The Face of Evil
This is a difficult post for me to write. The Aurora, Colorado, mass killing of 12 innocent souls and the wounding of 58 others, some seriously, is a monstrous tragedy with victims well beyond the casualties. Dozens of family members and friends are also deeply affected. Please believe me when I assure you I am not trying to capitalize on this tragedy, but I think there is a critical issue here that the media and others are missing. The significance of this and other similar mass killings committed without clear motive or justification is not being addressed, which masks their significance.
As is virtually always the case, the pundits and analysts come out of the woodwork to search for an explanation, precursor, motive or justification for someone deciding to kill a large number of innocent people, usually complete strangers. They look into the perpetrator's childhood, his activities, his associates, searching, searching for some vehicle of understanding. This derives from the pervasive notion that bad things can be prevented from happening if only we find the key to the behavior and fix it. Sometimes it's there in a distorted childhood or traumatic event, but usually it eludes identification.
Jeffery Dahmer had a stupefyingly normal upbringing in a normal family. He stated he didn't know why he did what he did, he just wanted to. The present mass killer, James Holmes, complete with red hair, appeared to be a relatively harmless Batman freak to friends, family and associates. One person, a shooting range proprietor, judged him from a bizarre voicemail greeting and strange conversation to be too unstable to shoot at his range, but did not consider him dangerous. Fellow neuroscience researchers thought him strange or did not notice him at all. The government gave him a sustaining stipend plus a $26,000 grant for his research, part of which he apparently spent to purchase the weapons he used in his rampage.
So. what motivated this hapless misfit and other mass killers? Are they just nuts? Certainly they are not mainstream mentally normal, but is that enough to explain such catastrophic behavior? I think it offers a partial explanation, in that we have shut down mental institutions and made it extremely difficult to commit someone against his will. However, there are lots of mentally deranged individuals walking the streets who don't slaughter a dozen or more fellow citizens.
So, what do we have here? How do we explain these seemingly inexplicable tragic events? We have a tendency in this country to avoid acknowledging evil. We explain the most heinous occurences, sometimes with extremely tortured reasoning. Atrocities committed by Islamic extremists are justified--not by everyone but by some--as the consequence of our bad deeds as a nation. Even 9/11 was so justified. Today, the cowardly street bombings by rebels in Syria are excused as a justified reaction to persecution by the Assad regime. It appears that only Adolf Hitler is acknowledged as an unredeemable bad guy by most folks. Yet, seemingly inexplicable outrages continue to occur with disturbing regularity.
Gun restrictions or an outright ban will not stop the acts of the man without a soul. An assault weapons ban is meaningless. The AR-15 "assault rifle" Holmes carried, along with a shotgun and handgun, was semi-automatic like most handguns, rifles and shotguns. "Semi-automatic" means the weapon fires each time the trigger is pulled. "Military style" is a meaningless appellation that relates more to appearance than function. The military AR-15 has full automatic capability, but is not available to the general public. The designation "assault weapon" is vague and undefined, which is why the NRA opposes their ban. A weapons ban will not stop mass killings. It will just serve to mask the problem.
The cold, hard truth is that evil exists in this world. There are individuals whose, in the Biblical sense, souls are dead. There is no voice of conscience to stay their proclivities for evil. There is no guilt or remorse. The image of red-haired James Holmes in a courtroom, nodding off during the proceedings, disconcerts family members and the public at large. Everyone is afraid to say it: this is an evil man. Jeffery Dahmer was an evil man. John Wayne Gacy was an evil man. So were David Berkowitz, Ted Bundy, Ed Gein, Charles Manson and more.
Without a soul, there is no limit on conduct. I do not subscribe to the inherent evil of man as some do. I interpret the concept of original sin differently. But there are those depraved individuals for whom there is no explanation other than they are purely evil. Evil has existed in the world since the beginning of history. It even has been responsible for despicable acts in the name of religion. This is not the fault of the religion, but rather of the soulless monster who cloaks his evil actions in it.
Aurora, Colorado, has no rational explanation, other than the act of an evil man. We search in vain for a rational causation. Holmes perhaps is technically insane, but that is not the answer. The only answer, and it is imperfect, is to confront evil where we find it and not to be afraid to deal with it, instead of like the shooting range operator who shrugged off his suspicions. Honest recognition of the existence of evil at least may allow us to identify and confront the enemy before the commission of a horrendous act of mass destruction.
There is no limit to the evil acts of the soulless.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






115 Comments
MGarber - Jul 29, 2012 8:03 AM
I wasnt talking about the whole world, Amy; I was talking about our little group.
I notice about how you arent mentioning all the groups/outlets that are blaming the shootings on the rise of atheism, the gays, Obama, etc. Where's your indignancy for that??
"Perceptions are based on reality."
They should be, but as Ive illustrated, it aint necessarily so.
Tom Bal - Jul 29, 2012 9:38 AM
What difference does it make whether he’s a conservative Liberal Islamic Purple white or black or liked Kiss?
In my option these people are truly insane. My problem with this though is if they are insane why are they were sane enough to contrive the deed. This took weeks of planning.
My thoughts are anyone who has no regard for life must have something deeply wrong in their heads.
I don’t see a need to politesse this at all.
These people are as Al said evil that’s it whether he’s Conservative Liberal religious or atheist it make do never mind to me. Evil is evil I really don’t care about his back ground his likes or dislikes.
There are still something’s I think we need to come together on and this is one of them.
These are tragic terrible deaths I really don’t care whether he watched CNN or Fox News in the end he made the choice.
When tragedy’s like this happen I just don’t understand the blame game, and I don’t think the victims loved ones do either.
And I really don’t understand the Media fueling these fires between us.
ahemmer - Jul 29, 2012 9:58 AM
Victor Ponelis - Jul 29, 2012 4:35 PM
Irrespective of that, Mr. Holmes should be locked up for the rest of his life...he is
a danger to himself and those around him.
I am bothered by your statement that "without a soul there is no limit on conduct".
If by soulless one means a psychopath, then we are in agreement. If you mean
some metaphysical entity, for which no evidence exists...well, then we have a
problem.
Let us constrain ourselves to observable reality....it is the only mechanism by
which the largest number of people can share in this important conversation.
As far as gun control is concerned....well, it has not been shown to be effective.
Statistically speaking, 3 things contribute to a lower crime rate: community
policing or increased policing, harsher crime sentences....and finally and most
effective, legalized abortion. Unwanted children grow up to be criminals, plan and
simple. This does not mean I recommend abortion as crime control (that would
be immoral and misconstrue unrelated arguments and issues), but if we want to
know what DOES lower crime.....it cannot be ignored.
aneuhauser - Jul 29, 2012 6:06 PM
Victor: Let's not get bogged down in definitions. The Christian calls it a soul, or conscience; the non-believer calls it by some psychiatric name. The net result is the same: a depraved individual who kills others without compunction. Please don't get me started on abortion. In my view, your statement is appalling.
Tom: Thanks. You get the point.
ahemmer - Jul 29, 2012 7:16 PM
Sorry. I have to disagree with you on this one. I have not tried to "politicize" this in any way, just am pointing out that in the big scheme of things, liberals usually do find excuses for criminal behavior and turn up their noses at the victims.
Victor Ponelis - Jul 29, 2012 7:25 PM
Methaphysical or not, I think we agree....he is depraved.
As for my appalling statement regarding gun control...I did not wish to offend, but
you brought up gun control. I was just sharing what statistical analysis shows....I
would prefer abortion not have that strong inverse relationship...but there it is.
Citation: http://neuro.bcm.edu/eagleman/neurolaw/papers/[Levitt]2004.pdf
aneuhauser - Jul 30, 2012 12:34 AM
Victor. The gun control and policing/sentencing comments are acceptable, even though I do not fully agree. I think enforcement can have a deterrent effect, but unfortunately not in the case of a truly evil miscreant who doesn't care. The abortion reference remains appalling. Pre-killing the innocent is not an acceptable solution to this or any problem, most especially in my book. (It's personal; we have two adopted daughters.)
Victor Ponelis - Jul 30, 2012 5:18 AM
abortion....well, in 20 years you better higher more cops, you are going to need
them. And neither I, nor the economist who wrote that article, would recommend
that...it would be immoral public policy. In my book, you legalize abortion
because those that can't control their own bodies (women) are thus second-class
citizens....and choice allows women to have the same control over their bodies
men do. That has always been my rationale.
However, it is a causative factor in lower crime rates. The stats don't lie. I'm not
going to be an ostrich and hide my head in the sand from this sad truth....but
there it is. And now because it is personally painful for you to contemplate,
consider the point made...and dropped.
ahemmer - Jul 30, 2012 7:21 AM
The point I wanted to add is that until all realize such, some in our society will attempt to make excuses and deflect blame away from the true perpetrators of evil. Why? I don't have a clue. However, by looking around for excuses for evil behavior - we are discounting those who suffer at the hands of evil to begin with.
MGarber - Jul 30, 2012 7:48 AM
False dichotomy.
Change the sentence to ""However, by looking around for causes and sources for evil behavior - we are discounting those who suffer at the hands of evil to begin with." and the false dichotomy becomes more apparant.
WFB resident - Jul 30, 2012 9:40 AM
Mucho - Jul 30, 2012 10:38 AM
policing or increased policing, harsher crime sentences....and finally and most
effective, legalized abortion"..."statistics don't lie" - Victorp
Very twisted that you bring up killing as a solution to killing. There is ONE significant contributor to crime - POVERTY. A better economy and lower unemployment is the tried and true method to lowering crime. Compiling associations between disparate conditions is bad logic.
Regardless, the Aurora massacre is outside the typical crime statitistics and falls into the classification of the evil that Al is talking about. Unlike most poverty driven and drug related crimes, petty theft, burglary, etc... abortion is rooted in that same evil. Just look at the origins of Planned Parenthood.
Better economy means lower crime. Decreasing the poverty level by 1% lowers crime by over 2%. http://economics.fundamentalfinance.com/povertycrime.php
By design (dating back to Margaret Sangers eugenics goals) Planned Parenthood preys on poor neighborhoods - That is why your bogus correlation exists between abortion and crime.
jman99 - Jul 30, 2012 11:30 AM
LOL.
It's never Hemmer's fault even when she blunders. Now that's Ego.
Actually bamaphd BBQ'd you quite well with your own words as the sauce.
Victor Ponelis - Jul 30, 2012 12:01 PM
statistically significant finding that legalized abortion lowers crime if it was
previously illegal. Abortion should not be pursued as a crime control measure,
and I stated this. Please do not misconstrue my position. Issues of female/male
equality are outside the scope of this discussion, but are the reasons I do support
a woman's choice regarding abortion.
Can we now return to the raison d'etre of this posting?
MGarber - Jul 30, 2012 2:02 PM
???!!!!...liberals turn up their noses at the victims. !!!!???
Thats not politicizing???? What is it called, then????
jman99 - Jul 30, 2012 2:35 PM
Thats not politicizing???? What is it called, then????"
Exactly.
Mucho - Jul 30, 2012 4:21 PM
I am happy to stay on point. You did a quick drive by and threw out an irrelevant mistruth and I called you on it. Poverty, unemployment and population density are equal factors in abortion rates and crime rates. Concluding ther is a direct relationship between the end products of the same root causes is illogical. Happy to stay on topic but you brought up the invalid statistic for a reason, so I thought it best to clean it up.
Mucho - Jul 30, 2012 4:30 PM
Whatever demons are inside that loser's head in Aurora are evil. If it can be associated as mental illness and not recognized for the evil that Al describes it as...It is still evil. Evil manifests itself in many ways, via any color, class, religion, party, age, etc...
Al makes a very solid point by calling a spade a spade.
Victor Ponelis - Jul 30, 2012 5:39 PM
information.