More on Obama’s campaign lies.
Another little tidbit of news that slipped through the ultra bias MSM, now the lame stream media, took place last week when Obama’s regime announced they will create a commission on how to fix the budget mess. That’s right, you read it correctly. Obama will start a commission to look into the mess he quadruped through his very unpopular moves. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574557571615004170.html.
And yet, he still insists in adding trillions to our debt through the very unpopular Obama/Reid/Pelosi healthcare reform.
Obama’s main campaign themes have now proven to be 100% lies. From transparency, closing Gitmo, pulling out of Iraq, ending Washington partisan deadlock, “Change must come to Washington,” “lobbyists aren’t just part of the system in Washington, they are the problem” (USA Today front page headline: Health care fight swells lobbying. Numbers of organizations hiring firms doubles in 09), and then to “Washington will have to tighten its belt and put off spending,” are enough to make one wonder how he even gets a 20% approval rating. The latest Gallup Poll now shows liberalism falling even more than last year with only 20% now admitting they are liberal.
Obama had my ears perked when he promised to “go through the federal budget and ending programs we don’t need.” Blame it on Bush? Can’t on this one. When Obama took office the federal deficit for this year was just over $400 billion. In the eleventh month of 2009, our federal deficit is at $1.5 trillion and counting. In fact, the total national debt grew in Obama’s first 10 months to $7.5 trillion from just over $6 trillion. At that pace he will bankrupt this country by the time we can get him and the liberal democrats out of office. We must stop Obama and our liberals in Washington from not just their financial bankruptcy of American, but their moral bankruptcy as well. What is even more egregious is most of the Obama/democrat ideas come from the Communist manifesto.
Poll after poll shows that Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats are regretting their decisions and at a rate maybe never seen before. In fact, as reported in the above WSJ URL: Anger over deficits was picked up in a late October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which asked voters if they'd rather boost "the economy even though it may mean larger budget deficits" or keep the "budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Only 31% chose boosting the economy; 62% wanted to keep the deficit down.
With Americans leaning much to the right with fiscal and moral ideologies, I don’t know how liberal democrats in Washington will fix this mess. The only way to fix America is to get these idiots, Obama included, out of office through impeachment or wait until 2010 and 2012.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.


46 Comments
KristianDerecho - Nov 27, 2009 10:53 AM
True Story - Nov 27, 2009 10:58 AM
jhayett - Nov 27, 2009 11:10 AM
So, was this the part of my blog you found impossible to debate?
Poll after poll shows that Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats are regretting their decisions and at a rate maybe never seen before. In fact, as reported in the above WSJ URL: Anger over deficits was picked up in a late October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which asked voters if they'd rather boost "the economy even though it may mean larger budget deficits" or keep the "budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Only 31% chose boosting the economy; 62% wanted to keep the deficit down.
All after Obama made this promise to get your vote True Story: “Washington will have to tighten its belt and put off spending" or “go through the federal budget and ending programs we don’t need.”
jhayett - Nov 27, 2009 11:24 AM
Remember this line from Obama while in Cairo? "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story."
ahemmer - Nov 27, 2009 11:46 AM
Obama stated, before being elected by people who drank his Kool-Aid: "We need earmark reform. And when I'm president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely." Then why the massive $787 Billion Dollar Stimulus Bill, Barry? So loaded with pork, it's also dubbed the "Porkulus Bill" or better yet - "The Generational Theft Act" - since our children, grandchildren, great-grandkids etc. will be paying for this government spending spree for generations...
"When there is a bill that ends up on my desk as the president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out what's in it before I sign it." Barry O. should have been on Saturday Night Live. We all know what a joke this was. And we all know what happened here.
Remember Barack Obama saying he would "bring home the troops within 16 months of taking office?" Personally, I am glad this is one lie Barry failed to achieve. However, he promised his anti-war leftie crowd that America would cut and run in the war on terror. No can do, it seems.
And the lies keep comin', but more Americans are finally wising up. Less than three years to go...
KristianDerecho - Nov 27, 2009 1:14 PM
KristianDerecho - Nov 27, 2009 1:17 PM
reformed trucker - Nov 27, 2009 7:00 PM
jhayett - Nov 27, 2009 7:28 PM
reformed trucker - Nov 27, 2009 11:37 PM
I don't really follow the polls. All I know is we are having a very minor rebound from companies downsizing and streamlining, and yet the government seems to be insistent on doing things that will bring it to a screeching halt. I know quite a few people who lost their jobs or are laid off. They should be more focused on creating jobs (REAL job creation, not the crap they pulled earlier this year). What was that mantra I heard repeated some years back? Oh yeah...
It's the economy, stupid.
It's the ECONOMY, stupid.
IT'S THE ECONOMY, STUPID!!!
Sound advice at this point in history.
snagglesim - Nov 28, 2009 1:41 AM
2Cents - Nov 28, 2009 9:03 AM
A month before the American Revolutionary War, Patrick Henry said:
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year?
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 9:33 AM
jmark - Nov 28, 2009 10:19 AM
2Cents - Nov 28, 2009 10:26 AM
We'll have to see how many protesters show up, this could make the Obama administration rethink the decision to bring the trial to New York. If so, this would be the true beginning of a revolution to take this country back.
I am not sure we have the time save this country from bankruptcy if we wait until the elections. We need to stop this spending now and get people back to work.
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 10:58 AM
In order to fix problems like we have and that comes all from our politicians from the president down, we the people must know who or what is the cause of these problems and more important (key word: more important jmark), who is the cause for it either not getting resolved or getting worse.
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:05 AM
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:14 AM
Mr. Beamer's poignant account of Jill Regan attempting to bring the feelings of 100,000 American citizens into the Senate Judiciary Committee left me feeling helpless. Where in Washington is the acknowledgment of the loss, grief and emptiness that those who lost loved ones in 9/11 will always experience? Where is the compassion of those who are willing to give more "rights" to murderers than to the families of those who were killed that horrible day? Our unwillingness to give proper respect to all those who have suffered at the hands of terrorists leaves me with little hope for our continuing freedom here in the United States.
Denise P. Ferguson
Baldwin, Md.
ml
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:16 AM
There is nothing baffling about Eric Holder's decision. The end game is to establish a civil basis for charging former Bush administration officials in the future with "war crimes" that they would not be able to do in military tribunals. That's why some terrorists will be tried under military auspices and others won't. Those who were "tortured"—that is, waterboarded—like KSM will be tried in civil court because the discovery process will put into play any acts that were classified and yet permissible under military law. To the extent that those very same acts are not permissible under civil/criminal law is why Messrs. Obama and Holder are holding the trial in federal court.
The trial has nothing to do with showing the world that we have nothing to hide. Mr. Holder is blurring the circumstantial differences between international warfare and domestic criminality to mislead the public. Indeed, the decision to go public is pure, political vindictiveness to mollify the left wing of the Democratic Party.
Richard Reay
Riverdale, N.Y.
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 11:16 AM
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574550332005137994.html
jmark - Nov 28, 2009 11:56 AM
This is from worldnetdaily, so you'll know that it's true. ;-)
"All six judges nominated by President Ronald Reagan, President George H.W. Bush and President George W. Bush, including William Pryor – who was recess-appointed just last year to avoid a Democratic filibuster – voted not to save Terri's life."
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44175
reformed trucker - Nov 28, 2009 12:06 PM
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 12:12 PM
"And don't forget, it was Republican judges that killed Terri Schiavo!!!!"
snagglesim - Nov 28, 2009 1:35 PM
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 1:40 PM
jmark - Nov 28, 2009 4:11 PM
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44175
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 4:26 PM
I know this is all news to you since you don't watch an ounce of balanced news.
So what part of my factual blog got you to change the subject? Was it these recent Obama campaign lies or is it his falling poll numbers? Maybe this:
Poll after poll shows that Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats are regretting their decisions and at a rate maybe never seen before. In fact, as reported in the above WSJ URL: Anger over deficits was picked up in a late October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which asked voters if they'd rather boost "the economy even though it may mean larger budget deficits" or keep the "budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Only 31% chose boosting the economy; 62% wanted to keep the deficit down.
jmark - Nov 28, 2009 5:09 PM
Are you fearful of knowing of the truth?
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 5:20 PM
But please explain what part of my blog has you so scared you can't address the issue at hand? Perhaps it was this part?
"Obama had my ears perked when he promised to “go through the federal budget and ending programs we don’t need.” Blame it on Bush? Can’t on this one. When Obama took office the federal deficit for this year was just over $400 billion. In the eleventh month of 2009, our federal deficit is at $1.5 trillion and counting. In fact, the total national debt grew in Obama’s first 10 months to $7.5 trillion from just over $6 trillion. At that pace he will bankrupt this country by the time we can get him and the liberal democrats out of office. We must stop Obama and our liberals in Washington from not just their financial bankruptcy of American, but their moral bankruptcy as well. What is even more egregious is most of the Obama/democrat ideas come from the Communist manifesto."
jmark - Nov 28, 2009 6:33 PM
"All six judges nominated by President Ronald Reagan, President George H.W. Bush and President George W. Bush, including William Pryor – who was recess-appointed just last year to avoid a Democratic filibuster – voted not to save Terri's life."
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44175
jhayett - Nov 28, 2009 7:19 PM
So again, what got you so sacred with my blog facts? Was it this?
Obama’s main campaign themes have now proven to be 100% lies. From transparency, closing Gitmo, pulling out of Iraq, ending Washington partisan deadlock, “Change must come to Washington,” “lobbyists aren’t just part of the system in Washington, they are the problem” (USA Today front page headline: Health care fight swells lobbying. Numbers of organizations hiring firms doubles in 09), and then to “Washington will have to tighten its belt and put off spending,” are enough to make one wonder how he even gets a 20% approval rating. The latest Gallup Poll now shows liberalism falling even more than last year with only 20% now admitting they are liberal.
Onlyoneme - Nov 28, 2009 8:03 PM
Do you believe that Terri had a life, or was capable to pursue happiness? She was in a permanent vegetative state. It was later proven in an autopsy that she was brain dead.
reformed trucker - Nov 28, 2009 8:12 PM
With the recent news story of that guy that was in a coma for 23(?) years and was cognizant/could feel everything that was going on, I fear Terri went through a slow and very painful death.
HSAT, it appears that you are right; judge George Greer is a conservative republican and a Southern Baptist (acording to wiki, anyhow). How sad.
Oh, and thanks for making me do homework, bub! ;)
Onlyoneme - Nov 28, 2009 8:37 PM
Terri’s husband Michael Schiavo had petitioned the courts for seven years to allow Terri to die since she was in a “persistent vegetative state”. This by the way speaks loudly for an advance medical directive or living will. Terri’s parents seeing their daughter’s involuntary reactions as signs of life refused to let go.
The fiasco starts when it eventually caught the attention of republican congress in Washington. The Congress wanted Terri and her husband to appear before a hearing of the committee in Washington DC. George W Bush even flew in from his ranch in Texas to sign “Terri’s Law”, which more than one judge had considered unconstitutional.
Onlyoneme - Nov 28, 2009 8:38 PM
jmark - Nov 28, 2009 8:51 PM
The Republicans turned the event into a political three ring circus. Remember Bush cutting his vacation short and flying back to D.C. so that he could sign into law a bill that would have allowed the federal courts to intervene? These are the same Republicans who piss and moan constantly about government intrusion into our every day lives.
Onlyoneme - Nov 28, 2009 9:32 PM
The first amendment would be rewritten to read Congress shall make any law encouraging the establishment of the chritian religion, and shall make no law inconveniencing the free exercise thereof; or promoting the freedom of Christian speech, or the right of Christians peacefully or otherwise to protest.
The second would read; A heavily armed population, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to buy and own arms of any kind and number, shall not be infringed.
The third would read; In times of undeclared war, the government shall reserve the right to defend the country against its enemies by any means necessary.
Onlyoneme - Nov 28, 2009 9:32 PM
The fifth would then read as; No person shall be held to answer for a capitol, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of undeclared war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be t twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor be deprived of property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken.
The sixth would be revised to read; In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a trial, by a jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been grievously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.
Onlyoneme - Nov 28, 2009 9:33 PM
The eighth amendment would read as; Excessive bail shall be required, and punitive damages shall not be imposed.
The ninth would just be stricken ( the ninth amendment reads as; The enumeration in the constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.)
And the tenth would be changed to read as; The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states.
jhayett - Nov 29, 2009 8:30 AM
"Poll after poll shows that Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats are regretting their decisions and at a rate maybe never seen before. In fact, as reported in the above WSJ URL: Anger over deficits was picked up in a late October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which asked voters if they'd rather boost "the economy even though it may mean larger budget deficits" or keep the "budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Only 31% chose boosting the economy; 62% wanted to keep the deficit down.
With Americans leaning much to the right with fiscal and moral ideologies, I don’t know how liberal democrats in Washington will fix this mess. The only way to fix America is to get these idiots, Obama included, out of office through impeachment or wait until 2010 and 2012."
jhayett - Nov 29, 2009 10:36 AM
Long after conservatives and the American people figured it out, CBS on Monday night came to the realization President Barack Obama has a "credibility" problem fueled by the "disconnect" between Obama's promise to reduce the deficit as he pushes for massive new spending.
http://www.mrc.org/public/default.aspx
Onlyoneme - Nov 29, 2009 12:40 PM
Scared of your blog facts, what a laugh. I wasn’t going to respond to your blog at all Jim.
I just wanted to set the record straight about Terri Schiavo. Then I thought I would throw in the neo-conservative constitution for fun.
Your “facts” aren’t’ worth commenting on in my own opinion. Not because your “facts” are either wrong or right but just because it is impossible to debate with you Jim.
snagglesim - Dec 02, 2009 2:57 AM
jhayett - Dec 03, 2009 12:10 PM
jhayett - Dec 03, 2009 12:13 PM
You keep saying my facts are worn or not worth debating. If so, give us an example of how this fact I published is wrong or not debatable please.
"Poll after poll shows that Americans who voted for Obama and the democrats are regretting their decisions and at a rate maybe never seen before. In fact, as reported in the above WSJ URL: Anger over deficits was picked up in a late October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, which asked voters if they'd rather boost "the economy even though it may mean larger budget deficits" or keep the "budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Only 31% chose boosting the economy; 62% wanted to keep the deficit down."
jhayett - Dec 03, 2009 12:14 PM
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 @ 02:38 AM ET
Long after conservatives and the American people figured it out, CBS on Monday night came to the realization President Barack Obama has a "credibility" problem fueled by the "disconnect" between Obama's promise to reduce the deficit as he pushes for massive new spending.
http://www.mrc.org/public/default.aspx