons".
Well the "demons" are still there. In cases like this you really don't know who the real person is and who the alter identities are. Most are very high functioning people who will not turn to violence. Many are never diagnosed. They are the "quirky" people.
Evil? Possible one of the identities is just that, driving another less strong identity to commit an act. There may not even be a true identity to this individual any longer, that can exert any sort of control.
Gun control would be no protection against this individual. because as demonstrated, he was able to make weapons on his own. The gun was just an easier , more efficient vehicle, that offered quicker gratification than what the Oklahoma bombers were able to use. (Ar-15 mods to full auto are all over the web BTW, it would be a no brainer for someone who had this level of smarts).
So evil? Tough call. What makes it evil: the killing, the planning, or both? Is he evil because he killed many or is he evil because he killed the first one? Is killing just one person less evil than killing many?
I think the term "evil" is over used to cover off too many things we don't want to take the time to dig into and understand fully. We don't sentence people based on a degree of "evilness" because it is too subjective, we sentence them by a proven degree of intent and planning, and only if we determine that they were sane at the time the committed the act.
MGarber - Jul 27, 2012 8:30 PM
6:30 on a Fri? Im giving her the bennefit of the doubt and chalk it up to martini editing.
Im more curious as to what made him snap so bad, rather than trying to define evil.
ExToDResident - Jul 27, 2012 8:57 PM
known about the human brain. The degree of discourse among the bloggers here
to see how little we understand about why we think the things we think.
I believe that the behavior of people like those you mention. Maybe someday in
the future we will learn to identify the behaviours that represent the foundations
for such violent acts.
Perhaps some day we will be able to cure the most pervasive and heinous of all age
related brain diseases; conservatism. At that time we will have cured the pie in the
sky optimism for the future of liberalism.
WFB resident - Jul 27, 2012 9:29 PM
what they see as a disease (Conservatism)and (people of color) ! But like most
diseases the first to try to correct them are proven incorrect . Usually trying the
exact opposite of what it really is . So please do not hold ex's comments against him
for some day he will grow up and out of his disease ! Hemmer and Hayett did ! lol...
Good night ex .
aneuhauser - Jul 28, 2012 12:43 AM
I don't buy the multiple personality concept for evil ones. Dahmer's, Gacy's, Manson's (he probably IS nuts) or Holmes's conduct was consistent over a period of time. The latter carefully planned and prepared for his rampage, including booby trapping his room to kill more in the person of police. There is/was no indication of a shift in personality. The "good guy" never came out.
bamaphd - Jul 28, 2012 10:00 AM
http://abcnews.go.com/US/colorado-shooting-suspect-james-holmes-psychiatrist/story?id=16872374#.UBP9xqDleSo
yert49 - Jul 28, 2012 10:58 AM
case many lefties do suffer from a weird affinity for criminals. I've never understood
it. It's a lack of recognition of good and evil. Al is right on here.
It truly is the emptiness of the soul. You will know it when you see it.
ahemmer - Jul 28, 2012 11:27 AM
I'll re-state part of my comment as it should have read just to be clear so lefties like bamaphd (a Phd. and he can't tell what I meant?) or GWB will understand:
"What I find appalling is that many (liberals for the most part) find more compassion for the criminals than the victims of crimes. Why? The true victims in ANY crime are those that fall prey to criminals. The criminals are not the victims, even though the lefties seem so intent on making them so."
Libs are so quick to bend over backwards, find any loophole, reason, or excuse bad or violent and/or criminal behavior. Someone kills someone - why, they had to have had a horrific childhood - the "system" failed them - blah blah blah. We are all to blame for the misconduct and evil deeds of others.
Sorry. No we are not.
We must stop trying to deflect the blame off the perpetrators and make excuses for bad or criminal behavior of others. Remember even after the horrors of 9/11 some were clamoring to "understand" where the terrorists were coming from? why did they hate us so? must have been something the USA did!!! Disgusting.
Victor Ponelis - Jul 28, 2012 12:15 PM
to violate the only real moral absolute, the "Golden Rule", a moral tenet from which
all others are derived.
Studies show 4% of the population are psychopaths, of one type or another.
ahemmer - Jul 28, 2012 4:31 PM
And Al didn't "start" anything.
MGarber - Jul 28, 2012 5:44 PM
There is no need to politicize this topic. Al didnt need to do it, and neither should you.
ahemmer - Jul 28, 2012 6:30 PM
I expected the leftie mainstream media to do exactly what they did in regards to Colorado, and they did not disappoint. Even though they were wrong.
bamaphd - Jul 28, 2012 6:43 PM
No, I don't read minds. I have to go by the evidence on the page.
bamaphd - Jul 28, 2012 6:50 PM
Only by the reality you perceive and believe exists. A chair is a chair to both you and me. That's reality. What you think of the chair and what I think of the chair are only our perceptions. Neither has any bearing on the reality of the chair being a chair, and cannot change it in any way shape or form.
yert49 - Jul 28, 2012 9:54 PM
have not heard of a spade being a spade. Perceptions are based on reality and
unless you are delusional based on facts.
WFB resident - Jul 28, 2012 11:52 PM
going to bed ! Nite !!