"Tax the Rich - an Animated Fairy Tale"
At first I thought this video was produced by the Obama White House (to go along with their idiotic "Life of Julia" film, showing a woman from birth to death entirely dependent upon the government and lovin' it...).
No, this little "fairy tale" was produced by the California Federation of Teachers (hey, aren't they broke in California? how can they afford to be producing anti-prosperous propaganda like this?).
"Tax the RIch" is narrated by uber-leftie, Ed Asner - a multi-millionaire in his own right (but we won't mention that). From NewsBusters.org:
------------------------------------
"As the fairy tale began, Asner said, “Once upon a time, there was a land that was happy and prosperous. They had a great education system, safe streets, and jobs for everyone.” There were a few poor people and a few rich people. Most were in the middle. The people of this land paid for their good life by investing in their future together. They called this ‘paying taxes.’”
From there, Asner said the tax system was set up so that the poor paid a little in taxes, the middle paid a moderate amount, and the rich paid a lot. But the rich of course didn’t like this, and according to Asner, they began changing the tax code so that they would pay less while creating loopholes and even breaking the law through tax evasion. Of course, Asner completely ignored the immutable fact that in the past 50 years, changes to the tax code have continually shifted the burden of taxation from lower wage earners to higher wage earners so much so that today almost 50 percent of workers don’t pay a cent of federal income taxes.
That didn't come up.
Instead, Asner said that as a result of rich people's greed, “Schools, public safety, the roads, parks, libraries, public transportation all went into decline. The rich people didn’t care.” Needless to say, Asner chose not to address how tax revenues at the federal and state level continued to rise during this period, or that the fiscal problems were caused by spending growing at a faster rate than the growth of receipts.
Liberals always ignore this.
Not surprisingly, Asner also took aim at Wall Street, “a place where money makes money.”
Somewhat disgracefully, midway through the video, there’s an image of the rich actually urinating on the 99 percent.
No, I’m not kidding.
As the video drew to a conclusion, Asner claimed the rich began blaming everyone else for the fiscal problems in the country including public teachers. In Asner’s view, the 99 percent weren’t believing the one percent, so the rich hired politicians to continue placing the blame on police, firefighters, teachers, librarians, and other public employees.
But not everyone bought this said Asner. They believed the crash was all caused by the one percent.
“People began to say, ‘Maybe rich people have too much money now,’” claimed Asner. “‘And maybe our problems have to do with the one percent not paying their fair share of taxes. And also, maybe rich people should pay the same rate of taxes they used to when our land was prosperous and more people were better off.’” Predictably, Asner - like the current President and his Party - didn’t recommend that ALL taxes should go back to where they were under Clinton when things were supposedly so much better.This is a little bit of hypocrisy the left and their media minions conveniently ignore in this debate.
“This is where we are now,” said Asner at the video’s conclusion. “And we have a question: is there no alternative, or can the people of this land do something to live happily ever after?”
Predictably, Asner chose not to mention that you could tax every cent of the rich's income and it wouldn't balance the budget.
This math is too complicated for people on the left."
------------------------------------
What always amazes me in the attacks on the rich from Obama (and his followers) is the total lack of understanding that the "economic pie" in our country is not stagnant. It is not "fixed." The poor are not poor because the rich are rich. Everyone in this country can move from poor to middle class to upper class and vice versa. The economy can grow. Jobs can grow. Incomes can grow. Opportunities can grow. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be true with Obama in charge - stifling growth, opportunity, ambition, etc. with rules, regulations, and - most importantly - perceptions. Obama is doing the American people a great injustice by demonizing the wealthy, as if success is to be frowned upon. Ooooh! Those one-percenters! We just hate 'em. They stole from the poor and are greedy, evil people!!! Let's tax them even more! Make them pay their "fair share" (I wish Obama would define "fair share")!!! Egads.
In closing, a good question to ask is: were all poor people wealthy years ago - and suddenly a bunch of greedy people rushed in and took their wealth away, making them poor? Barack Obama wants the people of this country to believe the answer is yes, but the honest answer is NO.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (265)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






76 Comments
Carl Hicks - Dec 05, 2012 8:16 PM
perverse plan we had a vibrant middle-class. Without a strong middle-class the
American dream is indeed under attack.
All trickle down economics does is enrich the 1% as it bleeds the rest of society.
As the 1% has accumulated more and more wealth workers wages have fallen
and the number of the poor grow.
Carl Hicks - Dec 05, 2012 9:10 PM
wealthy. If this country wants to give tax breaks to create jobs those breaks need
to be performance based not because they might potentially create jobs if they
spend some of their extra take home.
yert49 - Dec 05, 2012 9:47 PM
economy? If you have stood still economically for the past 25 years it may be that
there is something else wrong. Not even you can believe that only 1 percent
benefited from the tremendous growth that started under Reagan's helm. And
spare me the leftist claptrap about his deficits. Congress could have curbed their
spending at anytime, but didn't. Reason instilled confidence in markets.
Something this doofus of a president can't seem to fathom.
yert49 - Dec 05, 2012 9:49 PM
MGarber - Dec 05, 2012 10:09 PM
Look up what David Stockman has to say about the program he helped engineer.
http://rationalrevolution.net/war/trickle_down.htm
Carl Hicks - Dec 05, 2012 10:40 PM
you credit to who ran the government I credit to new inventions ,computers ,cell
phones,vhs,dvd,cd,etc...unfortunately the chinese make that stuff for us now.
Carl Hicks - Dec 05, 2012 11:27 PM
presidents deficits don't matter. I understand the idea of the government
influencing a slow economy by building ships like Reagan did ( I saw first hand
the influence that good paying union jobs had in Newport News VA) or highway
and schools like we keep hearing about lately.
Ike borrowed heavily to start the interstate highway system we take for granted
today. The space program was not cheap,the advances in technology from it are
priceless. We used to invest in ourselves.
WFB resident - Dec 05, 2012 11:36 PM
Well I just do not feel, that you are able to comprehend anything while you are
typing !
ExToDResident - Dec 05, 2012 11:40 PM
to upper class and visa versa.
Sorry Amy but this country doesn't have that good of economic mobility.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/us/harder-for-americans-to-rise-from-
lower-rungs.html?pagewanted=all
Carl Hicks - Dec 05, 2012 11:43 PM
expanded entitlements.
Carl Hicks - Dec 06, 2012 12:10 AM
How many of todays poor were middle-class before the rich became even better
off?
ExToDResident - Dec 06, 2012 2:30 AM
that is modeled on The Americans with Disabilities Act.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/us/despite-doles-wish-gop-rejects-
disabilities-treaty.html?_r=1&
http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/facts.shtml
ahemmer - Dec 06, 2012 6:30 AM
jman99 - Dec 06, 2012 6:50 AM
The Madoff's come to mind..... the Tyco guy..... the Enron guys...... I could go on.
jman99 - Dec 06, 2012 6:53 AM
And yet you tend to look upon these folk "elitist" and allow so much derision of them by others on your blog who have chosen otherwise.
ahemmer - Dec 06, 2012 7:09 AM
And the only "elitists" I deride are those who think they know what is best for everyone. The "elitist" lefties want to dictate to everyone else how to live their lives, yet the same "elitists" - like Barack Obama - don't follow the same rules and expectations they have for everyone else.
Nolongeralib - Dec 06, 2012 7:30 AM
Mucho - Dec 06, 2012 8:05 AM
That equals between $2.8 and $3.4 Trillion which is a little over HALF the amount added to the deficit under Obama.
Now what?
The fun thing about taxing the top 1% is that they will always be there as the percentage that pay NO federal income taxes continues to rise.
Keep in mind that Obama has made FIVE attempts to lower the deduction for charitable contributions. Who would that hurt?
As long as the radical left has a growing class of dependent constituents, they will keep moving the country away from free market capitalism. As liberty shrinks and dependency on government grows, so does their power. Obama needs to be creditted for being successful at growing that base.
As for Ed Asner - Appropriate spokesman for the radical left conspiracy theorists. Afer all, he was a big fan and supporter of Lyndon LaRouche for president. The occupy movement loves LaRouche and his theories of Queen Elizabeth laundering money through drug cartels and supporting the OK City bomber.
yert49 - Dec 06, 2012 8:58 AM
Now all these lefties we're up at the podium thanking Gaylord for starting Earth Day, leading the modern day enviromental movement, championing dogs and cats living together, etc... Towards the end of the meal, I was in the banquet room helping serve dessert, when this old lady burst in and yelled "give me a banquet uniform, I want to serve Mr. ASSner", We all looked at her and we all recognized her. We helped her with a uniform and we gave her a tray with one dessert on it so she could walk thru the crowd, walk up on the dias and deliver eddie's dessert. Well a gasp went up as this lone, befuddled waitress jumped on stage and set-down the dessert. Ole Eddie took one look at her and burst out laughing for the lady who had and caused all this ruckus and made this scene was none othe then Nancy Marchand, Lou Grant's editor in chief from the old "Lou Grant" Show. Oh, and the libs laughed and cried and all was right with the world. And now you know....the rest of the story!
WFB resident - Dec 06, 2012 9:29 AM
Here is a better question.
How many of todays poor were middle-class before the rich became even better
off?"
So lets poll it now I came from no money and no American background . I came
with $30.00 to my name . I now am in the top 1% !! So out of the 10 people who
post here I alone make 10% of this population that has seen the past American
dream . Now if you include my brothers and sisters which all were extemely poor .
But now some live here . That makes seven more that moved in to the middle class
from the extremely poor .
Carl , you should not jump to conclusions based on videos that are swayed to
make you assume something like your PDLS beliefs .
As for assner. I had no Idea the guy was such an idiot . The reporter who caught
that video above probably has less money than Assner . So why was assner asking
to pee on the poor reporter ? Why is that OK for the PDLS's ? Idiots like assner
always play the opposite than what they are . They all are wealthy,(Mikey moore,
John Stewart and such) and they get PDLS's to give them more because they pretend
to be poor / or the opposite of reality. As assner did above .