The Face of Evil
This is a difficult post for me to write. The Aurora, Colorado, mass killing of 12 innocent souls and the wounding of 58 others, some seriously, is a monstrous tragedy with victims well beyond the casualties. Dozens of family members and friends are also deeply affected. Please believe me when I assure you I am not trying to capitalize on this tragedy, but I think there is a critical issue here that the media and others are missing. The significance of this and other similar mass killings committed without clear motive or justification is not being addressed, which masks their significance.
As is virtually always the case, the pundits and analysts come out of the woodwork to search for an explanation, precursor, motive or justification for someone deciding to kill a large number of innocent people, usually complete strangers. They look into the perpetrator's childhood, his activities, his associates, searching, searching for some vehicle of understanding. This derives from the pervasive notion that bad things can be prevented from happening if only we find the key to the behavior and fix it. Sometimes it's there in a distorted childhood or traumatic event, but usually it eludes identification.
Jeffery Dahmer had a stupefyingly normal upbringing in a normal family. He stated he didn't know why he did what he did, he just wanted to. The present mass killer, James Holmes, complete with red hair, appeared to be a relatively harmless Batman freak to friends, family and associates. One person, a shooting range proprietor, judged him from a bizarre voicemail greeting and strange conversation to be too unstable to shoot at his range, but did not consider him dangerous. Fellow neuroscience researchers thought him strange or did not notice him at all. The government gave him a sustaining stipend plus a $26,000 grant for his research, part of which he apparently spent to purchase the weapons he used in his rampage.
So. what motivated this hapless misfit and other mass killers? Are they just nuts? Certainly they are not mainstream mentally normal, but is that enough to explain such catastrophic behavior? I think it offers a partial explanation, in that we have shut down mental institutions and made it extremely difficult to commit someone against his will. However, there are lots of mentally deranged individuals walking the streets who don't slaughter a dozen or more fellow citizens.
So, what do we have here? How do we explain these seemingly inexplicable tragic events? We have a tendency in this country to avoid acknowledging evil. We explain the most heinous occurences, sometimes with extremely tortured reasoning. Atrocities committed by Islamic extremists are justified--not by everyone but by some--as the consequence of our bad deeds as a nation. Even 9/11 was so justified. Today, the cowardly street bombings by rebels in Syria are excused as a justified reaction to persecution by the Assad regime. It appears that only Adolf Hitler is acknowledged as an unredeemable bad guy by most folks. Yet, seemingly inexplicable outrages continue to occur with disturbing regularity.
Gun restrictions or an outright ban will not stop the acts of the man without a soul. An assault weapons ban is meaningless. The AR-15 "assault rifle" Holmes carried, along with a shotgun and handgun, was semi-automatic like most handguns, rifles and shotguns. "Semi-automatic" means the weapon fires each time the trigger is pulled. "Military style" is a meaningless appellation that relates more to appearance than function. The military AR-15 has full automatic capability, but is not available to the general public. The designation "assault weapon" is vague and undefined, which is why the NRA opposes their ban. A weapons ban will not stop mass killings. It will just serve to mask the problem.
The cold, hard truth is that evil exists in this world. There are individuals whose, in the Biblical sense, souls are dead. There is no voice of conscience to stay their proclivities for evil. There is no guilt or remorse. The image of red-haired James Holmes in a courtroom, nodding off during the proceedings, disconcerts family members and the public at large. Everyone is afraid to say it: this is an evil man. Jeffery Dahmer was an evil man. John Wayne Gacy was an evil man. So were David Berkowitz, Ted Bundy, Ed Gein, Charles Manson and more.
Without a soul, there is no limit on conduct. I do not subscribe to the inherent evil of man as some do. I interpret the concept of original sin differently. But there are those depraved individuals for whom there is no explanation other than they are purely evil. Evil has existed in the world since the beginning of history. It even has been responsible for despicable acts in the name of religion. This is not the fault of the religion, but rather of the soulless monster who cloaks his evil actions in it.
Aurora, Colorado, has no rational explanation, other than the act of an evil man. We search in vain for a rational causation. Holmes perhaps is technically insane, but that is not the answer. The only answer, and it is imperfect, is to confront evil where we find it and not to be afraid to deal with it, instead of like the shooting range operator who shrugged off his suspicions. Honest recognition of the existence of evil at least may allow us to identify and confront the enemy before the commission of a horrendous act of mass destruction.
There is no limit to the evil acts of the soulless.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






115 Comments
WFB resident - Jul 30, 2012 8:08 PM
Mucho - Jul 31, 2012 11:54 AM
Poverty = High Crime
http://economics.fundamentalfinance.com/povertycrime.php
Poverty = High Abortion Rate
http://mobile.journals.lww.com/greenjournal/_layouts/oaks.journals.mobile/articleviewer.as
px?year=2011&issue=06000&article=00014
Good reasons in each analysis to demonstrate the dependency of the variables.
Drawing a relationship between crime and abortion when they are dependent upon the
same variables is bad math.
ExToDResident - Jul 31, 2012 12:25 PM
I will attempt to clarify what I was trying to say for you WFB.
“There is more that is known about deep space or the depths of the ocean than is
known about the human brain.” At present we know more about the oceans and space than we do about the functioning of the human brain. Science is just beginning to understand what effects body chemistry (hormone balances, chemicals, medications) has on the brain.
“The degree of discourse among the bloggers here to see how little we understand about why we think the things we think.” I was attempting to say that all one has to do is take a quick read of these blogs to see that there is a huge void in the understanding of the differences of opinion expressed in these blogs. With each side struggling to understand what the other stands for.
“I believe that the behavior of people like those you mention.” An incomplete thought, I was going to say that I believe that the behavior of the people you mentioned should be studied, by competent specialists to understand what made them do the things they did. In doing so it is possible to eventually understand what influences and life experiances caused them to act like they did. Do not get me wrong, I do not believe they should be coddled in any way, but they should be studied in order to attempt to understand why they are the way they are. Because then...”Maybe someday in the future we will learn to identify the behaviors that represent the foundations for such violent acts.”
I believe in criminal profiling and trying to “get into the perpetrators head” to try and figure out their next move. The more we understand about criminal behavior the better off we would be as a society.
ExToDResident - Jul 31, 2012 12:26 PM
Perhaps some day we will be able to cure the most pervasive and heinous of all age related brain diseases; conservatism. (It seems to eliminate all hope for the future, and leaves a longing for a golden age that never existed)
At that time we will have found the cure for the (feel good) pie in the sky optimism of liberalism. (Creates a delusional belief that in the future the human race will live in peace and harmony)
WFB resident - Jul 31, 2012 2:48 PM
ahemmer - Jul 31, 2012 4:17 PM
And somehow because of this portrayal are you saying that this is why the mainstream news media rushes all over each other when violent large-scale crimes are committed in their efforts to tie in the guilty with ANY conservative or right-leaning organization? Face it, Mucho. It happens in almost every instance, and the Aurora shooting was no exception. Witness ABC news manufacturing some sort of "Tea Party" connection to the shooter - which was not true in any sense. They just threw it out there, hoping it would stick. It didn't. On the flip side, look at how the media, in its love affair with protecting Muslims and terrorists, tried so hard to keep the fact that the Ft. Hood shooter was a Muslim. We didn't hear about that for days - until it managed to leak out. THe media bent over backwards to keep this fact quiet. Yet they have no problem writing ad nauseum about any tiny misbehavior by a very small group of U.S. soldiers who accidentally burn two or three Korans or play loud music at Club Gitmo (oh the horrors!).
ExToDResident - Jul 31, 2012 6:16 PM
matter what I write you spin and distort it into something completely different from
what I wrote. You are too consistent for this to be intentional, so I attribute it to
your nature. After all you have demonstrated a lack of comprehension in previous
blogs.
MGarber - Jul 31, 2012 7:32 PM
And ExToD tries to reason with a child.
Details at 10:00.
ExToDResident - Jul 31, 2012 8:50 PM
I was aware of the futility of trying to make the Wallboard Finished Basement
resident understand reason when I was composing my response.
I know I must stop feeding the troll.
Victor Ponelis - Jul 31, 2012 10:09 PM
having fallen into the pattern...and decided it was beneath me. I shall not
respond to goading...but stick to the relevant points of Al's thesis.
Evil, as I define it, is lack of empathy for one's fellow humans....metaphysics is
irrelevant. Disease, when present and responsible for great wrong, necessitates
treatment...and probable confinement. Mr. Holmes is diseased, at best, and
deserves life-long confinement.
Do not misunderstand my point regarding the uselessness of gun control...and
what has been responsible for the decrease of crime over the last 20 years. It is
certainly not an endorsement of abortion as a crime control measure...it is merely
a description of reality.
Causal relations are established by vigorous OLS analysis, and I do not deny
poverty as correlated....but causation with respect to violence has not been
established by the commentators here....and my vigorous analysis presented by
Dr. Levitt of UChicago stands until refuted. His control of disparate states that
legalized abortion previous to Roe v. Wade shows that abortion has a causative
relation with violence, inversely related. Many foreign, disparate, foreign
countries that have much lower rates of violence means culture has not been
controlled for...implying ours is a violent society....again, this is a hypothesis, not
causally established.
So...evil exists where empathy for one's fellow humans is lacking. Evil should be
punished, disease treated...is there truly any debate on this point?
Victor Ponelis - Jul 31, 2012 10:21 PM
significant. So, higher poverty equals higher crime (a common sense conclusion),
and higher poverty is associated with higher abortion rates. Also common sense.
Decrease poverty, decrease crime, decrease abortion. Laudable goals. But Dr.
Levitt's analysis is not invalidated. If you have legalized abortion, all things being
equal, and illegalize it, crime will increase with the increase in unwanted children.
Abortion, as I said before, is not a laudable crime control means...but if you want
to treat women the equal of men, you give them control over their own
bodies....my original point.
Victor Ponelis - Jul 31, 2012 10:28 PM
There really is no good reason to oppose abortion. Please do not cite
Leviticus....why should we, in the 21 Century, hold our morality hostage to Bronze
Age savages for whom the wheelbarrow would have been an innovation?
Also, please do not cite Catholic doctrine...it is bankrupt. Why people take their
sex advice from ostensible celibates (except, it seems, when it comes to young
boys) is beyond me. The papacy's discouragement of contraception, especially in
Africa, means the Catholic Church literally has the blood of innocent millions on its
hands.
Decrease crime....by focusing on poverty. Decrease abortion...by emphasizing
contraception. Easy. Moral. Simple.
irked - Aug 01, 2012 12:56 AM
punished, disease treated...is there truly any debate on this point?" How do you
decide if one is lacking empathy ? Is there no need for causation in your world ?
"Also, please do not cite Catholic doctrine...it is bankrupt. Why people take their
sex advice from ostensible celibates (except, it seems, when it comes to young
boys) is beyond me." Well to get true wisdom for as vic wrote "(sex with boys)" one
would only need to ask a Public school teacher ! For comparing abuse to abuse the
teachers far out number The Church in those matters !! Then vic says this : "The
papacy's discouragement of contraception, especially in
Africa, means the Catholic Church literally has the blood of innocent millions on its
hands."
Vic are you saying that abortion is OK ? If so how do you justify the killing of millions
of innocent babies ? Is that not a sign of showing no moral empathy ? It is to me .
With that conclusion would that not make pro-abortion people evil in your eyes ?
Some how I think your opinion/rules change then ! Funny how that works .
Victor Ponelis - Aug 01, 2012 7:22 AM
abortion. My point was on the apparent uselessness of gun control with respect
to violence, and cited the study I did as one that showed causal relations for those
things that have been shown to be statistically significant in reducing
crime....policing, harsher crime sentences and legalized abortion. I haven't seen
a strong challenge to those findings.
I am NOT saying abortion is OK. Anyone who says abortion is NOT killing is
obfuscating. What I have said, repeatedly, is that it is necessary to offer women
the CHOICE of whether to abort or not....because if they do not have control over
their own bodies, and men do, then they are treated lesser than men, and are
second-class citizens at best.
Religious objections aside (I'm not religious, so irrelevant to me...but if that is
one's central focus, I support, yet disagree, with your belief....it is your right to
believe that), I think the reason abortion is objected to by so many is that the
decision resides with a person. Most societies sanction group-sanctioned
violence....police in enforcing a nation's laws, armies in defending a nation).
Group-sanctioned violence means responsibility is dispersed throughout society.
The exception allowed universally is self-defence. (Max Weber held that the state
is that entity holding a legitimate monopoly on violence).
But the universe does not care about our moral quandaries....and liberty and
equality, person vs. group considerations, collide with abortion in an irreconcilable
way. Remember, I'm not saying women should have abortions....I'm saying that,
to be equal to men, they must have control over their bodies and have the choice.
It is not a conclusion I like...but there it is.
MGarber - Aug 01, 2012 8:03 AM
I read Feakanomics when it 1st came out, and it was a fun, fascinating read, but as far as the abortion-crime study: http://www.isteve.com/freakonomics_fiasco.htm.
Discounting his study still begs the question as to where the huge drop in crime in the 1990s actually DID come from.
Other than that, your analysis and viewpoint, strike me as sane and reasoned.
It hasn't got a chance.
jman99 - Aug 01, 2012 8:32 AM
irked - Aug 02, 2012 12:30 AM
baby just to allow equality in your mind is showing no moral empathy ! Equality does
not happen by allowing one to kill ! If a woman wants true rights over her body she
must not except ones donation to add to a child ! In doing so she has given her self
to another in more ways than one !! Justification is a strong instinct for
murderers,Druggies, child molesters, and any other person trying to feel better
about themselves ! The face of evil is shrouded in justification which connects your
jump to prosti.......no abortion .
Carl Hicks - Aug 02, 2012 1:37 AM
been and will always be those who do not care about how their actions affect
others.
irked - Aug 02, 2012 7:39 AM
help !!
ExToDResident - Aug 02, 2012 1:36 PM
there is nothing that we as a society can do about these heinous acts. Until we
understand what makes people like this do such heinous acts we are powerless to
intervene.
For instance Dahmer dissected dead animals, and became withdrawn and
antisocial in his youth. Could this have been a sign of the kind of person he
became?
Perhaps there are other signs of antisocial behaviour that we are not aware of that
indicate that the person will become a monster that we are unaware of.
Just blaming these acts on evil is an easy out.