The evolution of math in America...
(Thanks goes to my cousin, Steve (once again) for providing this lesson in math via an e-mail...LOL!!! Good stuff!)
------------------------------------------------
Last week I purchased a burger at a fast food restaurant for $1.58. The counter girl
took my $ 2 and I was digging for my change when I pulled 8 cents from my
pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and 3
pennies, while looking at the screen on her register.
I sensed her discomfort and tried to tell her to just give me two quarters,
but she hailed the manager for help. While he tried to explain the
transaction to her, she stood there and cried.
Why do I tell you this? Because of the evolution in teaching math since the
1950s:
1. Teaching Math In 1950s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5
of the price. What is his profit?
2. Teaching Math In 1960s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5
of the price, or $80. What is his profit?
3. Teaching Math In1970s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is
$80. Did he make a profit?
4. Teaching Math In 1980s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80
and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.
5. Teaching Math In 1990s
A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and
inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the
preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20.
What do you think of this way of making a living?
----------------------------------------------
Topic for class participation after answering the question: How did the
birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no
wrong answers, and if you feel like crying, it's ok. )
----------------------------------------------
6. Teaching Math In 2009
Un hachero vende una carretada de maderapara $100. El costo de la
producciones es $80. Cuanto
dinero ha hecho?
7. Teaching Math In 2013
Who cares, just steal the lumber from your rich neighbor's property. He
won't have a gun to stop you, and it's OK anyway cuz it's redistributing
the wealth.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (177)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






70 Comments
ahemmer - Feb 25, 2013 3:46 PM
A small blurb:
"The president's sequester strategy is like Howard Beale in "Network": "Woe is us. . . . And woe is us! We're in a lot of trouble!"
It is always cliffs, ceilings and looming catastrophes with Barack Obama. It is always government by freakout...
Mr. Obama thrives in chaos. He flourishes in unsettled circumstances and grooves on his own calm. He spins an air of calamity, points fingers and garners support. His only opponent is a hapless, hydra-headed House."
Read the entire article. Noonan describes the rule of Obama perfectly.
ahemmer - Feb 25, 2013 3:58 PM
I use the sequester example to compare to how lefties here - on this blog site - don't address the real blog topic, but would rather poke fun at:
1) what definition of "evolution" I used in the blog title (egads, can we get more petty - yes we can!),
2) how "stupid" this post is (way to go, Carl!!!)
3) then I am accussed of "dishonesty in discussion" (whatever the heck that means, thanks again, Carl!)
4) then Mr. Arrogant himself chimes in - Peter123 - who seems to think it's OK in math for no "wrong or right" answer cuz, well cuz English and Social Studies are more flexible! As long as an attempt is made to solve a problem - give 'em credit!!! Egads. And then we analyze the logger problem to death - saying we "don't know the cost of production." Get a grip, Peter. It's a story, using humor.
5) Then ExToDresident chimes in with a complaint that I did nothing to "revise" the joke... HUH? I was sent an e-mail, Ex. I thought it was funny. I used it as a blog topic. If I had "revised" it, you lefties would be complaining that I took liberties with someone elses work. Again, - egads.
6) But the best comes from Mr. Hicks at the end - accusing us of "hate" cuz we won't "discuss" the problems America is facing.... 'scuze me while I go bang my head against the wall...
Chaos. Plain and simple. The Obama way. The Saul Alinsky way.
ExToDResident - Feb 25, 2013 4:38 PM
Petty huh? You should listen to yourself (the queen of petty); as if that would ever
happen.
I made the suggestion (roughly) that instead of your using the word evolution you
should have used devolution because its definition more closely fits what the joke
was about. You summarily rejected my comment simply because you see me as
a liberal. How could anything be more petty than that?
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 4:47 PM
piles of partisan misinformation a public service.
PS speaking of petty, both jim and trollboy both used to instead of TOO, why
didn't you correct them as you would me?
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 4:48 PM
piles of partisan misinformation a public service.
PS speaking of petty, both jim and trollboy both used to instead of TOO, why
didn't you correct them as you would me?
ExToDResident - Feb 25, 2013 4:53 PM
A complaint? I beg your pardon, did I direct the comment at you?
Apparently, nothing is ever clear enough for you to understand. I was attempting
to point out to Peter that you didn't change the joke any and therefore didn't add
to it as Peter had suggested.
In short I was defending you.
(Note to self; don't bother posting anything that is supportive of Hemmer's stance
because she doesn't deserve my support.)
ahemmer - Feb 25, 2013 4:56 PM
By the way, have I ever corrected your use of the word "to" vs. "too?" Are you a wee bit sensitive?
ExToDR: Now you come back and complain that I didn't use your "devolution" term? Then you whine about me being "petty?" Really? Don't you have anything better to do?
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 5:05 PM
mentioned is factual. Which is why I say this type of thinking is what is wrong
with our country.
Why do you insist on being part of the problem?
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 5:09 PM
answer. No i am not sensitive, guess I just have a better memory then you.
ExToDResident - Feb 25, 2013 5:12 PM
Sigh...like I just said; Apparently nothing is clear enough for you to understand.
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 5:17 PM
partisan misinformation that honest discussion is impossible!
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 5:30 PM
posted factual information on the subject a meaningful productive debate could
have been had here however you posted some bogus partisan "joke" and now are
upset that that "information" is being called out for what it is.
ExToDResident - Feb 25, 2013 5:45 PM
want to have a serious debate about the state of education in OUR United States
of America.
This blog is Hemmer's podium for potification and nothing more.
ahemmer - Feb 25, 2013 5:49 PM
And my goodness, the lefties here are bursting a blood vessel (I know! I'll soon get called out by anyone who has had a stroke for being "insensitive" - whatever).
I posted a column that I thought was funny - and a bit on-target - about the state of education in America. Little did I know that it would generate such a silly frenzy - about "honesty" and "partisan misinformation." Good grief. I just am shaking my head in disgust. Next up - my blog on Michelle Obama at the Oscars - totally disgusting! Get ready to rip me to shreds, leftie - rub some lotion on those fingertips for typing! :)
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 6:07 PM
blame game. You must not care about the problem at all.
MGarber - Feb 25, 2013 6:32 PM
I did; Its a partisan opinion piece.
"And my goodness, the lefties here are bursting a blood vessel..."
Well, YOU started it when you said "'scuze me while I go bang my head against the wall..." (and they say there's too much gore & violence on TV).
"Next up - my blog on Michelle Obama at the Oscars - totally disgusting".
Save yourself from being disgusting, and dont do it.
Peter123 - Feb 25, 2013 6:38 PM
Of course, you've failed to read my comment. About math, I say I've always seen answers marked as right or wrong, not whatever you feel like. Partial credit may be there, but a wrong answer is still wrong and marked as such.
Please bother to read my comment before attacking it.
ExToD, fair point. It's all third-hand jokes here. No sense commenting on the source material.
Peter123 - Feb 25, 2013 6:44 PM
WFB resident - Feb 25, 2013 6:52 PM
ten in education all the while being taught in school that being close is good enough
? By the way do you even have kids or grandkids in school ? If you do then why do
you not know about what Amy is talking about ? Yet you say she does not know !
Peter , I work in a school now . Amy is correct in how the kids are taught !
Carl Hicks - Feb 25, 2013 6:57 PM
would be allowed to do so here?