January 19th special election in Massachusetts - a sign of things to come?
This Tuesday, January 19th, there will be a special election in the state of Massachusetts. The senate seat held by the late Ted Kennedy IS UP FOR GRABS. This is unprecedented. Massachusetts is a Democratic stronghold and has been for decades. Kennedy was the Senator from Massachusetts for forty-plus years. It was a given that the person who would replace him would be a Democrat! No question about it. Business as usual. But wait....something has happened. Seems a growing majority of Americans aren't too happy with Democrats and President Obama. Most polls reflect as much. Many Democrats up for re-election later on are seeing dismal poll numbers, with Republican challengers fairing rather well. Sometimes with double-digit leads over their Democratic counterparts.
And in Massachusetts, this is simply amazing. Democrat candidate Martha Coakley is only 2 percentage points ahead of Republican challenger - Scott Brown - 49% to 47%, with 2% undecided. Just a few days ago, Coakley had a 9% lead. What happened? Considering that Massachusetts is a state where only 11% of registered voters are Republican, Brown's chances of winning are incredible! Where did this guy come from? What is going on?
Could it be because Brown is running on a small-government platform? Because he is against Obamacare? Brown could kill socialized medicine in an instant with his vote. Brown also scored big during a recent debate against Ms. Coakley, where Coakley looked lost. One of the high points of the debate came when the moderator asked Brown how he would feel as the 41st vote denying the Democrats their filibuster majority on health care from Kennedy's seat. Brown stated:
"It's not the Kennedy's seat; it's not the Democrat's seat; it's the people's seat."
What a brilliant statement! Bringing back politics to the people! Actually considering "the people" - the constituents who elect the politicians that are supposed to represent us!
The Democrats right now are NOT representing the American people. They are doing what they want - and the most perfect example is health care. The majority of Americans do not want what the government is planning. And the government - the so-called "transparent" government of Obama - is busy behind closed doors crafting yet another version of a monstrous, messy health care bill which in reality is little more than a government power-grab. A health care bill that Americans are being kept in the dark about. Just let Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi work their magic....they know what is best for us! We are just mere peons to the elitists running the country. We peasants need to get out of their way and let them do their work!!! If we don't, we are unpatriotic!
This type of attitude is what is playing into the Massachusetts race. Martha Coakley and the Dems are desperate. The Democratic National Committee Chair, Tim Kaine said: "it's frightening how much traction" Coakley's opponent has been able to get in just the last week. And if Brown wins, Dems are threatening to stall in certifying him, so he may not be able to vote on the health care bill!
As a side note, a Weekly Standard journalist was roughed up by a Coakley operative after Coakley appeared at a fundraiser at a Capital Hill restaurant on January 12th. During the fundraiser, Coakley refused to answer a question as to whether or not she stood by her statement declaring that there were "no terrorists in Afghanistan." The Weekly Standard reporter asked Coakley why health care lobbyists were supporting her at the fundraiser - and she refused to answer that, too.
Given the thug tactics used by Democrats at Town Halls and Tea parties during the past few months, the physical attack seen in this video should come as no surprise. Much is at stake now. The Democrats realize that they may lose power - and soon. They are scared. If the Senate seat in Massachusetts goes to a Republican, just think what might happen in 2010 and 2012! Could this special election represent a sign of things to come? Is this the tipping point? Why, even if Brown loses, the fact that he managed to pull almost even with the Democratic challenger IN MASSACHUSETTS is a victory in itself.
Now, hopefully voter fraud won't play a major role in this special election on Tuesday, but you never know. ACORN might resurrect itself to slip in a few fake votes. Moveon.org might register a few dead people or NFL football teams.... Remember what happened in Minnesota to help Al Franken win? Voting ballots disappeared. Voting ballots re-appeared, all for Franken. Ballots were rumored to have been found in the trunk of a car and were allowed to be counted. Even political experts said that usually when lost or absentee votes are "discovered," they tend to skew 50-50. Not in Minnesota. They went to Al Franken. And Franken won. The Democrats have cornered the market on the fine art of cheating at elections. Maybe in Massachusetts, if it's looking bad for Coakley, voter ballots may be discovered in the trunk of a '69 Oldsmobile submerged in a tidal channel in the Chappaquiddick Islands... resulting in a Coakley victory!
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg snubs the U.S. Constitution (44)
- An important letter from the Reverend Archbishop of Milwaukee (69)
- Recall the Recall! (71)
- "We thought more about the next generation than we did about the next election." - Governor Scott Walker (270)
- No honor in recall effort. (270)
- Political Buzzwords for 2012 (229)
- Walker initiated John Doe investigation (125)
- Let's HOPE for CHANGE in November, 2012 (47)
- My Top Ten Political Hopes for 2012 (145)
- Obama - fourth greatest president ever? (17)
- More It's Hemmer Time posts






45 Comments
jhayett - Jan 15, 2010 7:45 AM
Onlyoneme - Jan 15, 2010 11:37 AM
ahemmer - Jan 15, 2010 2:28 PM
jhayett - Jan 15, 2010 5:53 PM
jhayett - Jan 15, 2010 6:12 PM
jhayett - Jan 15, 2010 8:15 PM
By JAMES FREEMAN
The Journal's Dorothy Rabinowitz describes how Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley "fought so relentlessly" to maintain a case against the Amirault family. Yet the Democratic Senate candidate was far from relentless when investigating fellow politicians.
Mr. Kix reports that "the three biggest public-corruption cases of the past three years—the only three that anyone remembers—saw her sitting on the sidelines." "The FBI had video proof of Wilkerson stuffing bribe money into her bra. Coakley did nothing. The [Boston] Globe and Secretary of State William Galvin hammered DiMasi and his (allegedly) shady friends for 14 months. And the best Coakley could do was indict DiMasi's golfing buddy Richard Vitale? On misdemeanor charges?"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703657604575005513996542830.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion
jhayett - Jan 15, 2010 8:22 PM
The story of the Amiraults of Massachusetts, and of the prosecution that had turned the lives of this thriving American family to dust, was well known to the world by the year 2001. It was well known, especially, to District Attorney Martha Coakley, who had by then arrived to take a final, conspicuous, role in a case so notorious as to assure that the Amiraults' name would be known around the globe.
Gerald was sent to prison for 30 to 40 years, his mother and sister sentenced to eight to 20 years. The prosecutors celebrated what they called, at the time "a model, multidisciplinary prosecution." Gerald's wife, Patricia, and their three children—the family unfailingly devoted to him—went on with their lives. They spoke to him nightly and cherished such hope as they could find, that he would be restored to them.
In 2000, the Massachusetts Governor's Board of Pardons and Paroles met to consider a commutation of Gerald's sentence. After nine months of investigation, the board, reputed to be the toughest in the country, voted 5-0, with one abstention, to commute his sentence. But Coakley refused to accept the powerful evidence that the crimes were not committed and she continued to try and keep this family behind bars. This story is sick and is why she cannot serve America with balance
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704281204575003341640657862.html?mod=WSJ_hp_mostpop_read
jmark - Jan 16, 2010 2:16 PM
"While this decision should ultimately be made by the woman in consultation with her doctor, I believe we need to reduce the number of abortions in America."
"understands that abortion is a divisive issue, and respects those who disagree with him. However, he has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice"
"wants to overturn Roe v. Wade and his party’s platform opposes all abortions — even in cases of rape and incest."
ahemmer - Jan 16, 2010 6:58 PM
And while Brown may be a very "liberal" conservative - as most politicians are in that state, given the ultra-liberal climate of Massachusetts to begin with, he is still more conservative and a better choice than Coakley.
Brown's position on abortion, for those interested, are as follows: Brown believes the government has a responsiblity to regulate this area. He also believes that parents are to be notified in the case of pregnant minors and parental consent is needed for an abortion. He also opposes partial birth abortion.
As a side note, Brown opposes amnesty for illegals. He wants to strengthen our borders.
He believes in the death penalty.
He opposes Cap and Tax (oops, I mean "trade.")
Too bad the race in Massachussetts is ALL about health care, jmark...
Onlyoneme - Jan 16, 2010 10:27 PM
I thoght you were a teacher, I can see now why you are just a substitute.
One More Voice - Jan 17, 2010 5:08 AM
1) Don't post personal attacks and insults; threats; ethnic, racial, religious or sexual slurs; or otherwise engage in hateful conversation.
2) Don't stray from the topic of the blog or submit pointless comments.
I believe your comment clearly disregards rules as it was pointless and did nothing to address the original topic. I also felt that it borders on being a personal attack that was intended to be a veiled insult.
jmark - Jan 17, 2010 8:16 AM
Be honest Amy, you're promoting a rhino.
jhayett - Jan 17, 2010 9:09 AM
jhayett - Jan 17, 2010 9:17 AM
ahemmer - Jan 17, 2010 10:37 AM
Brown is a better choice for the Senate than Coakley. Period. Coakley is another ultra-liberal, who will follow Obama, Pelosi, and Reid without question. Who will ignore the will of the people - like what is currently going on in Washington, D.C.
Brown, while not as conservative as I would like, does still adhere to some very conservative values in many key areas. He may be for abortion - up until a point, yet he is against socialized medicine, bigger government, cap and tax (oops, I mean "trade") and is in favor of strengthening our borders to keep out those "undocumented workers (wink wink)" otherwise known as "illegal aliens." And he is against granting illegals amnesty. He is also in favor of the death penalty. One strike against him in regards to abortion is far outweighed by the conservative issues he favors and supports. And if Brown can derail Obamacare and send a message to Washington D.C. that the Amercican people are afraid and angry about what the Dems are doing to our country - more power to him!
And onlyoneme: I agree with One More Voice. Your recent comment to this blog is little more than a personal attack on me, and says nothing about the blog. If it disappears soon, you will know why.
Onlyoneme - Jan 17, 2010 12:27 PM
Ok, so Massachusetts, (at least in your dreams) goes to a conservative. There are more seats than this one up for grabs. But I suppose you figured you would start with Ted Kennedy’s old seat.
Onlyoneme - Jan 17, 2010 12:32 PM
Since you agreed with Jim’s blog you are in good standing with him. Just wait until you disagree with him. Then be ready to join the rest of us “village idiots”.
Onlyoneme - Jan 17, 2010 12:37 PM
Onlyoneme - Jan 17, 2010 12:42 PM
Carl Hicks - Jan 17, 2010 1:00 PM