This is what we have to overcome...
(Sent from my conservative sister, Paula (thanks!)):
(*Note -information provided by Charlie Sykes/WTMJ AM620):
Advocates have quickly turned the perk (free cell phones) into an entitlement. The spokesman for the leading company offering the subsidized phone says, "Having a telephone service, just in general, is not a privilege, it should be a right of each one.” Presumably this means that they are also entitled to free text messages, call waiting, and caller ID as well.
The cell phone freebies are subsidized by the Universal Service Fund, essentially a tax on phone service that was originally used to subsidize rural phone bills. The program was expanded in the Reagan years with the creation of the “Lifeline” program that provided modest subsidies for the phone bills of poor people. In 1996, Congress further expanded the subsidy program by creating the Universal Service Administrative Company with the express mission of ensuring "all Americans, including low-income consumers and those who live in rural, insular, high cost areas, shall have affordable service and [to] help to connect eligible schools, libraries, and rural health care providers to the global telecommunications network." While this subsidy was largely still limited to landline phone, in 2008 under the Bush Administration it spawned a further subsidy known as Safelink, which began providing free cell phones.
Even so, Tracphone apparently wants to have it both ways. In web ads pushing the free phones to poor people in Wisconsin, for example, Tracphone touts: “FREE government supported cell phone.” But in a Lifeline/Safelink “Fact Sheet,” the company insists that “Safelink phones are not paid for by taxpayers or the federal government.” This is a quibble without a distinction, since the funds are paid for from the federally created Universal Service Administrative Company, which was created by Congress and set up by the Federal Communication Commission and funded by the Universal Service Fee, which is a tax in all but name.)
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (179)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






89 Comments
MGarber - Sep 28, 2012 7:54 AM
It would never occur to me to slap a label on my relatives when I refer to them. Do you do that often??
Mucho - Sep 28, 2012 9:30 AM
MGarber - Sep 28, 2012 10:15 AM
WFB resident - Sep 28, 2012 11:02 AM
WFB resident - Sep 28, 2012 11:03 AM
MGarber - Sep 28, 2012 11:24 AM
Paula - the Conservative
Amy - the Reactionary
(this gal) - the Crazy Liberal
(some other gal) - the Wine and Cheese Liberal
(some guy) - the PostModernist
(some other guy) - the Nihilist
(etc)
Carl Hicks - Sep 28, 2012 12:47 PM
MGarber - Sep 28, 2012 1:09 PM
Spoilsport!
I wasnt sure if the topic was the program (as you described), or how clueless the "citizen" was. The former made no sense, and if the latter, it's a grade school excercise to come up with an endless supply of stupidity "on the other side".
Carl Hicks - Sep 28, 2012 1:16 PM
Mucho - Sep 28, 2012 1:25 PM
You mean the Ronald Reagan that got bashed by the lefties for championing Workfare?
You are quite the history revisionist.
MGarber - Sep 28, 2012 1:34 PM
Carl Hicks - Sep 28, 2012 1:56 PM
But seriously if this is a Bush program why is it being labeled an Obama
entitlement ?
Janetluvshorses - Sep 28, 2012 2:17 PM
Who Pays for Universal Service?
All telecommunications service providers and certain other providers of telecommunications must contribute to the federal USF based on a percentage of their interstate and international end-user telecommunications revenues. These companies include wireline phone companies, wireless phone companies, paging service companies and certain Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers.
Some consumers may notice a “Universal Service” line item on their telephone bills. This line item appears when a company chooses to recover its USF contributions directly from its customers by billing them this charge. The FCC does not require this charge to be passed on to customers. Each company makes a business decision about whether and how to assess charges to recover its Universal Service costs. These charges usually appear as a percentage of the consumer’s phone bill. Companies that choose to collect Universal Service fees from their customers cannot collect an amount that exceeds their contribution to the USF. They also cannot collect any fees from a Lifeline program participant.
ahemmer - Sep 28, 2012 2:19 PM
And no, MGarber, Paula isn't a blood relative - she is not my sister. I do not have any sisters. It was a figure of speech - I'll make it easy for you - similar to the union hacks referring to each other as "brothers" and "sisters"... Understand?
The point of what Paula sent me is to exhibit a classic example of the "entitlement" mentality. Living, breathing, - not willing nor wanting to work cuz everything is provided for them. The whole attitude is simply appalling - and sad for society as a whole.
What's next? If cell phones - with all the bells and whistles in their user plans like texting, etc. are a freebie - how about iPads? or home computers? doesn't everyone have a RIGHT to be connected? Egads.
MGarber - Sep 28, 2012 2:21 PM
Janetluvshorses - Sep 28, 2012 2:42 PM
ahemmer - Sep 28, 2012 3:30 PM
"The Act was not taxpayer funded… exactly. Taxpayers do pay for coverage but not via federal income taxes. Instead, the Act “mandated the creation of the universal service fund (USF) into which all telecommunications providers are required to contribute a percentage of their interstate and international end-user telecommunications revenues.” So that little fee on your phone bill labeled USF? That’s what you’re paying for."
Taxpayer funded in a roundabout, creative way. And Janetluvshorses, remember that nothing provided by the government is "free." For example: "free" school lunches (and breakfasts and dinners) do have a price - for taxpayers. Just keep in mind when you hear the term "free" used by the government "free" = "taxpayer-funded" and you'll understand.
Mucho - Sep 28, 2012 3:38 PM
Mgarber deomonstrates this ignorance by posting an article that reports on how conservatives resort to direct mail and email to share facts that the liberal media won't cover.
Case in point - The Left Wing media is "debunking" and "fact checking" on the Obama phone claim instead of illustrating how ignorant this woman is. The story is how sad it is that Romney is right about this 47% of the takers lookin to Obama for their income because he promotes dependence on the littany of Gov't programs this woman rattles off in her rant.
Typical Obama voters like this woman and the ones Howard Stern interviewed on the street just want their free stuff and they don't care what it does to America's middle class family to get it. Why the Janetluvs, MGarbers and CarlHicks of the world but into the Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Obama plan to keep these people ignorant is something that is worth looking into. I can only assume they have a lot in common with the ObamaPhone lady.
MGarber - Sep 28, 2012 3:48 PM
Ah... you get the Emails, too, eh?
"...that the liberal media won't cover."
Like how Obama is gay?
jman99 - Sep 28, 2012 3:56 PM
http://themoderatevoice.com/161797/report-mentally-ill-father-tormented-by-the-prospect-of-obama-winning-the-lection/
This is so sad. Those poor boys, had their lives ahead of them.
Think before you write and think about what you write Hemmer.