Reverse Profiling
We are all familiar with the controversy surrounding the use of profiling to identify criminals. Law enforcement agencies are being closely watched for any evidence of racial or ethnic profiling, despite clear evidence that some demographic groups are, for a myriad of reasons, more prone to criminal activity than others.
With respect to terrorism, involving acts with much greater potential for serious harm, the overwhelming majority of identified terrorists are young Arabic or African Islamic males. Not too many blue-haired octogenarian females in this bunch. Notwithstanding, Islamic organizations, like the identified terrorist-supporting CAIR, immediately wax loudly indignant at any real or imagined incidence of profiling by Homeland Security and other law enforcement agencies involved in counter-terrorism.
I believe that it has gotten so bad that airport and other travel port security personnel have been instructed to bend over backwards to avoid any hint of profiling, to the extent of practicing reverse profiling--specifically relaxing examination criteria for Muslim/Arabic/African travelers.
No-one will of course acknowledge the existence of special criteria for certain ethnic categories. The recent near disaster on Christmas Day involving an attempt to blow up Northwest Flight 253, a trans-Atlantic flight from Amsterdam to Detroit with 289 souls on board, by a young Nigerian Muslim al-Qaeda wannabe trained and equipped in Yemen reputedly by Quantanamo releasees is, sadly, a clear case in point.
We have been assured that security procedures at the Amsterdam Schiphol Airport point of origin mirror those in the U.S. (Why am I not assured?) O.K., let's recreate the scenario as accurately as possible given the information available.
A young Nigerian male buys a last-minute one way trans-Atlantic ticket costing $2,800, with a wad of cash. He plunks down 28-$100 bills on the ticket counter in payment. The ticket agent says, "Thank you, sir, Let's see if I have your name right--Mr. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab? O.K. Would you like to check your luggage, Mr. Abdulmutallab? Oh, you don't have any? Fine, sir. We'll be boarding Flight 253 through Gate 27 on the International Concourse in two hours. Have a nice flight."
Now imagine being a middle-aged Caucasian male in the same scenario. Can you picture yourself handcuffed naked to an iron chair bolted to the floor in a secluded room in the airport being interrogated by several very large, unsmiling security agents? I can.
The rather unspecific warning from his father, overseas contacts, a web site and other signs detected by several security agencies, none of which were a clear-cut smoking gun but, admittedly, given some pretty sophisticated information sharing, should have resulted in this guy being blocked and arrested. The media, in an apparent attempt to deflect responsibility and in concert with the Administration, is emphasizing lapses in inter-agency coordination which, in my opinion, is blame misdirected. The simple fact of an ethnic African with an obvious Arabic name buying a last-minute one-way ticket with a wad of cash and without luggage for a trans-Atlantic flight should have raised every red flag and rung every alarm bell in the place. There is no way he should have been allowed to board the aircraft.
The fact that he waltzed through unimpeded constitutes the real danger here. The PETN* bomb Abdulmutallab smuggled aboard should have destroyed the aircraft and killed all 289 persons on board. The fact that it didn't I believe qualifies as a miracle. It simply wasn't their time. It would be folly, however, to continue to depend on divine intervention to save us from future disasters. We forgo the valuable weapon of profiling in the fight against the evil Islamic tactic of terrorism at our peril.
All responsible, peace-loving Muslims should support appropriate profiling to identify potential Islamic terrorists if only to prevent inappropriate stereotyping of all Muslims.
*PETN: Pentaerythritol Nitrate, a major ingredient of SEMTEX, is an extremely powerful explosive, crystalline in nature, 100 grams (about 3-1/2 ounces) of which can destroy a car.
NOTE: Ann Coulter has just published a column making many of the points I have. To allay any suspicion of plagiarism, be aware that I wrote this article in longhand two days before hers appeared.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.






25 Comments
jmark - Jan 01, 2010 9:34 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wnPHFSdrME&feature=related
jhayett - Jan 01, 2010 9:55 AM
Al...great article. I'm convinced with the current admin in Washington (democrats) that we will never be able to profile despite that nearly all terrorists are mainly Muslim/Arabic/African as you point out. However, I'm not sure politics would let the Republicans do any better when they get back into power. I would let Ted Nugent take over TSA and start today!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nurM0mY9N10
aneuhauser - Jan 01, 2010 11:48 PM
Jim: As usual, you are right. Since we, the Great Satan, are the prime target, any flight, domestic or international, with primarily American passengers and/or overflying U.S. territory should be screened with all available tools, including profiling. (I vote for Dick Cheney.)
Christian Democrat - Jan 02, 2010 2:27 AM
If we focus on one race, one nationality, one faith - we take the chance of narrowing our minds against others who may be recruited against us. It has to be about the SITUATION, not the specific person's ethnicity. Its not about protecting THEM, it is about adequately protecting US.
referee33 - Jan 02, 2010 8:29 AM
jhayett - Jan 02, 2010 8:41 AM
1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by:
In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by:
In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by:
In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:
In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:
In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by:
In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:
In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:
In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by:
In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:
In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:
Muslims, Christian Dem, Muslims! Not Scooby Doo or Mr. Rogers. Muslims that hate Jews, Christians like you, and America. How many more years or decades of these cowardly, senseless killings does it take for liberals like you to realize we are and have been under attack by Muslims
jmark - Jan 02, 2010 11:00 AM
Christian Democrat - Jan 02, 2010 12:50 PM
I am merely suggesting that by narrowing our focus on one particular dynamic of people, we are creating an opportuity for the terrorist to recruit and change their dynamic. When we thought we were protected before against knives and guns onboard, they used nail files, then shoe bombs, then water bottles, etc. I am saying that everyone that presents suspicious behavior, including myself if that were the case, deserves the exact same treatment. It is not that Muslims should not be checked MORE, it is that everyone should be checked equally and BETTER. Everyone, regardless of what they look like. If I have nothing to hide, then there is nothing to fear....and I would feel much safer knowing that every single person was treated with the same diligent criteria before they step on a plane.
jhayett - Jan 02, 2010 5:41 PM
jhayett - Jan 02, 2010 5:47 PM
Christian Democrat - Jan 02, 2010 6:40 PM
jhayett - Jan 02, 2010 8:59 PM
Now reread the comment six above this one.
aneuhauser - Jan 03, 2010 12:02 AM
Having said that, I do think that Muslim identity should be one, repeat, one, criterion in focusing attention on certain passengers. I referred to this as APPROPRIATE profiling. I certainly don't advocate strip-searching every suspected Muslim passenger; however, if combined with another suspicious element or two, should elicit special attention.
aneuhauser - Jan 03, 2010 12:04 AM
Christian Democrat - Jan 03, 2010 12:52 AM
Al, I would certainly hope that any American or foreigner would agree that any screenings be completed in order to safeguard themselves and others. I think the problem is when one particular group is screened over another, based on the color of their skin or their faith. That is where the vocal level rises..Thanks for the great post. This has been a very interesting (and without hostility) debate. Wonderfully refreshing.
Carl Hicks - Jan 03, 2010 6:50 PM
" If you spend all your time looking back you'll never know what hit ya"
Onlyoneme - Jan 03, 2010 6:58 PM
"equipped in Yemen reputedly by Quantanamo releasees"
Onlyoneme - Jan 03, 2010 7:29 PM
Now imagine being a middle-aged Caucasian male in the same scenario. Can you picture yourself handcuffed naked to an iron chair bolted to the floor in a secluded room in the airport being interrogated by several very large, unsmiling security agents? I can.”
You aren’t starting to get a little paranoid are you Al?
Actually, I would think that a “middle-aged Caucasian male in the same scenario” would fare much better. It would most like be assumed that the “middle-aged Caucasian male” was there on business, depending on how he was dressed of course. In addition, I doubt a “middle-aged Caucasian” would be answering to the name of Abdulmutallab. So the middle-aged Caucasian would draw less attention than a
There are a couple possible excuses for a lack of luggage. Perhaps the luggage was freighted to the persons destination, or lost through theft. Truth is often stranger than fiction.
Onlyoneme - Jan 03, 2010 8:22 PM
I do not believe the “take the fight to them” strategy was the right one. Imagine how much we could have done to tighten shipping port as well as airport security with the money we have squandered in Iraq and Afghanistan in the last eight years. I do not feel any “safer” under a conservative president than I do under a liberal president.
aneuhauser - Jan 03, 2010 11:16 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/29/AR2009122902289.html
"That a group partially led by former Guantanamo detainees may have equipped and trained Nigerian bombing suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab is likely to raise more questions about plans to repatriate those prisoners to Yemen."