This blog might offend some. I'm not the most politically correct guy, but hopefully you will see eye-to-eye with me. Bottom line is I will take a look at today's problems, stories, politics, news and put a realistic take on it - not one bought, or one that is from the left or right - but one that will help all of us see through the arguments and fix what's wrong with our country.
Transocean Ltd
How many people have heard the Transocean Ltd name thrown around with the BP oil spill, if I had to guess, not many. Transocean, the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor, provides the most versatile fleet of mobile offshore drilling units to all the different oil companies. Truth be told, it could have been anyone leasing this rig, but it happened to be BP when the failure occurred.
Many columns, blogs, TV shows etc are playing the blame game, seems if you listen to the media this disaster can be blamed on Bush or Obama, depending on what side of the fence you’re on. But let’s face it; we have a big problem on our hands. Placing blame on anyone at this point is ridiculous and a waste of resources.
I lived in the Gulf region for awhile, in fact I used to frequent some of the beaches that are now in danger, (all I can say is if Surfside beach gets ruined, I will fly off the handle). The one thing that always crossed my mind when watching these huge rigs were - how do they work? I have supplied maintenance material to companies similar to Transocean and had the opportunity to see what is involved in such a huge vessel. For those who don’t know, basically eight 7375 horsepower props along with GPS keep the floating rig over the well at all times. When I learned this, the first thing that crossed my mind was, seems like a ton of things have to go right for success and just a few things need to go wrong for failure. I’m not an engineer, but this kind of reminds me of the mentality of The White Star Company with the lack of life boats on the Titanic. I believe P.A.S. Franklin said “We place absolute confidence in the Titanic. We believe the boat is unsinkable.” But I did ask what happens during a hurricane? The response was we disconnect and move the rig to a safe place, but then I asked, what happens if it has to be done quickly, the response this time was, how quick?
I know we can’t engineer for every scenario, for every failure, but where and who decides when where we stop? We need oil right now, I know in a perfect world we would have alternatives to oil, but right now we don’t, to stop drilling would make no sense, our economy revolves around oil, but what we need to do know is first stop the oil being released into the gulf and try to come up with solutions so this does not happen again. As I’m sitting here writing this, I have read many articles and opinions on who’s fault this is, but I am hard-pressed to find anyone offering solutions or suggestions to keep this from happening again. Let’s try to figure out what to do next and leave the blame game to the attorneys. To boycott BP or any other oil company just does not make sense, don’t be a pawn in a game you don’t understand.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.





26 Comments
Carl Hicks - Jun 06, 2010 4:23 PM
DaveByrnes53119 - Jun 07, 2010 10:25 AM
The biggest problem with wind and solar power is you can not store power on the grid, what needs to happens first before we fill our fields with wind turbines is find a way to store this power. Once you do this we are good to go.. I have been involved with the power companies for many years and I can assure you a online wind turbine can consume power, but I can also assure you this is something the power companies do not want to happen and it costs them money when it does so its a rare occurrence..
lake country progressive - Jun 07, 2010 12:23 PM
So what are you trying to say?
The biggest problem with coal-powered generators is that you can not store power on the grid, what needs to happen before polluting our planet with one of these is find a way to store this power. I'm very well educated in power and can assure you a coal-powered plant can consume power, but I can also assure you this is something the power companies do not want to happen and it costs them money when it does so its a rare occurrence..
I hope you see that your statements apply to ANYTHING that can connect to the grid and is not a reason to not use any given power conversion device.
lake country progressive - Jun 07, 2010 12:57 PM
You seem to imply that because a given windmill does not generate electricity when there is no wind BLOWING ON IT, that we need to be able to handle the case when there is NO WIND BLOWING EVERYWHERE. This simply isn't true. There is ALWAYS WIND BLOWING in a large enough collection of places, especially in the areas where they put off-shore oil rigs that destroy our coasts.
DaveByrnes53119 - Jun 07, 2010 3:49 PM
DaveByrnes53119 - Jun 07, 2010 3:53 PM
DaveByrnes53119 - Jun 07, 2010 3:56 PM
ahemmer - Jun 07, 2010 5:04 PM
Given the small number of major oil spills over the years, the oil industry is relatively safe and we DO need oil We do NOT need the added reliance on foreign oil that puts us at the mercy of others who aren't exactly friends to the United States.
In addition, the Gulf Oil spill is far from being the worst oil spill in the world. Even the Exxon Valdez was ranked 35th out of major spills. Number one: the oil spill in the Arab Gulf/Kuwait - coming in at 520 million gallons. Exxon Valdez spilled 10.8 million gallons. The Gulf Oil spill so far has amounted to 22 million gallons and counting.
Check out: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/454782/the_worst_major_oil_spills_in_history_pg3.html?cat=37
And:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2010/05/how-much-oil-has-spilled-in-the-gulf-of-mexico.html
for more information. And isn't it amazing how the earth always recovers?
ahemmer - Jun 07, 2010 7:17 PM
C'mon ye of little faith. Believe in the healing powers of the planet. All is not doom and gloom. And oil spills do happen once in a while. Believe it or not, the largest one on earth is not what is going on in the Gulf. Far from it. In the Arab Gulf/Kuwait, a spill of 520 million gallons of oil occurred in 1991. Has that area disappeared? No life? And guess what, the Gulf Oil Spill has spilled 22 million gallons of oil into the water. The Exxon Valdez disaster spilled 10.8 million gallons. And guess what? Did Alaska cease to exist? No. It took years, but the area recovered.
Have some "hope" - after all, isn't that what Barry ran on?
Carl Hicks - Jun 07, 2010 9:15 PM
Carl Hicks - Jun 07, 2010 9:41 PM
ahemmer - Jun 08, 2010 8:04 AM
I used the Huffington Post as a source, so liberals won't question it:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/08/bubble-of-methane-trigger_n_568842.html
And when all is said and done, this was an accident. Remember - an accident. BP is not the evil, greedy corporation that Obama wants everyone to think. BP was doing their jobs and they provide a very valuable commodity to the world - oil. It is very unfortunate for all of us that an accident like this happened, but, as is the case with most accidents of this proportion, we learn from them. We move on. The earth recovers. And it does take time. It may be decades. But in the big scheme of life, decades are a small blip.
And we must continue to allow drilling. We should allow MORE drilling on land and closer to shore. Imagine - foreign countries like China and Cuba are allowed to drill closer to our OWN shores than we allow ourselves! And do you really think that Cuba and/or China imposes as many rules and regulations on their oil rigs/workers as we do? The insanity of it all is absurd.
ahemmer - Jun 08, 2010 8:07 AM
Carl Hicks - Jun 08, 2010 10:41 AM
Carl Hicks - Jun 08, 2010 10:43 AM
I could care what source you use until an official investigation is completed and released I'll leave speculation to the experts.
Carl Hicks - Jun 08, 2010 10:50 AM
And is the suggestion actually being made that over regulation is a culprit in this accident...I never went down the "evil" corporation path only stated a simple fact that companies will sidestep safety protocols to keep a schedule or a budget.
Carl Hicks - Jun 08, 2010 5:56 PM
I promise not to repeat anything said in this comment to your blog post for the duration of my commenting to it.
Amy- Your propensity to downplay is exasperating. I just wish you would get the picture here.
"as is the case with most accidents of this proportion, we learn from them( then why are oil companies using the the same methods that didn't work in 79 ). ... But in the big scheme of life, decades are a small blip." (only for the survivors).
So nonchalant about the gulf coasts livelyhood being decimated.The region has a future to look forward to now where complete industries will fail that before the spill were completely self sufficient.I dare you to go face to face with the guy who just put his whole life on the line to start a small business along the gulf coast.Tell it to my old boss who retired to one of the Florida barrier islands that is coated now.
And my last comment about wildfires. Plants thrive after a wildfire due to the ash containing nutirents ( it truely is a natural process ) The only thing that makes them a disaster is mans interference, we put out fires so the deadwood and other natural debris stays there and accumulates instead of burning off as needed when lit by lightening strikes and left to burn themselves out naturally.
A coating of oil isn't a good thing for anything living. I have been doing alot of reading lately about long term effects in areas of past spills and I'm sure if you researched the subject you would have a little more respect for the situation at hand.
mrfish1223 - Jun 15, 2010 8:21 AM
To compare fires to us spewing millions of gallons of oil into the ocean is absurd.
Tami Klink - Jun 15, 2010 4:01 PM
Bottom line is, we need oil. At least until we can get a serious attempt made at alternative energy such as what was talked about in the 1970's. The question is, is it too late for all of the ways of doing things that we now know to change? Not to mention what it is going to cost for the infrastructure to support new ways of doing things.
Have a great week!
Carl Hicks - Jun 22, 2010 11:16 AM
It's just a shame it has only been talk for the past 40 years as this clip from The Daily Show" shows clearly.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-june-16-2010/an-energy-independent-future