Vote for Supreme Court Justice Pat Roggensack today!

Judges endorsing one of their own: that's a bit like the inmates of an asylum voting for the most sane among them.

you would know jman ! But I was wondering why you corrolate judges with the
mentally ill ? lol... are you ill today jman ?

You won't hear a lot of support for the other candidates, they aren't qualified.

Even those lefties out there will have to admit that the other candidates' resumes don't hold a candle to Roggensack's. Only a pure partisan would vote against her.

@jman99: Politicians endorse their own in many instances. Look at Bill Clinton - even hitting the campaign trail to stump for Barry O. (A bit like the inmates of an asylum voting for the most sane among them?)

Mucho: Exactly. The two Democrats running against Roggensack have basically declared they are Dems in what is to be a non-partisan race. However, the two Democrats are hoping for a seat on the court simply to undo ACT 10. Again, we have another instance of the left trying to undo and legislate from the bench - with no shame or attempts to even hide their agenda. Isn't something really wrong with that? And the useless Mayor of Milwaukee has actually endorsed one of the two Democratic candidates - very telling in itself. Barrett could care less about qualifications and instead is focused on partisanship.

Roggensack IS the only qualified candidate running for the Wisconsin State Supreme Court. I hope that most conservative/republicans AND Dems who really want a qualified judge on the court will vote for Roggansack now - in the primary - and again in April.

Sadly, at my polling place I was only #8 at 7:30 a.m. Doesn't look like strong voter turnout so far...

Hey slo ! Your off topic again, Since you are a low information voter, I bet you did
not notice ? Have you even watched how PDLS Dumocrats pretend to be on the
oppositional side once in a while ? Have you noticed that the media tries to seem in
the middle ? Only a low infornmation voter would not !!! lol... normal turn out today
at the polls so I will call Roggensack as the winner as of now ! yeahhhhhhhhhhhh!

Well, you better get the vote out or this woman in Ohio will vote for you. like she did for 5 others in Ohio:

http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_central_cincinnati/downtown/Poll-worker-accused-of-voter-fraud-in-Hamilton-County-speaks-out

"@jman99: Politicians endorse their own in many instances. Look at Bill Clinton - even hitting the campaign trail to stump for Barry O. (A bit like the inmates of an asylum voting for the most sane among them?)"

Not the same at all Hemmer, unless the only judges endorsing her are all republicans. Is that true? You don't give any evidence one way or the other in you comments or your blog.

Only then is the comparison valid.

“Judges endorsing one of their own...”

“Politicians endorse their own in many instances.”

Which is she; a judge, or a politician?

"http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_central_cincinnati/downtown/Poll-worker-accused-of-voter-fraud-in-Hamilton-County-speaks-out"

Sounded more like stupidity rather than anything malicious.

"Sounded more like stupidity rather than anything malicious. " -Mgarber

Beautiful! From the party of the underinformed comes a plea of ignorance and stupidity as an excuse for breaking the law.

Can Walker count on your support for Voter ID to protect the country from stupidity, since voter fraud doesn't exist?

"Beautiful! From the party ..."
My comment was mime; it did not come from any "party".... fool.

"... of the underinformed ...."
Is this the new mantra for the week??

"...comes a plea of ignorance and stupidity as an excuse for breaking the law."
Its not a plea, and its not an excuse. She should be punished completely as the law allows..... fool. If stupidity was an excuse for anything, folks would be giving you a lot more leeway.
What it doesnt sound like is some sort of conspiracy to stuff the ballot box.

"....since voter fraud doesn't exist?"
There have been about as many GOP related fraud instances as Dem and they all are single vote type instances, and they have been a tinttinytiny fraction of all votes cast. What HASNT happened is Obama winning the election via fraud, as your mother Amy, and idiot brother WFB assert.

And inasmuch as you're an elete member of the high information club, Im sure you've noticed how voter ID would have done ZERO to prevent the Cincinatti abuse.
Yeah. I didnt think so.

Nice - You move to the old intellectual standby of name calling: e.g.
"fool...fool...stupid...idiot"

Not saying Obama won due to fraud but this case was a poll worker stuffing the box and intimidating other workers and voters. you can casually dismiss it all you want but it's prevalent and dozens of elections each year are decided by single digit vote discrepencies. Al Franken won via the felon vote and Scott McCallum won his seat after a tie - just to name 2.

It seems that Melowese Richardson is not an exception for an Obama supporter and I have yet to hear of the GOP example of a fraudlent ballot being cast.

Regardless, the liberal justices running in this election would each need 5000 Melowese poll workers to beat Roggensack.

"Nice - You move to the old intellectual standby of name calling"
Only incidentally. Maybe if you stoped saying ridiculous things, that'd help.

"Not saying Obama won due to fraud..."
Tell your friends, and maybe they'll stop looking like fools (not name calling; such assertions ARE foolish. period).

No ! The more I learn about those low information Dumocrats the more I am sure
that the o would not have won if voter fraud were stopped !!! lol...

Amy...took the family to vote. We did the liberal way of voting: early and often

"and I have yet to hear of the GOP example of a fraudlent ballot being cast."

"Amy...took the family to vote. We did the liberal way of voting: early and often "

You wanted an example, looks like you didn't have to look far....

How many times you vote Jim?

@Carl Hicks: I think Mr. Hayett was joking, Carl. Maybe you need to get a sense of humor?

Congrats to Supreme Court Justice Pat Roggensack on her victory in yesterday's elections. However, do not let the victory make anyone complacent when it comes to voting in April. The liberals will pull out all the stops to get their Democrat candidate elected. A lot of people sat the primary election out - turnout was less than 10% - and one of the Dems was going to win anyhow so many did not bother to turnout.

Rest assured come April (and before) we'll see the busses of "helpers" coming into our state from other states to assist ("vote early, vote often") in getting another liberal on the court to undo ACT10/Voter ID and shoot down anything Governor Walker wants to do. The cheat factor will skyrocket. Roggensack will need every legitimate vote she can get to overcome the cheat factor and then some...

The heavy lifting is coming in April. Be prepared. Get out now to help Roggensack get re-elected. Simply put, she IS the most qualified candidate. The Dems have turned this into a partisan race without blinking an eye or questioning if this is even right or wrong. Whatever. We need to win this one.

Can Walker count on your support for Voter ID to protect the country from stupidity, since voter fraud doesn't exist? - Mucho's question to MGarber

LOL! His non-answer just made my day. Thanks.