More on Obama’s campaign lies.
Another little tidbit of news that slipped through the ultra bias MSM, now the lame stream media, took place last week when Obama’s regime announced they will create a commission on how to fix the budget mess. That’s right, you read it correctly. Obama will start a commission to look into the mess he quadruped through his very unpopular moves. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574557571615004170.html.
And yet, he still insists in adding trillions to our debt through the very unpopular Obama/Reid/Pelosi healthcare reform.
Obama’s main campaign themes have now proven to be 100% lies. From transparency, closing Gitmo, pulling out of Iraq, ending Washington partisan deadlock, “Change must come to Washington,” “lobbyists aren’t just part of the system in Washington, they are the problem” (USA Today front page headline: Health care fight swells lobbying. Numbers of organizations hiring firms doubles in 09), and then to “Washington will have to tighten its belt and put off spending,” are enough to make one wonder how he even gets a 20% approval rating. The latest Gallup Poll now shows liberalism falling even more than last year with only 20% now admitting they are liberal.
Obama had my ears perked when he promised to “go through the federal budget and ending programs we don’t need.” Blame it on Bush? Can’t on this one. When Obama took office the federal deficit for this year was just over $400 billion. In the eleventh month of 2009, our federal deficit is at $1.5 trillion and counting. In fact, the total national debt grew in Obama’s first 10 months to $7.5 trillion from just over $6 trillion. At that pace he will bankrupt this country by the time we can get him and the liberal democrats out of office. We must stop Obama and our liberals in Washington from not just their financial bankruptcy of American, but their moral bankruptcy as well. What is even more egregious is most of the Obama/democrat ideas come from the Communist manifesto.
Poll after poll shows that Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats are regretting their decisions and at a rate maybe never seen before. In fact, as reported in the above WSJ URL: Anger over deficits was picked up in a late October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which asked voters if they'd rather boost "the economy even though it may mean larger budget deficits" or keep the "budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Only 31% chose boosting the economy; 62% wanted to keep the deficit down.
With Americans leaning much to the right with fiscal and moral ideologies, I don’t know how liberal democrats in Washington will fix this mess. The only way to fix America is to get these idiots, Obama included, out of office through impeachment or wait until 2010 and 2012.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.


46 Comments
KristianDerecho - Nov 27, 2009 10:53 AM
True Story - Nov 27, 2009 10:58 AM
jhayett - Nov 27, 2009 11:10 AM
So, was this the part of my blog you found impossible to debate?
Poll after poll shows that Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats are regretting their decisions and at a rate maybe never seen before. In fact, as reported in the above WSJ URL: Anger over deficits was picked up in a late October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which asked voters if they'd rather boost "the economy even though it may mean larger budget deficits" or keep the "budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Only 31% chose boosting the economy; 62% wanted to keep the deficit down.
All after Obama made this promise to get your vote True Story: “Washington will have to tighten its belt and put off spending" or “go through the federal budget and ending programs we don’t need.”
jhayett - Nov 27, 2009 11:24 AM
Remember this line from Obama while in Cairo? "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story."
ahemmer - Nov 27, 2009 11:46 AM
Obama stated, before being elected by people who drank his Kool-Aid: "We need earmark reform. And when I'm president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely." Then why the massive $787 Billion Dollar Stimulus Bill, Barry? So loaded with pork, it's also dubbed the "Porkulus Bill" or better yet - "The Generational Theft Act" - since our children, grandchildren, great-grandkids etc. will be paying for this government spending spree for generations...
"When there is a bill that ends up on my desk as the president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out what's in it before I sign it." Barry O. should have been on Saturday Night Live. We all know what a joke this was. And we all know what happened here.
Remember Barack Obama saying he would "bring home the troops within 16 months of taking office?" Personally, I am glad this is one lie Barry failed to achieve. However, he promised his anti-war leftie crowd that America would cut and run in the war on terror. No can do, it seems.
And the lies keep comin', but more Americans are finally wising up. Less than three years to go...
KristianDerecho - Nov 27, 2009 1:14 PM
KristianDerecho - Nov 27, 2009 1:17 PM
reformed trucker - Nov 27, 2009 7:00 PM
jhayett - Nov 27, 2009 7:28 PM
reformed trucker - Nov 27, 2009 11:37 PM
I don't really follow the polls. All I know is we are having a very minor rebound from companies downsizing and streamlining, and yet the government seems to be insistent on doing things that will bring it to a screeching halt. I know quite a few people who lost their jobs or are laid off. They should be more focused on creating jobs (REAL job creation, not the crap they pulled earlier this year). What was that mantra I heard repeated some years back? Oh yeah...
It's the economy, stupid.
It's the ECONOMY, stupid.
IT'S THE ECONOMY, STUPID!!!
Sound advice at this point in history.
snagglesim - Nov 28, 2009 1:41 AM
2Cents - Nov 28, 2009 9:03 AM
A month before the American Revolutionary War, Patrick Henry said:
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year?
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 9:33 AM
jmark - Nov 28, 2009 10:19 AM
2Cents - Nov 28, 2009 10:26 AM
We'll have to see how many protesters show up, this could make the Obama administration rethink the decision to bring the trial to New York. If so, this would be the true beginning of a revolution to take this country back.
I am not sure we have the time save this country from bankruptcy if we wait until the elections. We need to stop this spending now and get people back to work.
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 10:58 AM
In order to fix problems like we have and that comes all from our politicians from the president down, we the people must know who or what is the cause of these problems and more important (key word: more important jmark), who is the cause for it either not getting resolved or getting worse.
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:05 AM
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:14 AM
Mr. Beamer's poignant account of Jill Regan attempting to bring the feelings of 100,000 American citizens into the Senate Judiciary Committee left me feeling helpless. Where in Washington is the acknowledgment of the loss, grief and emptiness that those who lost loved ones in 9/11 will always experience? Where is the compassion of those who are willing to give more "rights" to murderers than to the families of those who were killed that horrible day? Our unwillingness to give proper respect to all those who have suffered at the hands of terrorists leaves me with little hope for our continuing freedom here in the United States.
Denise P. Ferguson
Baldwin, Md.
ml
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:16 AM
There is nothing baffling about Eric Holder's decision. The end game is to establish a civil basis for charging former Bush administration officials in the future with "war crimes" that they would not be able to do in military tribunals. That's why some terrorists will be tried under military auspices and others won't. Those who were "tortured"—that is, waterboarded—like KSM will be tried in civil court because the discovery process will put into play any acts that were classified and yet permissible under military law. To the extent that those very same acts are not permissible under civil/criminal law is why Messrs. Obama and Holder are holding the trial in federal court.
The trial has nothing to do with showing the world that we have nothing to hide. Mr. Holder is blurring the circumstantial differences between international warfare and domestic criminality to mislead the public. Indeed, the decision to go public is pure, political vindictiveness to mollify the left wing of the Democratic Party.
Richard Reay
Riverdale, N.Y.
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:16 AM
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574550332005137994.html