A New Word

Somehow, I think we'll be using this word a lot in the next four years...
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (148)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts
Politics






87 Comments
Peter123 - Nov 25, 2012 6:20 PM
jhayett - Nov 25, 2012 6:21 PM
To prove another one of your liberal lies - oops, I mean libertarian lies ;) ;), I have no clue who you are even talking about.
jhayett - Nov 25, 2012 6:39 PM
Libs like you have no idea how or even why you voted for him. So go ahead and
change the subject since I called out your unbalanced sources and your lack of
knowledge with obams foreign affairs. But dont feel bad. Obama has no clue either.
Peter123 - Nov 25, 2012 6:46 PM
ExToDResident - Nov 25, 2012 6:55 PM
That's right Jim, for some reason I am always struggling with what you call "my
facts". Mainly because they bear little resemblance to the actual facts and events.
"You're a hoot!"
Ditto...
WFB resident - Nov 25, 2012 7:02 PM
Jerome Corsi served up regarding the o not being a US born citizen?"
You have to admit that the o was either hiding his information , or his media hid it
for him ! I do wonder when the media will ever show us the o's transcripts ? I find it
funny that a group that attacked Bush for being dumb . (His transcripts are better
than the o's) Has no problem even looking in to the o's . Yet the o wasted more , lost
more , screwed up more , and lied where people died ! Yet no call for the o to step
down .
ExToDResident - Nov 25, 2012 7:19 PM
Bad publicity?
Inquiring minds would like to know...well, ok, I want to know.
jhayett - Nov 25, 2012 7:32 PM
geno53151 - Nov 25, 2012 7:36 PM
You seem to accept what they print as Gospel.
Investigation by Obama Administration into Benghazi,? Border Agent Brian Terry was killed on Dec. 14, 2010. Two years later and we have not been told who gave the go ahead for Fast and Furious.
Reminds me of a cartoon by Mark Parisi. Always "not me".
WFB resident - Nov 25, 2012 7:54 PM
over . Yet if you look back and check what is said . Fox is far more on point and
proven fact driven ! Yet they saw the truth , they reported the truth and for several
weeks now the msm has yet to admit that Fox told the truth while the New Joke
Times and its brethren news groups , Were telling lies ! You could blame the o since
he heads the WH , but nobody on the left does . Yet it took the truth telling Fox News
to inform the public correctly . Even after they reported the information the PDLS's all
keep saying "Fox lies " !!! How sad that such a great news group is slandered over
and over .
Peter123 - Nov 25, 2012 8:04 PM
jhayett - Nov 25, 2012 9:37 PM
referee33 - Nov 25, 2012 9:37 PM
WFB resident - Nov 25, 2012 10:20 PM
stream media . Especially the new york times and msnbc ! I do see that their news
does cover many things and some things are well done . But I also see a gap in
decent coverage when it comes to anything that opposes PDLS thinking . I was
wondering if you see it also ? Do not get me wrong, sometimes I have to turn off the
right side of the media also .
ahemmer - Nov 26, 2012 7:10 AM
So before you go stating that "Fast and Furious" was started by Bush, read up. It wasn't. No matter how you want to spin it:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/21/Obama-Lies-Says-Fast-and-Furious-Started-Under-George-W-Bush
Just a blurb to get you started:
"Here are the facts: there was an operation to crack down on cartel members and border crime under Bush, but it wasn't Fast and Furious, and it was stopped approximately two years after it began because the Bush administration realized there was a loophole in it that could be exploited.
Besides being a completely different operation, "Wide Receiver" was miniscule in comparison to Fast and Furious. It involved only 400 to 450 guns, compared to 2500 in Fast and Furious, and every gun was equipped with a tracing/tracking device. Yet Congressman Paul Gosar (R-AZ) alleges only two guns out of the entire 2500 involved in Fast and Furious had tracing/tracking devices on them.
Moreover, the Mexican government knew about "Wide Receiver," and Mexican agents worked with Phoenix-area ATF when the operation was conducted. Contrast that with Fast and Furious, where Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder did not bother letting the Mexican government know 2500 guns were headed their way."
referee33 - Nov 26, 2012 8:30 AM
MGarber - Nov 26, 2012 8:44 AM
"To prove another one of your liberal lies ...I have no clue who you are even talking about. "
Doesnt matter. Everyone who ever espoused birther nonsense, got it (one way or another) from him.
referee33 - Nov 26, 2012 9:12 AM