
The blog is a view of life, science, politics and education from an engineering perspective. As engineers, we are taught to view the world objectively. We can hope, believe and calculate a particular outcome, but natural laws are inflexible and pay no heed to who we are or what we believe. We must approach the objective dispassionately, while compensating for our own distorted perceptions. Balance is also a key element; balancing between the ideal and the pragmatic, balancing cost and functionality, balancing analysis with action, etc.
Scheduling routine critical self-analysis is the foundation to objectivity. If we do not fully understand and compensate for our own failures, tendencies, habits and skewed thought processes, we will not see the world as it is. Without a regular critical self-analysis we will see the world as we are and then fall prey to self-delusion.
Failure is a great teacher. When failure is coupled with perseverance, it produces the fruit of patience and humility. An engineer, fresh out of engineering school is typically set up for failure early and often. The failure breaks the new engineer of any ideas of self-importance, arrogance and book smarts. Only then can the new engineer be formed and molded into a productive element in the industry.
Thanks,
Bernie
New Developments in Egypt
Since the Arab spring, it was painfully obvious that the revolution was all about exchanging a dictator for a far worse extreme Islamist regime with big ambitions. I had warned people that Shariah will be the law of the land and that the former constitution granting the freedom of religion, equality and women’s rights would soon be a thing of the past.
On February 11, 2011, addressing the success of Egypt’s revolution, which he himself enthusiastically supported, President Barack Obama stood in the Grand Foyer of the White House and triumphantly declared, “The people of Egypt have spoken, their voices have been heard, and Egypt will never be the same.” I was afraid that the statement would become true and that Egypt would never be the same…but for the worse.
About two weeks ago, Egyptian President Morsi appeared on Egyptian television and shocked the nation, issuing a presidential decree effectively banning all challenges to his decrees, laws and decisions. The decree stated: “The president can issue any decision or measure to protect the revolution.” “The constitutional declarations, decisions and laws issued by the president are final and not subject to appeal.” The country’s constitution was repealed and a new constitution would be written.
Since Morsi’s declaration, Egypt has experienced a new wave of protests. The protests groups contain a high concentration of women, moderates, Coptic Christians and minority groups, who know what is coming. Former U.S. diplomat Jamie Rubin said Morsi's edict "brings to mind all the fears that people in that part of the world have had about the Muslim Brotherhood when it comes to democracy."
The Morsi regime has responded with a heavy hand to criticism it has received in the press. On December 4th, at least eight influential dailies, a mix of opposition party mouthpieces and independent publications, suspended publication for a day to protest against government restrictions and the ban on the freedom of expression in the draft constitution.
Mohamed El Baradei, an opponent of Morsi during the elections, accused the president of establishing himself as “a new pharaoh.”
On November 27th, a CNN reporter had interviewed protester about the developments in their government. One protester responded, “Weren't things in Egypt supposed to be different now?” The economy is still staggering, the police are still clashing with protestors and the people have fewer freedoms than before.
The big winner of the Morsi/Muslim Brotherhood sweepstakes, however, is the relations with Turkey.
Egyptian Ambassador in Ankara Abderahman Salaheldin said, "the bilateral relations between Egypt and Turkey boomed in the aftermath of the revolution."
Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood have developed close ties with Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. In fact, it appears that Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood has modeled itself after Turkey’s Islamist political party.
Playing off the title of Turkey’s ruling Islamist political party, “The Justice and Development Party,” the Muslim Brotherhood ironically named its political party “The Freedom and Justice Party.” UN’s Palmer Report cites the new strategic cooperation agreements Ergodan plans to sign with Cairo.
Egypt and Turkey are considering plans to lift visa restrictions and recently completed joint naval exercises in the Mediterranean Sea. Turkey has offered a host of measures to bolster Egypt’s economy, including a $2 billion aid package. There is even talk of Turkey’s helping Egypt to restore its Ottoman-era buildings, according to Tim Arango of the NY Times.
Over the past 10 years, Turkey’s Erdogan has systematically dismantled the most well-established secular form of government in the Middle East, while establishing and guaranteeing his own power for many more years to come – all in the name of “democracy.” Morsi is attempting to make the same changes, but over the course of a few months. For many Egyptians, this transformation is too extreme and too fast.
Erdogan’s ambitions have caused many to believe that he is seeking a leadership role beyond Turkey, throughout the whole region. At the annual convention of Mr. Erdogan’s party in Ankara, the capital, a few weeks ago offered a portrait of a realigned Middle East with Turkey at the helm. Mr. Morsi said at the gathering, “We offer our gratefulness for the support that the Turkish people and its administration has extended and will extend to us in the future.” To a standing ovation, Khaled Meshal, the political leader of Hamas, the Palestinian militant group, declared of Mr. Erdogan: “You are not only a Turkish leader. You are, now, also a leader of the world of Islam.”
In a recent interview with Russia Today, Syrian President Basshar al-Assad said of Erdogan, “He personally thinks that he is the new sultan of the Ottoman and he can control the region as it was during the Ottoman Empire under a new umbrella. In his heart he thinks he is a caliph.”
In mid September, Erdogan was received at Cairo’s airport to a ‘rapturous reception’. Using a sound system, Erdogan spoke to the crowds in Arabic, saying, "Salaam aleikum, Egypt and Turkey are one. Peace to the Egyptian people." The crowds responded with shouts of; "Egypt and Turkey will together become an Islamic Caliphate".
But he was given a more reserved reception by officials of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose old guard do not share the admiration of the group's younger generation for the Turkish leader. "We welcome Turkey and we welcome Erdogan as a prominent leader but we do not think that he or his country alone should be leading the region or drawing up its future," said Essam el-Erian, deputy leader of the Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice party.
Will the new found cooperation between Egypt and Turkey last? I think it will be short lived. Although Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood is finding support and guidance from Turkey, I do not think Egypt will be content to live under the shadow of Turkey.
Paul J. Sullivan, a Middle East security expert at Georgetown University, does not believe that Egypt will accept Turkish dominance of the region, “There is within the Egyptian psyche that belief that Egypt should be the leader of the region,” The Turks are not Arabs and should not take the mantle of responsibility for the Arab world.
With the ascendancy of Turkey in the north and Egypt’s new role as an emerging player, could we see two competing influences in the region? Is there a coming show down between Egypt and Turkey? I think yes. When two countries with big ambitions for regional dominance exist, sooner or later they will collide.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Moses' Song (45)
- NSA wire tap (108)
- McCain and the terrorists (168)
- Power of the ballot box (50)
- The Raw Milk Debate (192)
- Congressional hearings (79)
- Israeli attack on Syria (101)
- The reserve currency (121)
- Who Is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev? (185)
- The Boston tragedy (6)
- More The Engineering Perspective posts





52 Comments
Mucho - Dec 04, 2012 1:09 PM
referee33 - Dec 04, 2012 3:31 PM
Bernie Ziebart - Dec 04, 2012 4:32 PM
But even the best laid plans could devolve into nothingness. Egypt could experience a civil war that will destroy the country. The big ambitions of the Muslim brotherhood could end with the civil war.
I think that Egypt could go either of two ways; 1) regional domination as planned by the Muslim Brotherhood, 2) Civil war
WFB resident - Dec 04, 2012 6:46 PM
Bernie Ziebart - Dec 05, 2012 6:34 AM
You could have done better than to arm yourself with 10 year old Democratic talking points that really are not pertinent to the subject at hand.
george,
Sooner or later, you will have to let GW go.
MGarber - Dec 05, 2012 8:09 AM
Not really.
Mucho's statement inferrs that we should "not allow" some scenario in an highly populated culture that is nothing like ours in a place far away.
Good luck with that.
Obama's continued $upport of Israelli missile defense is evidence enough for me that he has no intention of "letting" Israel get run over.
WFB resident - Dec 05, 2012 9:19 AM
Bernie Ziebart - Dec 05, 2012 11:12 AM
When the topic of exporting 'Western style Democracy' is discussed, I typically hear the argument made that the people there are not like us and we can't assume what they want.
I would like to refute that world view.
The most recent Egyptian constitution (just trashed) gave women the right to vote. It is unlikely that the new constitution will give women the right to vote (if the draft version is any indication of the final). What many here are essentially saying is that the Egyptian culture is different than ours and the women there really don't mind losing the ability to vote. Just because we have that right here, it doesn't they should have that right...or even want it. But if someone at the NY Times wanted to do something worthy of print, they would conduct a survey of Egyptian women to determine their mindset on voting. But until that happens, I will assume that women want to vote, especially in light of the heavy female demographic in the protests. Just as everyone wants life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It is the natural yearning of mankind. Granted, those liberties may take on a different form, but the principle remains.
(Note: I am not implying that Egyptian women are heavy.)
Mucho - Dec 05, 2012 12:03 PM
All this "sit at the table" and discuss BS that he has run on twice boils down to total lack of a US compass for any of our allies to leverage and for all of their enemies to exploit. To date, Obama takes credit for good and scapegoats the bad.
We will be slashing the defense budget and wallowing in the mire of another recession soon so the MidEast knows it's a free-for-all. Let the best armed terrorist and dictator win.
Bernie Ziebart - Dec 05, 2012 12:35 PM
I think that we should send Nancy Pelosi over to Egypt to tell their government to pass the new constitution so they can find out what is in it.
Carl Hicks - Dec 05, 2012 12:45 PM
MGarber - Dec 05, 2012 1:24 PM
No. No one is saying anying of the sort.
Look. I'll be the 1st to agree that whats going on there is a terrible setback for freedom in general, but Im not going to use it to politicize this or any other administration. People that do that (and Im not speaking of anyone in particular, Mucho, but Im looking at you) look like petty demagogues.
Mucho - Dec 05, 2012 2:22 PM
Wasn't it Obama that praised the Egyptian Military for deposing Mubarak? When a week prior he called Mubarak a "patriot"? Following the street protests, Mr. Obama promised “whatever assistance is necessary” to pursue a “credible transition to a democracy.”
Now he sits idly by watching the new regime turn against the people more harshly than the "patriot" he applauded the new dictator for overturning?
The tricky thing about facts and hostory that you are forgetting is that they are recorded: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/12/world/middleeast/12diplomacy.html?_r=0
Obama has diminished the US role in foreing affairs to a "front running" cheerleader that turns its back on even its own diplomats when times get tough. If that makes me a demagogue, sobeit. You will have to dig deeper and darker into your vernacular to honestly state what that makes our current "bystander in chief".
MGarber - Dec 05, 2012 3:38 PM
Yes; Along with 90% of the egyptian people; both the moderates and islamists hated Mubarak.
"Now he sits idly by ...."
OK. What exactly would you rather see him do?
Mucho - Dec 05, 2012 3:53 PM
Obama should not be praising a guy that just promoted himself to dictator and promise him $1billion in aide despite his power grab.
How about a little tough talk and keep the purse strings a little tighter? Then again, he can print more.
WFB resident - Dec 05, 2012 11:40 PM
would do ! lol...
referee33 - Dec 06, 2012 8:12 AM