The evolution of math in America...
(Thanks goes to my cousin, Steve (once again) for providing this lesson in math via an e-mail...LOL!!! Good stuff!)
------------------------------------------------
Last week I purchased a burger at a fast food restaurant for $1.58. The counter girl
took my $ 2 and I was digging for my change when I pulled 8 cents from my
pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and 3
pennies, while looking at the screen on her register.
I sensed her discomfort and tried to tell her to just give me two quarters,
but she hailed the manager for help. While he tried to explain the
transaction to her, she stood there and cried.
Why do I tell you this? Because of the evolution in teaching math since the
1950s:
1. Teaching Math In 1950s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5
of the price. What is his profit?
2. Teaching Math In 1960s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5
of the price, or $80. What is his profit?
3. Teaching Math In1970s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is
$80. Did he make a profit?
4. Teaching Math In 1980s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80
and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.
5. Teaching Math In 1990s
A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and
inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the
preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20.
What do you think of this way of making a living?
----------------------------------------------
Topic for class participation after answering the question: How did the
birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no
wrong answers, and if you feel like crying, it's ok. )
----------------------------------------------
6. Teaching Math In 2009
Un hachero vende una carretada de maderapara $100. El costo de la
producciones es $80. Cuanto
dinero ha hecho?
7. Teaching Math In 2013
Who cares, just steal the lumber from your rich neighbor's property. He
won't have a gun to stop you, and it's OK anyway cuz it's redistributing
the wealth.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (57)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






70 Comments
ExToDResident - Feb 24, 2013 3:42 PM
Do you know the difference?
Carl Hicks - Feb 24, 2013 3:49 PM
ExToDResident - Feb 24, 2013 3:56 PM
author met one such person.
It is just as obvious that the article is opinion; with an completely distorted view
of the lessons detailed.
Carl Hicks - Feb 24, 2013 3:59 PM
as my coworkers pull out calculators and I solve their equations faster in my head
then they can punch in numbers.
WFB resident - Feb 24, 2013 4:02 PM
happened where something was gained ? side note: All evolution comes from the
loss of dna not a gain ! lol... Do you PDLS's even know this ? Then carl proves
Hemmers point for her in his second post ! lol...
ahemmer - Feb 24, 2013 4:17 PM
(From the Merriam Webster dictionary.)
The process I am describing, ExTODR and Mr. Hicks, falls within these parameters.
And I think the article and observations, sadly true in many ways, still were rather funny... :)
Lighten up, people! Egads.
Carl Hicks - Feb 24, 2013 4:20 PM
Which is a shame since the dumbing down of this country is a problem, however
dishonesty by those discussing such problems is an worse problem.
Carl Hicks - Feb 24, 2013 4:53 PM
this distortion of reality. Is it because it blames liberals?
ahemmer - Feb 24, 2013 5:08 PM
And Carl, in regards to the truth of some of these "observations" - if you think this post blames liberals, you are exactly right! If the shoe fits, wear it! The goofiness of liberalism is clearly pointed out in the "topic for class participation" in the blog...
Just like liberal math: 2 + 2 = 5, cuz at least lil' Johnny tried really, really hard at solving the problem! Give him an "A" for effort, even though he is incorrect and all the dumbing down in the world in a pathetic effort to build up self-esteem is doing more damage to lil' Johnny than libs are willing to admit.
Carl Hicks - Feb 24, 2013 5:39 PM
just to blame liberals. And even more disturbibg is how you revel in your
dishonesty.
Pretty sad you can't be honest in discussing a true problem. With this type of
discussion of problems it is clear you don't care about finding a solution but only
care about blaming liberals.
yert49 - Feb 24, 2013 6:11 PM
Get a clue. This is an excellent post. Not only by highlighting the "dumbing down"
process through the years, but by poking fun at all you feel good, humorless,
lefties.
WFB resident - Feb 24, 2013 6:30 PM
Carl Hicks - Feb 24, 2013 6:45 PM
needs to get a grip?
I am laughing at being asked to "lighten up" by someone who refuses to lighten
up herself. After all the best humor is based in reality!
Peter123 - Feb 24, 2013 6:57 PM
I've never taken a math course which didn't have right and wrong answers on the major evaluations. The "any answer can be right" mindset tends to be in English and social studies essays (which are about how the argument is made). Sometimes there's partial credit for being on the right track, as the process is important. Of course, perhaps my background at Hartland-Lakeside, Arrowhead, and UW-Madison didn't touch on the liberal institutions Amy is decrying. I certainly can't speak for everywhere.
The problem is that Amy is distracting from the real problems. For example, an over-reliance on standardized tests due to a desire to quantify performance. Or an inability to put in teacher accountability because the teachers' unions don't trust the evaluation methods. Or the reliance of students on their calculators because the tests allow calculators, which means school funding relies upon their proficiency with calculators rather than understanding the math. Word problems are still a thing as of my time in school.
Regarding the logger, we can't know his profit because we only know the cost of production. Shipping is a substantial part of the cost for such products, and he's only got $20 left for it.
And for the story, obviously this is a problem with the kids these days. After all, there has never been an older cashier who had such a problem. Or a young cashier who could do the math.
Carl Hicks - Feb 24, 2013 6:57 PM
anywhere? What school used the past methods mentioned?
yert49 - Feb 24, 2013 6:58 PM
Peter123 - Feb 24, 2013 7:01 PM
jhayett - Feb 24, 2013 7:50 PM
It doesn’t take a brain surgeon, or even Jethro Bodine, to figure out the meaning behind it. Our children are losing not just their moral compass from our schools, but their ability to compete worldwide. I won't even bring up the entitlement or socialism meaning within. That might be to much overload on that simple brain of yours.
Sadly I know you have one. Just not sure where it is located!
WFB resident - Feb 24, 2013 8:53 PM
WFB resident - Feb 24, 2013 8:54 PM