
I have a background in science and writing. I consider myself liberal, progressive, environmentally aware on many issues, but also believe that conservatism has a place and is valid.
To discharge or otherwise discriminate against any individual because of any of the following
http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/111/II/322
Prohibited bases of discrimination. Subject to ss. 111.33 to 111.365, no employer, labor organization, employment agency, licensing agency, or other person may engage in any act of employment discrimination as specified in s. 111.322 against any individual on the basis of age, race, creed, color, disability, marital status, sex, national origin, ancestry, arrest record, conviction record, military service, use or nonuse of lawful products off the employer's premises during nonworking hours, or declining to attend a meeting or to participate in any communication about religious matters or political matters.
In this case "political discrimination" on who's going to get layed off first.
http://hypatianshore.blogspot.com/2012/11/hateful-jim-hayett-gone-from-lake.html
http://hypatianshore.blogspot.com/2012/11/did-jim-hayett-brake-wisconsin-employer.html
http://hypatianshore.blogspot.com/2012/11/jim-hayett-chance-to-explain-yourself.html
Scott Walkers DWD civil rights division does not know the state law and we were ignored.
His employee's must be protected and only we can do it.
Thanks, Jake
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- To discharge or otherwise discriminate against any individual because of any of the following (228)
- Vote for Romney, if you don't I will be forced to take your benefits so I can keep the majority of the profits! (60)
- "Yes. Right. I think we believe that insofar as there are inappropriate things, people who vote inappropriately are more likely to vote Democrat." Glenn Grothman (122)
- Writers Block - Open Forum (82)
- Being self-sufficient is not a partisan ideology (103)
- Congrats Walkerites! Victory, Forward, I think? (81)
- To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women. Conan the Barbarian (51)
- Dunkirk Walker Style: Divide & Conquer (58)
- The Walker Gang in: I Control your Uterus & Pro-Discrimination is good for Business (81)
- Death Threats so soon! (87)
- Liberals are incapable of being Professional (66)
- Dead Men Don't Tell Tales (22)
- WI SCOTUS & Voter ID: We All know the Ruling (37)
- R - WI ALEC (61)
- Using personal information for Intimidation will not be Tolerated (54)
- (R -WI WMC) except for Dale Schultz(R-WI), The Legislative Process & The Mining Bill of Doom (67)
- Open Forum (156)
- Female Birth Control: A Man???s right to choose (93)
- "We cannot afford another story like this one." ???"No one can give them any reason to do another story. That means no laptops, no websites, no time away during the work day, etc." (49)
- Race to the bottom economics: Ideology trumps Common Sense (104)
- Pro-Scott "jon doe" Walker zealots are hypocrites about Recall Elections (40)
- The plan to secure the future (52)
- Finger Pointing & Big Butt's they do not lie! (34)
- Family Value Conservatism: Newt Gingrich vs. John Edwards (66)
- The Devil's Advocate (80)
- Questions? & More (30)
- Where's my Tax Cut! (83)
- Scott Walkers Sermon on the Mound of Cash (82)
- Taking Power Away from the People Machine (80)
- Thanks for the Crutches! (73)
- Official First Quarter 2012 Re-Post Blog & Open Forum (47)
- The Tea Party was un-willing to connect the dots but the OWS Protestors did (89)
- "I don't want everyone to vote. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down." (27)
- This is the End (41)
- Posters MUST enforce the LLC Discussion Guidelines (4)
- SCOTUS: Who will own Tom Barret? (11)
- A brief history of the 100 year Republican Majority (3)
- Tea Baggers where were They? (22)
- Shove the Healthcare Bill down the Throats of the Republicans (12)
- An Ecological Primer and the Myth of the “Free Market”: Part I (3)
- My Personal Philosophy (15)
- May the Bodies of the Uninsured, Smother the tree of Liberty with Gold (16)
- Healthcare Reform: Republican Legislation 1995-2008 (114)
- Eliminationist Rhetoric: Exhibit A (38)
- Assassination Attempt against Barak Obama (21)
- Undeniable Proof that Barak Obama is a Communist (5)
- Liberals are Destroying America or How to Defeat Liberalism? (18)
- Real Americans Like you and me! (22)
- Christian Democrat (111)
- Respond to this Post to Receive a , “You're not George W. Bush" Peace Prize (15)
- ......deaths among uninsured adults age 25-64 is in the range of 22,000 a year. (24)
- The Adventures of Republican Jesus: The Bible is Liberally Biased! (3)
- In Order to Save the Democratic Republic of the USA from the Democratic Liberal Socialist Nazi Communist Menace. First you must Destroy It! (6)
- Healthcare Reform: What should it Be? (14)
- Words, Pictures, Anger, Hate (32)
- Tea Party Protest Signs: Part I (9)
- Revolution! Gorge the Tree of Liberty with the Blood of Liberals! (32)
- We liberals have a deep, deep secret. (24)
- America: A Socialized Medicine Breeding Ground (34)
- On Death Panels, On Birthers, On Indoctrinators, & Screamers……. (44)
- Obama's Speech to School Children Transcript (16)
- "I promise to end years of borrow and spend.??? Evidence Fabrication (15)
- Lies: Which are worse Liberal? or Conservative? (38)
- Healthcare: Paul Ryan Says, "Where did that Money in my Pocket come From!" (4)
- The Uninsured or Private Insurance's Cash Cow (1)
- Congrats to Amy G-Hemmer: First LLC Blog Award Winner (18)
- Healthcare: The Christian Right's Corrupted Values (9)
- Public Option may be Killed / Proves that Fear and Intimidation Work (16)
- Healthcare War: Dispatches August 10th, 2009 (22)
- Healthcare War: The Prelude to RW Violence (10)
- Unions Receive Increasingly Scary Threats Of Violence For Town Hall Participation (19)
- Healthcare Mob Rules: Fox News Not Fair or Balanced (22)
- Steal This Blog. (12)
- Private Health Insurance CEO???s: Follow the Money (3)
- Healthcare Statistics: The Failure of Private Insurance (2)
- Healthcare: Right or Privilege (22)
- www.Free Republic.com Beyond Reprehensible re: Malia Obama (27)
- LLC Terms of Use Double Standard or Jim and Amy's Free Pass (53)
- Free Will: A theological Question (14)
- Family Values (Conservative) In Name Only (31)
- Erik von Brunn said this about Extremists (0)
- Newt, Rush, Sotomayor and Context (10)
- The Purging of Republican Moderates Continues in Marathon County (0)
- History of Anti-Abortion Domestic Terrorism (19)
- Abortion Doctor Murderd By Right Wing Extremist (20)
- Why is it? (10)
- Church going Christians support Torture (37)
- Arlen Specter (D) PA vs. The Republican Mob (4)
- Should Water Torture Be U.S, Policy? (4)
- Peter King (R) NY threatens to halt Gov. if Bush officials prosecuted for breaking Laws regarding torture (2)
- Threats of Violence on LLC Blogs are Unacceptable (5)
- BillyJ - Local Wingnut Has Personal Vendetta (6)
- Silly Rightwing, don't you understand. Why the majority of Americans don't trust you? (3)
- Michelle Bachmann Calling for Violent Overthrow of Elected Government (2)
- Conservatism's Biggest Weakness (2)
- Prologue: The 100 Year Republican Majority (3)
- Pot ! Are you calling the kettle black? Executive Responsibility for the Economy (0)
- The Adventures of “The Hulk” Archconservative (0)
- Fact vs. Fiction: No terrorists Attacks on the US since 9/11 (1)
- Rush Limbaugh Racist Sexist Pig (9)
- King George vs. The Bill of Rights (3)
- Stimulis Bill: Long Term Loss if the Status Quo of Corporate Welfare and Tax Cuts for the wealthy Remain Intact (1)
- The Real Generational Theft Act (3)
- Random Observations, Ironies, & Judgments (0)
- Milwaukee County Scott Walkers Tool (1)
- Oh! Self-Imposed Ignorance! Fundamentalist Christian thoughts on Science and atheism. (8)
- Liberals and Democrats are the American Fifth Column (0)
- House Republicans American Taliban (4)
- Bush Hatred and Evil Liberals (1)
- Meet Ex-Representative David Duke, Republican (4)
- Desert Sea - Fiction (0)
- My view of GWBush Era Conservatism (2)
- Oh know! It's True, I am real!! (6)
- More Alien Relay 2.0 posts





228 Comments
ahemmer - Nov 09, 2012 6:20 PM
MCPickard - Nov 09, 2012 6:30 PM
the content of this post, you decide to just attack Jake instead. How pathetically
typical of you and your poor writing skills.
What? Living off the welfare of your husband not good enough for you?
ahemmer - Nov 09, 2012 6:42 PM
MCPickard - Nov 09, 2012 6:46 PM
express myself. Admit it Hemmer, you want people to pay attention to you so that
why you had to go into personal attack mode against Jake... which is the only way
people will pay attention to you. Poor Hemmer oh how I do you pity you.
ahemmer - Nov 09, 2012 6:49 PM
"Vote for Romney, if you don't I will be forced to take your benefits so I can keep the majority of the profits!"
And:
"Yes. Right. I think we believe that insofar as there are inappropriate things, people who vote inappropriately are more likely to vote Democrat." Glenn Grothman"
Silly? Yes. Hard to read? Yes. Laughable? Yes. And the blog writing contained within is ripe with poor sentence structure and incorrectly spelled words. A "background in writing?" Me thinks not. :)
By the way, MC, your shot at "living off the hubby" should make many women cringe. Especially those in families. What have you got against a husband, wife, and kids? You probably don't have any children, so you know not of what you speak. You are as sad and misguided as your brother. Just cuz no one reads your blog doesn't mean you have to take out your frustrations on me!!! And hey, your guy won! Shouldn't you be happy!?! Have a nice night! :)
ahemmer - Nov 09, 2012 6:55 PM
Now, have a nice night and better tomorrows! :)
MCPickard - Nov 09, 2012 6:57 PM
conservative that needs no assistance.
And as far as my family-life, it really is none of your business. Because of a select
few right wingers like yourself and Jim Hayett who would punish those that disagree
with you (such as Jim Hayett wanting to firie his employees because they either
voted for Obama or Baldwin) I tend to keep those matters private.
Yes, Jake should take some care in his writing which, now that you have again
attacked Jake's writing AGAIN is entirely IRRELEVANT to whether or not Jim Hayett
has engaged in prohibited employer/employee discrimination and intimidation
against Wisconsin law.
Jacob Pickard - Nov 09, 2012 7:06 PM
As far as my sentence structure. I only wrote 3 full ones and they were pretty bland. Sorry If I don't put enought hate filled rhetoric in my blogs Amy, I am so not as angery as you are.
Jacob Pickard - Nov 09, 2012 7:08 PM
I, unlike Amy or Jim, don't steal peoples work or quotes and attribute them to myself.
Jacob Pickard - Nov 09, 2012 7:11 PM
ahemmer - Nov 09, 2012 7:19 PM
"angery" What the heck is that?
Try writing and spelling correctly, Jacob, and maybe one of these days people will take you seriously. Otherwise, you read like a cartoon.
And do your really "comment" to your brother on you blog site? Why not text him or call him on the phone? Too funny!!!
Gosh, I just had to check back in here for the chuckles and Pickard Squared did not disappoint. Now I am gone for the evening! And a suggestion - celebrate your win, guys! You two come across as sore losers!!! WHY? President Kardashian won again! You should be happy! What's with the liberal angst and venom?
Have a great night! Rip me to shreds as you wish! :)
MCPickard - Nov 09, 2012 7:30 PM
do you just want to vapidly chatter about spelling all night? What? Yeah, that's what I
thought.
MCPickard - Nov 09, 2012 7:39 PM
call him on the phone? Too funny!!!"
Two can play this game. Let me correct that for you Amy.
1. "And do *your..."* should be" And do *you*..." 2. "on *you* blog site* should be
on *your* blog site...
Hemmer is a teacher is she not? I am not one, so what's her excuse?
With that Hemmer sticks foot in mouth and doesn't have one intelligent response to
Jim Hayett's threats to fire employees because his employees voted for Obama and
Baldwin in direct contradiction to Wisconsin law as Jake outlined above.
MCPickard - Nov 09, 2012 7:40 PM
call him on the phone? Too funny!!!"
Two can play this game. Let me correct that for you Amy.
1. "And do *your..."* should be" And do *you*..." 2. "on *you* blog site* should be
on *your* blog site...
Hemmer is a teacher is she not? I am not one, so what's her excuse?
With that Hemmer sticks foot in mouth and doesn't have one intelligent response to
Jim Hayett's threats to fire employees because his employees voted for Obama and
Baldwin in direct contradiction to Wisconsin law as Jake outlined above.
Jacob Pickard - Nov 09, 2012 7:55 PM
Amy this is great just like old times.
MCPickard - Nov 09, 2012 9:06 PM
you know you have victory.
Amy lost on her very first post.
WFB resident - Nov 09, 2012 9:15 PM
kicking kard ! lol...
WFB resident - Nov 09, 2012 10:39 PM
fighting a war to keep your white privilege ? Yt you wish to project this falsehood of
the Republicans being like Dumocrats !!!
MCPickard - Nov 10, 2012 5:45 AM
WFB resident - Nov 10, 2012 8:43 AM
ahemmer - Nov 10, 2012 12:39 PM
I'll keep it simple. I was remarking on how loooooong the titles to your posts are. I used your Grothman one as an example. That's it. It's akin to you deciding to do a blog on Lincoln's Gettysburg address and posting the whole address as your title. Get it now?
@MC: I was a substitute teacher for 4 1/2 years. Haven't taught since winning a seat on a school board since one is not allowed to sub in the schools for which they are elected to be on the board. I left my position as a sub and went back to the private sector. As for my use of the "your" and "you" I think it is easy to see I transposed the two words. My comments and blogs, unlike Jacob's (and Jake - it's called "spell check" - give it a try sometime!) are not ripe with incorrect grammar, poor spelling, poor sentence structure, and incoherent ramblings. Sometimes it is really just painful to try to read Jake's stuff, although most of the time I don't bother. And remember, Jake is the one who claims to have a "background in writing!" That's a hoot in itself.
Now have a great day! The sun is shining and all is right with the world except for the re-election of President Kardashian. But, being a conservative, we will move on, re-group, and come back stronger. Keep the faith! We WILL weather this storm for two/four more years. I just guess it has to get really, really bad before more people realize what a huge mistake they made by re-electing this clown before common sense clicks in! :)
BruceSpringsteen - Nov 11, 2012 5:37 AM
school board since one is not allowed to sub in the schools for which they are
elected to be on the board. I left my position as a sub and went back to the private
sector. - hemmer
When public schools find a way to rid themselves of poor quality substitute
teachers and incompetent school board members, then education might be on the
right track. -sosaystheBOSS
Congratulations Mr. President!
WFB resident - Nov 11, 2012 8:36 AM
Boss hog is correct , We need to oust the bad teachers . The best way to start is to
get rid of the unions !
ExToDResident - Nov 11, 2012 1:51 PM
My guess is that Jake is an advocate of free speech unlike the person making the
nasty and vile, as well as off topic comments.
I was looking at the first link to MC's blog. I followed the link to the review of
Hayett's business. Seems like a few negative reviews of Hayett's character could be
affecting business.
In one of my last posts which Jim blocked (probably something I said) I asked
about business being slow that he needed to fire someone; I stated that maybe
some of his customers were reading his blog.
Hey MC Jim was under the impression that I was you. No matter how much I tried
to dissuade him of him of his delusion it was to no avail.
But then Jim doesn't like, trust, or believe anything a "liberal" (a term misused by
Jim to label everyone who didn't agree with him) had to say.
Jim's blog was never a debate because he refused to let it be a debate. A debate
requires a free exchange of ideas generally arriving at some form of a consensus.
WFB resident - Nov 11, 2012 7:11 PM
voted for you ! Has anyone noticed that an employer only has to pick the employee
that does not mesh with the owners ideas for the company ? It is a wonderful thing ,
Usually the ones that do not mesh well are those that I disagree with . lol...Boss Hog
and ex why are you not discussing the topic ?
Mucho - Nov 12, 2012 11:46 AM
It is a sound management practice to terminate employees that damage your bottom line if it does not serve to improve product, customer service, morale or quality of work conditions. Voting in favor of taxing your employer at a higher rate is a sign-off on becoming laid off.
When companies like CostCo, Olive Garden, Jimmy Johns, American Family, Ford, GE, ... elect to dramatically reduce their full time employee base in favor of sub-contracters, LTE's and 30 hour per week part-timers on flex-shifts, they are all doing what higher taxes and ObamaCare provide incentives for.
Some employers like Rite Hite, Olive Garden, CostCo (and perhaps Jim) were just being honest about it in advance.
WFB resident - Nov 12, 2012 12:19 PM
always the PDLS's can not admit it .
Jacob Pickard - Nov 12, 2012 4:54 PM
Mucho - We all have a constitutional right to vote the way we choose, as does the employer. That being said a "Voter" is a protected class either way they vote. So as an employer if I threaten your job to you vote the WAY i want you too, and you don't vote the way I want you too, and fire you; it is clear discrimination not based on performance but based on politics.
Mucho it is clear by your response you don't beleive in the constitutional right to vote the way someone chooses without retribution.
WFB resident - Nov 13, 2012 12:25 AM
BruceSpringsteen - Nov 13, 2012 5:33 AM
jman99 - Nov 13, 2012 2:22 PM
Highlight because it so plainly showed his deep felt hate at anything liberal even to the point of threatening his own employees.
Low light, because It showed so plainly that there were indeed such hateful people in this world that they would resort to such measures and then brashly brag about what they were doing, as if they had some special privileged bestowed on them by their version of "capitalism" to take such inhuman actions.
No, I will not, and cannot take any credit for this.
Hayett did it all to himself: He was the master of his soul.
Mucho - Nov 13, 2012 2:52 PM
Replace the word "retribution" with consequences and you nailed it. Lots of companies took a "wait and see" approach to the election regarding cost of full time employees going into 2013. The re-election of Obama comes with a certain package of costs (higher taxes on small businesses and costs of PPACA) that would not be there if another candidate would have won.
While Obama was not honest about the impact his re-election would have on small businesses and large companies with thousands of low wage workers, many employers like Rite Hite, Papa John's and Jim were. You can condemn these employers for presenting the truth but there is nothing illegal about it.
It should not be and is not illegal for an employer to inform their employees about their company's outlook/business forecast should certain things occur (NAFTA, tarriffs, immigration reform, higher min wage, ObamaCare, GTAC mine approval, Keystone pipeline passage, bailout of GM, Medicare reimbursement changes, NASA program shutdowns, Defense budget sequestering, another Stimulus....).
I prefer to have as much information about policy impacts as possible before I determine my approval or disapproval of a candidate, policy or bill. Voters have the right to be as informed or ignorant as they choose. However, it would be irresponsible of an employer to shield their employees from facts that could impact their livelihood. Rite Hite, Papa John's, Olive Garden and Jim provided such information regarding the costs of a second term for Obama so they should not be surprised. Just as the Public School Teachers were advised of the consequences of a Scott Walker election...twice. You can't have it both ways.
WFB resident - Nov 13, 2012 4:13 PM
dumb ones assume that thy are only laying off because of their vote ! lol... Not that
the vote forces their layoffs !!! You are correct thst the ones who voted the o in
should be the ones to reap its effect ! We should have a law that says the way you
vote directly connects to how you have a job !!!
BruceSpringsteen - Nov 13, 2012 6:11 PM
We should have a law that says the way you vote directly connects to how you
have a job !!!
Really? That would mean that all republicans would be relegated to the fast food
industry. That's not so good.
yert49 - Nov 13, 2012 8:54 PM
jman99 - Nov 13, 2012 9:20 PM
Funny, the only place where they don't pay for "socialist healthcare" is in the USA.
1400 world wide is not a big employer.
jman99 - Nov 13, 2012 9:23 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/13/papa-johns-obamacare_n_2123207.html
"Caleb Melby of Forbes has graciously done the math on Obamacare’s cost to Papa John’s and according to his analysis, to cover the cost of Obamacare, the pizza chain would have to raise prices by 3.4 to 4.6 cents per pie -- way less than the 11 to 14 cents Schnatter claims he needs.
And there are other changes the chain could make to save some money, Melby notes, like not giving away 2 million pizzas for free at a cost of between $24 and $32 million to the company, for example. "
Perhaps he needs to pay for this:
http://updatednews.ca/2012/11/13/papa-johns-faces-250-million-spam-lawsuit/
jman99 - Nov 13, 2012 9:28 PM
Nope its not:
Saying that you will fire anyone who votes for the guy you don't like, is illegal.
Employers are not omnipotent. Capitalism does not make them so.
yert49 - Nov 13, 2012 10:03 PM
the cost of this program. Which is more then the media did on behalf of all the
entire left, who care only about taxing the rich, gay rights and abortion on demand.
Just remember that you have already eliminated half of the population from taxes
and now your demanding that they pay for this fiasco. The least you could do is
say thanks and then you could tell the truth. However, that may be hard for you
since that was the first thing you've sacrificed on Election Day.
WFB resident - Nov 13, 2012 10:06 PM
bamaphd - Nov 14, 2012 6:21 AM
Yert:
Perhaps you missed this exchange that was coppied into Jakes blog:
"Jim Hayett says:
"jman99...you are such a sad, lost soul.
Amy, too funny! BTW. I have to lay off more employees. Not being able to determine who I should give the bad news to, I decide to layoff those who voted for Obama and or will vote for Baldwin since it's Obama and the dems who made our country worse off than it was before Obama was elected. "
If you want to support workers then call:
If anyone else want to contact them here is the info:
Questions about employment discrimination should be directed to:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
EQUAL RIGHTS DIVISION
CIVIL RIGHTS BUREAU
201 E WASHINGTON AVE
ROOM A300
PO BOX 8928
MADISON WI 53708
Telephone Number: (608) 266-6860
TTY Number: (608) 264-8752
Or
819 N 6th ST
ROOM 723
MILWAUKEE WI 53203
Telephone Number: (414) 227-4384
TTY Number: (414) 227-4081 "
Note this phrase of intent:
"I have to lay off more employees. Not being able to determine who I should give the bad news to, I decide to layoff those who voted for Obama and or will vote for Baldwin since it's Obama and the dems who made our country worse off than it was before Obama was elected. "
yert49 - Nov 14, 2012 7:34 AM
I'm not touching what Jim said.
referee33 - Nov 14, 2012 8:28 AM
yert49 - Nov 14, 2012 11:50 AM
Mucho - Nov 14, 2012 12:23 PM
Nobody did that. All else being equal between two employees why would you keep the one that contributed to lower profits?
As for Papa John's, it is the small business franchise owners that will be paying the price or dodging the cost for Obamacare. These are the "super rich" people that leveraged their life savings, took a risk and employeed people. After 1-3 years of struggling to break even, they might pull in $200K in a year working 70 hours per week. Obamacare gives them a huge financial incentive to replace 3 full time people with 4 part time people to avoid the rate hike in Health Care coverage. Being honest with their employees up front was a respectable thing to do. Now they have to act on the results.
Compensation modifies behavior. Knowing that even the simpletons in the Obama Administration can grasp Economics 101, Obamacare is designed to fail so harsher restrictions (higher taxes, rationed coverage, more mandates) "must" follow.
VoicesOfAuthority - Nov 14, 2012 1:46 PM
Saw the posts on Hypatian shore about Jingo Jimmy.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Agreed. Good riddance...if only for a little while.
VoicesOfAuthority - Nov 14, 2012 2:39 PM
WFB resident - Nov 14, 2012 5:51 PM
referee33 - Nov 14, 2012 5:52 PM
WFB resident - Nov 14, 2012 7:21 PM
Republicans give even when they are not forced !!!
yert49 - Nov 14, 2012 7:47 PM
nice if we all had to pay based on income. No exceptions. Everyone should have
to participate. The thing is Ref, you have no idea how much a small business
person pays. Granted there are tremendous benefits, even though in Obama's
eyes we didn't build it, but please spare me the sanctimony. If it wasn't for the
other half, you couldn't lay this workin man entitlement jive on the rest of us. It was
your life and YOU made choices. If you have regrets that's YOUR problem!
referee33 - Nov 14, 2012 9:02 PM
VoicesOfAuthority - Nov 14, 2012 9:04 PM
What's sad is WFB can't even keep a blog owners subject in mind before spouting more BS. But then spouting BS is obviously what WFB does best.
WFB resident - Nov 14, 2012 9:24 PM
job that suits your remaining strong points? Well other than the way you think . Or
are you just going to siphon from those that try ?
yert49 - Nov 14, 2012 9:38 PM
a tiered rate, but everyone should have to participate. We all have to have
ownership when it comes to income tax. No one should be exempt. Even if they
get 100% government funding. Ref, I'm truly sorry about your back, but I'm so sick
and tired of the politics and divisiveness practiced by the left. The idea of putting a
wedge between people based on their incomes and their ability to pay is a travesty.
Too many people buy into this red herring by the Democrats and quite frankly, even
though your income is fixed, your too smart of a person to advocate a 50-50
participation. It's wrong!
referee33 - Nov 15, 2012 9:23 AM
Mucho - Nov 15, 2012 10:49 AM
Higher prices and lower wages:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/15/florida-restaurateur-to-impose-surcharge-for-obamacare/
Congratulations.
WFB resident - Nov 15, 2012 1:26 PM
let you go . But off the cuff I will say : writer , or maybe phone solicitor ! Maybe
bank teller . How about at the local school ! They have part time positions and the
teller is with benefits . At the school it usually is different in dif. areas but they pay
well , you work when you want . and in some cases you get a pension at part time .
Funny is it not . lately those frozen yogurt places are popping up everywhere . The
work strain is limited especially during winter coming . but you still may help . Other
wise if you naysay might comments , you might be going through depression . Many
people are even if they do not realize it . Especially if you blame your age and your
back for your employment problems . I understand that reading what I assume on
this blog about you will be hard to swollow but I am not blaming you for your
emotional state . Or making fun of you . I understand some of those hand made hats
in some stores are made by at home people . You may want to look in to it for they
do pay under the counter also . If you are worried about your unemployment
/benefits !
ExToDResident - Nov 19, 2012 12:48 PM
you never met and know nothing about. You are beyond despicable and
contemptible.
Apparently nothing is sacred to you, ever ready to ridicule and condescend anyone
for anything. You are truly a troll.
Everything you claimed about yourself contradicts itself. At one point you claimed
to be a "retire" living on the money received from some invention. Next you owned
and sold a company, and now you have facilities that do business in all fifty states.
Tomorrow the story will change yet again into some other fantastic story. You very
existence in this blog is a lie, hence my reason for calling you the most pretentious
poster to these logs.
WFB resident - Nov 19, 2012 1:57 PM
second guess someone you never met "
Ex , did you ever meet me ? lol...
As for your comments on what I am , Non of it did I lie about . If you understood
how , well then you would know . But until then please keep your guesses to just
that . lol...
MGarber - Nov 19, 2012 3:37 PM
I didn't understand what went on in your mind when you called my family/parents nazi sympathisers.
And I dont want to.
"WFB you are lower than than the lowest."
He wasnt wrong.
ExToDResident - Nov 19, 2012 5:31 PM
You should hope I don't...
"As for your comments on what I am..."
I didn't go into that, I just recounted what you claimed to be.
"...Non of it did I lie about . If you understood how , well then you would know."
Well you therein lies the problem because I don't believe anything you say. You
have been caught in lies before and for that reason I don't believe you.
Now if would care to explain...
WFB resident - Nov 19, 2012 5:57 PM
sympathizers like you for just being anti business is reality ! If you would like I will
say now that I would never do that just for that reason . ( See now I said it) lol... I
would pick those that are not good fits for my Company ! As to what makes them not
good fits is determined by me ! lol... Welcome to reality . Mostly they are not good
fits for not being able to fit in with other employees ! Thank goodness I hire also !
lol...
WFB resident - Nov 19, 2012 6:00 PM
"Ex , did you ever meet me ? lol..."
You should hope I don't...)
So ex please tell me why I should hope not to meet you ? lol...
WFB resident - Nov 19, 2012 6:02 PM
pertain to Conservatives . Not the lowbrows that actually use them . Was I correct in
assuming that you are threatening me ex ?
ExToDResident - Nov 19, 2012 6:10 PM
ExToDResident - Nov 19, 2012 6:42 PM
ExToDResident - Nov 19, 2012 6:49 PM
many of them in my lifetime.
WFB resident - Nov 19, 2012 6:49 PM
asked . again Why would I hope not meeting you ? (in your words) . Please tell us
why for I do not know, other than you threatening me .
ExToDResident - Nov 19, 2012 7:06 PM
WFB resident - Nov 19, 2012 7:41 PM
am serious ,I would enjoy meeting you and buying you a drink/meal ! I fully enjoy
discussions with others on topics that tend to make people cringe . I truly believe
that even when you threaten me that if you actually met me ,that I think we could be
friends . (If you gave it a chance) Like Walker , I am a decent person who cares
about others very much . Unlike Walker I have a short fuse when it comes to antics
like the PDLS's pull all the time . In other words I call a lying rat/scoundrel the way
they are .
ExToDResident - Nov 20, 2012 1:38 AM
these blogs that you don't give a damn about any of them.
You aren't fooling me with this 180', "I actually enjoy our time together" bull.
First off there has been no "time together", and I would prefer to keep it that way.
Second I never "threatened you", if you understood the you would know. lol...
Everything you say and have said is a lie, just like now with your saying that you
"luv" to meet me. Really its ok I wouldn't want to meet Hayett, Hemmer, or your
buddy Tom Bla...er, Bal either.
BTW...did you ever go out for that brat and beer with Jim and Tom?
WFB resident - Nov 20, 2012 10:22 AM
believe it I do not care . As for the Brat and beer . Trying to get hard working people
together is hard and I tried but failed . I am sure we can meet though . I truly took
your past comment as a threat . So be it ! I feel that you would benefit from the five
show . It might show you how Conservatives can be happy while trying to fight back
against a socialist movement that threatens all of us . Some day you will see it
(hopefully) !
Carl Hicks - Nov 20, 2012 12:44 PM
WFB resident - Nov 20, 2012 1:03 PM
Jacob Pickard - Nov 21, 2012 6:17 PM
I don't recall that happening in WI after we are all forced to have car insurance.
Forcing for-profit insurance companies in our "REGULATED" market to actually fully cover their customers is not socialist, it is market reform.
Socialism is when the government "controls" all means of healthcare down to the doctors education.
What the ACA does is not socialized medicine, it is a market reform, on a industry that is out of control and looks at you in dollars only, not at the quality or your being.
WFB resident - Nov 21, 2012 9:00 PM
ExToDResident - Nov 22, 2012 1:22 AM
tried but failed ."
No...now you see I don't believe you here either. I am pretty sure that Jim and Tom
did meet each other. As I recall you failed to provide contact information.
The Five Show? Oh yea! The show on Faux in which four conservatives are needed
to counter the one liberals arguments? I think it shows how weak the conservatives
arguments are.
I do like the bookends that they have at the table. I watched it when I had cable I
preferred to watch with the sound muted, or turned down if the mute icon got in
the way.
WFB resident - Nov 22, 2012 11:17 PM
Gutfeld sits on one side !
ExToDResident - Nov 23, 2012 12:47 PM
Wow WFB , you are more uninformed than I thought !
WFB resident - Nov 23, 2012 5:39 PM
WFB resident - Dec 02, 2012 11:44 AM
have the o in again so now the economy is booming correct ? It has been 4 years
now . How many mor must go by before you acknowledge that the o and his way of
thinking is bad for the USA ? Do not kid yourself when you see an uptick for brief
periods . The economy lives and will fluctuate constantly . But the overall is declining
!!! How many years ex ?
Tom Bal - Dec 06, 2012 5:28 PM
"luv" to meet me. Really its ok I wouldn't want to meet Hayett, Hemmer, or your
buddy Tom Bla...er, Bal either.
Minty the last time we spoke you said you were going to seek Help
How’s that worken for ya
Haven’t found the right combo of anti’s yet uh
Well keep trying numskull.
Nice to know I haven’t posted in months but I’m still always on your mind
ExToDResident - Dec 08, 2012 2:37 AM
Well if it isn't Tom Bla, hey while you're here could you reveal why you guys never
got together for that 'brat and beer" like you guys said you would.
Believe me Tom when I tell you that you are not always on my mind. Like I told
you before you're not my type. Sorry to turn you away like this again Tom. I hope
you can understand.
WFB resident - Dec 08, 2012 7:06 AM
Tom Bal - Dec 08, 2012 8:23 AM
ExToDResident - Dec 08, 2012 12:48 PM
ExToDResident - Dec 08, 2012 1:31 PM
them. And then the terms of endearment (numskull, party pooper, Know it all,
nitwit) that you're using.
You missed me...aw, how touching.
So apparently you returned just to banter with me. I am not worth your time
Tom. You know you can do better.
I hope you're still not thinking of me when you're unzipping in public restrooms.
So tell me do you sit with a wide stance hoping it is me in the next stall?
Just ask Jim, I cannot be trusted to not publish an email sent to me.
(Though he was the one who started talking about it.
WFB resident - Dec 08, 2012 1:59 PM
one now reading this blog understand why we call ex Minty ? lol...
ExToDResident - Dec 08, 2012 2:06 PM
WFB resident - Dec 08, 2012 9:10 PM
Sorry ex, I just had to do it .
AAAaaaaahhhhhh ! Minty fresh ! lol...
Tom Bal - Dec 09, 2012 9:21 AM
As for the stall next to me sorry I stand no stall needed unless of course you need to squat in which case there wouldn’t be A Mint to look at now would there.
And what are you doing in the Men’s room anyway wrong turn or just visiting family??
ExToDResident - Dec 09, 2012 1:20 PM
Really; so you enter the "outhouse" with the intention of soliciting sex with other
men???!!
I was just kidding I had no idea that I had hit on the truth.
What would your wife think.
You are one sick puppy, Tom.
ExToDResident - Dec 09, 2012 4:48 PM
If Tom is...well..that way...and the three of you "guys" don't want to discuss your
get together...
Oh my God!!! You "guys" are disgusting, such debauchery! How can you face your
wife or family?
A "brat and a beer" takes on a whole new connotation.
WFB resident - Dec 09, 2012 5:01 PM
using the gay way of living to be a bad thing ? Proof once again how the PDLS's are
the racists !!
ExToDResident - Dec 09, 2012 5:35 PM
Sorry I asked.
I'm glad I wasn't invited.
WFB resident - Dec 09, 2012 7:17 PM
Tom Bal - Dec 10, 2012 5:57 PM
I knew exactly what you meant by your comments Now your back tracking saying nothing wrong with that life style wow.
And for all these years you and the likes of your party call us Homophobic
Well I guess you just showed your true colors didn’t ya .
By the way your description of what takes place in a stall makes one wonder if you are the experienced one here. One as highly intelligent as you just put his hoof in his mouth.
You never cease to amaze me with your stupidity, reckon as long as they vote for your man you can always snicker behind their backs and make obscene jokes about life styles.
Now look in the mirror and ask yourself who’s the Sick Puppy..
Very Judgmental for a libber.
ExToDResident - Dec 10, 2012 7:07 PM
I cannot "back track" from a position I did not take.
Over the years I have had many friends from many aspects of the LGBT
community. I always respected their lifestyle .
The fact that the two of you think I am homophobic is hilarious. I tell you I am in
stitches. ROFLMAO.
I have been having so much fun, I am glad you came back to banter with me
Tom.
ExToDResident - Dec 10, 2012 7:13 PM
ExToDResident - Dec 10, 2012 7:38 PM
Oh and WFB; please point out where I made a "racist" comment.
WFB resident - Dec 10, 2012 8:29 PM
Tom Bal - Dec 13, 2012 5:58 PM
LOL
Now back to your comment it was off color and I’m sure as a liberal lover girl you realize you sounded exactly what you call us A homophobic Racist slob.
Tisk Tisk Not nice Eor
ExToDResident - Dec 13, 2012 7:17 PM
Because they were/are very comfortable with who they are. From what you say
you seem to believe that people of the LGBT community are conflicted in some
way. You couldn't be further from the truth.
For a lesbian friends birthday I bought her a card that showed a gorgeous
brunette on the front. The caption read; " This is Edith", the when opened it
showed the picture of a cake. Under the cake it read; "this is your cake." The final
punch line read; "You can't have your cake and Edith too."
They were in stitches they were laughing so hard.
ExToDResident - Dec 13, 2012 7:33 PM
Like I am.
I still don't see any posts from you anywhere in any of the other blogs.
Only here in Jacobs blog; and they are all addressed to me.
Do you love Tom?
Or don't you have anyone to abuse in your little world?
ExToDResident - Dec 13, 2012 8:21 PM
Ha ha.
That wouldn't happen because they are not neanderthals like you.
I am the next "long haired freaking noun" you want to hold down and give a
haircut too.
Here I am Tom; dancing and prancing around in front of you flaunting my long
hair in your face.
WFB resident - Dec 13, 2012 8:40 PM
ExToDResident - Dec 13, 2012 8:57 PM
WFB resident - Dec 13, 2012 9:06 PM
you assume others to be homophobes/racists ! Please put my name over yours in
your comments . I bet you would finally see how racist and homophobe you are !
ExToDResident - Dec 13, 2012 10:30 PM
As judged by who? You? Tom? Way too funny...
Two of the most derisive posters to ever post to these blogs are telling me my
comments are "way over board". ROFLMAO
WFB resident - Dec 14, 2012 8:08 AM
Socialist friends . Ask them what this guy sounds like then . Yes they will tell you a
racist bigot ,homophobe . Do not take my word ask a person on the street . For your
so blinded that you do not see how your side really is .
ExToDResident - Dec 14, 2012 12:41 PM
And what side is that? I didn't pick a side; it was assigned when I started blogging
here. It was a label assigned by conservatives like yourself that are so far right
that anyone anywhere to the left of them is a liberal. Conservatives like yourself
that are blinded to the dangers posed by "your side" and how they have eroded
the personal freedoms they claim to protect.
You are blinded to the fact that "your side" put us in this position with their
delusional faith in "trickle down" economics.
ExToDResident - Dec 14, 2012 12:56 PM
because "your side" is so far out of touch with reality.
The candidates "your side" ran for the last two elections were just as out of touch
with reality as you have shown yourself to be.
WFB resident - Dec 14, 2012 2:27 PM
touch with reality ? lol... Walker won by a bigger margin than the o did !! look it up .
As for being left of me , I am pretty close to the middle so yes every one left of me
is a left wing nut !!! I do agree with you . I wonder if the media would actually repirt
the news instead of right bashing . If the o would have won ? I doubt it , but that is
why the Media needs to help the left wing nuts . Did you see the videos of the unions
attacking right leaning people in Michigan ? The Tea Party never did that ! Just go
and watch . Not to mention they called an Africvan American the n word many times
while they ruind his business !!! Go watch how racist the Dumocrat Party is and
alway was !!!
Tom Bal - Dec 14, 2012 5:19 PM
Only reason I stopped was to take a quick look that’s why I posted here doesn’t take much time or brain power to go after you goof ball
Too busy in life to waste more than a minute or two on you.
I’ll say this I would love to meet you I think you could actually make me P my pants in laughter listing to you.
You are that strange that’s a gimme
Woops that’s 30 seconds time to go
ExToDResident - Dec 14, 2012 6:16 PM
You cannot be serious...you close to the middle, that is one of the most absurd
comment you ever made. It ranks right along side Hateyets claim that he is a
centrist.
Apparently conservatives like your self are delusional enough to think the
political spectrum starts in the center and only goes to the left.
WFB resident - Dec 14, 2012 10:59 PM
ExToDResident - Dec 15, 2012 12:36 AM
Or so you believe; thing is the views you have expressed do not support your
claim that you "are pretty close to the middle".
If you were "close to the middle", as you say, then you would have shown more
criticism of the "right", instead of the abounding support you have shown.
WFB resident - Dec 15, 2012 7:36 AM
the right for they are policed by the media !!!! But the left ! They are in open season
. No media outlet focuses on them at all ! Lets look at the tea Party , They are over
welhemlingly very decent and upstanding individuals . They have not attacked
businesses , others in public with out the rest of the Party stopping them ! Then look
at the OWS's and unions in Michigan and Wisconsin they have attacked , threatened
officials lives , Broken in to their homes , You name it they have done it yet the
media says nothing(very little) about them . Yet the upstanding Tea Party is
maghlined with untrue comments like (rscists , bigot, haters ) and such !
Tom Bal - Dec 15, 2012 5:27 PM
Maybe he’s just got sick and tire of this country’s path and decided to take a break or maybe just stop completely.
Heck not everyone’s got your kind of time to blog. You and your fat head brother can take all the credit you want but in the end it has nothing to do with either of you. Get over it and move on to something interesting.
The one and only reason you have a blog Jake baby is to give your God Hating brother a place to vent.
On your own you don’t have the brains to do this.
Throw in enough hate form MC and between the 2 of ya you have a forum of hate.
One can hardly take this site as serious your only goal is to not counter what others have said or state an honest option but rather to attack the few on here you don’t like
This site is as I said before A JOKE.
You and your brother can have the sheep you have in your flock. I don’t believe for a minute LLC stopped him you and the other Fat Head are making one big assumption again.
I guess they stopped me also, or maybe I just got sick and tired of the BS and stupidity on here.
Good luck with your after life I hope you like it HOT
WFB resident - Dec 16, 2012 12:29 PM
toting teachers ! We should take those obscene teacher salaries and reduce them to
pay more for the teachers willing to take the responsibility of teaching with a gun !!
Further more if teacher in an existing school refuses to do so . A job hunting they
must go !
referee33 - Dec 16, 2012 5:49 PM
WFB resident - Dec 16, 2012 8:39 PM
jman99 - Dec 17, 2012 7:18 AM
So are you Hemmer. That's America.
"1) My deepest sympathies and heartfelt prayers go out to all the people in Newtown, Connecticut. I cannot begin to fathom what the parents who lost children are going through, or others who lost family members. Their lives have been forever changed, as have the lives of those children and adults who survived. The trauma and mayhem which occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School is shocking. "
I don't for a minute believe any of the above.
Why?
Because real sympathy is never tempered with the statements that came listed afterwards.
You had a political agenda posting this blog and you've used the death of 20 children as a vehicle for it.
Congrats.
You will most likely delete this post, so I'll put it up on Jakes blog as well.
Sorry Jake.
MGarber - Dec 17, 2012 8:43 AM
OOoooohhhh.... I can just feel the love. Its a good thing you can distance yourself from all that God Hating hate.
We wish YOU Good luck with YOUR after life. We hope you wont be shattered when you find out youve chosen poorly in your current life. I hope you like it LOUD!
WFB resident - Dec 17, 2012 9:16 AM
hold 6 hand prints in its memory ! With that the children would never see or be
aware of the guns ! I understand that you are thinking with emotion and are not
aware of many devises used to conceal / store guns !!! They are the size of a bread
box and can be mounted under shelves, under desks , in drawers , or decorated
right out in the open . Those who do not look for them would not identify them as
gun boxes . The problem is that your knowledge of guns is limited to what you see .
Not what is known ! Also the trend of mass shootings is down from the 90's and is
far below the high in the 1930's !!! Did any of you hear how the mall shootings
ended recently ? Thank goodness there was a concealed carry user in the mall !!!
jman99 - Dec 17, 2012 12:03 PM
So here we have an elected official, whose job it is to oversee the administration of one of our public schools, posts a video from someone who she obviously shares a point of view. Using a video, that reflects the utter extreme in social and political thought, she aligns herself with someone who can only be described as inhabiting the outer-most fringe of social behavior.
This elected official uses this despicable tragedy to suggest that the President of the United States is a narcissistic, self-absorbed, cold-hearted socialist. And then, not being satisfied with that particular string of disparaging adjectives, she continues – “Sadly, the president of the United States is a sociopathic socialist. No feelings. No empathy. Just a puppet - striving for power at the behest of the string-pullers.”
Finally, this elected official, who is in a position to develop and approve school policy suggests - “Having a few armed individuals within the school is not an outrageous or unreal suggestion. We know that many in society are unstable. Why not have a few well-trained, responsible individuals who volunteer to be "protectors" armed - with the know-how of how to use a gun? What is so wrong about that? Let's arm the "sitting ducks" so they CAN defend themselves and save the lives of innocents in the process.”
To all the voters of this school district, please take a moment and understand the extreme manner of thought that this person exhibits and seriously consider the implications of having this person in a position of power. "
I think Hemmer need professional help. A while back something snapped for her, I don't know what, but a lot of people are not paying attention to the results of that.
They should.
WFB resident - Dec 17, 2012 2:16 PM
that !! Yet he /she has no problem with the o and his lying which caused people to
die ? He/she has no problem with the o wanting to change our laws / Constitution !
Why do you guys live in the USA ? To be socialists / Communists ? Must be !!
jman99 - Dec 17, 2012 2:59 PM
I did not write that, I merely reposted it here and then added an afterthought.
MGarber - Dec 17, 2012 3:09 PM
Asside from the election of a black democrat???
Pierre Del Norte - Dec 17, 2012 3:28 PM
Are you referring to the election of our 1st black president, or the RE-Election of that same black president?
I am sure both were highly traumatic for the "fragile mind."
Pierre Del Norte - Dec 17, 2012 3:34 PM
Those were my comments, jmann just added his usually insightful observations.
No need for you to comment further. I simply do not have the energy to respond to your doltish gibberish. (Is that redundant?)
Oh, and please don't take that personally.
jman99 - Dec 17, 2012 3:41 PM
Asside from the election of a black democrat??? "
No it was earlier than November. Something in and around the end of August beginning of September.
No idea what it was but there was a subtle shift that became more visible over time.
MGarber - Dec 17, 2012 3:52 PM
http://www.livinglakecountry.com/blogs/communityblogs/52676112.html
MGarber - Dec 17, 2012 4:01 PM
Pierre Del Norte - Dec 17, 2012 4:19 PM
Are you saying there is a chance that Hemmer might "Light-up like a pinball machine and pay out in silver dollars?"
Jacob Pickard - Dec 17, 2012 4:55 PM
brother. I will get in touch with law enforcement and with the help of L L C to track
your UP address and thus find your identity. I am not playing games with the
possibility of mentally unstable people like you using threats of death and pain as a
clear warning to me.
MGarber - Dec 17, 2012 6:39 PM
A short circuit with improper grounding is usually good for emitting smoke, heat, a bit of noise, and sparks. Not much else.
WFB resident - Dec 17, 2012 8:09 PM
an observation ! I have not seen what you are talking about Picard . Other PDLS's
have not /are not able to discuss the gun situation in true form . For they all have
run from the obvious points that prove guns help more than harm !!!
WFB resident - Dec 17, 2012 9:34 PM
cloud your brains ! Did you see in the AP report that mass shootings are at a low ?
Did you look at the statistics that show that mass shootings happen in no gun zones
? Yet your answer is to make more no gun zones !! Kind of stupid is it not ? Can any
PDLS point out Why we would ban guns when places that do ban guns like Chicago
and Washington DC do ban but they have the highest gun shootings in the country ?
That would be stupid to ban guns in more places ! Well unless you are not thinking
anyway .
Tom Bal - Dec 18, 2012 6:14 PM
But before you do show me exactly where I ever threaten you or your bro
Not my style.
Your being a bit melodramatic. Why cause that’s your way.
I made a statement Last time I looked that was still legal in this country.
Like it or not.
Show me the threat. Or why I would.
WFB resident - Dec 18, 2012 9:28 PM
Well, if they do not get a PDLS mad anyway .
Tom Bal - Dec 19, 2012 5:30 PM
The last line was tongue in cheek as to their beliefs or lack of, not nice on my part sort of judgmental
Funny a year ago SLA made the comment about finding out where I live never once took it as a threat but hey that’s just me Happy happy happy
Have LLC contact me I’ll give them my address and everyone can come on over, saves the time of going through IP address chasing
WFB have a nice Christmas.
WFB resident - Dec 19, 2012 9:28 PM
there !!
jman99 - Dec 20, 2012 11:37 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/national-coal-museum-installs-200-solar-panels-save-201157374.html
WFB resident - Dec 20, 2012 7:36 PM
rifles in 2010 ! The FBI is the source . Only the morons would think to ban the rifles !
lol...
MGarber - Dec 20, 2012 8:00 PM
But I thought you said you were "middle".
WFB resident - Dec 20, 2012 8:13 PM
am definetly a thinker not a taker ! lol...
ExToDResident - Dec 26, 2012 1:39 PM
Now that IS FUNNY!!!!
You occasionally come up with some good laughs.
That is rich, a "thinker", you...way too funny. ROFLMAO
WFB resident - Dec 27, 2012 8:19 AM
referee33 - Dec 27, 2012 10:13 PM
ExToDResident - Dec 28, 2012 1:54 AM
Saving those views for another blog or place?
Because I haven't seen any "liberal ideas" expressed by you here.
ExToDResident - Dec 28, 2012 1:58 AM
I am sure I speak for (most) every one here when I say; we would love to hear
one of your "liberal ideas".
WFB resident - Dec 29, 2012 5:58 PM
with not being paid more than others ! What I do have a problem with is that PDLS's
are living ! They only take and give not ! That is why I refuse to go along with these
ideals I have been raised with ! There are more . Better yet if only Conservatives
lived in the USA . I would have no problem pushingf for that "Community" lifestyle !!!
lol...
WFB resident - Dec 29, 2012 5:58 PM
ExToDResident - Dec 29, 2012 8:10 PM
Apparently talk radio and Faux News own the grey matter between your ears.
WFB resident - Dec 30, 2012 9:08 AM
beleive thast what you earn as money is yours and should only be spent by the
worker whom earned it ? lol... your a joke ex , pay attention to what is written not
what you want it to say !
ExToDResident - Dec 30, 2012 12:34 PM
Never said that, I do find it telling that those were the examples you came up
with when asked to reveal a "liberal idea" that you hold.
"your a joke ex"
Not as big of one as you have made yourself to be.
BTW your is incorrect, it should be you're, as in You're a joke WFB.
"Pay attention to what is written not what you want it to say !"
Psychological projection seems to be rampant among conservatives like yourself.
When have you EVER paid attention to what is written? Your responses have
always been to you wild interpretations of what was "said".
ExToDResident - Dec 30, 2012 12:51 PM
ramblings.
ExToDResident - Dec 30, 2012 1:02 PM
not ."
Are you suggesting that you would like to exterminate the PDLS's? (Just taking
into account how you were raised.)
This is the comment that makes be believe that you listen to talk radio to much
and watch too much Faux News.
MGarber - Dec 31, 2012 8:20 AM
By wolves?
In a barn?
A poor black child?
In Hardtime Mississippi?
WFB resident - Dec 31, 2012 9:10 AM
you put it, would want me, to exterminate Republicans ! Do you even know how the
KKK came in to existance ? Their job was to exterminate Republicans !!! But law
abiding people like me and other right leaning people do not think about
exterminating anybody ! Why did your brain take you to this extreme? unless you
think this way ex ? lol... Just let a fool talk and he will show you how he thinks ! ....
You can use my sentence as a quote anytime ex . Here it is again for you : wfb
quote - Just let a fool talk ,and he will show you how he thinks ! lol... extermination
is your PDLS back ground . Lets make a list of PDLS groups : Nazis ! KKK ! Dumocrat
Party ! Progressives ! Liberals ! Communists ! Hesbola ! Bin ladins group ! All of
these were PDLS groups that forced their beliefs on to others ! All of them are
Dumocrat type groups ! Was it not your leader the o who said we need to spread
around the money ? As for garber he also puts wolves , barns , black children as
hatred groups ! That is sad Garber !!! Why would you even put black children as a
derogatory comment ? It is more proof on how you racist PDLS's think !!!
ExToDResident - Dec 31, 2012 11:28 AM
numerous to detail. But suffice it to say; All the groups you name were not left
wing. Apparently you just love your revisionist history.
You were the one who said you have a problem with "PDLS's living". I was merely
asking how you intend to "cure your problem".
WFB resident - Dec 31, 2012 2:34 PM
!!! Just one ! Nazis ? Read there own comments about themselves ! KKK? Read the
party platform before the 1960's ! As for your killing comment ex . We on the right
do not think about killing others ! But that is the first thing that comes to a PDLS';s
mind that is why you should know that those groups listed above are all PDLS's !!!
jman99 - Jan 01, 2013 10:34 AM
tele (608) 266-8005 | fax (608) 267-0500 | tty 1-800-947-3529 | e-mail gab@wi.gov
Toll-Free Voter Help Line: 1-866-VOTE-WIS
I will be contacting them tomorrow Mr. Balaced and alerting them to you allegations. I suggest others here do the same.
I'm sure they will get to the bottom of this one way or the other.
jman99 - Jan 01, 2013 10:35 AM
Wisconsin Government Accountability Board | 212 East Washington Avenue, Third Floor P.O. Box 7984 | Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7984
tele (608) 266-8005 | fax (608) 267-0500 | tty 1-800-947-3529 | e-mail gab@wi.gov
Toll-Free Voter Help Line: 1-866-VOTE-WIS
I will be contacting them tomorrow Mr. Balaced and alerting them to you allegations. I suggest others here do the same.
I'm sure they will get to the bottom of this one way or the other.
jman99 - Jan 01, 2013 10:35 AM
"Two from our group worked two voting stations in the core. One found a couple voting twice. Another saw young minorities bussed in with well-dressed adults and directing the young adults to the booths and helping them vote. That particular voting station was completely overwhelmed. No one seemed to even care.
Carl, you can ask for proof and deny what I just said. You can complain all you want. But from what I and my friends witnessed that day will never leave my mind. Voting fraud is a real and growing threat to our nation’s freedom and wellbeing.
I wish we could get all Americans to stop this and demand our President and the Democrats to come forward and help fight voting fraud
Would you help us take this up to the Democrats? "
Please tell us which stations these were. I have some contacts at various levels of government and I would like to pursue these alleged frauds.
Since you saw it it is your civic duty to set it out. We all need to know.
Carl Hicks - Jan 01, 2013 12:10 PM
ExToDResident - Jan 01, 2013 12:27 PM
"Ok ex pick one of any of those and we will discuss your inaboility to know the
truth !!!"
You do come up with some extremely absurd and therefore hilarious comments.
You are going to show me my "inaboility to know the truth". A person who has
demonstrated that they are delusional and extremely biased in their opinion
claims to "know the truth".
Give a while to stop laughing...oh man...too funny.
WFB resident - Jan 02, 2013 7:04 PM
what I say to be untrue ,but you are not able to prove it ! I guess I will need time, to
stop laughing at your obsurdity of truth . lol...
ExToDResident - Jan 03, 2013 12:25 AM
proves that you are no where near the middle.
The Nazis were corporation friendly, they did not nationalize any companies.
Even though they took control (or nationalized) parts of German society like
labor. "Read their own comments..", well duh! They were all psychotic!
The KKK is about white supremacy and as such is very right wing. Unfortunately
their association with an earlier version of the Democratic party has clouded your
recognition of their political leanings.
The only left leaning groups I see in your list are the Democratic party and
communist.
Progressivism and liberalism are ideologies and not groups.
Hezbollah (Hezbola) and "Bin ladins group" (al Qaeda) are theocratic and more
right leaning in that they are "fighting to return to a golden era" just like
conservatives.
Carl Hicks - Jan 03, 2013 1:28 AM
definitions. His gut tells him they are all the same because he dislikes them.
ExToDResident - Jan 03, 2013 1:30 AM
ROFLMAO
ExToDResident - Jan 03, 2013 1:42 AM
it doesn't like as "PDLS's" out of laziness and low effort thinking.
From all appearances WFB looked it up in its "gut".
WFB resident - Jan 03, 2013 4:08 PM
learn your history ! You claimn them to be Right leaning groups but you assume that
they are !!!! The KKK was a Dumocrat party militia !!!!! Made by the Dumocrats !!!!
The Nazis were a socialist Party !!!!It is low brow thinkers like you who claim them
to be right wing people for you feel that they are n0t because they are !!! Again just
look at the Dumocrats bylaws back before 1960 !!! They have it written in on how
the KKK was made to kill Republicans !!!! Guess what Black people voted before your
dumocrats taught the uninformed that the right was killing blacks ! Do you remember
what side stopped slavery ? Yep the Right wing !! Go learnb your own history !!!!
WFB resident - Jan 03, 2013 4:09 PM
? Yes we all do ! Do yo0u remember when the Nazis took money fronm the rich and
gave it to all !!! Yes I do !! lol...
ExToDResident - Jan 03, 2013 8:13 PM
remember...I do) meet a Dixicrat?
They were the Democrats that voted against civil rights. You also overlook the
mass exodus of those conservative Democrats switched to the Republican party
after 1964!
You might want to look into the Southern Strategy.
WFB resident - Jan 03, 2013 11:13 PM
inslaved (kept them in their place)Those blacks and women ! Not the Republicans
that saved them from you .
ExToDResident - Jan 04, 2013 12:14 AM
When did this become your blog? Fact is our entire conversation is "off topic".
Again you are confusing history. It was Klan members who beat and lynched the
blacks. And some clan members were Democrats. However not all Democrats are
Klan members. There were northern Democrats that voted for the civil right that
had absolutely nothing to do with what was going on in the south and were not
affiliated with the Klan.
Do you deny that that industry under the Nazis was left private. Like I said before
the Nazis took over labor for the benefit of industry not the people. The Nazis
even repatriated industries previously nationalized under the Kaiser.
ExToDResident - Jan 04, 2013 12:23 AM
No one and I repeat NO ONE has ever needed saving from me!
You are the one who said they had a problem with PDLS's living.
You still didn't say what you ment by that. Though you did say to "remember how
you were raised".
Carl Hicks - Jan 04, 2013 1:06 AM
WFB resident - Jan 04, 2013 2:02 PM
? Hell I am not a social conservative ! What does that have to do with Dumocrats
inslaving blacks and women ? Nothing !!! For it was the Republican Lincoln who
stopped you Dumocrats from subjegating others ! lol...You should not call ex a goof !
He can not help it !
ExToDResident - Jan 04, 2013 5:32 PM
Tell me what was the vote for the Civil Rights bill by party.
How many Democrats voted for the bill and how many against?
And likewise how many Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act and how many
voted against?
WFB resident - Jan 04, 2013 9:26 PM
of the companies what they can and can not make ! That is not Capitolism that is
socialism ! Kind of like China today ! Are you able to understand that ? Apparently
not for that is the only thing that makes you believe that the socialist Nazis were not
socialists !! lol... grow up and learn that just because it was not full socialism that it
was not socialist !! lol... You are so blind and funny ex !
ExToDResident - Jan 04, 2013 11:29 PM
No, I am a middle of the road who has voiced his dislike for either of the
controlling parties. Unlike you who has spoken glowingly of republicans while
denegrating everyone to the left like a true right-winger.
The US also took control of manufacturing during the war telling the different
manufacturers what to make. Like the US the industrialists profited handsomely
from the work that their companies produced.
Where did I ever say that I didn't believe the Nazis were socialist? I said that they
enacted their brand of socialism to control labor for industry.
ExToDResident - Jan 04, 2013 11:34 PM
republicans for/against) for the Civil Rights Bill?
ExToDResident - Jan 05, 2013 1:40 AM
Child's version of capitalism is very similar to the Nazis version of capitalism. With
private control of industry and government control of labor.
http://thediplomat.com/china-power/a-dying-model-chinese-capitalism/
ExToDResident - Jan 05, 2013 12:01 PM
"We on the right do not think about killing others !"
The Klan was about white supremacy which is a right-wing ideology, and is far
from a "bleeding heart" liberal ideology.
They were confederate soldiers stripped of their voting right, criminals and a host
of others who were not happy with the feds telling them how to live.
ExToDResident - Jan 05, 2013 12:04 PM
So how do you plan on curing this "problem"???
WFB resident - Jan 06, 2013 8:23 PM
see it as a problem . I see it as fact , they do live ! lol... Notice how you think killing
and I see it as life ? Do you understand yet ? I doubt it also .
WFB resident - Jan 06, 2013 9:02 PM
the way you do .
ExToDResident - Jan 07, 2013 12:06 PM
So you are saying that your problem with PDLS’s is socialism??? How is that comment “still socialism”??
That comment is just another reason why you sound like you don’t know what you are talking about.
“What problem ex ? You some how see it as a problem . I see it as fact , they do live ! lol...”
Again with the Psychological Projection; you are the person who said that PDLS’s living is a problem for you. I have no problem with anyone living, even psychotic right-wingers like you.
“Notice how you think killing and I see it as life ? Do you understand yet ? I doubt it also .”
You certainly try to spin and deflect like a conservative, but all your attempts are so pathetic.
“I finally get it you see killing and I see it as your bad beliefs !”
You are so delusional...how do you function on a daily basis????
“sorry I didf not think the way you do .”
And thank God for that!!!! What is disturbing is that even if you are an anomaly, there are too many people who think like you.
Everything you write is disjointed and chaotic; I imagine that is a reflection of your thought processes as well.
WFB resident - Jan 07, 2013 6:26 PM
and teach you ! You and your Lib friends think about killing others to often . Please
do not tie me in with what you believe over what is true ! Then corralating how I
write to how I think is fine ! If you want to believe it then so be it . But I find it funny
that a disjointed thinker is better at living in this world than such a great thinker like
you ! lol... Are you still living off of welfare ex ?
ExToDResident - Jan 08, 2013 8:47 PM
You just keep coming up with these absurd ideas. Now you want to “teach” me? I am quite sure that you have nothing to “teach” me. Besides why would I want to dumb down to your level of thinking???
“You and your Lib friends think about killing others to often .”
Again it was you who said you have a problem with PDLS’s living, not me. And once again with the psychological projection, as you continue to try and pin your words on me. I simply asked you what the solution was to this problem you said you had with PDLS’s living.
“Please do not tie me in with what you believe over what is true !”
You mean over what you believe to be true. Don’t worry, I wouldn’t expect you to give up your revisionist history, just as I don’t expect you to suddenly develop any compassion or even understanding for those PDLSs you have a problem with living.
“Then corralating how I write to how I think is fine ! If you want to believe it then so be it .”
I don’t need you to ok what I believe to be the truth about you, it is evident enough from what you write. Your PDLS acronym for those you obviously hate since you claim to have a problem with them “living”. The evidence of this hate and loathing is in all the posts you have made in these blogs.
ExToDResident - Jan 08, 2013 8:48 PM
This is way too funny “...better at living in this world...”, fact is it is all a matter of perspective.
You obviously equate wealth with being “better at living in this world”.
I do not; as hard as it might be for you to imagine I do not envy you in the slightest, in fact I pity you. For all your “success” (if what little you have said about yourself is true) you gave up too much.
Fact is I am quite happy with my simple life, sure I wouldn’t mind making just a little bit more each month, but I hold no regrets over the choices I have made.
“...such a great thinker like you !”
Why thank you, but I assure you I do not deserve such platitudes.
“Are you still living off of welfare ex ?”
Typical pitiful cheap shot that I have come to expect from right-wing neo-cons like you.
WFB resident - Jan 08, 2013 9:48 PM
own words . I do agree that you do not deserve any platitudes on greatness . But
why do you not answer about your welfare use ? My only regret is not being able to
teach the uninformed (all) PDLS's infesting this country !
ExToDResident - Jan 09, 2013 12:55 AM
…because there is nothing to answer, I have never received “welfare”.
Apparently, part of the stereotype that you created for your PDLS acronym includes them receiving welfare.
Do you actually think that all “PDLSs” are on welfare, receiving rent assistance, are enrolled in Food Share and soaking the system for everything they can get?
You have nothing to “teach” me. Like I said; "...why would I want to dumb down to your level of thinking???"
WFB resident - Jan 09, 2013 8:57 AM
you to collect in their basement . lol...Your just to high level of a thinker for me !
lol...
ExToDResident - Jan 09, 2013 1:27 PM
Once again, and as usual, you are WRONG!!
“Well if your parents allow you to collect in their basement . lol...”
WFB stands for Welfare Family Basement Resident or Wives Family Basement Resident.
“Your just to high level of a thinker for me ! lol...”
Are you saying that you are a low level thinker?
Your problem is your low effort thinking and all the speculation and generalizing that you do.
Just because you can think it doesn’t make it true or real.
WFB resident - Jan 09, 2013 8:02 PM
you collecting welfare benefits ! But if you dis-agree why do you not prove it ? lol...
ExToDResident - Jan 09, 2013 8:40 PM
More than you have ever been before.
No one tolerates or celebrates the existence a problem. Everyone looks for cures to their problems.
So Welfare Family Basement Resident, just how do you plane on curing your problem of PDLSs' living??
WFB resident - Jan 09, 2013 9:20 PM
Dictator ! As for your living on Welfare ? I would put a stop to fraudulent use that
you are doing while living with your parents ! As for the killing of PDLS views ? Well
reality takes care of that ! But living in your parents basement keeps you from
experiencing reality ! lol...
ExToDResident - Jan 09, 2013 10:24 PM
You said you had a problem with PDLSs “living”, not with PDLS “views”.
I would like to know what solution you have for the problem you have with PDLSs “living”?
ExToDResident - Jan 09, 2013 10:46 PM
Once again with the ludicrous and wild accusations that has no basis in any reality.
Thanks for providing such a clear example of how distorted you are. I cannot deny that you have an imagination but like most conservatives it barely qualifies as such since it is dry and dull.
It is obvious that you have absolutely no clue if what you are saying is correct, you simply say it to elicit a reaction, you are grasping at straws.
You are so pitiful, and lame; I really do pity you, all your “success” has made you petty and crass.
WFB resident - Jan 09, 2013 11:51 PM
being on Welfare ? Better yet just go upstairs and ask your parents to write a
comment on this blog for you to back up your accusations ! lol...
MGarber - Jan 10, 2013 7:52 AM
I dont think WFBs "sucess" has made him/her anything, in fact, I dont recall any indication of any "success" whatsoever. For example, he/she may be heady with pride, and think they're "all that" with their sudden acquisition of indoor plumbing.
Whatever his/her status, WFB is the HoneyBooBoo of LLC.
WFB resident - Jan 10, 2013 9:31 AM
do with his inabillity to understand what productive people do here in the USA ! Just
like ex's quote above points out ! ex's quote :"I dont think " ! Yep that pretty much
says it all ! lol...
ExToDResident - Jan 10, 2013 1:55 PM
Good point Mgarber; I hereby retract any statement I may have made giving any credibility to the cretin known as WFB Resident, irked, alteman, and any other monikers which IT posts under.
To suggest that IT has achieved any level of “success” would suggest that there is a shred of credibility to its mindless babble.
It is obvious that the pretentious nature of said cretin is directed at inciting a negative reaction.
ExToDResident - Jan 10, 2013 2:09 PM
For the sake of argument; what would be acceptable proof that could be shared within these blogs?
“I do not doubt that his inabillity to work has a lot to do with his inabillity to understand what productive people do here in the USA !”
FYI inability is spelled with only one ‘l’ in it.
You are so far out in right field that you are not in the ballpark anymore; you’re not even in the parking lot, you’re in some distant galaxy far far away.
“Just like ex's quote above points out ! ex's quote :"I dont think " ! Yep that pretty much says it all ! lol...”
You are such an idiot, why you attribute to me posts from others in these blogs.
I suppose this is another tactic that you hope will incite some kind of reaction.
Like I said you are so pitiful.
ExToDResident - Jan 10, 2013 2:17 PM
WFBoo?
WFB resident - Jan 10, 2013 2:32 PM
calling me honey boo boo . lol... Now I was wondering , How can a funtioning adult
ask somebody else how to become credible ! ex , If you are not able to prove that
you are not accepting welfare anymore . Atleast show the proof that Your
unemployment claims have run out for you . If you have recently (actually ) started
working , I suggest you tell us where and what your position is . lol... Seriously , You
really are not aware on how to prove your position ? lol...
ExToDResident - Jan 10, 2013 3:43 PM
Fat chance.
WFB resident - Jan 10, 2013 4:22 PM
ExToDResident - Jan 10, 2013 7:04 PM
“Now I was wondering ,” (That must have been very painful!!) “How can a funtioning adult ask somebody else how to become credible !”
Who asked that?? And just what is a funtioning adult?
If you meant to say functioning, I have to question how you would have any clue as to what represents a functioning adult.
WFB resident - Jan 10, 2013 7:20 PM
your parents next time ! wow , first you ask, then you attack me just like my
teenaged sons did years ago . Oh well, I do not doubt that you assume to be
smarter than me also ex . Now,.... did you figure out how to prove something yet ?
ExToDResident - Jan 11, 2013 12:05 AM
What I asked was; “For the sake of argument; what would be acceptable proof that could be shared within these blogs?”
Though I would have thought that my original wording would have been sufficiently clear I forgot to take into account “how you were raised”.
First of all I did not ask “how to be credible” as you say. If you can’t tell the difference between the two very different phrases then that is your problem and not mine.
Finally, within the confines of this blog there is no proof I could possibly offer to prove that I am not on welfare.
Just as there is no proof that you could possibly prove that you are not living in your Wives Family Basement.
Or that could prove that you are a callous greedy b@stard that owns a company that does business in all fifty states.
“Now,.... did you figure out how to prove something yet ?”
Like I said I am not about to “share” any information to prove anything to you outside of the format we are currently using.
Or in other words I am not about to send or post any email, links of any other form or correspondence in order to fulfill your demand.
Neither will I identify my employer to a degenerate like you. I don't trust the likes of you.
“...then you attack me just like my teenaged sons did years ago .”
Now that is extremely troubling, I find it very disturbing that you have had offspring!!!!!
WFB resident - Jan 11, 2013 12:21 AM
ExToDResident - Jan 11, 2013 12:52 PM
Besides I don't have to justify anything for the likes of you.
So tell me; how do you justify being a callous right-wing jerk??
WFB resident - Jan 11, 2013 2:30 PM
benefit ,not mine !
Tom Bal - Feb 10, 2013 2:53 PM
Jake, I’ve been standing at my door for 4 months now waiting for the sheriff to show up any idea when?
WFB resident - Feb 10, 2013 4:03 PM
jman99 - Feb 20, 2013 8:18 AM
"Amy...took the family to vote. We did the liberal way of voting: early and often "
WFB resident - Feb 22, 2013 4:58 PM
hipocisy !
MGarber - Mar 21, 2013 2:53 PM
Kinda pulls a "Palin"?
WFB resident - Mar 25, 2013 8:39 AM
WFB resident - Apr 15, 2013 8:07 PM
jman99 - May 18, 2013 2:11 PM
WFB:
May 28th 12:37 pm:
"First fastb and furious ! Then the next three scandels ! Now we have the zcar type
move in umbreela gate ! When will the socialist Dumocrats wake up to the total
ignorince of the o ? So they try there (look here) move since they have nothing else
!!! It 9s not the fault of Republicans that ABC and all the other Socialist news media
is not able to proof an article ! So instead of blaming their news agency they attack
those that gave them the talking points !! lol... How slow can the PDLS's be ? There
is no end to their incompetents !!! lol... How did you like that last word ? lol... "
One minute later:
WFB:
May 28th 12:38pm
" By the way :Actual jobs data show Wisconsin gained over 62,000 jobs in 2011-2012.
This is great news for the people of our state because it means that 62,000 more
moms, dads, and grandparents have jobs and are able to make ends meet.
Whether it's increased wages, increased manufacturing jobs, increased revenue, or
a lower unemployment rate, all economic indicators show Wisconsin is creating jobs.
We’re headed in the right direction, and I’ll continue to place my focus on jobs every
single day as your Governor."
Clearly, these two comments are written by two different users accessing the same account.
This needs to be looked into as it is against the guidelines of this provider.