Boiling Water
Most of you are familiar with the mini-parable about boiling a frog. To review, it goes like this.
If you try to boil a frog (don't ask!) by dropping him in a pot of boiling water, he will react to the hot water by springing out of the pot as soon as he feels it, relatively intact but not happy. However, if you drop him in a pot of cool water and slowly heat it up, he will be lulled to sleep by the warmth and be gradually boiled, unaware of what is happening to him.
There has been a general outcry over the administration's and Congress' proposed health care reform legislation, H.R.3200 in the House and the Senate HELP (Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) Committee version. Many have protested against this legislation in town meetings and via direct contact to legislators. The White House and their left-wing support groups have responded with a multi-million dollar ad campaign and controversial emails from chief presidential advisor David Axelrod to folks who have no idea how they got on the list. (I was one of the unwilling recipients until I unsubscribed.)
The outbursts against the pending legislation have frequently been loud and boistrous but nonviolent (except for SEIU goons). Support for the legislation has dropped below 50% along with the president's approval ratings.
Some of the accusations have been excessive, such as the suggestion that the bills support euthanasia, which they do not. (The House version does mandate periodic "end-of-life counseling;" I believe the Senate version makes that voluntary.) The Capp Amendment (H.R. 3200) authorizing federal funding of abortions for "low-income urban populations" has added to the uproar. (This is eerily reminiscent of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger's quotes regarding "populations we don't want too many of"). The HELP Committee version is changing daily and so is hard to keep up with. The latest is a suggestion that the "government option"--federal insurance agency--might be dropped. This may just be a trial balloon.
On the other hand, supporters have emphasized that we have nothing to fear because everything is voluntary and nothing is mandatory, which is also untrue. Establishment of several committees and councils intended to "advise" and "recommend" health care policy to various government agencies, while not overtly mandating anything, create a framework for policy implementation by federal agencies like HHS that do have regulatory authority. This is disingenious to say the least.
I'm not going to obsess over this conglomeration of confusing legislation--1,200 pages in H.R. 3200 and 617 pages at last count in the Senate HELP bill. This has been done to a turn by others. I think there is something larger at work here in the vociferous opposition that has so discomfited our esteemed politicos and the Prez. That is the headlong rush to change and fix everything right now, an approach generally accredited to Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. I think they failed to understand the nature of the traditional American.
We have, in addition to health care reform--the 800-pound gorilla, real or proposed initiatives like TARP (started under Bush); multiple rescues, stimuli and bailouts; monstrous present and future deficit spending commitments; auto and financial industry takeovers; cap and trade; CARS (Cash for Clunkers); taxes; Card Check; Fairness Doctrine; amnesty for illegals; closing Guantanamo bay; and more that don't come to mind at the moment. The point is, the administration and Democrats in Congress have tossed the frog into a pot of boiling water and that won't work with this particular frog.
The traditional American throughout the history of this country has resisted force and intimidation. If you push gently, he (gender neutral) will move, sometimes too easily. However, shove hard and he will resist. Attempt coercion and force, and he will fight back with everything he has. Just ask the British and French (colonial times), Santa Ana and the Mexicans, the Axis powers, Republican Guard, al Qaeda, the Taliban, and even the North Vietnamese who "won" the war at an unimaginably great cost.
I believe what we are seeing in the opposition to health care reform, as well as the growing disaffection with the Obama administration and the liberal Democratic Congress in general, is this resistance to being pushed around. They misunderstand the American psyche as they always have, in fact as they must. This is the Achilles' heel of liberal elitists. They know what's best for us and are determined to shove it down our throats. They underestimate the ability of us "fly-over" Americans to clench our teeth.
This is what the Founders truly meant when they created a Constitutional Republic incorporating checks and balances, forcing (they thought) moderation and caution in "change". They too were "a stiff-necked people." Thank God we haven't completely lost it.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






54 Comments
2Cents - Aug 18, 2009 9:47 AM
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened." – Norman Thomas, American socialist
This is what scares the heck out of people. How we could even be debating some of these ideas in the 21st century, after all of the failures of socialism around the world? Americans may simply be too far gone spiritually, morally and intellectually to reject the temptations of socialism.
Socialism has great appeal to the human mind but is good for America. I am not one who thinks this is the answer.
Why would I want to work, live and play exactly like everyone else. When the government programs us to do what they want, we are nothing more than a robot.
lakeside liberterian - Aug 18, 2009 1:42 PM
Your Limboughtomy is complete , you may wander aimlessly in discontent now.
Why do conservatives scream socialism to every democratic government policy as they stood silent to and or applauded civil liberties being stripped (i.e. habeus corpus for US citizens determined to be an "enemy of the state", warrantless wiretaps,rewriting decades old international treaties for our own expediency, GITMO used as an indefinite detainment facility for people whom the government either can't or won't charge with a crime? Or are we being programmed from both sides a little at a time ?
2Cents - Aug 18, 2009 2:16 PM
aneuhauser - Aug 18, 2009 6:06 PM
The problem is, liberal elitists never admit error and simply escalate their public policies until we wake up one day "boiled", having lost another freedom.
2Cents - Aug 18, 2009 6:50 PM
GITMO is the perfect place to keep those Terrorists that have and will continue to kill to support their world-wide jihad. As long as there is jihad, they should be contained, and I really don’t care where it is. There already was discussion about the sympathy some liberals have for criminals, this is a perfect example.
Oh, and aren’t you the one who said - “I'm still not sure I want the government involved in health care” . . . . who’s wandering aimlessly in discontent? . . . . I am positive "I" don’t want socialized health care.
jmark - Aug 19, 2009 7:01 AM
lake country progressive - Aug 19, 2009 7:09 AM
The neocons, and their right-wing wack-o's like this blog have done the same thing.
lake country progressive - Aug 19, 2009 7:09 AM
There has been a greater outcry over the status quo
lake country progressive - Aug 19, 2009 7:10 AM
But are ALL coming from hatred and none from rational thought. None of the protesters are willing to discuss anything rationally.
lake country progressive - Aug 19, 2009 7:10 AM
No, they are all excessive and based upon neocon fear tactics.
lake country progressive - Aug 19, 2009 7:10 AM
That s not true. The supports claim that the bill provides CHOICE. Nobody has said there are no mandates.
lake country progressive - Aug 19, 2009 7:10 AM
If they delayed they would be shirking the responsibility and you'd be blogging that they are do-nothings. The argument that they are somehow rushing the thing doesn't hold water.
lake country progressive - Aug 19, 2009 7:11 AM
Bailouts and rescues are being paid back. Stimulus has hardly even gotten underway and will be a wash but will also avoid deeper recession. Deficit spending has been a major problem for the republicans. Obama situation is eerily similar to Clinton's in his first year. We'll all be very happy if Obama's economy is like Clinton's.
2Cents - Aug 19, 2009 8:20 AM
Jmark; Do we not own this to our senior citizens who have worked to raise a family and pay taxes to support the over 65 group when they were younger? It's a pretty good gamble for the system as they paid in to it for about 45 years and get an average of 10-15 years out of it.
Or should we spend it on health care for the millions of illegal immigrants.
referee33 - Aug 19, 2009 8:54 AM
You do realize that we are already paying for the health care of the illegal immigrants and the uninsured. Any time the hospital has to "eat" the cost of any treatment, that cost ends up on the debit side of the ledger. In order to make the ledger balance, there has to be an increase in the credit side, so rates go up. Those with insurance or who pay cash for their services, get to "eat" the hospitals deficit.
Some questions I'd like to know the answers to. Is there still an upper limit on the amount of income you pay FICA taxes on and is so why? SS and Medicare are essentially 50 year input and 10-20 year output programs. Is there any program that attempts to increase the amount of input into the system from those who only contribute for, say, 30 years?
referee33 - Aug 19, 2009 9:08 AM
2Cents - Aug 19, 2009 10:07 AM
Yes, and this is one of the biggest reasons insurance costs are high. This is why we must do something about the illegals and those who elect not to be insured first. Why divide this nation further trying to overhauling the entire system for a small realistic percentage. I gave a breakdown of the 45 million so-called uninsured being thrown around on this issue. Nobody has disputed the numbers I gave, nobody can tell us how many are illegal either. Do you realize if this bill were to pass we still will be paying for these illegals and those who elect not to be insured? Even the "individual mandate" or a 2.5% penalty can fix this problem. Those making under 50k pay zero yet we still will be forced to pay for their medical bills.
Yes, Social Security and Medicare are government run but they are both broke. Both were designed to take care of our senior citizens and should stay that way. A socialized program is much different from a socialized government.
FICA has a yearly cap, no term cap that I know of.
2Cents - Aug 19, 2009 10:23 AM
Actually, Medicare only requires you work a minimum for 10 years. An immigrant can get citizenship at age 55 and work until they are 65 and get the same benefits as Al.
2Cents - Aug 19, 2009 12:17 PM
jmark - Aug 19, 2009 2:43 PM
And no, I don't want to deny our senior citizens health care. I just wish they were a little less stingy with their social programs.