
The blog is a view of life, science, politics and education from an engineering perspective. As engineers, we are taught to view the world objectively. We can hope, believe and calculate a particular outcome, but natural laws are inflexible and pay no heed to who we are or what we believe. We must approach the objective dispassionately, while compensating for our own distorted perceptions. Balance is also a key element; balancing between the ideal and the pragmatic, balancing cost and functionality, balancing analysis with action, etc.
Scheduling routine critical self-analysis is the foundation to objectivity. If we do not fully understand and compensate for our own failures, tendencies, habits and skewed thought processes, we will not see the world as it is. Without a regular critical self-analysis we will see the world as we are and then fall prey to self-delusion.
Failure is a great teacher. When failure is coupled with perseverance, it produces the fruit of patience and humility. An engineer, fresh out of engineering school is typically set up for failure early and often. The failure breaks the new engineer of any ideas of self-importance, arrogance and book smarts. Only then can the new engineer be formed and molded into a productive element in the industry.
Thanks,
Bernie
Conflict within the NRA
After the Newtown shooting, the National Rifle Association, with roughly 4.3 million members, deactivated its Facebook page, had stopped tweeting on its Twitter account and had been issuing a "no comment" to any media outlet seeking a response.
But late Tuesday, the group broke that silence with a statement:
"The National Rifle Association of America is made up of four million moms and dads, sons and daughters -- and we were shocked, saddened and heartbroken by the news of the horrific and senseless murders in Newtown. Out of respect for the families, and as a matter of common decency, we have given time for mourning, prayer and a full investigation of the facts before commenting. The NRA is prepared to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again."
There are two major forces at work within the NRA. With the increased talk of gun control, the NRA has added an average of 8000 members per day and has received an large influx of contributions. But since the statement was released, the NRA website has been overwhelmed by member furious at the thought of the NRA softening its opposition to gun control. Of course, the official statement didn’t explicitly state that it would moderate its position, but it gave a tone of moderation.
The NRA is seen as the primary restraining force to gun control, but its members believe this it is also providing less restraint against government than is desired.
Some NRA members have demanded to see the books to determine if money was a factor in the new moderate tone. With just a cursory look at the main sources of revenue in December, it became clear that Karl Rove may have influenced the NRA into a softer stance. The NRA has received over $600,000 in donations from Crossroads GPS and Rove’s super PAC, American Crossroads. Although this amount of money is significant it represents a small percentage of income. During the 2012, the NRA spent a total of $17.6 million on political campaigns; including $243,000 on Tommy Thompson’s Senate campaign.
Karl Rove is not a well-liked individual in conservative circles. His support of many pro-choice, big government candidates has angered many conservatives, but his disdain for the second amendment is a particularly sore spot.
The NRA is a 501(c)(4) group and is not required to disclose its donors. But in order to maintain 501(c)(4) status with the Internal Revenue Service, social welfare must be the main focus of these groups, so they cannot have more than half of their overall spending go toward politics. Therefore the expenditures are public documents.
Many NRA members are openly talking about their displeasure with the NRA and joining the GOA (Gun Owners of America), a gun rights lobbying group which is much more rigid in its ideology. But with the tremendous influx of new members and money, the NRA appears to have momentum and even the most conservative members do not want to hurt that momentum. Thus they are stuck between great displeasure over the lack of response by the NRA and the excitement of the rise in membership.
While members look for a convenient spot to jump ship, the lament is that nearly every conservative group gets hijacked by moderates sooner or later.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Moses' Song (45)
- NSA wire tap (108)
- McCain and the terrorists (168)
- Power of the ballot box (50)
- The Raw Milk Debate (192)
- Congressional hearings (79)
- Israeli attack on Syria (101)
- The reserve currency (121)
- Who Is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev? (185)
- The Boston tragedy (6)
- More The Engineering Perspective posts





68 Comments
jman99 - Dec 23, 2012 8:41 AM
So why not make it harder to buy guns and ammo on line. if it is good for on, then it must be good for the other as well.
bamaphd - Dec 23, 2012 8:54 AM
Charlton Heston and Clint Eastwood
Tom Clancy the author of may book with violence in their plots is also a consutant to many video game producers ( in fact some of his plots have been made into violent video games from which he gains royalties ) is also an NRA member.
Perhaps you should start by trying to cleaning up your own back yard first ......
bamaphd - Dec 23, 2012 9:44 AM
up to say about the 1970, if you were an NRA member you were just as likely to be a Democrat as a Republican and the only competition you had was in the shooting grounds.
I would say that the bulk of the NRA is made up of conservative Republicans and the TP with a very small following from Democrats.
This most likely started with the support of Reagan over Carter and then the campaign againts the speaker of the house under Clinton. When this happened, the NRA lost its neutral American soul and became just another lobby group.
Mr Balanced - Dec 23, 2012 10:08 AM
I would like to sit down with you and play some Texas-Holdem. We could live a more comfortable retirement. You're going down a very slippery slope Phd. Sorry, I should not have put you there.
If I’m “trampling” on our First Amendment rights, then what are you? Using only your logic, that I was hoping you would move to, President Obama and many democrats are trying to “trample” on our Second Rights. That is why I pointed out yours and many politicians hypocrisy with regards to our Constitution. My concern is President Obama and many Democrats and Republicans alike are politicizing this for their own ideologies and those who support them. A balanced approach would be to try and fix this growing concern by looking at all aspects and all the data. All we have seen from the press and the President is gun control (Second Amendment). If so, then look at Hollywood (First Amendment). Why is that not fair? Mr. LaPierre made sure the press was informed about theirs and Obama's mistakes with the investigations as to why
jman99 - Dec 23, 2012 10:36 AM
Lol.
A fist full of dollars.
The good, the bad and the ugly ( a subjective treatise if there ever was one)
A few dollars more.
bamaphd - Dec 23, 2012 11:47 AM
" All we have seen from the press and the President is gun control (Second Amendment). If so, then look at Hollywood (First Amendment). Why is that not fair?"
Well, all we need to do is to look at the previous VP, who being a gun advocate , and NRA member and of sound mind (questioned by some) and in the company of the secret service, managed to shoot an innocent person.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney_hunting_incident
Here is a person, a heart beat away from controlling the largest arsenal on earth, yet unable to handle a gun safely.
In an odd twist, if the shooting had been the other way around, the Secret service would have been all over Cheney's victim if he had been the shooter, but in this case, the secret service did not protect the victim at all.
As far as I know, President Obama has yet to fell anyone with a stray golf ball.
jman99 - Dec 23, 2012 1:44 PM
The secret service, even armed as they were with military grade weapons, could not stop Cheney shooting and innocent civilian.
Can you imagine the carnage if he'd had an assault rifle?
bamaphd - Dec 23, 2012 10:14 PM
https://d27fcql9yjk2c0.cloudfront.net/assets/6074789/lightbox/deerarmour.jpg?1344808028
Keep on the look out for these, as they may be attacking hunters in your area.
WFB resident - Dec 23, 2012 10:45 PM
you do hunt with others hunters around ! If you have the abillity to remember things
. You would know that Cheneys shot was an accident . You know like when a person
runs into something/one with a car ? lol... except cars kill more people than those
dasturdly guns ! lol...
Mr Balanced - Dec 29, 2012 2:12 PM
Submitted by John C on Sat, 12/29/2012 - 15:12
in
Daily Paul Liberty Forumhttp://www.dailypaul.com/267875/the-san-antonio-theater-shooting
On Sunday December 17, 2012, 2 days after the CT shooting, a man went to a restaurant in San Antonio to kill his X-girlfriend. After he shot her, most of the people in the restaurant fled next door to a theater. The gunman followed them and entered the theater so he could shoot more people. He started shooting and people in the theater started running and screaming. It’s like the Aurora, CO theater story plus a restaurant!
Now aren’t you wondering why this isn’t a lead story in the national media along with the school shooting?
There was an off duty county deputy at the theater. SHE pulled out her gun and shot the man 4 times before he had a chance to kill anyone. So since this story makes the point that the best thing to stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun, the media is treating it like it never happened...
Mr Balanced - Dec 29, 2012 2:17 PM
Nearly 500 murders in Chicago this year. 62 where school aged kids. All from the most liberal and most strict gun laws in the nation. Any ideas, anyone, why the press didn't mention this?
Mr Balanced - Dec 29, 2012 2:40 PM
I stand to be corrected. The 446 were not murders, but school children shot in Chicago! 62 were killed by nutjobs like Lanza.
The Daily pointed out in a Friday (June 2012) column that more Chicago residents -- 228 -- have been killed so far this year in the city than the number of U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan - 144 -- over the same period. Chicago’s murder rate is also currently quadruple that of New York and double Los Angeles' rate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/chicago-homicide-rate-wor_n_1602692.html
jman99 - Dec 29, 2012 4:28 PM
up you need that national guard everywhere to protect Americans from other Americans.
WFB resident - Dec 30, 2012 9:05 AM
Bernie Ziebart - Dec 31, 2012 8:46 AM
1. guns, like moonshine is not too difficult to produce. With moonshine you need a still and to make a gun you need a machine shop.
2. Prohibition gave rise to tremendous underground markets with crime syndicates. Likewise, since Mexico enacted extremely restrictive gun control legislation, cartels took a dominant position in society with little ability of the average citizen to defend themselves against the cartels.
3. Prohibition caused numerous deaths through poisoned moonshine. Some made wood alcohol instead of grain alcohol. With people making their own guns and bullets, I don't believe that it will be safe to use, store or transport these weapons.
4. A tremendous increase in the numer of police and agents will be needed to monitor the gun traffic just as the number of police expanded during prohibition.
A gun is only tool, but a very effective tool. But we have a society that has gone crazy. We no longer have the ability to think straight and think through an action with resulting consequences. Emotional and mental instability is on the rise and I don't know how to keep weapons out of the hands of emotionally damaged people. I fear that there will be more Newtown incidents.
WFB resident - Dec 31, 2012 8:55 AM
jman99 - Dec 31, 2012 11:33 AM
http://www.vpc.org/studies/unincont.htm
jman99 - Dec 31, 2012 1:25 PM
Sort of makes the whole thing self regulating in a Darwinian kind of way. It would not be the same because you could make a batch of booze that was distributed to many. Gunsmithing is not like that.
jman99 - Dec 31, 2012 1:30 PM
Stills are easy to make.
Machine shops are much tougher to set up if you want to smith a gun. for stills, you have a multitude of feed stocks, for gun barrels, not so much. A still will cost you about $300.00 to set up. A good lathe and mill will set you back into the thousands.