
I have a background in science and writing. I consider myself liberal, progressive, environmentally aware on many issues, but also believe that conservatism has a place and is valid.
Healthcare Reform: Republican Legislation 1995-2008
Republican Control of Government excluding the Courts:
1995 = 0 Republican Congress
1996 = 0 Republican Congress
1997 = 0 Republican Congress
1998 = 0 Republican Congress
1999 = 0 Republican Congress
2000 = 0 GW Bush & Republican Congress
2001 = 0 GW Bush & Republican Congress
2002 = 0 GW Bush & Republican Congress
2003 = 0 GW Bush & Republican Congress
2004 = 0 GW Bush & Republican Congress
2005 = 0 GW Bush & Republican Congress
2006 = 0 GW Bush
2007 = 0 GW Bush
2008 = 0 GW Bush
First, Republicans lost big in 2008 because they failed the majority of Americans by providing Domestic legislation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Paul Ryan Finally Get’s It!
URL: http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/barney-frank-gets-paul-ryan-admit-repub#comment-1313822
The Link has the Video directly from Paul Ryan’s Mouth. CrooksandLiars is biased toward the left, but The Primary Source is a CNBC debate between Paul Ryan and Barney Frank.
FRANK: I just want to ask Paul one question. … When did you figure that out? Because apparently for the 12 years that the Republicans were in control — eight of which had a Republican president — that hadn’t occurred to you. So I’m glad you now understand that. Can you tell me at what moment the revelation occurred?
RYAN: First of all, I introduced on this subject about six years ago.
FRANK: You had control of the Congress. Why didn’t the Republican Congress fix it?
RYAN: I will have a moment of bipartisan agreement. We should have fixed this under our watch and I’m frustrated we didn’t.
- - - - - - - - -
So here we have it.
During the time when Republicans were voted in as majorities to use the power of government to fix domestic problems, the Republicans and the conservatives among them decided to ignore the issue of access to affordable healthcare for all Americans, providing for the general welfare as dictated by the Constitution and ignore the abuses of the for Profit system that is part of the Status Quo.
So ask yourself this, WHY should I, WE, trust any solution from the same people who ignored the problem when they were in power??
The answer is NO, the issue has been pushed on them, and issue they would rather have ignored and let the abuses of the system continue because it lines their pockets come election time. Ask Paul Ryan, in fact go to this website called OPEN Secrets and research the now LOYAL opposition against Healthcare Reform and a public option. URL: http://www.opensecrets.org/index.php
Republicans and Conservative Republicans had from 1995 to 2008 to try to make a difference, to level the playing field with market reforms that revoked Insurance Providers anti-trust laws, enacting regulation on the For Profit health insurance to stop abuses against their customers, and show ALL AMERICANS that they could provide the structure for a “free market” system that would both be fair and accessible.
It’s not that they Tried and Failed. They didn't even try!
It’s because they view government as the PROBLEM and not a tool to be used to FIX these problems. The Republicans had the legislative power and control to change things, but they squandered it, on what? You tell me.
I leave you with these two questions:
1) “Are Politicians who are philosophically against government effective legislatures?”
2) “If they are more effective legislators then how can you explain a lack of legislative action on the healthcare issue since 1995?”
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Pro-Scott "jon doe" Walker zealots are hypocrites about Recall Elections (31)
- The plan to secure the future (56)
- Finger Pointing & Big Butt's they do not lie! (34)
- Family Value Conservatism: Newt Gingrich vs. John Edwards (66)
- The Devil's Advocate (80)
- Questions? & More (30)
- Where's my Tax Cut! (83)
- Scott Walkers Sermon on the Mound of Cash (82)
- Taking Power Away from the People Machine (80)
- Thanks for the Crutches! (73)
- More Alien Relay 2.0 posts





114 Comments
jmark - Nov 29, 2009 2:00 PM
The "government is the problem" mantra is little more than a marketing slogan designed to garner votes. The government grew enormously under Reagan.
"In January 1981, when Reagan declared the federal budget to be "out of control," the deficit had reached almost $74 billion, the federal debt $930 billion. Within two years, the deficit was $208 billion. The debt by 1988 totaled $2.6 trillion. In those eight years, the United States moved from being the world's largest international creditor to the largest debtor nation."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26402-2004Jun8.html
mollymann - Nov 29, 2009 2:39 PM
Carl Hicks - Nov 29, 2009 3:31 PM
It is hypocrritical to be a politician and be against government. Unfortunately it would be "pigeon holing" to lump them all together. Take Ron Paul for instance, he votes against most spending bills on the basis of that he won't approve the pork earmarked into most every bill passed by either side of the aisle. His reasoning is much different than your typical righty or lefty who just votes against anything the other guys are trying to pass just to conform to his party agenda.
Carl Hicks - Nov 29, 2009 5:33 PM
How can they be an anti government politician and be effective in government? Another hypocrisy!
The lack of reform legislation is simple , no lobbiest offered up campaign contributions to push that agenda, plain and simple.
Onlyoneme - Nov 30, 2009 6:57 PM
Compridious - Dec 01, 2009 8:32 AM
Onlyoneme - Dec 01, 2009 12:11 PM
Pandering didn't work for John Kerry
True Story - Dec 01, 2009 3:15 PM
Actually that's not entirely accurate. Republicans are a party of "yes." Yes to discrimination and obfuscation and this only alienates moderates -- this is why the big tent of a moderate to conservative Democrat president is so effective in governing.
Republicans can't hold a candle to that, even if they win from time to time by being beholden to the religious right -- which was self identified in recent polling of the party faithful.
ajohnson911 - Dec 01, 2009 5:39 PM
Keep snowing yourselves, liberals--electing this idiot will set your party back--now AND in the future!!!
And I say now if obamas plans for Afghanistan do not pay immediate dividends (and by the way--it's still essentially Bush's time-frame for withdrawl he's borrowed--only he waited too long to committ the troops) his head should role--and I'd better see YOU calling for it hypocrites!
Jacob Pickard - Dec 01, 2009 5:56 PM
Passing the Buck!!
Jacob Pickard - Dec 01, 2009 6:00 PM
12 years, 12 years, 12 years, 12 years your cohort has done nothing to addresss teh healthcare issues in this country. Done nothing to shape it to a system that is in a "free market" approach.
Blame yourselves, you lost the election becuase you spent the last 8 years bending over and taking it from the Bush administration.
Carl Hicks - Dec 01, 2009 7:49 PM
Immediate results? Why wasn't there a call for immediate results for the past 8 years?
Waited too long to send the troops? GW took 3 months to make a decision on the surge in Iraq, why no screaming he didn't move faster?
I'd better see YOU calling for it hypocrites!
ajohnson911 - Dec 02, 2009 7:47 AM
I'll make you look silly later mr hicks.
True Story - Dec 02, 2009 9:06 AM
jmark - Dec 02, 2009 10:38 AM
Not everyone can live off the government teat. Right fireboy?
ajohnson911 - Dec 02, 2009 1:09 PM
But, were talking about FREE MARKET (not allowed to develope above)--that was your question. . .to the contrary, I work "other" jobs to suppliment my income, and give to causes and volunteer too (yes, republicans give--often a lot MORE than liberals)--you know, I think it was Blackwell who wrote it best some months ago: he advocated a change in the way we live, work and how we spend our time--the oness was really on the individual to create his own life (is that about right, Jeff?)--while I'm far from rich or a success; I'm happy and can live with myself--without being a drain on resources, financial or otherwise--this is the conservative way--and getting back to your original point--the reason governement ought not be trusted much less expanded--and yes, mr true, any "IDIOT" can see that.
True Story - Dec 02, 2009 2:34 PM
You. are. so. weak.
ajohnson911 - Dec 02, 2009 5:04 PM
referee33 - Dec 02, 2009 5:13 PM
True Story - Dec 03, 2009 9:58 AM