
The blog is a view of life, science, politics and education from an engineering perspective. As engineers, we are taught to view the world objectively. We can hope, believe and calculate a particular outcome, but natural laws are inflexible and pay no heed to who we are or what we believe. We must approach the objective dispassionately, while compensating for our own distorted perceptions. Balance is also a key element; balancing between the ideal and the pragmatic, balancing cost and functionality, balancing analysis with action, etc.
Scheduling routine critical self-analysis is the foundation to objectivity. If we do not fully understand and compensate for our own failures, tendencies, habits and skewed thought processes, we will not see the world as it is. Without a regular critical self-analysis we will see the world as we are and then fall prey to self-delusion.
Failure is a great teacher. When failure is coupled with perseverance, it produces the fruit of patience and humility. An engineer, fresh out of engineering school is typically set up for failure early and often. The failure breaks the new engineer of any ideas of self-importance, arrogance and book smarts. Only then can the new engineer be formed and molded into a productive element in the industry.
Thanks,
Bernie
Apologist in chief
US launches PR blitz;
Al Jazeera;20 Sep 2012 12:47
Against the tense backdrop of the Libyan embassy massacre, the US has bought time on Pakistani television stations to run a series of ads in an effort to assuage Muslim feelings of hurt.
The US hopes the ad would show that the country had no involvement with the controversial internet video.
The US embassy in Islamabad bought air time to run the announcement, which features clips of Barack Obama, the US president, and Hillary Clinton, secretary of state, underscoring US respect for religion and declaring the US government had nothing to do with the video. The 30 second ads were run on every television station throughout the country throughout the day to reach every segment of the population.
Obama is shown saying: "Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."
Clinton then says: "Let me state very clearly, the United States has absolutely nothing to do with this video. We absolutely reject its contents. America's commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation."
In an interview with Al Jazeera, Barack Obama said, "In order to ensure we reached the largest number of Pakistanis, some 90 million as I understand it in this case with these spots, it was the judgment that this was the best way to do it."
Addressing a media briefing on the ad campaign, Victoria Nuland, state department spokeswoman, said the aim was "to make sure that the Pakistani people hear the president's messages and the secretary's messages".
The announcement aired as the US asked its citizens to avoid non-essential travel to Pakistan.
Upon reading the article, I was thoroughly disgusted.
- The intensions of stirring more hate in Pakistan is quite evident
- Our apologist in Chief is notifying the Pakistani population that the video exists and that they should be offended by it; despite the fact that the video was only viewed 3 (or some low number) times and pulled off of YouTube last week.
- These are not the actions of a serious rational administration.
- The administration obviously has too much money it they feel that this is a worthwhile investment of taxpayer dollars.
What was the response to the Presidential apology? A day of rage.
Headlines this morning:
“Tens of thousands of Pakistanis are expected to take to the streets across the country after the government called an impromptu public holiday to let people protest.”
The US embassy in Pakistan became the latest target of protesters angry at the YouTube video (prior to the Obama apology they didn't know existed: my editorial). The total number of protesters touched 5,000 yesterday with the arrival of protesters carrying the flags of anti-American Islamist groups. More are expected today.
At least 50 people were injured as police fired tear gas and live rounds towards the crowds.
The air time that Obama purchased got the desired outcome.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.





17 Comments
jman99 - Sep 21, 2012 10:25 AM
Um no. Intention was to put the video in it's proper perspective.
" Our apologist in Chief is notifying the Pakistani population that the video exists and that they should be offended by it; despite the fact that the video was only viewed 3 (or some low number) times and pulled off of YouTube last week."
Does not matter, most would not watch it because of their beliefs. But they already know it exists.
"These are not the actions of a serious rational administration."
Actually they are the actions of an administration that wants to keep peace in the world no matter what nut job citizens hiding behind the first amendment say, putting American lives in danger.
" The administration obviously has too much money it they feel that this is a worthwhile investment of taxpayer dollars."
Obviously it was, because the clerics sent everyone home yesterday.
Better to have one day of venting and draining a wound rather than months of a festering sore.
Ask any doctor.
PS: Your F35 blog was better use of your time.
Bernie Ziebart - Sep 21, 2012 11:36 AM
An adult response to the video is; "In the US, the consistution gives its citizens the freedom of speech and freedom of ideas. Not everything produced by all US citizens will be to your liking. Nor do the opinions of its citizens reflect the opinions of the administration. Deal with it."
This is akin to coddling a two year with a temper tantrum.
Jman, you are bright and thoughtful. But you are also a bit too trusting of your own government. I am of the opinion that it is impossible to be sufficiently cynical of government. As a result, I will not go out on a limb and profess that the Obama administration was trying to calm the Pakistani people. I simply don't know what their intentions were. But by looking at the results, the lack of dealing with the Pakistani's as adults and excusing the bad behavior of the Pakistani rioters leads me to the conclusion that this must be the desired result...regardless of what they say.
jman99 - Sep 21, 2012 11:49 AM
oy!
You sound like you're one step from moving to Montana and hiding out in the woods.
The Pakistani rioters are exercising a fundamental freedom to express themselves, which we hold as dear in this country.
Deal with it.
WFB resident - Sep 21, 2012 12:57 PM
rioters are exercising a fundamental freedom "
Now lets ask that slow thinker what is the fundamentalist rioters freedom to do
what ?? lol... You do realize thsat being a rioter is un lawful ? unthinking ? right !
lol... What college did you graduate from ?
Bernie Ziebart - Sep 21, 2012 1:11 PM
A two year old has the freedom to scream in the middle of Walmart because it did not get the toy it wanted. A civil society doesn't tolerate that.
jman99 - Sep 21, 2012 1:18 PM
But a civil society will tolerate the spreading of lies about what others hold dear and true?
Remember that the quest for the freedom of expression killed thousands in this country.
Bernie Ziebart - Sep 21, 2012 4:12 PM
" But a civil society will tolerate the spreading of lies about what others hold dear and true?"
Kind of like the lies told about Romney; that he killed some guy's wife?
I know that it was off topic, but I couldn't help myself.
jman99 - Sep 21, 2012 4:31 PM
Well, it's quite possible that he did.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/17/1110907/-Mitt-Romney-s-Driving-Killed-Leola-Anderson-His-Cover-Up-Tale-is-Proved-Dishonest
jman99 - Sep 21, 2012 4:46 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/21/us-libya-benghazi-militia-idUSBRE88K17920120921
Bernie Ziebart - Sep 21, 2012 4:56 PM
WFB resident - Sep 21, 2012 7:47 PM
Carl Hicks - Sep 22, 2012 1:46 AM
WFB resident - Sep 22, 2012 2:14 PM
WFB resident - Sep 23, 2012 9:26 PM
able to refute/debate him !! lol...
WFB resident - Sep 24, 2012 9:37 AM
high school ,maybe you can refute comments with ideas and thought . lol...