I sure do miss George W.

The lack of knowledge with so many Americans when it comes to the war on terror, President Bush, and our national debt and spending is mindboggling. The war on terror bothers me the most because some still believe the US and our policies are what created the hate from the Muslim world and is what caused 9/11. If those with such a warped ideology exercised their power of judgment – that means going outside the bias MSM – they would know Muslims have been at war with not only themselves but the West long before it was discovered that the world is indeed round. But too many liberals, even many who run our country and make up the budgets, bills, and laws, can’t go outside the box and think for themselves. Too much work and too much face to save.
The best example of liberal ignorance may be with our debt and our spending. And like I said in my past blog(s), too many blame the spending on Bush. In fact, one of our young minds who blogs here, who is running for political office, is so misguided he too thinks the spending and our outrageous debt that Obama and the democrats are causing was learned from Bush. Ignorance is bliss to some. Let’s look at the facts and clear up some of those issues with Obama and our debt.
We hear all too often that Bush’s spending is what caused our current fiscal crisis. Just like the spoon caused Rosie O’Donnell to become big and fat. And yet seven percent of this country still believes Elvis is alive. That’s more than those who think the stimulus is working! That’s sad. So let’s take a peek at the laws and how they affect our budgets, deficits, and our debt. I could end this debate if you can think for yourself for a minute. Why? Budgets do not come from the White House: they come from Congress. Who controlled Congress since 11/2006? The democrats. That’s who. And who passed these spending bills under Bush? Pelosi, Reid, Obama, and even some idiots we have here in Wisconsin that represent us in Washington. And how long have the democrats been passing these huge deficits and outrageous spending bills? 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, plus the 2011 multi trillions added to our debt. It all comes from Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and our democrats and a handful of Republicans. But where, I ask, is the outrage from our liberal democrats who complained daily, alongside our bias MSM, back in 2006 until G.W. left office? Either hiding under their desk, behind their body guard, or inside their gated community, while the others were nowhere to be found. That’s the hypocrisy of liberalism. The only issue they stand behind is the one their gods tell them too no matter how stupid and false the appearance looks. Liberal contradiction, or what I call LCAT, is an all too often occurrence. Yet our MSM still jumps on the band wagon as if we are all that stupid. Are you?
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
- Does America really want four more speeches like this? (8)
- More common sense why Obama must go. (2)
- A great American President vs a bad un-American President (15)
- And some want four more years of this dishonesty and hypocrisy? (143)
- The Great Divider. (84)
- Recall Your Mom (0)
- Tax Truth (0)
- Anyone recall the last standing ovation at a Presidential primary? (0)
- Need your help to stop this liberal corruption (0)
- Why Walker should not be recalled. (0)
- More Fighting Liberal Lies! posts






45 Comments
referee33 - Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM
Pentagon report, November 2004 - Quote "Muslims do not hate our freedom, rather they hate our policies"
CIA - the Pentagon - not the MSM say it was the policies.
Read the fatwa, granted it's not easy, but you will reach the same conclusion as the Pentagon and CIA.
jhayett - Feb 18, 2010 6:30 PM
Carl Hicks - Feb 19, 2010 12:18 PM
And Jim as far as spending bills go who signed them into law for 2007, 2008, 2009?
jhayett - Feb 19, 2010 5:26 PM
Oh, by the way, 2009 was Obama and his cronies.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/12/AR2007121201791.html
Carl Hicks - Feb 19, 2010 6:00 PM
I am not happy about Obamas increased spending but let the blame for past spending fall on the right shoulders.
jhayett - Feb 19, 2010 6:14 PM
The past spending is on Bush but it doesn't even come close to Obama's. And this is Obama's time. Bush's spending actually fell until the dems took over. Here's the chart I gave on one of my blogs to prove that.
http://www.livinglakecountry.com/blogs/communityblogs/83711217.html
Carter and Clinton are two of the worst presidents ever. So what. There is nothing you or I can do about the past. But it's what we do about the present the can make the difference. If you are against Obama's spending, then tell that to the idiots you put in office. That's all you have to do and then vote them out in Nov. That simple.
jhayett - Feb 19, 2010 6:23 PM
Take a look at this site and visit the presidential spending for each president that either increased or decreased our national debt. Too many voters have no clue about the difference between spending, deficits, and our national debt. President Clinton lowered our debt but not by much. G W increased our debt but only by a few percentage points from Clintons. Carter, Reagan, and Bush 1 had some of the lowest debt/GDP for any President. Now look at Obama’s. It’s off the charts. But what is so alarming, but never mentioned in the MSM, is that Obama just finished his first year! That’s the tragedy and why he must be stopped!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms
Carl Hicks - Feb 20, 2010 10:41 AM
Jim spending bills are signed at the biginning of a fiscal year not the end
jhayett - Feb 20, 2010 11:43 AM
Why have you ignored this data of past and current presidential spending Carl?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms
Carl Hicks - Feb 20, 2010 1:14 PM
jhayett - Feb 20, 2010 1:48 PM
Clinton? I can't believe you can't figure that one out! Should we start with the stained blue dress?
If you use only the debt and spending issues as to judge a president, which is in the URL I gave, then you just made a fool out of yourself since Bush had an good record and Obama now has the highest debt/GDP ratio ever. That's even greater than Roosevelt and Truman!
referee33 - Feb 20, 2010 11:23 PM
Carl Hicks - Feb 21, 2010 7:35 AM
And as far as the Carter hostage situation goes I do happen to know that a hostage rescue plan did end up failing after some very very strange happenings...say like a sudden and unexpected release of AFFF into the hanger bay( aqueous film forming foam,which works wonders at putting out fuel fires but can mess up wiring in an aircraft) onto the choppers the night before the mission which was undoubtledly reason for the mechanical failure that scrubbed the mission.
And as far as Clintons dress goes... yeah he was dumb for not making her go home in something else and not making sure that dress went to the cleaners..
Jacob Pickard - Feb 21, 2010 9:39 AM
jhayett - Feb 21, 2010 3:01 PM
jhayett - Feb 21, 2010 3:03 PM
jhayett - Feb 21, 2010 3:39 PM
referee33 - Feb 21, 2010 4:27 PM
If you are attacked, you may defend.
referee33 - Feb 21, 2010 4:54 PM
Not forced to convert.
jhayett - Feb 21, 2010 5:04 PM
Know what 'jihad" means?