Still think no bias in our local news paper?
After I peruse through the sports section on Sunday, and my wife clips her coupons, I turn to the business section. Journalists like Kathleen Gallagher have done a remarkable job with the Business section despite what they have to work with. However, what I read (not from Mss. Gallagher) is as bad as it gets. And what is most frustrating is most liberals don’t even know what I’m about to report.
An article in Sunday’s Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel found that Governor Doyle (D) fudged the high-speed rail job numbers so to attract more of our taxpayer money. Where was this article placed? Hidden in the Business section of all places! For those that recall, Doyle’s campaign for stimulus money has been touted as front page news, or at least section A (and I’m not even bringing up Obama’s corrupt increase in job numbers so to pretend the stimulus is creating jobs). So why place this very damaging article in the Business section and not the front page? I asked the paper but they have yet to give me an answer.
Doyle’s untruthfulness (is that better than if I said “lie?”) about his earlier, super news stories where high-speed rail will create 13,000 new jobs here in Wisconsin, was placed as top news. However, a Journal/Sentinel reporter discovered that only 4,732 jobs will be created instead of the 13,000 Doyle used for the grant application so to receive more stimulus money. That’s about two thirds less than Doyle previously claimed. Bad journalism? No. Bad placement by management? Absolutely. Those that read the front page and Section A most likely have no clue that the fake job numbers, reported by our dishonest governor, are no longer. Here Doyle lies (oops, “didn’t quite tell the true story”) and our only paper doesn’t bother to give this huge discrepancy top billing. It gets better.
Two weeks to the day, the Journal/Sentinel did another bias piece of journalism. In the business section on January 24th (sound familiar?), it was reported that Obamacare would bring tremendous cost burdens to Wisconsin citizens. All the while the democrats kept telling us that Obamacare will not cost us diddly. But it will to almost every Wisconsinite. Big deal? You better believe it’s a big deal! Most of those who voted for Obama may not even know any of this since that article was also hidden in the Business section. I ask why these very damaging articles against Obamacare and Doyle were not on the front page or headline news? Most, if not all, the baloney and the so-called good news about Obamacare and the job increases due to high-speed rail have been billed as top news stories over the past 12-14 months. And both articles dealt with huge problems right here in our own state. One would think the Milwaukee JS would also make those stories headline news.
Both articles should have been top billing and in the same place as all the other articles that pointed out for years all the so-called "good news" that comes from our corrupt democrats. Did the Milwaukee J/S show bias? I report the bias, you decide.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Does America really want four more speeches like this? (8)
- More common sense why Obama must go. (2)
- A great American President vs a bad un-American President (15)
- And some want four more years of this dishonesty and hypocrisy? (0)
- The Great Divider. (0)
- Recall Your Mom (0)
- Tax Truth (0)
- Anyone recall the last standing ovation at a Presidential primary? (0)
- Need your help to stop this liberal corruption (0)
- Why Walker should not be recalled. (0)
- More Fighting Liberal Lies! posts






87 Comments
Andy_Kristensen - Feb 09, 2010 11:24 PM
ajohnson911 - Feb 10, 2010 6:25 AM
That's ALL you get out of Jim's blog??? Yes, the blog is about bias (and both "journalists" and editors (management) have been infected), but it's also about Wisconsin and America getting fleeced AGAIN by liberal liars. Wake up!!!
jhayett - Feb 10, 2010 7:02 AM
ps...I hit your comment pretty hard with some facts on my last blog but you didn't have a comeback. Or maybe you didn't read it?
Andy_Kristensen - Feb 10, 2010 8:44 AM
Christian Democrat - Feb 10, 2010 8:53 AM
Because, as we all know from all you RW'ers, Conservatives NEVER lie, it is only the liberals that do that......lol
And Jim, I agree. It never ceases to amaze me that retractions are always buried somewhere in the back of the paper. Doesn't matter what the story is about either. If it is a retraction, they never admit their mistake.
Christian Democrat - Feb 10, 2010 8:55 AM
Sorry, when I copied and pasted, it didn't transfer the last part.
ajohnson911 - Feb 10, 2010 9:51 AM
And yeah, as if there is a voting record for individuals--Come On!!! That's not an arguement that just diversion tactics when you know that media outlets are left leaning.
And, this ISN'T a retraction--it's news worthy but jim's right--conveniently buried. Another example--the fraud and bad data behind the global warming lie? Where are those stories anymore?
ajohnson911 - Feb 10, 2010 10:03 AM
KEY FINDINGS:
81 percent of the journalists interviewed voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in every election between 1964 and 1976.
I guarantee things have not changed!!!! Find me a similar study to prove this is NOT true and I'll concede.
Another! "SLATE" magazine makes a point of polling it's "journalist" and of 57 reporters last election 55 voted obama, and 2 voted independant. Not a single journalist on their staff voted for McCain/Palin.
Google: do journalists vote democratic or even voting statistics by profession and you'll find MANY more sources to back up Jim's blog.
Jacob Pickard - Feb 10, 2010 10:55 AM
I mean if JS was so bent on pushing a hidden liberal Agenda why include conservative blogs As well as own 620 WTMJ who only has RIghtwing and conservative commentaters the mouthpiece for state Republicans?
Kind of difficult to reconcile this when rightwing screamers keep on playing the REFS and call everything liberal bias. And it's also hard to take a BIASED opinion based from a hard anti-liberal blogger seriously biased view of all media.
ahemmer - Feb 10, 2010 1:28 PM
I asked Dustin Klein if he had read the business section of Sunday's paper, since he also claimed that light rail would bring 10,000 jobs to Wisconsin. Maybe he does his math the same way Doyle and Obama do - count the same jobs over, carry over the same jobs from year to year - and keep adding them, etc. Talk about fuzzy math.
Yet, the truth came out - too bad it was buried in the Business section. If light rail was a Republican pet project and it was discovered the Republicans lied about job creation numbers and costs, it would have been front page news, above the fold. Therein lies the bias.
Christian Democrat - Feb 10, 2010 1:51 PM
I am a corporate accountant who also holds an insurance license in the state of Wisconsin. Hmm, you may have to rethink that one, huh?
BTW, I know there is no individual voting record - thats why I asked the question of YOU - because you seemed to have more information than the rest of us concerning these "liberal liars". I wanted verification on how exactly you KNEW they were liberal. And you obviously proved my point even further by your "finance" theory.....not always so black and white, is it?
And it IS a retraction if the original story held information that was later to be found incorrect. What is your definiton of "retraction"?
CAD Monkey - Feb 10, 2010 2:27 PM
ahemmer - Feb 10, 2010 3:05 PM
ajohnson911 - Feb 10, 2010 7:31 PM
By the way, I minored in journalism--And the story was NOT a retraction--there is only one definition for "Retractions" which are specific journalistic pieces (placed often in a specific place in the paper) and including the editiors noted corrections often with an apology for the error. You will find them most often used to correct misnamed or misquoted individuals. I read the story; it was its own news item, just lighted covered. Again, clearly the liberal leaning media needs to protect its "savior," the idiot, obama!
You're 0-2!!!
referee33 - Feb 11, 2010 2:14 AM
ahemmer - Feb 11, 2010 7:29 AM
And the article fudging (aka: lying) the numbers of jobs created by light rail was not a retraction. It was an article in it's own right in the Business section.
Christian Democrat - Feb 11, 2010 8:31 AM
And perhaps you need to go back and read my post concerning this blog topic. I AGREED with Jim on the bias of the journalists. I was not defending them, I was questioning YOUR comment regarding them being "liberal liars" and what you based that claim on....which I still have not received an answer for. Don't blame it on them being journalists......since you have clearly made the stance that not ALL people in a field hold the same political leanings. Therefore....I am assuming you have other information you haven't shared with us?? Or perhaps you just need to admit you made a baseless comment and lets move on......
referee33 - Feb 11, 2010 9:10 AM
"just like in my journalism study (noted in last post.. which you conveniently ignore)". "MY", he says "my journalism study" Claims ownership of it for himself.
www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics3.asp
No apology coming. The post is a direct reprint of the Media Research article and he gives them no credit for it.
ahemmer - Feb 11, 2010 9:17 AM
His later comment at 7:13 p.m. is simply referencing the study he cited from an earlier comment. Anyone can see he does not take credit for the study.
You owe ajohnson an apology.
jhayett - Feb 11, 2010 10:00 AM