A Life Lost
I have been on a self-imposed sabbatical, for reasons that are not clear even to me. Consequently I have not written any posts for some time now. However, a recent newspaper article so incensed me that i could not remain quiet.
The article described a situation involving a young girl, age 3, the daughter of an unmarried woman. This woman, one of 25 children by 15 different men, had a long history of physically abusing her other children, who had consequently been removed from her control and placed in foster care. Then, about three years ago she gave birth to another child, a girl whom she immediately abused with injury. This infant child was also removed from her and placed in a foster home.
Time passed, about three years, as the child grew up in the foster home, apparently in a loving, nurturing environment. However, nothing was done to terminate the mother's parental rights. The foster family experessed a desire to adopt the girl but was unable to because the mother still retained parental rights. By policy, the girl could not remain with her long-term foster family apparently because of concern for bonding, which was a bit late in this case. The Milwaukee child welfare agency then returned the child to the biological mother, who had received counseling. The mother, who appparently is suffering from mental problems, then immediately abused the child again.
The issue ended up in court before a Judge Foley, apparently a good man. Because action had not been taken to terminate parental rights by the agency, adoption by the original foster family, the only family the child has known, was not possible. The child could not be returned to the control of the mother because of the history of abuse. Therefore, the judge's only recourse was to place the child back in the foster care system. Judge Foley was publically incensed at this record of incompetence. This poor child's future is now one of multiple foster care environments with, believe it or not, supervised visitation with this obbviously incompetent biological mother. Talk about a bleak future.
Milwaukee has the unenviable reputation of possessing one of the worst records of returning children to biological mothers that resulted in further abuse. This is a classic example of the destruction of young innocent lives at the hands of an incompetent bureaucracy. I can only speculate on the reasons for this incompetence. Lack of concern is certainly a possibility, but a misguided racial element may also be involved. There apparently is a philosophy in the black community that states that black children should be raised only by black parents. I do not know if this was a factor in this case. I don't even know the race of the original foster family, although many are white. I sincerely hope that race was not a factor in the mishandling of this case, which resulted in ripping this child from a loving foster family wishing to adopt her and throwing her to the bureaucratic wolves. Had adoption occurred, this child's future would have been brightly optimistic instead of the present portent of dark disaster.
I don't have a solution, except that this bureaucratic morass should reorient itself to the welfare of the innocent child above and beyond any biological considerations, race-tinged or otherwise. I would hope that this case would result in legislative or at least administrative remediation, but, sadly, I doubt it.
This first rule: Protect the bureaucracy.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






7 Comments
WFB resident - Mar 14, 2013 7:59 PM
think about the future , The future President and senate ! I and I are asking to
relieve this women of her parental rights. (In ourt minds rightfully so). In the minds
of PDLS's they think it is OK to make people like me lose my rights based on what
they deem OK ! Our forefathers came to this country to raise their families the way
they deem OK . They set up the Constitution to Protect those in the minority from
those in the majority (Those who deem themselves correct) . If my constitutional
rights are going to be infringed (right to bare arms) . I will try to show those that
their constitutional rights will be next (freedom of speech) ! For we all know the pen
is mightier than the gun ! From this I can not make a decision about this PDLS
woman and her child . I must know more than what you shared with me (and proof
on top of that) to give my OK to terminate this womens rights !!!
aneuhauser - Mar 16, 2013 10:30 AM
WFB resident - Mar 16, 2013 11:57 AM
how people think of situations causes them to legitimize anything they want by using
such examples ! I do believe that is why we are in a situation where some think it is
OK to change the Constitution just because they feel a certain way ! For instance
2013 death rate from guns is down fron the 90's . Yet now because of the media
whipping all up in a frenzy do people want to change the constitution ! Not only that
but the guns they focus on only account for 1% of all gun related problems ! It is so
stupid that only uninformed peope can believe that changing the Constitution will
help . That was my point , But I do agree I would want the mother in this case
stated to lose her parental rights !
bamaphd - Mar 16, 2013 8:45 PM
Is this correct?
WFB resident - Mar 17, 2013 8:24 PM
what the initial writer said ! Just another way for the low brows to blame others and
justify what they do and act !
aneuhauser - Mar 20, 2013 5:14 PM
Bama and kharma: The reference to the womans familial environment--one of 25 children by 15 fathers--was definitely in the front page article in last Sunday's J-S. Unfortunately the paper went out Wednesday in the recycling bin. I certainly would not make something like this up.
WFB resident - Mar 20, 2013 8:08 PM
front of me ! Now if you assume that they do not, well you would be an uninformed
whitey !!! I went to a friends wedding where my date and I were the only white
people present outside of the white males direct family ! Directly in front of us the
parents of the bride made dispariging remarks about this mixed union!!! I was
astounded and not sure why Americans were so race worried at that time ! But if
you actually work with many Minorities and few caucasions , they (those that see
whitey as something other than themselves ) start to see you as one of them and
open up more to such racial comments ! Almost on a daily basis did I hear on how
whites and blacks should not mingle ! Never did I hear that from a white until I
started hanging around Dumocrats !