Just a few observations...
With numerous issues and events taking place during the past week, I thought I'd just offer a few quick observations on the ones I found most interesting. Here are my quick hits:
1) A memo from the upper echelon of the White House recently surfaced regarding the slow down in spending (not "cuts" as the media keeps reporting) known as the sequestration. The memo advised those departments who had to scale back a wee bit on spending to make sure they kept in line with the White House drumbeat of how painful these "cuts" (aka: a temporary tiny spending slowdown) will be.
From the Washington Post:
"In the internal email, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service official Charles Brown said he asked if he could try to spread out the sequester cuts in his region to minimize the impact, and he said he was told not to do anything that would lessen the dire impacts Congress had been warned of.
“We have gone on record with a notification to Congress and whoever else that ‘APHIS" would eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry, unless they provide funding to cover the costs.’ So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be,” Mr. Brown, in the internal email, said his superiors told him."
One question, if the White House has even had to cancel White House tours (hosted by unpaid volunteers, no less!) BECAUSE of the sequestration - why in the world did our newest Secretary of State, John Kerry, pledge almost $250 million dollars in aide to Egypt - a country led by the Muslim Brotherhood??? Why is the United States giving $15 million to Pakistan? Why is the government buying new TSA uniforms for $50 million dollars? Why aren't journalists directing such questions at Obama? Scary thought that the President of the United States - who takes an oath to protect our nation - is doing everything he can to make the citizens "hurt" as much as possible simply for his own political purposes...
2) Lefties, and communists everywhere were besides themselves with grief this past week with the passing of Venezuela's evil anti-American, socialist dictator Hugo Chavez. (What was very surprising was that Obama did not order flags flown at half-mast to honor Chavez!) After all, given their political ideologies, Chavez and Obama are practically twins separated at birth!)
During his reign, Chavez took from the producers of his own country, attacked the rich, seized lands, and kept the poor equally miserable, while pretending he was a president for "the people." All the while Chavez himself accumulated great wealth and power - at the expense of "the people," of course. (Sound familiar? Should be. It's what Americans are currently experiencing at the hands of The One.) I only wish that who were head-over-heels in adoration with Chavez, like Hollywood socialists Sean Penn, Danny Glover, and Oliver Stone, etc., would just move to Venezuela and stay there.
Good riddance, Hugo Chavez.
3) Interesting note. The WIAA High School Boys Basketball finals were televised this weekend. Several really good games were played.
What was noticeably missing during the broadcasts, however, were any of the usual commercials run by WEAC (Wisconsin Education Association Council) If anyone else watched the WIAA high school sports finals on television in prior years, a standard fixture were the WEAC ads. They were the ones stating that "each child deserves a great school!" During the ACT10 protests in Madison, most in the state learned how ironic this motto really was. After all, in past years, school administrators and school boards struggled for ways to balance budgets while WEAC officials refused to accept financial concessions that would have helped maintain quality programming for students. Prior to ACT10, school districts across the state had to layoff teachers, increase class sizes, and cut student programs simply because WEAC refused to budge on accepting temporary pay freezes, or contributing a tiny portion of their on pay towards their own health insurance and pension plans. (See: The Bad Old Days of Collective Bargaining" for more information.) My guess is that WEAC, which after ACT 10 lost a lot of members now that teachers can no longer be forced to join (and pay hefty union dues), doesn't have the money to spend on false advertising anymore.
4) Kudos to Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) for his recent filibuster designed to bring attention to how Obama & Co. are ignoring the United States Constitution. Senator Paul talked on the senate floor for almost 13 hours, pointing out that the drone program Obama has in place should NOT be allowed to target American citizens on American soil. From The Washington Post:
“I will speak until I can no longer speak,” Paul said as he began. “I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”
A small - yet very important - victory came after the filibuster, when Attorney General Eric Holder sent Paul a letter saying that the Obama Administration would not use drones on Americans on American soil. This was the answer Paul and others were seeking - the answer that Obama and Holder and Co. refused to conceed to prior to the filibuster. Paul forced their hand, brought attention to what the Obama Administration was trying to do, and won. Now if only more Republicans and conservatives in Washington D.C would grow a spine and stand up to Obama. America and Americans would be better off. We need people in Washington D.C. willing to defend our Constitution and stand up for the rights of the American people.
...and last but not least:
5) On his radio show Friday, March 8th, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh talked about a study on bloggers. It seems that many of the younger writers are becoming afraid to post blogs for fear of the nasty comments that will come their way. In addition, some bloggers have taken to not accepting comments at all. Limbaugh stated that the most mean-spirited and hate-filled comments come from....take a guess....those of the liberal ilk. The study also wondered if the people posting such awful comments would behave the same way in person. It concluded that some, indeed, are as nasty in person as they are when hiding behind fake names and throwing mud. Amazing.
Isn't it disappointing that people cannot write a post without expecting vile, obscene, hate-filled, and personal attacks to be thrown at them? I know. Every one of my posts receives many of such comments, which I am able to delete - thankfully. (I have considered posting some of them as a "blog topic," and include the commentors "monikers," but I don't think the folks at livinglakecountry.com would find such a post acceptable.)
A very sad comment (no pun intended!) on society today.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Rain: "Hold my umbrella" - Benghazi: "Stand Down" (172)
- Does the truth matter anymore? (265)
- "My kind of town, Chicago is" (262)
- Two words we must not utter: radical Islam!!! (314)
- Boston Massacre (279)
- What's missing? (308)
- Just in time for Easter... (232)
- The definition of "fair" according to Obama (127)
- Why I Do Not Like The Obamas (207)
- Just a few observations... (311)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






170 Comments
Carl Hicks - Mar 10, 2013 2:19 PM
"If Mr. Paul wants to be taken seriously, he needs to do more than pull political stunts that fire up impressionable libertarian kids in their college dorms. He needs to know what he’s talking about,” McCain said. “I don’t think what happened yesterday was helpful to the American people."
Graham portrayed Paul's views on the drone program as outside the mainstream of the Republican Party and praised Obama for defending it.
"To my party, I’m a bit disappointed that you no longer apparently think we’re at war,” Graham said. “Not Sen. Paul, he’s a man to himself. He has a view that I don’t think is a Republican view."
ahemmer - Mar 10, 2013 2:34 PM
McCain and Graham are of the old-school, they take people at their word. Obama is NOT of the old-school. He cannot be taken at his word, that RINO's like McCain and Graham have yet to learn, which is why Obama has been able to do so much damage. The RINO's and old-schoolers keep taking Obama at his word, then are surprised when what he tells them is the exact opposite of what he does. Like Lucy and Charlie Brown playing football. Lucy keeps holding the football for Charlie Brown to kick, promising each time she won't pull it away at the last minute. Yet, every time Charlie Brown tries to kick, she yanks the football away and laughs. What a perfect illustration of what Obama does to many in the Republican party - who are then stunned when Obama doesn't stay true to his word. At least people like Rand Paul are on to Obama and the fact that his word means nothing.
What Rand Paul did was a watershed moment. The Republican Party is better for it. We need more like him, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, etc. - not the old RINO dinosaurs like McCain and Graham.
ExToDResident - Mar 10, 2013 2:51 PM
“All the while Chavez himself accumulated great wealth and power - at the expense of "the people," of course. (Sound familiar? Should be. It's what Americans are currently experiencing at the hands of The One.)”
Do you have any examples of Obama enriching himself at the expense of the American people?
Other than the vacations that have been taken.
ExToDResident - Mar 10, 2013 3:05 PM
Ah so you are for the Republican Party further marginalizing itself by ostracizing what is left of the moderates. Or anyone that doesn’t hold far-right views.
How much more support do you think the republicans will have when there are only radical right wingers left?
Do you think that ostracizing conservatives that are not far right will help the Republicans win elections?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_right
ahemmer - Mar 10, 2013 3:36 PM
Obama has "enriched" himself at the expense of the American people in various ways.
Growing the government is one of them. Making the government - including the Office of the Prez - more powerful and the individual less so. Taking the rights away from the little people to insert more government rules, regulations, etc. Obamacare comes to mind. Forcing people to buy a product (health insurance) they may not want, nor feel they need.
And since you, Ex, already pointed out how Obama and the Missus travel all over creation on vacation jaunts at the expense of the taxpayers, I could just add how often Obama golfs (wonder how much each golf outing costs the taxpayers - travel, Secret Service, etc. - but as long as Barry gets a few rounds in, that's OK, cuz he's Barry!)
In 2011, Barry and his family cost American taxpayers 1.4 billion dollars. See: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/obama-and-family-cost-taxpayers-1-4-billion-dollars-last-year/
Imagine what the taxpayer price tag is up to by now from The Celebrity-In-Chief and the little missus!
And ExToDr: McCain and Graham are RINO's - you may wish to call them "moderates" if it makes you feel better. They are poor representatives of the Republican Party and what is stands for. And I love it how the libs have no problem with the ultra-lefties in the "Dem" party who should really be called socialists if we were being honest. Start with Obama.
Carl Hicks - Mar 10, 2013 3:38 PM
I wonder how it must feel to you that your views on this subject are closer to Bill Maher then Charles Krauthammer....
Wouldn't it be wonderful if America could put partisianship aside and work towards a common goal of supporting The Bill of Rights....I know i'm not holding my breath on that...
ahemmer - Mar 10, 2013 5:22 PM
By the way, here's another great example of The One "enriching" himself at the expense of the American people. Bo ( named using Barry's initials - egads - how narcisstic are you, Obama???), the Obama family dog, travels by motorcade.
See: http://now.msn.com/bo-obama-keeps-motorcade-during-sequester
And Obama cannot allow people to tour their OWN house - The White House???
Yet he can supply the family pet their own limo??? C'mon, lefties, justify this one.
ahemmer - Mar 10, 2013 5:27 PM
I offer a friendly reminder to readers to not respond to any comments from sirlaughsoutloud (many other aliases, too numerous to list) and Pierre Del Norte.
Both have been banned for past bad behaviors when it came to making comments.
It is also sad how both these individuals don't seem to have much of a life outside of the blogosphere, lurking around my site and trying to post comments whenever possible. Sorry guys, you are done. You are not welcome here.
So, readers, PLEASE do not respond to anything these two individuals post. Their comments will not be up for long, as I remove them whenever I check in.
Carl Hicks - Mar 10, 2013 5:38 PM
Carl Hicks - Mar 10, 2013 5:48 PM
Hopefully not a repost but the other seemed to become lost in cyerland....
ExToDResident - Mar 10, 2013 6:10 PM
Mean wages for the lower classes has been stagnant and has even declined over the last decade, you can’t get blood out of a turnip. And if the “rich” as you called them are the job creators where are the jobs they were supposed to be creating?
“Obama has "enriched" himself at the expense of the American people in various ways. Growing the government is one of them. Making the government - including the Office of the Prez - more powerful and the individual less so. Taking the rights away from the little people to insert more government rules, regulations, etc."
How is that enriching himself?
Besides that has been a constant among all the presidents, apparently it only incites you when a Democrat does it.
“Obamacare comes to mind. Forcing people to buy a product (health insurance) they may not want, nor feel they need.”
Again how is that enriching Obama?
BTW - The mandate was originally a Republican idea that was adopted for “Obamacare”.
All you have here are fallacies, or as I suggested Obsessions.
I have to wonder if you understand the definition of the word enrich?
Here are the definitions to enrich;
1. enhance quality of something: to improve the quality of something, usually by adding something else to it
2. improve nutritional content of food: to add substances such as vitamins or minerals to a food to improve its nutritional value
3. make somebody or something wealthier: to increase the amount of wealth that somebody or something has
So I ask again how has Obama been enriching himself?
jman99 - Mar 10, 2013 7:02 PM
WFB resident - Mar 10, 2013 8:48 PM
back door deals that the o makes with unions and the such. Pay off in the future !
That and the media not actually reporting anything against the o . Makes it hard to
point out untill it is blatent . Even then the media will slant it to make it seem OK to
low information voters which the Dumocrat Party is full of ! So add those to the ones
you and Hemmer pointed out ! lol...
As for posting comments to norte and slow, I keep forgetting and answer for I
deal with them on other sites . I will try to obide with your wishes Amy .
ahemmer - Mar 11, 2013 6:22 AM
Please abide by the Discussion Guidelines.
MGarber - Mar 11, 2013 8:20 AM
Let me get this straight.... you obsess over the imagined size of Michelle Obama's butt, and comment on her table manners, but clutch your pearls over "personal attacks"???
geno53151 - Mar 11, 2013 9:09 AM
.
MGarber - Mar 11, 2013 9:34 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QlVMxovKEgI
Off topic? Not at all; it directly address all 5 points, except for maybe the WIAA issue.
OK. It probably applies to the WIAA issue, too.
geno53151 - Mar 11, 2013 10:00 AM
Administration would not use drones on Americans on American soil.""
Nothing said about using drones to take out a " terrorist" on U.S. soil. Holder said Americans would not be targeted.
WFB resident - Mar 11, 2013 11:18 AM
admit (and did before) that she looks far better now after 4 years of mooching from
US tax payers !! While purchasing thousand dollar shoes and clothing . Moochelle
also does eat with elbows on the table ,especially for a person who was born in the
USA and raised here . Now if she were from some other countries , I would have no
problem with it for it is their way of eating . But moochelle is supposed to be the US
Presidents wife ! We (as in patriotic americans)expect more from our leaders andf
their Spouses !!
ExToDResident - Mar 11, 2013 1:06 PM
How inane can you possibly be?
Besides the comment itself which clearly demonstrates your lack of intelligence but also your spelling.
The spelling for Enrich was demonstrated around a dozen times and you still misspell it.