
The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment. - Bertrand Russell
I Can Admit When I'm Wrong...Bush DOES Have 9/11 Blood on His Hands
Recently, I wrote how former President Bush was NOT responsible for 9/11, but did share responsibility with his predecessors for not solving systemic problems of information-sharing between U.S. intelligence agencies.
I apologize for my error.
You see, I COMPLETELY forgot about the August 6, 2001 classified memo, presented to President Bush, entitled, "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.".
So, logic dictates that Bush is indeed at least partly responsible for almost 3,000 American dead that day.
Also crying, "Out, Damn Spot!" is Condoleeza Rice...who, through her craven lying in order to ingratiate herself to Bush, has blood on her hands.
LIE
"I don't think anybody could have predicted that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile." (This lie was told by Condoleeza Rice to the American people on May 16, 2002.)
TRUTH
George W. Bush himself was given a one-and-a-half page briefing on August 6, 2001. That briefing informed him that Osama Bin Laden's organization was capable of using a hijacked American airplane to conduct a major strike against targets within the United States. Furthermore, a month earlier, the Bush Administration was informed that terrorists had concocted plans to use airplanes as missiles. The truth is that experts did predict that terrorists would use hijacked airplanes as missiles, and those experts told George W. Bush about the threat. George W. Bush sat around and did nothing about it.
LIE
When the Bush Administration was confronted with evidence that Condoleeza Rice had lied, and that George W. Bush had received a briefing warning of terrorist plans to use hijacked airplanes as missiles against American targets, Condoleeza Rice said that Bush got the briefing because he had been so concerned about the elevated terrorist threat levels during the summer of 2001. (This lie was told by Condoleeza Rice to the American people on March 25, 2004.)
TRUTH
The Central Intelligence Agency has revealed that the terrorist briefing was in no way solicited by George W. Bush. Instead, the Central Intelligence Agency created the brief without any expression of interest from Bush because they thought that the matter was so critical that the President needed to be aware of the terrorist plans without further delay. The truth is that, in spite of the elevated terrorist threat levels just before September 11, George W. Bush did not bother to ask the CIA to be briefed about the methods Osama Bin Laden could use to kill Americans. Bush was on vacation on his dude ranch that month.
LIE
Embarrassed by reports of Bush's lack of preparation for attacks by Osama Bin Laden, Condoleeza Rice said, "In June and July when the threat spikes were so high we were at battle stations." (This lie was told to the American people by Condoleeza Rice on March 22, 2004)
TRUTH
When the Clinton Administration got information about high threat levels for terrorist attacks, Bill Clinton ordered his officials to go to battle stations. Bush's anti-terrorism chief Richard Clarke has revealed that George W. Bush never ordered anyone to go to battle stations, even though the reported threat in the weeks before September 11, 2001 was much higher than anything ever reported during the Clinton Administration. Furthermore, George W. Bush ordered that a program to monitor Al Quaida suspects within the United States be discontinued. The truth is that Bush not only failed to order anti-terrorism officials to battle stations, he lowered America's protections against terrorism just as the terrorist threat was reaching record levels.
LIE
"Our [pre-9/11 NSPD] plan called for military options to attack al Qaeda and Taliban leadership, ground forces and other targets, taking the fight to the enemy where he lived." (Condoleeza Rice told the American people this lie on March 22, 2004)
TRUTH
The commission studying the context of the September 11 attacks found that the NSPD plan referred to by Condoleeza Rice in fact had no military component. Commission member Gorelick has stated, "There is nothing in the NSPD that came out that we could find that had an invasion plan, a military plan." George W. Bush's own Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, admitted to the commission that Condoleeza Rice's claim was completely inaccurate. When Armitage was asked, "Is it true, as Dr. Rice said, 'Our plan called for military options to attack Al Qaida and Taliban leadership'?", Armitage replied "No." The truth is that Condoleeza Rice knew that what she was saying was false. She just made up a claim in order to cover up the failure of George W. Bush to take adequate steps to protect America before September 11, 2001.
Per this penultimate truth, it also seems that all the wing-nuttery regarding Clinton and his lackadaisical approach to terrorism is also totally incorrect.
By the way, the Center for American Progress collated these truths and lies. Before some idiot claims that this is a liberal think tank, let me remind said-idiot that the CAP merely collated this info…it's all in the public record.
Finally, enjoy this Hardball excerpt…it's what got me thinking about this in the first place.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Happy GroundHog Day! (19)
- It's over. (34)
- Big Money in Politics...In or Out? (7)
- Jon Stewart on Fox News' Brown Coverage... (2)
- Unconstitutional Republicans (30)
- WHAT ARE YOU? Take the Quiz... (16)
- Political Dialogue: R.I.P. (18)
- I Can Admit When I'm Wrong...Bush DOES Have 9/11 Blood on His Hands (11)
- Listen to your Mother (4)
- Christmas Terrorism? Thanks, George W. Bush (15)
- More Lake Country Liberal posts





11 Comments
jmark - Jan 07, 2010 12:56 PM
I've been having this very same debate with Amy over at right view wisconsin. It's about time you came to my defense! ;-)
Imagine if it was discovered that Obama had ignored a presidential daily brief entitled "Abdulmutallab Determined To Strike". Imagine if Obama had foreknowledge of a possible terrorist attack and did absolutely nothing to prevent it? No, it would never happen. No one could be that irresponsibly incompetent.
Jacob Pickard - Jan 07, 2010 5:04 PM
But Clinton put up the wall between the FBI and the CIA, and Bill Clinton was the president when 9/11 happened!!!!!! Whaa, Liberals Bad ,Conservatives Good!! Whaa , you socialist loving communist welfare pigs.WHAAA!!! Idiot's Village Idiots. I am not a viallge idiot becuase I am a centrist!! Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!
Victor from now on I will use this Blog as a counter, it is laid out well. Thanks.
jmark - Jan 07, 2010 5:20 PM
I argue with morons because I am a patriot.
god bless Amerka!
Onlyoneme - Jan 07, 2010 10:31 PM
I swear, there must be some medical procedure necessary to produce the effects we see in the right-wingers and their cohorts. The radical right of the Republican Party has figured out a way to program some human minds, it does not work on everyone, just those with conservative ideologies. They figured out a way to do it through radio and television broadcasting on the “fair and balanced” news channels. Let us think of the process as a “Rush-Limbaugh-tomy”.
It is almost funny how when times are good under a democrat after taking over from a conservative president, my conservative friends will say that it takes time for a president’s policies to take effect, as when Bill Clinton took over after George H.W. Bush. But apparently in a conservatives mind, when a democrat inherits a recession from a republican then it’s the democrats fault for everything that takes place from the moment that democrat speaks the oath of office. I am a libertarian, I would call myself a little more on the conservative side, but the “resident conservatives” spout such a right-wing –authoritarian- psychobabble that I look liberal standing next to them. But according to “Conservapedia” (that is what I am talking about “fair and balanced, fair and balanced”. They certainly don’t play fair with their blogs citing “liberal” sources as they see fit, but dismissing it as liberal lies when it doesn’t work in their favor.
Onlyoneme - Jan 07, 2010 10:32 PM
Onlyoneme - Jan 07, 2010 10:38 PM
Onlyoneme - Jan 07, 2010 10:41 PM
Onlyoneme - Jan 07, 2010 11:40 PM
Since a new president’s policies could not possibly have an effect on the first year a president is in office, I give them that long, at least. To make improvements. Our conservative friends have said it themselves things just do not work that fast in government run programs.
Concerning the Guantanamo prisoners I say let’s build a maximum security prison in Alaska, as far north and as far away from civilization as we can build it, maybe use one of the Aleutian Islands. Build structures for them to take shelter in that barely keep out the cold and only enough fuel for the winter to keep the thermostat set at 55 degrees or colder, and air drop food on a weekly basis, then drop them off on the Island and leave them there for the winter. How is that for cruel and unusual take people from a hot arid region and deposit them in a frigid moist local.
Victor Ponelis - Jan 08, 2010 9:29 PM
Strip Bin Laden and al-Zawahiri naked, coat their genitals in bacon grease, then put them in a room with Michael Vick's dogs. Woof!
Carl Hicks - Jan 09, 2010 10:25 AM
Carl Hicks - Jan 10, 2010 11:02 AM