Swine Flu: a national emergency? or a distraction?
The Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel headline for Sunday, October 25th screams: "Swine flu a national emergency."
Oh, really.
Looks like President Obama has gone ahead and declared that the swine flu outbreak is indeed a national emergency. And we know that Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, has stated in the past that "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius now has more power and authority to bypass federal rules regarding the operations of hospitals and alternative care sites. And the government has taken another step towards grabbing more power in controlling the population of America because of Obama's declaration.
However, the real questions that need to be asked are: is swine flu a REAL crisis? or a distraction?
I think the "real crisis" is the Obama presidency. Obama & Co. know they are in trouble - big time. Obama is sinking in the polls as many Americans are against his socialist policies and plans for America. Obamacare is on life support, as people are protesting against socialized medicine and more government intrusion into our day-to-day lives. We see the president putting our country in debt, the likes of which we have never seen before and may never recover from. Trillions upon trillions of dollars being spent - and owed. People continue to lose jobs. Businesses are closing, or leaving America. We see Obama waffling for weeks on Afghanistan, unable to make a simple decision: send more troops as requested by his own hand-picked general in order to win? or refuse to send more troops and lose. Which will it be? Instead of focusing on the war in Afghanistan, Obama sure seems to have enough time on his hands to wage his own war on Fox News....go figure. So, with people disgusted with the White House, Obama, and the Dems in Congress and the Senate, what to do? 2010 is shaping up to be a disaster for the Democratic party. Seems like a distraction is needed. The attention of the American people needs to be diverted -away from the bumbling incompetence, lies, and misdeeds of the president and the White House. The current "crisis of the day" - Global Warming - has run its course. More people are realizing the hype about global warming may not exactly be true and that there is no dire catastrophe looming on the horizon....
So, next up, Swine Flu. The "crisis du jour."
But is swine flu a "crisis?" Every year 36,000 people die from flu-related symptoms from the seasonal flu. 200,000 are hospitalized. Contrast this to the latest H1N1 numbers: from August 30, 2009 until October 10, 2009 - there have been 292 H1N1 deaths. Two hundred and ninety two. Now, in no way am I making light of those figures - it is sad that some have died from H1N1. In most of these cases, the deaths from H1N1 occurred in people who already had some pre-existing health problems. Yet, is this an epidemic? Time to panic? Remember, every year in our country, over 30,000 people die from the flu! Yet, every year, the president has not declared a "state of emergency." Because the flu is a fact of life. Many people get sick, some die. Year after year. Regarding the Swine Flu, the Center for Disease Control issued this statement: "Most people are just getting mild flu symptoms and a few days later they are fine." National emergency? No.
On a personal note, several weeks ago our middle child was ill. She had body aches, chills, a slight fever, and just felt horrible. Looking on the website which described "swine flu" symptoms, I immediately called our family physician and got her an appointment a few hours later. Upon arriving at the clinic, she was asked to don a surgical mask, and we waited in a room to see the doctor. Prior to the doctor's visit, a nurse came in - decked out in scrubs, a face mask, face shield, and surgical gloves. Guess that is standard procedure when one could be exposed to "swine flu" (however, I sat there completely unprotected, no mask, etc. The health professionals must figure anyone in the same household is probably already exposed?). Anyhow, the nurse did most of the exam up front. Our child had a fever, but we were told it was not consistent with swine flu - it was below 100 degrees. We were also told several interesting things: people with swine flu usually have sore throats for some time, they also have a fever over 100 degrees for several days, and the usual flu symptoms are common, too. They concluded right off the bat that our child did not have swine flu. She did not even need to be tested. They also said that many people are getting the usual flu -as is common every year. The symptoms are quite close to swine flu. And there are also various strains of swine flu - some people may have a mild case and not even realize they had it. For some it is more severe, but goes away after a period of time. Our daughter was fine after a couple of days. There are so many strains of flu out there, it is difficult to pinpoint what type anyone has at any given moment. And no one in our family has gotten a flu vaccine - except my husband who was required to, since he works in a hospital.
This leads to another key point. Everyone in America is aware that Obama & the Obama government want to take over the health care system. One of the biggest power grabs imaginable. Yet, with the "swine flu" epidemic in the forefront, we are witnessing various cities either seeing people refusing to be vaccinated (Milwaukee public health workers had 1,200 doses sitting unused after two days of "free clinics" to vaccinate anyone who wanted it), or shortages. Clinics in Chicago ran out quickly and had to turn people away. In other areas, people waited in line for hours - in the cold or freezing rain. Yet, not enough vaccines available. What a great example of what government-run health care in our country will look like - waiting, long lines, and not enough services for everyone. And those who are refusing to be vaccinated may not have a choice. In the future they may be forced to by Big Brother (oops, I mean our government!) - whether they want the vaccine or not. With Obama's declaration of an emergency comes more authority for the government. One of the items included in that authority is the power to force mandatory swine flu vaccinations on the entire population! Watch closely, people! The swine flu "epidemic" is giving us all a glimpse of how inept our government is at running things that they have no business sticking their noses in. It will also demonstrate how the government can grab more power simply by declaring something a "national emergency."
Of course not all "national emergencies" are a power grab or meant to be a distraction. 9/11 WAS a real national emergency -no debate there. As was Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Charlie, and other storms that areas of our country experience throughout the years. The wildfires we often see out west which destroy millions of acres, kill people, and leave many without homes ARE national emergencies. Flooding in many states results, with good reason, in national emergencies being declared. And in those cases, the government does step in - with benevolent intentions to really help out those in need.
So why, oh why, is swine flu suddenly a "national emergency?' Simple. Obama and Co. desperately need a distraction. And that distraction is: Swine "don't let a serious crisis - even if it's phony - go to waste" Flu.
Many people who voted for Obama now realized they were fooled. Bamboozled. They were distracted. Their attention was diverted from the facts and realities of Obama's true beliefs and plans for America. Now they know that Obama's "hope" and "change" simply translates into socialism. Don't get fooled again. Don't be "distracted." Continue to focus on what is going on in Washington, D.C. rather than ringing your hands in panic about the swine flu. Instead, wring your hands in panic about the direction that Obama is taking America - and continue to speak out!
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- An important letter from the Reverend Archbishop of Milwaukee (33)
- Recall the Recall! (67)
- "We thought more about the next generation than we did about the next election." - Governor Scott Walker (270)
- No honor in recall effort. (270)
- Political Buzzwords for 2012 (229)
- Walker initiated John Doe investigation (125)
- Let's HOPE for CHANGE in November, 2012 (47)
- My Top Ten Political Hopes for 2012 (145)
- Obama - fourth greatest president ever? (17)
- Tim Tebow Derangement Syndrome (81)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






39 Comments
referee33 - Oct 25, 2009 10:20 PM
ahemmer - Oct 26, 2009 7:29 AM
As an interesting side note, since the swine flu scare began, and now that Obama has declared the swine flu a "national emergency", emergency rooms across the country (especially near the border of Mexico) have seen a huge increase in people coming in - with little more than common colds. They are afraid they have the swine flu. People are scared - and the surge in volume in ER's is taxing health care professionals. ER's are busier than normal and unable to donate the time to see the people who really need help vs. those who are just worried.
And remember who said they weren't going to run the country based on "fear?" Obama. Guess what The One is doing? Looks like my belief is true - whatever Obama says, he does the exact opposite. First he scared everyone that the economy would fail if his porkulus bill wasn't rushed through. Look what happened there...Then we had dire warnings if his health care bill didn't get passed right away - in August! At least the American people managed to put the brakes on that monstrosity power grab. And now the Swine Flue is the rage....What next?
Christian Democrat - Oct 26, 2009 9:16 AM
ahemmer - Oct 26, 2009 9:36 AM
ahemmer - Oct 26, 2009 11:37 AM
For my other readers, here is a link provided by another reader to some more information on swine flu which questions the "emergency" status of this flu, as well as other questions concerning swine flu testing: click on:
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/21/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5406025.shtml?tag=cbsnewsTwoColUpperPromoArea
It's from CBS news, so the libs out there should believe it...
Compridious - Oct 26, 2009 11:41 AM
- Richard Nixon
Christian Democrat - Oct 26, 2009 11:48 AM
But of course, to you - it is just another reason to slam the President of the United States. Kudos to you, Amy.
dtatarowicz - Oct 26, 2009 12:12 PM
Present Swine Flu mild in Spring ...
Mostly affects Young People ...
Those are THE reasons that the Experts are concerned.
Forget your anecdotal information --- forget that most health care workers are not experts (despite our private health care system -- or maybe because of it, many of them are clueless) ..
Read the following from the National Archives about the Spanish Flu --- 1918 --- and you will learn why health care EXPERTS are very concerned --- not because they know what the present Swine flu will mutate into --- but precisely because they do NOT know what it will --- but what it COULD !!!
-------------------------------------------------------------
World War I claimed an estimated 16 million lives. The influenza epidemic that swept the world in 1918 killed an estimated 50 million people. One fifth of the world's population was attacked by this deadly virus. Within months, it had killed more people than any other illness in recorded history.
The plague emerged in two phases. In late spring of 1918, the first phase, known as the "three-day fever," appeared without warning. Few deaths were reported. Victims recovered after a few days. When the disease surfaced again that fall, it was far more severe. Scientists, doctors, and health officials could not identify this disease which was striking so fast and so viciously, eluding treatment and defying control. Some victims died within hours of their first symptoms. Others succumbed after a few days; their lungs filled with fluid and they suffocated to death.
The plague did not discriminate. It was rampant in urban and rural areas, from the densely populated East coast to the remotest parts of Alaska. Young adults, usually unaffected by these types of infectious diseases, were among the hardest hit groups along with the elderly and young children. The flu afflicted over 25 percent of the U.S. population. In one year, the average life expectancy in the United States dropped by 12 years.
dtatarowicz - Oct 26, 2009 12:13 PM
Present Swine Flu mild in Spring ...
Mostly affects Young People ...
Those are THE reasons that the Experts are concerned.
Forget your anecdotal information --- forget that most health care workers are not experts (despite our private health care system -- or maybe because of it, many of them are clueless) ..
Read the following from the National Archives about the Spanish Flu --- 1918 --- and you will learn why health care EXPERTS are very concerned --- not because they know what the present Swine flu will mutate into --- but precisely because they do NOT know what it will --- but what it COULD !!!
-------------------------------------------------------------
World War I claimed an estimated 16 million lives. The influenza epidemic that swept the world in 1918 killed an estimated 50 million people. One fifth of the world's population was attacked by this deadly virus. Within months, it had killed more people than any other illness in recorded history.
The plague emerged in two phases. In late spring of 1918, the first phase, known as the "three-day fever," appeared without warning. Few deaths were reported. Victims recovered after a few days. When the disease surfaced again that fall, it was far more severe. Scientists, doctors, and health officials could not identify this disease which was striking so fast and so viciously, eluding treatment and defying control. Some victims died within hours of their first symptoms. Others succumbed after a few days; their lungs filled with fluid and they suffocated to death.
The plague did not discriminate. It was rampant in urban and rural areas, from the densely populated East coast to the remotest parts of Alaska. Young adults, usually unaffected by these types of infectious diseases, were among the hardest hit groups along with the elderly and young children. The flu afflicted over 25 percent of the U.S. population. In one year, the average life expectancy in the United States dropped by 12 years.
Tami Klink - Oct 26, 2009 12:14 PM
Have a great week!
referee33 - Oct 26, 2009 12:15 PM
ahemmer - Oct 26, 2009 12:36 PM
1) The power to force mandatory swin flu vaccinations on the entire population.
2) The power to arrest, quarantine, or "involuntarily transport" anyone who refuses a swine flu vaccination.
3) The power to quarantine an entire city and halt all travel out of that city.
4) The power to enter any home or office without a search warrant and order the destruction of any belongings or structures deemed to be a threat to public health.
5) The effective nullification of the Bill of Rights. Your right to due process, to being safe from government search and seizure, and to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination are all null and void under a presidential declaration of a national emergency.
Does a real national emergency even exist? I think not. CD, you even state that world wide, since swine flu came into being, that the swine flu has killed 5,000 people. Is that an epidemic? No. Again, the regular flu in the U.S. kills 36,000 plus every year. Yet, no national emergency declared.
dtatarowicz: You state regarding the swine flu being a national emergency because: "health care EXPERTS are very concerned --- not because they know what the present Swine flu will mutate into --- but precisely because they do NOT know what it will --- but what it COULD !!!"
Sorry, but I couldn't help but think of Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize -not for anything he has done, but for things he has said he will do or is thinking of....
referee33 - Oct 26, 2009 12:54 PM
Christian Democrat - Oct 26, 2009 1:00 PM
Sounds like the Patriot Act actually.....
And Amy, I certainly hope that you are correct. I hope this disease does not become what it is feared to be. But I am certainly happy that our President is taking a pro-active approach, listening to the experts and not waiting till after the disaster to say, "Gee, wish I could have known how serious this was going to be"......kinda like Katrina, don't you think?
(The quote is made up - it is not attributed to any individual. )
ahemmer - Oct 26, 2009 1:31 PM
And if Obama is taking a "pro-active approach, listening to the experts" regarding a made-up crisis of swine flu, why can't he do the same in regards to Afghanistan? You know, he could listen to his own generals about needing more troops in order not to lose? Take a pro-active approach?
Tami Klink - Oct 26, 2009 1:56 PM
jmark - Oct 26, 2009 2:02 PM
makes no allowance for the suspension of any of its provisions during a national emergency. Disputes over the constitutionality or legality of the exercise of emergency powers are judicially reviewable. Indeed, both the judiciary and Congress, as co-equal branches, can restrain the executive regarding emergency powers. So can public opinion."
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/98-505.pdf
It requires a real stretch of the imagination to believe the president would, under these circumstances, suspend habeas corpus. This power grabbing nonsense is circulating the rightwingosphere.
Keep in mind, the villagers thrive on paranoia.
Compridious - Oct 26, 2009 2:11 PM
Or we can ignore the warning signs like W and clean up the mess later!
Christian Democrat - Oct 26, 2009 2:30 PM
As for Afganistan, it took your guy 8 months to come up with a failed plan, so why not allow Obama a few WEEKS to come up with a solid one.....
ahemmer - Oct 26, 2009 3:24 PM
As for Hurricanes, the worst Hurricane ever to hit the United States occurred in 1900 and wiped out the entire town of Galveston, Texas. 1,800 people died and it cost $157 billion dollars way back in 1900 - yet, who rebuilt Galveston? The locals. Those who survived. Do you think they sat on their butts waiting for the Feds? That type of mentality was rare back then. People assumed responsibility and went to work. Somewhere along the way, that idea has been lost - taken over by the "entitlement" mentality that prevailed in New Orleans.