The Religion of Peace
I watched and read several commentaries, memorials and tributes associated with the 11th anniversary of 9/11 last Tuesday. Remembering the victims certainly is appropriate, but nowhere did I find a single reference to who did it. I know we're trying very hard to not offend Muslim sensitivities, which seems not to be working all that well, witness the deadly outrage at the U.S. embassy in Libya and violent demonstrations in Egypt. Seems like the Arab Spring has turned to winter. Some of us felt all along that it was less an expression of democracy and more a power play by radical Islamic elements. Sadly, it appears we may have been right.
We have, or at least had, a tendency to heap scorn on the 19 or 20 perpetrators of the destruction of the WTC twin towers and concurrent murder of thousands of innocents. We usually picture terrorists as wild-eyed ignorant fanatics blowing themselves up. Yet, the 9/11 perpetrators were generally well-educated mostly Saudi men, some of them professionals. However, they chose to immolate themselve in a blatant attack on the U.S. Their motivation was their fervent religious belief, a belief that includes destroying obstacles to the spread or Islam. (The Koran does encourage persuasion but also condones violent and deadly destruction of obstacles to the propagation of the faith.)
These men were simply firm believers in their religion, generally a desirable chracteristic. They felt compelled to martyr themselves in support of that religion, also not really a bad thing when you consider the fate of the Christian apostles. They, however, felt justified in taking many innocent lives with them. Osama bin Laden, the architect of 9/11, was a respected and well-educated professional man as well as a fervent believer. Make no mistake, these people are not kooks, which makes this paradigm even more dangerous.
So, where is the evil in all this. Certainly this was an evil act, considering the loss of innocent life. Was it in the act itself or those who perpetrated it? No, the act in itself was not evil, but the Wahhabist form of radical Islam that justified the act is the true evil. The perpetrators died for their faith. I don't blame them, but then who is to blame? Let us take a look at this faith.
Islam and Christianity have common roots. The Biblical Old Testament is the basis of much of the Koran. The Old Testament contains accounts of bloody violence, a fact frequently pointed out to me, even to the extent of the massacre of women and children. I'm not going to try to justify these historical events. Theologians have twisted themselves into knots trying. The fact is, they happened. But that was then and this is now.
Recall also that Christianity and Islam worship the same Diety. Allah is just another name for God. So, why does radical Islam kill and destroy to defend and spread its faith while Christianity, with the same imperative to spread the faith, does not? The difference is that Christianity is based on the New Testament, the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. Mohammad is not Jesus. Islam does not have the benign persuasion characteristic of present-day Christianity. (Judaism is another case which I will neglect for now.) We send out missionaries, they--the Wahhabists and their sympathizers--send out bombers.
Why us? What did we ever do to Islam to earn their enmity? The simple truth is, it's our very existence. Remember, Islam demonizes obstacles to the spreading of the faith. The United States, a very successful, rich and extremely powerful Christian (mostly) nation, is a powerful symbolic obstacle to the world-wide spread of Islam. Israel, as a successful Jewish nation in the desert of the Middle East, is another hated symbol of non-Islamic success. However, Israel is small and not nearly the equal of the U.S. It's no accident that Israel is known in the Islamic world as the "Little Satan," but the U.S is known as the "Great Satan." WE are the big problem for expansionist, radical Islam. Thus, we are the target. The Atlantic Ocean and vigilent security measures have protected us for some time, but cannot be depended on to shield us indefinitely.
We must recognize that our enemy, radical, Wahhabist Islam, not a small group by any means and growing, considers our very existence an abomination. As the Israelis know, this enmity will never end. Certainly not all Muslims subscribe to this aggressive form of Islam, just as there are many different Christian denominations, but the radical element is strong and relentless and, sadly, frequently enjoys the tacit approval of the non-violent sects of Islam.
I have no happy ending. But we endanger ourselves by letting down our guard. Apologetics and appeasements will not work. The problem is not what we do, it is us. We would do well not to forget that on this anniversary of the most successful terrorist attack ever.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






66 Comments
jman99 - Sep 13, 2012 6:18 PM
You have to practice it every day.
You can't put it to one side just because you want or need something for yourself. Once you do that, you put yourself ahead of the religion of peace.
Peace means you preserve it both for yourself and for others because you see them as equally deserving of peace.
MGarber - Sep 13, 2012 8:25 PM
No they wernt! They were zealots, and that is almost never a desirable chracteristic.
Dont loose sight of the fact that sometimes, in some places, muslims and jews and christians have lived together peacefully (Morocco and Turkey comes to mind). Why were these circumstances different than others???
Carl Hicks - Sep 14, 2012 12:07 AM
our "allies" are Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and enemy number one was a Saudi
we hunted down and found in Pakistan. I found that quite ironic.
I heard an interesting idea on solving the Iranian nuclear situation
Give them our oldest smallest warhead then explain that we have 20,000 and
they have 1 use yours wisely.
WFB resident - Sep 14, 2012 8:51 AM
and Goliath once . It has been around a long time ! Yet somehow, some still think
that all are scared of great odds . The only thing that diminishes most of it is actually
doing something ! To prove your force . Having only these drones doing something,
is not showing your strength . Apologizing for different religions shows sympathy !
To be exploited . It started with one ,now it has spread to many .
In my view point , it started when ows thugs was allowed to occupy our public
areas ! lol...
ahemmer - Sep 14, 2012 6:04 PM
The liberals can laugh all they want, but the sad reality is that many Muslims hate us - the United States. Not because of some stupid YouTube movie, but because we exist. Period.
Barack Obama came into office and thought because he wanted all flowers and unicorns and the "we'll work with you" ideology towards terrorists that all would be right with the world.
Well, it isn't.
And Barry & Co. continue to make the U.S. look weak and pathetic.
The sooner Romney gets in office, the better.
jman99 - Sep 14, 2012 8:48 PM
I guess you don't need to look too far in Wisconsin to find the roots of hate.
Go home Hemmer.
WFB resident - Sep 14, 2012 10:36 PM
political or not , Not smart ! I find it funny that those on the left want socialism yet
they will not leave Ameica ! If you feel that you can make friends with them and their
way is so good please leave this country !! No comments needed , Just leave ! Have
fun and do not let our millitary hit you in the behind when you go . lol...
aneuhauser - Sep 15, 2012 12:26 AM
MG: I'm not so sure about the zealot business. I think they thought of themselves as martyrs, which in many cultures is considered heroic, i.e. dying for a cause.
Carl: I think the Saudis are masters of deceit. They sit there above the fray, enable the Wahabbi Muslim extremists and fund terrorists. They do this to preserve their rotten kingdom and the western world supports them because of their oil.
WFB: We have a tendency in this country to minimize threats that we don't know how to deal with. We ignore problems that don't appear to have a solution, like militant Islam.
Amy: I think you're agreeing with me in general. I think the warhead bit was not serious. (It wasn't, was it Carl?)
Thank you all for civil comments.
aneuhauser - Sep 15, 2012 12:27 AM
aneuhauser - Sep 15, 2012 12:30 AM
MGarber - Sep 15, 2012 7:47 AM
And when you get down to it, isnt that the most realistic concept of peace?
MGarber - Sep 15, 2012 7:50 AM
We've made mistakes, yes, but we've made mistakes against alot of different countries/people. This is fundamentally (no pun intended) different.
jman99 - Sep 15, 2012 11:18 AM
I don't think it's a "side".
It is much more fluid than that.
What you see is more factionalism vs. presence.
There are factions that want holy wars and Armageddon world wide. What the USA does better than most, is to provide a focus for some of those factions.
When we condemn all based on the operations of a faction, we make no friends with the general population.
WFB resident - Sep 16, 2012 7:56 AM
be demolished ? Is that not what happened when 9/11 happened ? Why not take
those who think this is OK, and have them placed in the remaining US properties, in
Muslim rich countries ? Yes fjl there is so much thought in your way of doing things
.lol...
WFB resident - Sep 16, 2012 9:48 AM
Frau Clinton was for the retribution ? Do you not recall that the information that Bush
recieved allowed the o to get the Osama ? Do you not recall club Gitmo ? Most
Dumocrats in the hose wanted Bush to get retrobution ! Yet some how fjl wants to
pretend that his safety here in the US just happened . Yeah he is yusing all of his
thought processes ! lol... By the way who told you my real name ?
WFB resident - Sep 16, 2012 5:05 PM
said out of text is another PDLS wish ! Yet only those who are drinking their koolaid
would think his argument is stable . lol...
WFB resident - Sep 16, 2012 10:25 PM
stable ?
Pierre Del Norte - Sep 17, 2012 2:53 PM
Within that temporal plain, the space is defined by characteristic dualities - good/evil, light/dark, win/lose, life/death, etc., - with the ultimate duality being fear and desire.
Our human experience is that of the hero's journey - to slay the dragons in our lives. And, on every scale of that dragon are written two words - fear and desire.
That is our life challenge - to slay that dragon.
When we do that, we disengage from the temporal and experience the eternal (timelessness) existence. That is how we experience true peace in our lives - shut out the temporal, leave behind the challenging dualities.
Christian monks practice the ascetic life. The solitary Buddhist monk lives a life of meditation on a mountain top. They have discovered this fact.
So, short of disconnecting completely from the temporal, the peace in our lives will be fleeting.
Or, as W.B. Yeats wrote of the Lake Isle of Innisfree -
"And I shall have some peace there, for peace comes dropping slow,
Dropping from the veils of the morning to where the crickets sing."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ptVEZ0vEEE&feature=fvwrel