"What difference at this point does it make?"
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, after laying low for months supposedly suffering from a wide range of various illnesses, finally had to sit down in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and answer questions about the terrorist attack on 9/11/12 in Benghazi.
The attack killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens. (As most of us know, the Obama Administration did its best to hide the fact that this event WAS a terrorist attack. At stake was the presidential election, so Obama & Co. went in to spin mode - blaming the attack on a YouTube video. For weeks. After all, with Obama "taking out Bin Laden" and spiking the football constantly gloating about it, saying terrorists were on the run and in retreat mode, we couldn't let the word get out that this was not true. Terrorists attacked the embassy. Terrorists killed four Americans in the process. Terrorists are back with a vengeance. In fact, Obama's weak policies on fighting the "war on terror" (oops! I mean "Overseas Contingency Operation") seem to have allowed terrorism to go unchecked.)
Anyhow, during the course of questioning, it was clear that the Democrats on the panel had been given their marching orders on what to say and ask. For all intensive purposes, the Democrats could have been at a dinner honoring Hillary and the job she has been doing as Secretary of State (will someone please inform us exactly WHAT Clinton has done while Secretary of State that is so wonderful?). Listen to the Dems fawn all over Hillary ad nauseum:
Of course, once they got done heaping praises on Clinton, the Dems proceeded to lob softball questions her way that did little to address the seriousness of the debacle that occurred in Benghazi. At least a few Republicans didn't allow her to skate away and avoid answering the many questions still out there regarding Benghazi. Senator Ron Johnson - who did Wisconsin proud - actually had the nerve to ask Clinton WHY did the administration lie to the American people for weeks, blaming the attack on a YouTube video when they knew all along it was a terrorist attack.
Clinton's response: "What difference at this point does it make?" Incredible.
I wish Senator Johnson would have shot back, saying that it does make a difference whether or not the American people are told the truth or told lies. Obviously, the Obama Administration doesn't care about the truth. They just want this whole issue to go away. To this end, the media has been complicit - refusing to delve deep into Benghazi: the lies, the deaths, and the cover-up - especially before a presidential election. WHY? Because if the truth HAD been allowed to come out - the truth that terrorists attacked Benghazi AND the attack was planned AND Americans in the embassy had been asking for more security months before the attack - Obama may not have won re-election.
Clinton's public responses to the Senate panel were too little too late. All this hearing did was enable Hillary Clinton to wiggle out of a bad situation, setting herself up for a presidential run in 2016. The Democrats on the panel were there to help her, not get to the bottom of what happened. They could care less about allowing the truth to be told. Clinton and the Dems realize that Hillary needs to wash her hands of her own incompetence and blame. (It is rather ironic how she takes "full responsibility" yet doesn't. How Clintonian.)
What we are left with is a frustrating exercise in avoiding the truth. Clinton refused to answer many basic questions. Clinton got mad when the questions got tough. Clinton cried.
In the end, Clinton has been made out to be a hero by the media and Dems, while the Republicans are - as usual - being made out to be the "bad guys" for simply asking questions and expecting honest answers.
Sad. But this IS the world of Obama. Welcome to it.
The only thing that Republicans and conservatives can do when Hillary Clinton throws her hat in the ring to run for president in 2016 is to remind everyone about her words regarding four dead American in Benghazi:
"What difference at this point does it make?"
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (148)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






67 Comments
Mucho - Jan 25, 2013 2:20 PM
What difference does it make now? So someone broke into the hotel and stole private files. I would have won the election anyway. (said President Nixon).
What difference does it make now that there really were not any WMD's. There was a consensus of intelligence reports and overwhelming Congressional votes in favor of the war (Says George W. Bush)
What difference does it make that the stimulus failed and so many of my supporteres got $billions in boondoggles like Solyndra, we can just raise the debt ceiling and tax the producers (says Obama).
Who cares if Osama Bin Laden was behind 911 and Iraq played a negligible role, we can't "un-bomb" Iraq now. (Says George W)
EIther you are "all in" on exposing lies and reasons for failure and conver-ups or you have to accept unchecked arrogance of our leaders with no accountability or consequence.
Or does only Hillary get a free pass because she mustered up some tears and playd teh emotional, weak, sympathetic girl card?
ahemmer - Jan 25, 2013 6:35 PM
Is that the attitude we can expect today? from the government? I am sure the families of the four slain Americans in Benghazi aren't saying "What difference does it make?" They must want to know why the government of the United States watched the slaughter of their family members in real time - not bothering to OK the military to come to their rescue AND not OK'ing additional security as requested by the embassy for months before the attack. Ya think?
Hillary Clinton is a disgrace to the country and should be booted out of office, rather than being allowed to resign her position. Hidden for the first two years of the Obama rule, Hillary emerged to do.....nothing. And in doing nothing, she allowed the slaughter of four Americans - doing the bidding of the Dear Leader, Barack Hussein Obama.
She MUST be held accountable - and in a perfect world, Obama should be impeached.
ExToDResident - Jan 25, 2013 8:56 PM
Because everyone will have forgotten in four years…well, almost everyone.
Besides what difference does it make?
referee33 - Jan 25, 2013 9:16 PM
WFB resident - Jan 25, 2013 10:34 PM
? I swear you guys are media dumb !
referee33 - Jan 25, 2013 11:53 PM
WFB resident - Jan 26, 2013 12:00 AM
that ? Think , when did the media announce that Bush was proven correct ? This is a
great learning moment . Do any PDLS's know this ? Or is your blame Bush comments
out of ignorence ?
Carl Hicks - Jan 26, 2013 1:40 AM
Yup ol Ron is doing Wisconsin alright, not any good but ....After missng the briefing that would have told him what was happening, he screams why wasn't I told anything, I'm not proud of that at all.
patriot4progress - Jan 26, 2013 3:11 AM
WMDs and ties to Bin Laden all of which caused thousands more deaths and over a
trillion dollars of new debt it is truly amazing you hypocrites have the nerve to say one
word... Please just stop it I am laughing so hard I can't take it... You are out of you're ever
lovin minds now.
sharpaxe - Jan 26, 2013 7:16 AM
ahemmer - Jan 26, 2013 8:48 AM
The leftie cries about "no WMD's" now has not been a "What difference at this point does it make" approach. The Iraq situation was attacked on a daily basis by the Bush-hating media. We heard all about it for days, weeks, months, and years. They didn't let this pass like Benghazi. They didn't praise Bush like they are currently doing with Clinton - who botched Benghazi big-time - resulting in the deaths of four Americans. Nope. Dems are given a pass.
ahemmer - Jan 26, 2013 8:51 AM
Don't you just think Benghazi is much worse than Watergate ever was? and maybe, just maybe, President Barack Hussein Obama and his henchmen like Clinton SHOULD be held accountable? Obama should resign over it- if the press beat the drum over and over regarding it like they did years ago during Watergate. Benghazi was much worse - people died - including an American ambassador - all the while the Dems watched in real time - not wanting to help - and then spinning a tale about a YouTube video to protect Obama's run for the presidency. Political ambitions triumphed over saving the lives of 4 people. Despicable - and impeachable.
geno53151 - Jan 26, 2013 9:35 AM
Two years have passed and the Obama Administration has not owned up to
who authorized Fast & Furious.
Two months later, not one word as to who it was that made the decision to not immediately help our Ambassador in Libya when we knew the embassy was under attack.
Three years and we still do not know what is all in the Obama Care bill. Just this week, it was found that, those who smoke may find their Health Care premiums
double.
What else is hidden by this Administration?
ExToDResident - Jan 26, 2013 12:55 PM
Source??
Carl Hicks - Jan 26, 2013 1:44 PM
Of course you would consider poor decision making to be worse than criminal activiy simply because the one is a liberal and the other a conservative.
ahemmer - Jan 26, 2013 2:23 PM
"I became a member of the Committee quite recently, and so was not invited to the briefing offered last year. I have participated in multiple classified briefings on Benghazi, and others that were unclassified. I attended briefings offered to all Senators, and to members of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs."
See: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/kerry-criticizes-johnson-for-missing-benghazi-briefing-fi8gonv-188239491.html
Hmmm. As usual, the truth was left out. of Kerry's accusation aimed at Johnson didn't tell the whole story. As Gomer Pyle was fond of saying: surprise! surprise! surprise!
ahemmer - Jan 26, 2013 2:32 PM
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/
WFB resident - Jan 26, 2013 2:59 PM
patriot4progress - Jan 26, 2013 3:30 PM
how do we stop it from happening again? Not ONE? Paul Rand used his time to talk
about the US selling arms to Turkey Reagan style. He had zero proof of anything he
heard it on Glenn beck and wanted to ask... Proving as your republican leader Jindal said
you are the party of stupid.... Ahemmer you trying to re-write Iraq is not gonna happen
Condi was caught red handed in a scandal where she new she lied the memo was dated
and stamped read. She just carried the water for Bush you all backed her and still do to
this day.... Thousands of non-military lost their lives from Bushs administrations
inexcusable miss on not paying attention to information that they had in hand about the
9/11 attack.... No one on Bushs staff was held accountable Condi the incompetent was
promoted... Bush and Cheney outed the CIA agent that wrote the TRUTH that Iraq had no
WMDs before we invaded they then pinned the rap on Scooter Libby not for treason like it
was. Just obstruction of an investigation of high treason that Bush was apart of. There
was not one terrorist camp associated with 9/11 in Iraq Ahemm that is not provable by any
real source anywhere that is 100% a pure lie. I challenge you to find a credible source that
backs up your lie.... Just the shear hypocricy you dare to try is unbelievable.... Your party
didnt ask one credible question on how to help make the protection of high risk posts
better this was how can we try and look better than Obama and the next president Hilary
plain and simple... Even Billy O copped to that fact. The problem is Hilary made a fools of
them with Ron Johnson getting a highlight film that will be the best commercial ever for the
Dem running against him... It may out perform the shot in the foot Mitt had when he got
caught telling his 47% campaign killer..,, LOL
ExToDResident - Jan 26, 2013 3:38 PM
I asked for a source to which you provided this link.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/
Tell me teach; on which paragraph of the article does it mention “uranium-enrichment centrifuges”?
I “read to my heart’s content” (and then some) looking the article over a couple of times and it continues to elude me as to where the centrifuge is mentioned.
The entire article from what I read in the link you provided is exclusively about chemical weapons and chemical labs that have been found. But we already knew Saddam had those since Reagan and Rumsfeld sold them to him.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/17/how-reagan-armed-saddam-with-chemical-weapons/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-153210/Rumsfeld-helped-Iraq-chemical-weapons.html