Vote for Supreme Court Justice Pat Roggensack today!

"@Carl Hicks: I think Mr. Hayett was joking, Carl. Maybe you need to get a sense of humor? "

But you can't say with any degree of certainty, that he did not vote more than once can you? No you can't.

Carl...take a break pal. It was a joke!

Here's what you might be looking for


"Yes, I voted twice," Richardson told WCPO-TV. "I, after registering thousands of people, certainly wanted my vote to count, so I voted. I voted at the polls."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/ohio-poll-worker-obama-supporter-investigated-for-potentially-voting-six-times/#ixzz2LRhXBqWw

"LOL! His non-answer just made my day. Thanks. " - sharpaxe

Apparently sharpaxe does not know what a rhetorical question is. Kudos to Mgarber for understanding.

The 98th assembly district leaders are only 30 votes apart and the absentee ballot count will likely make it tighter. Voter ID would help eliminate as much doubt as possible about the integrity of every ballot cast and true winners in close elections.

"His non-answer just made my day."
When someone can show me a case or three where it would have actually made a difference, then maybe I'll decide if voter ID is worth the effort. In the meantime, if all your going to talk about are cases like the one in Ohio, where voter ID would have made Zero difference, then Id say you are proposing the wrong solution.

In the meantime, Im glad I made your day.

Richardson is one of 19 people suspected of illegal voting by the Hamilton County Board of Elections in the last election.

"I'm outraged, and every voter, regardless of their political affiliation, should be outraged," said Hamilton County Board of Elections member Alex Triantafilou, who is also chairman of the county Republican Party. "It causes folks to have real doubts about the fabric of our very democratic process, and it's dangerous. It is disconcerting that someone would be so bold as to admit their conduct in such a fashion ... We fully intend to prosecute these cases."

Richardson claimed she had submitted an absentee ballot, but was afraid her vote would not count so she also voted in person. She also said she voted in the name of her granddaughter and yet another person.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/ohio-poll-worker-obama-supporter-investigated-for-potentially-voting-six-times/#ixzz2LRkQnbCV

Oh, I got it Mucho! lol. I knew his response would make it even funnier...and he delivered.

When someone can show me a case or three where it would have actually made a difference, then maybe I'll decide if voter ID is worth the effort. In the meantime, if all your going to talk about are cases like the one in Ohio, where voter ID would have made Zero difference, then Id say you are proposing the wrong solution. - MGarber

LOL again! What used to be "show me proof of fraud", has morphed into "show me proof that the fraud (which now exists) made a difference". It's laughable. What's the next excuse?

Mgarber…you are using the typical liberal talking points. This blog has shown many cases of voter fraud. From the fake Dallas Cowboy’s names in 08 to this lady; adds up. But that is still not the point or the only voter fraud that has been proven at this site. It’s nationwide. However, more important is how many have not been caught. It’s nearly impossible to find voter fraud. Except when the person is as stupid as Richardson. Or where the Gore campaign was stupid enough to get caught giving cigarettes to the homeless so to vote for Gore. And so on.

Enforcing voter ID is the only answer. No one is disenfranchised. That’s the liberal excuse to make sure they get those illegal votes. You know it Mgarber. As do most other liberals. But can’t admit it.

Just push all the facts aside when they don't follow the liberal ideology.

MGarber: So now you are saying that if voter fraud has no effect on election results, we don't need Voter ID???

I don't think that the honest among us who go to the polls and vote ONCE would agree that voter fraud is OK and we do not need Voter ID UNLESS the margins of victory for one candidate over another are too close to call. Egads.

People - this is the kind of "logic" we are up against. Scary, isn't it???

"It’s nearly impossible to find voter fraud. "
"Enforcing voter ID is the only answer."
If it doesnt actually catch cases of fraud that we know about (and most of them are in this catagory; Gore's cigatettes, this lady in Ohio, etc), being "the only answer" is still the wrong answer.

"So now you are saying that if voter fraud has no effect on election results, we don't need Voter ID???"
Im saying severity is a factor. If you contend that we need to take whatever steps are necessary to prevent a single fraud, that is no different than the liberal's contention that every child should be clothed in bubble wrap ("because if just one child can be saved....").

"People - this is the kind of "logic" we are up against. Scary, isn't it???"

Who are you talking to?

Mgarber…it’s obvious once again that you are struggling with the truth. Normally I would chuckle at your struggles with the truth and facts. But not when it comes to our most important freedom we as Americans own: the right to a fair and honest election.

For you to even try to argue over any of this shows your colors: win elections for liberals at any cost.

There are no other ways to fight voter fraud but to show an ID and have more honest people working at the polls.

Any legislation that limits voter fraud will be opposed by Democrats until they stop being the primary beneficiaries of it. Same goes for illegal immigration. Simple as that.

Why would you comment like that garber ,just because you lost the discussion to
facts ? Even when you listen to PDLS's comment when talking to onanother theysay
vote and vote often !!! It is the montra ! The belief ! The way of life for Dumocrats to
cheat at any cost for they know that if they do it Maybe the Republicans might !!!